Cover not available
Part of
Contemporary Trends in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics: Selected papers from the Hispanic Linguistic Symposium 2015
Edited by Jonathan E. MacDonald
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15] 2018
► pp. 309–332

Chapter 14
Extra-syntactic factors in the that-trace effect

| University of Southern Maine
| University of Illinois at Chicago
Using predictions from the Interface Hypothesis and the grammar of Spanish-English bilinguals, we test whether non-syntactic factors play a role in the that-trace effect. Though generally analyzed syntactically, some work on that-trace supports a syntax-prosody account (Kandybowicz, 2006). The Interface Hypothesis predicts that bilinguals will have difficulty with interface phenomena but not narrow syntax, such that testing bilinguals’ knowledge of that-trace provides a unique testing ground for comparing the two approaches. We demonstrate that bilinguals have the syntactic underpinnings necessary for both syntactic and syntax-prosody accounts of that-trace; however, they differ from the monolinguals with regard to that-trace, extending the phenomenon’s restriction on extraction to a new context, supporting a syntax-prosody account of that-trace.
Keywords: bilingualism, Interface Hypothesis, EPP, wh-questions, expletives, syntax-prosody interface, wh-question, wh-phrase, that-trace effect, extraction, comp-trace effect, complementizer-trace effect, syntax-prosody interface, Interface Hypothesis, Extended Projection Principle, EPP, expletives
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The that-trace effect
    • 2.1Extraction restrictions in Spanish and English
    • 2.2Syntactic accounts of the that-trace effect
    • 2.3Interface-based accounts
  • 3.The Interface Hypothesis
  • 4.Subject placement and the that-trace effect
  • 5.Experiment 1
    • 5.1Methods
    • 5.2Results
  • 6.Experiment 2
    • 6.1Methods
    • 6.2Results
    • 6.3Interim discussion
  • 7.Experiment 3
    • 7.1Methods
    • 7.2Results
  • 8.Discussion
  • 9.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 February 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.15.15hei
References

References

Bae, S. H.
(2015) The syntax-phonology interface in native and near-native Korean. Unpublished PhD dissertation. Harvard University.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J.
(1977) Variables in the theory of transformations. In P. W. Culicover, T. Wasow, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 157–196). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bullock, B. E.
(2009) Prosody in contact in French: A case study from a heritage variety in the USA. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13(2), 165–194. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cabin, R. J., & Mitchell, R. J.
(2000) To Bonferroni or not to Bonferroni: When and how are the questions. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, 81(3), 246–248.Google Scholar
de Chene, B.
(2000) Prosody and subject traces. Unpublished manuscript, Waseda University. Tokyo. [URL]
Chomsky, N.
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Colantoni, L., & Gurlekian, J.
(2004) Convergence and intonation: Historical evidence from Buenos Aires Spanish. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 7(2), 107–119. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, P. W.
(1993) The adverb effect: Evidence against ecp accounts of the that-t effect. In A. J. Schafer (Ed.) Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 23 (pp. 97–111). University of Ottawa: Graduate Linguistic Student Association.Google Scholar
Donaldson, B.
(2011) Nativelike right-dislocation in near-native French. Second Language Research, 27(3), 361–390. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ebert, S.
(2014) The Morphosyntax of Wh-questions: Evidence from Spanish-English Code-switching. Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago.Google Scholar
Ellis, R.
(2005) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 141–172. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elordieta, G.
(2003) The Spanish intonation of speakers of a Basque pitch-accent dialect. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 2, 67–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011) An overview of theories of the syntax-phonology interface. Anuario del Seminario de Filología Vasca “Julio de Urquijo”, 42(1), 209–286.Google Scholar
Garamszegi, L. Z.
(2006) Comparing effect sizes across variables: Generalization without the need for Bonferroni correction. Behavioral Ecology, 17(4), 682–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
González-Vilbazo, K., Bartlett, L., Downey, S., Ebert, S., Heil, J., Hoot, B., … Ramos, S.
(2013) Methodological considerations in code-switching research. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 6(1), 119–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Y., & Ellis, R.
(1998) Implicit knowledge, explicit knowledge and general language proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 2(1):1–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ionin, T., & Montrul, S. A.
(2009) Article use and generic reference. Parallels between L1- and L2- acquisition. In M. del P. Gacía Mayo, & R. Hawkins (Eds.), Second language acquisition of articles: Empirical findings and theoretical implications (pp. 147–173). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, I. P.
(2012) L2 acquisition of Bulgarian clitic doubling: A test case for the Interface Hypothesis. Second Language Research, 28(3), 345–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iverson, M., Kempchinsky, P., & Rothman, J.
(2008) Interface vulnerability and knowledge of the subjunctive/indicative distinction with negated epistemic predicates in L2 Spanish. EUROSLA Yearbook 8, 135–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kandybowicz, J.
(2006) Comp-trace effects explained away. In D. Baumer, D. Montero, & M. Scanlon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 220–228.) Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2009) Embracing edges: Syntactic and phono-syntactic edge sensitivity in Nupe. Natural Language Linguistic Theory, 27, 305–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinović, M.
(2014) Wh-morphology and cyclicity in Wolof. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago. [URL]
Montrul, S. A.
(2004) Subject and object expression in Spanish heritage speakers: A case of morpho-syntactic convergence. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 125–142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Incomplete acquisition in bilingualism: Reexamining the age factor. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
O’Rourke, E.
(2003) Peak alignment in two regional varieties of Peruvian Spanish intonation. In J. Auger, J. Clements, & B. Vance (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics (pp. 321–341). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, D.
(1971) Deep and surface structure constraints in syntax. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D.
(2015) Complementizer-trace effects. In M. Everaert, & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Companion to syntax. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1982) Complementizer-trace phenomena and the nominative islands condition. The Linguistic Review, 1, 297–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rice, W. R.
(1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 43(1), 223–225. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L.
(1982) Negation, wh-movement and the null subject parameter. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), Issues in Italian syntax (pp. 117–185). Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schütze, C. T.
(1996) The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Serratrice, L., Sorace, A., & Paoli, S.
(2004) Crosslinguistic influence at the syntax – pragmatics interface: Subjects and objects in English – Italian bilingual and monolingual acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and cognition, 7(3), 183–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slabakova, R., & Ivanov, I.
(2011) A more careful look at the syntax-discourse interface. Lingua, 121(4), 637–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A.
(2005) Selective optionality in language development. In L. Cornips, & K. P. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social (pp. 55–80). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F.
(2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22, 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Serratrice, L.
(2009) Internal and external interfaces in bilingual language development: Beyond structural overlap. International Journal of Bilingualism 13, 195–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, M.
(1994) V-movement and the licensing of argumental wh-phrases in Spanish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 12(2), 335–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M., & Sorace, A.
(2006) Differentiating interfaces: L2 performance in syntax – semantics and syntax – discourse phenomena. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 653–664). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, I. M.
(2014) Early, late or very late? Timing acquisition and bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(3), 283–313. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
White, L.
(2009) Grammatical theory: Interfaces and L2 knowledge. In T. Bhatia, & W. Ritchie (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (2nd ed., pp. 49–68). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
White, E. J., Genesee, F., & Steinhauer, K.
(2012) Brain responses before and after intensive second language learning: Proficiency based changes and first language background effects in adult learners. PloS one, 7(12), e52318. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilson, F., Sorace, A., & Keller, F.
(2009) Antecedent preferences for anaphoric demonstratives in L2 German. In J. Chandlee, M. Franchini, S. Lord, & G-M. Rheiner (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 634–645). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 2 other publications

Chomsky, Noam, T. Daniel Seely, Robert C. Berwick, Sandiway Fong, M. A. C. Huybregts, Hisatsugu Kitahara, Andrew McInnerney & Yushi Sugimoto
2023. Merge and the Strong Minimalist Thesis, DOI logo
Kim, Boyoung & Grant Goodall
2022. The source of the that-trace effect: New evidence from L2 English. Second Language Research ► pp. 026765832211046 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.