Cover not available
Part of
Studies on Variation in Portuguese
Edited by Pilar P. Barbosa, Maria da Conceição de Paiva and Celeste Rodrigues
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 14] 2017
► pp. 1–20

The study of variation in Portuguese

Overview and outlook

| University of Minho, Portugal
| Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| University of Lisbon, Portugal
Article outline
  • 1.Current issues in the study of language variation (an overview)
  • 2.The volume
  • 3.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 2 November 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.14.int
References
Adger, D.
(2006) Combinatorial variability. Journal of Linguistics, 42, 503–530. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adger, D., & Smith, J.
(2005) Variation and the Minimalist Programme. In L. Cornips & K. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social (pp. 149–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aguilera, W. de A.
(2012) Para um atlas pluridimensional: Pesquisas e pesquisadores. Alfa: Revista de Linguística, 56(3), 871–890.Google Scholar
Alexandre, N., Gonçalves, R., & Hagemeijer T.
(2011) A formação de relativas de PP no português oral de Cabo Verde e de S. Tomé. In A. Costa, I. Falé, & P. Barbosa (Eds.), Textos seleccionados do XXVI Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística 2010 (pp. 17–34). Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística; Edições Colibri.Google Scholar
Baker, M.
(1996) The polysyn thesis parameter. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P., Rato, A., Barroso, H., Santos, I., Teixeira, J. P. … & Paiva, M. C.
(2014) Perfil Sociolinguístico da Fala Bracarense [Corpus]. Retrieved from [URL]
Barlow, M., & Kemmer, S.
(2000) Usage-based models of language. Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Boersma, P.
(1997) How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Sciences, 21, 43–58.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Hayes, B.
(2001) Empirical tests of the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 45–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonet, E.
(1991) Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in Romance. (Doctoral dissertation) MIT. Distributed by MITWPL.Google Scholar
Bybee, J.
(2000) The phonology of the lexicon: Evidence from lexical diffusion. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp. 65–85). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
(2001) Phonology and language use. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J., & Hopper P.
(2001) Introduction to frequency effects and the emergence of linguistic structure. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency effects and the emmergence of linguistic structures (pp. 1–19). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brandão, S. F.
(1991) A geografia linguística no Brasil. São Paulo: ÀticaGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, S. A. M.
(2010) Geolinguística: Tradição e modernidade. São Paulo: Parábola.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H.
(1973) Interplay of social and linguistic factors in Panama. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cornell University.Google Scholar
Cedergren, H., & Sankoff, D.
(1974) Variable rules: Performance as a statistical reflection of competence. Language, 50(2), 333–355. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carrilho, E., & Pereira, S.
(2011) Sobre a distribuição geográfica de construções sintácticas não padrão em Português Europeu. In A. Costa, I. Falé, & P. Barbosa, Textos Seleccionados do XXVI Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, (pp.125–139). Lisboa: Associação Portuguesa de Linguística. Retrieved from [URL]
Cavalcante, S. R.
(2011) Padrões estatísticos do encaixamento da mudança de se-passivo a se-indefinido na história do Português. Alfa: Revista de Linguística, 66(2), 523–544.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K.
(2003) Sociolinguistic theory: Linguistic variation and its social significance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N.
(1981) Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(1986) Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
(1995) The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cyrino, S., Duarte, M. E. L., & Kato, M.
(2000) Visible subjects and invisible clitics in Brazilian Portuguese. In M. A. Kato & E. V. Negrão (Eds.), Brazilian Portuguese and the Null Subject Parameter (pp. 55–73). Madrid: Iberoamenricana / Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Coetzee, A. W.
(2009) An integrated gramatical/non-grammatical model of phonological variation. In Y. S. Kang, S. W. Tang, C. Kim, J. Y. Yon, Y. S. Kang, K. Kim, H. Yoo … & H. K. Kang (Eds.), Current issues in linguistic interfaces (pp. 267–294). Seoul: Hankookmunhwasa.Google Scholar
Collishonn, G., & Moneratto
(2012) Banco de dados Varsul: A relevância de suas características e a abrangência de seus resultados. Alfa: Revista de Linguística, 56(3), 835–855.Google Scholar
Cristófaro-Silva, T., & Gomes, C. A.
(2004) Representações múltiplas e organização do componente fonológico. Fórum Lingüístico, 4(1), 147–177.Google Scholar
(2007) Aquisição fonológica na perspectiva multirepresentacional. Letras de hoje, 42(1), 179–191.Google Scholar
Croft, W.
(2000) Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar
(2003) Typology and universals (2nd ed.). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dettoni, R. V., Pacheco, C. S., Andrade, C. Q. & Scherre, M. M. P.
(2012) Projeto de variação linguística no centro-oeste (VALCO). Alfa: Revista de Linguística 56(3), 807–834.Google Scholar
Duarte, M. E. L.
(1995) A perda do princípio “Evite Pronome” no Português Brasileiro. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade Estadual de Campinas.Google Scholar
Eckert, P.
(1999) New generalizations and explanation in language and gender research. Language in Society 28(2), 185–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2000) Language variation as social practice. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Embick, D.
(2007) Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feagin, C.
(2002) Entering the community: Fieldwork. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 20–39). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Galves, C., & Faria, P.
(2010) Tycho Brahe Parsed Corpus of historical Portuguese. [URL]
Gonçalves, P.
(2010) A génese do Português de Moçambique. Lisboa: Imprensa Nacional/Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar
Gomes, C. A.
(2013) Arquitetura da gramática e variação linguística na abordagem dos modelos multirepresentacionais. Interdisciplinar: Edição Especial da Revista da Abralin/SE, 17, 13–26.Google Scholar
Gomes, C. A., & Gonçalves, C. M.
(2010) Flexão nominal na gramática da criança e na gramática do adulto. Revista Veredas, 1, 122–134. Retrieved from [URL]<
Greenberg, J. H.
(1966) Some universals of Grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73–113). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Guy, G.
(1991) Contextual conditioning in variable lexical phonology. Language Variation and Change, 3, 1–22. DOI logo
Guy, G. R.
(2000) A identidade lingüística da comunidade de fala: Paralelismo interdialetal nos padrões de variação lingüística. ORGANON: Revista do Instituto de Letras da UFRGS, 14 (28–29), 17–32. Retrieved from [URL]
Halle, M.
(1997) Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In B. Bruening,Y. Kang, & M. McGinni (Eds.), MITWPL 30: Papers at the Interface (pp. 425–449). Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Henry, A.
(2002) Variation and syntactic theory. In J. K. Chambers, P. Trudgill, & N. Schilling-Estes (Eds.), The handbook of language variation and change (pp. 267–282). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J.
(1984) On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 531–574.Google Scholar
Hudson, R.
(2007a) English dialect syntax in Word Grammar. English Language and Linguistic, 11, 383–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007b) Language networks: The new word grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Jonhson, K.
(1997) Speech perception without speaker normalisation: An exemplar model. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullenix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech perception (pp. 145–165). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Jonhson, K., & Mullenix, J. W.
(1997) Complex representation used in speech perception. In K. Johnson & J. W. Mullenix (Eds.), Talker variability in speech perception (pp. 1–8). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S.
(2013) Comparative syntax. Lingua, 130, 132–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, A.
(1989) Reflexes of gramar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change, 1, 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W.
(1963) The social motivation of a sound change. Word, 19, 273–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1966) The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
(1969) Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Language, 45, 715–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1970) The study of language in its social context. Studium Generale, 23(1), 30–87.Google Scholar
(1971) Some principles of linguistic methodology. Language in Society,1(1), 97–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1972) Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
(1994) Principles of linguistic change, Volume I: Internal factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2001) Principles of linguistic change, Volume II: Social factors. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(2010) Principles of linguistic change, Volume III: Cultural and cognitive factors. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W.
(1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar, Volume 1: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000) A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow, S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based models of language (pp.1–63). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Martins, M. A.
(2009) Competição de gramáticas na escrita catarinense dos séculos 19 e 20. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis.Google Scholar
Mendes, R. B., & Oushiro, L.
(2012) O paulistano no mapa sociolinguístico brasileiro. Alfa: Revista de Linguística 56(3), 973–1002.Google Scholar
Milroy, L.
(1980) Language and social networks. Baltimore MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
(1987) Observing and analysing natural language: A critical account of sociolinguistic method. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Milroy, L., & Gordon, M.
(2003) Sociolinguistics: Method and interpretation. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mota, M. A. C., & Vieira, S. R.
(2008) Contrastando variedades do Português Brasileiro e Europeu: Padrões de concordância sujeito-verbo. In C. A. Gonçalves & M. L. L. Almeida (Eds.), Língua portuguesa: Identidade, difusão e variabilidade (pp. 111–137). Rio de Janeiro: AILP/UFRJ.Google Scholar
Nevins, A., & Parrott, J. K.
(2010) Variable rules meet impoverishment theory: Patterns of agreement leveling in English varieties. Lingua, 120, 1135–1159. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noyer, R.
(1998) Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness. In S. Lapointe, D. K. Brentari, & P. Farrell (Eds.), Morphology and its relation to Phonology and Syntax (pp. 264–285). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Oliveira e Silva, G. M. de, & Scherre, M. M. P.
(Eds.) (1996) Padrões sociolinguísticos: Análise de fenômenos variáveis do português falado na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro.Google Scholar
Paiva, M. C., de, & Scherre, M. M. P.
(1999) Retrospectiva sociolinguística: Contribuições do PEUL. Linguística: Revista da Alfal, 11, 203–230.Google Scholar
Paiva, M. C. de, & Duarte, M. E. L.
(2006) Posfácio: Quarenta anos depois: A herança de um programa na sociolinguistica brasileira. In U. Weinreich, W. Labov, & M. Herzog, Fundamentos empíricos para uma teoria da mudança linguística (pp. 131–151). [Translated by Marcos Bagno and revised by Carlos Alberto Faraco. The original English version was published in 1968, by the University of Texas Press.] São Paulo: Parábola.Google Scholar
Paiva, M. C de, & Duarte, M. E. L.
(2003) Mudança linguística em tempo real. Rio de Janeiro: Contra Capa; FAPERJ.Google Scholar
Paiva, M. C. de, & Paredes Silva, V. L.
(2012) Cumprindo uma pauta de trabalho: Contribuições recentes do Peul (2012) Alfa: Revista de Linguística, 56(3), 739–770.Google Scholar
Paul, H.
(1880 [1983]) Princípios fundamentais da história da língua. [Translated by Maria Luisa Schemann, the original was published in 1880]. Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J.
(2001) Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In J. Bybee & P. Hopper (Eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of linguistic structure (pp. 1–19). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003) Probabilistic phonology: Discrimination and robustness. In R. Bod, J. Haye & S. Jannedy (Eds.), Probabilistic linguistics. Probability theory in linguistics (pp. 175–228). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Retrieved from [URL]
Pintzuk, S.
(2003) Variationist approach to syntactic change. In B. D. Joseph & R. D. Janda, The handbook of historical linguistics (pp. 509–528). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, S., & Kroch, A.
(1989) The rightward movement of complements and adjuncts in the Old English of Beowulf. Language Variation and Change, 1(2) 115–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P.
(1993) Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar (Technical Report 2). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
(2004) Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Cambridge: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1982) Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I. A., & Rousseau, A.
(2003) Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, C.
(2003) Lisboa e Braga: Fonologia e variação. Lisboa: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia; Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G.
(1977) L’emploi productif du ne dans le Français parlé à Montréal. Le Français Moderne, 45, 243–56.Google Scholar
Sankoff, D.
(1988) Variable rules. In U. Ammon, N. Dittmar, & K. J. Mattheier (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (Vol. 2, pp. 984–997). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G., & Thibault, P.
(1977) L’alternance entre les auxiliares avoir et être en Français parlé à Montréal. Langue Française, 34, 81–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, D., & Labov, W.
(1979) On the uses of variable rules. Language in Society, 8, 189–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, D., & Thibault, P.
(1981) Weak complementarity: Tense and aspect in Montreal French. In B. B. Johns & D. R. Strong (Eds.), Syntactic change (pp. 205–216). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Silva, A. S. da
(2010) Measuring and parameterizing lexical convergence and divergence between European and Brazilian Portuguese. In D. Geeraerts, G. Kristiansen, & Y. Peirsman (Eds.), Advances in cognitive sociolinguistics (pp. 41–83). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Sistema e variação: Quão sistemático pode ser o sistema linguístico num modelo baseado no uso? Revista Linguística / Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Linguística da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, 8(1), 15–32. Retrieved from [URL]
Silva, J.
(2011) Caracterização prosódica dos falares brasileiros: As orações interrogativas totais. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Tagliamonte, S.
(2012) Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, observation, interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Tarallo, F., & Kato, M. A.
(1989) Harmonia trans-sistêmica: Variação inter e intralinguística. Preedição, 5, 315–353.Google Scholar
Thibault, P., & Vincent, D.
(1990) Un corpus de français parlé, Montréal 84: Historique, méthodes et perspectives de recherche. Québec: Département de Langues et Linguistique, Université Laval.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.
(1974) The Social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M.
(1968) Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In W. Lehman & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Directions for historical linguistics (pp. 87–195). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, W.
(1969) A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Yacovenco, L., Scherre. M. M. P., Tesch, L., Bragança, M., Evangelista, E. M., Mendonça, A. K., … & Benfica, A. T.
(2012) Projeto PortVix: A fala de Vitória/ES em cena. Alfa: Revista de Linguísitica (56)3, 771–806. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Nkollo, Mikołaj & Alexandra Fiéis
2020. The não interpolation in Classical and early Modern European Portuguese and the mapping between syntactic and phonological structures: An empirical study . Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 115 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.