Part of
Studies on Variation in Portuguese
Edited by Pilar P. Barbosa, Maria da Conceição de Paiva and Celeste Rodrigues
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 14] 2017
► pp. 153176
Bassani, I., & Lunguinho, M.
(2011) Revisitando a flexão verbal do Português à luz da morfologia distribuída: Um estudo do presente, pretérito imperfeito e pretérito perfeito do indicativo. ReVEL, 5 (Special Issue). Retrieved from [URL]
Bonet, E.
(1991) Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1986) Knowledge of language. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
(1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2003) Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Embick, D., & Noyer, R.
(2007) Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces (pp. 289–324). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H.
(1966) Language universals, with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague: Mouton & Co.Google Scholar
Guy, G. R.
(1991) Explanation in variable phonology: An exponential model of morphological constraints. Language Variation and Change, 3, 1–22. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M.
(1997) Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In B. Bruening, Y. Kang, & M. McGinnis (Eds.), MITWPL 30: Papers at the interface (pp. 425–449). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A.
(1993) Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, H.
(2008) When is a syncretism more than a syncretism? Impoverishment, metasyncretism and underspecification. In D. Harbour, D. Adger, & S. Bejar (Eds.), Phi-features across modules and interfaces (pp. 251–294). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Johnson, D.
(2009) Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Pennsylvania PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
(1997) No escape from syntax: Donʹt try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(2), 201–225.Google Scholar
Mateus, M. H. M.
(1982) Aspectos da Fonologia portuguesa. Lisbon: INIC.Google Scholar
Nevins, A.
(2007) The representation of third person and its consequences for person-case effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nevins, A. & Parrott, J. K.
(2010) Variable rules meet impoverishment theory: Patterns of agreement levelling in English varieties. Lingua, 120, 1135–1159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noyer, R.
(1998) Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness. In S. Lapointe, D. K. Brentari, & P. Farrell (Eds.), Morphology and its relation to Phonology and Syntax (pp. 264–285). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, I.
(2013) Variability and allomorphy in the morphosyntax of Catalan past perfective. In O. Matushanksy & A. Marantz (Eds.), Distributed morphology today – Morphemes for Morris Halle (pp.1–20). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1999) On the notion of theme vowel: A new approach to Catalan verbal morphology. (Unpublished master’s thesis). MIT.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, I., & Arregi, K.
(2005) Stress-by-structure in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(1), 43–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vivas, V.
(2010) A alternância vocálica no Português: Regularidade e sistematização. Cadernos do NEMP, 1(1), 33–44.Google Scholar
Teixeira, G.
(2012) As formas verbais regulares e simples do Português brasileiro: Uma proposta à luz da morfologia distribuída, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina. Retrieved from [URL]Google Scholar