References
Adger, D., & Ramchand, G. (2005). Merge and move: Wh-dependencies revisited. Linguistic Inquiry, 36(2), 161–193. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ahn, B. T. (2010). Not just emphatic reflexives themselves: Their syntax, semantics and prosody (Unpublished PhD dissertation). UCLA.
Alexiadou, A., & Anagnostopoulou, E. (1998). Parametrizing AGR: Word order, V-movement and EPP-Checking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 491–539. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., Iordachioaia, G., & Marchis, M. (2008). A stronger argument for backward control. Talk presented at 39th
Meeting of the North East
Linguistic
Society
. Cornell University, November 2008.
Bailyn, J. F. (2004). Generalized inversion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 22, 1–49. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barbosa, P. (1995). Null subjects (Unpublished PhD dissertation). MIT.
Barbosa, P. (2000). Clitics: A window into the null subject property. In J. Costa (Ed.), Portuguese syntax: Comparative studies (pp. 31–93). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barbosa, P. (2009). Two kinds of subject pro
. Studia Linguistica, 63(1), 2–58. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barbosa, P. (2013). Partial pro-drop as null NP anaphora. In Y. Fainleib, N. Lacara, & Y. Park (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st annual meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (Vol. 2, pp. 71–85). Amherst, MA: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barbosa, P. (2014).
Pro as a minimal NP (Unpublished manuscript). Retrieved from <[URL]>
Belletti, A. (2005). Extended doubling on the VP periphery. Probus, 17(1), 1–35. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brandi, L., & Cordin, P. (1989). Two Italian dialects and the null subject parameter. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 111–142). Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burzio, L. (1986). Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Campos, H. (1997). On subject extraction and the antiagreement effect in Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 92–119.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, A. (1998). A second thought on emarginazioni: Destressing vs. ‘right dislocation’. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, 8(2), 1–28.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, A. (1999). Italian emphatic pronouns are postverbal subjects. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics, 9, 59–92.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cardinaletti, A. (2004). Toward a cartography of subject positions. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), The cartography of syntactic structures – The structure of CP and IP (Vol. 2, pp. 115–165). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ceccheto, C. (2000). Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus, 12, 93–126. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chierchia, G. (1990). Anaphora and attitudes de se
. In R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem, & P. van Emde Boas (Eds.), Semantics and contextual expression (pp. 1–32). Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-Movement. In P. Culicover, T. Wasos, & A. Akmajian (Eds.), Formal syntax (pp. 71–132). New York, NY: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In R. Martin, D. Michaels, & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step. Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 89–155). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, G. (1990). Types of A’-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, G. (1993). A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 239–267.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, R. (1990). Thematic theory in syntax and interpretation. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Costa, J. (1998). Word order variation. A constraint-based approach. The Hague: HAG.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Costa, J. (2004). Subjects in Spec,vP: locality and agree. In A. Castro, M. Ferreira, V. Hacquard, & A. Salanova (Eds.), Romance syntax (MITWPL 46). Cambridge, MA: MIT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Costa, J., & Duarte, I. (2002). Preverbal subjects in null subject languages are not necessarily dislocated. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics, 2, 159–176. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Cat, C. (2007). French dislocation without movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25(3), 485–534. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dermidache, H. (1992). Resumptive chains in restrictive relative chains, appositives and dislocation structures (Unpublished PhD dissertation). MIT.
É. Kiss, K. (1995). Discourse configurational languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
É. Kiss, K. (2006). Focussing as predication. In V. Molnar & S. Winkler (Eds.), The architecture of focus (pp. 169–193). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elbourne, P. (2005). Situations and individuals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Endriss, C., & Hinterwimmer, S. (2008). Direct and indirect aboutness topics, Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 55(3–4), 297–307. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gast, V. (2006). The grammar of identity. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herbeck, P. (2011). Overt subjects in Spanish control infinitives and the theory of empty categories. Generative Grammar in Geneva, 7, 1–22.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Higgins, R. (1973). The pseudo-cleft construction in English (Unpublished PhD dissertation). MIT.
Holmberg, A. (2005). Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 533–564. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hornstein, N. (1999). Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 69–96. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huber, S. (2000). Es-Clefts und det-Clefts. Zur syntax, semantik und informations struktur von spaltsätzen im Deutschen und Swedischen. Stockholm: Almkist und Wiksell International.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaeggli, O. (1984). Subject extraction and the null subject parameter. North East Linguistic Society, 14, 132–153.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jelinek, E. (1984). Empty categories, case, and configurationality. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 2, 39–76. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kato, M. (1999). Strong and weak pronominals in the null subject parameter. Probus, 11, 1–37. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, R. (1991). Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 647–686.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
König, E., & Siemund, P. (2005). Intensifiers and reflexives. In M. Haspelmath, M. S. Dryer, D. Gil, & N. Comrie (Eds.), The world atlas of language structures (pp. 194–197). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, A. (2009). Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 187–237. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, I. (2015). A two-tiered theory of control. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Livitz, A. (2011). Incorporating PRO: A defective goal analysis. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics, 3, 95–119.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. R. (2009). PRO, pro, and NP-trace (raising) are interpretations. In K. Grohmann (Ed.), Explorations of phase theory. Features and arguments (pp. 131–179). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, M. R., & Savoia, L. (2002). Parameters of subject inflection in Italian dialects. In P. Svenonius (Ed.), Subjects, expletives and the EPP (pp. 157–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Martins, A. M. (1994). Clíticos na história do português (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Lisbon.
Müller, G. (2005).
Pro-drop and impoverishment. In P. Brandt & E. Fuss (Eds.), Form, structure and grammar. A Festschrift presented to Günther Grewendorf on the occasion of his 60th birthday (pp. 93–115). Tübingen: Narr.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Noyer, R. (1992). Features, positions, and affixes in autonomous morphological structure (Unpublished PhD dissertation). MIT.
Ordóñez, F., & Treviño, E. (1999). Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua, 107, 39–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Panagiotidis, P. (2003). Empty nouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Inquiry, 21(2), 381–432. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Partee, B. (1987). Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers (pp. 115–143). Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Piera, C. (1987). Sobre la estructura de las cláusulas de infinitivo. In V. Demonte & M. Lagunilla (Eds.), Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas (pp. 148–163). Madrid: Ediciones El Arquero.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Platzack, C. (2004). Agreement and the person phrase hypothesis. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax, 73, 83–112.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poletto, C. (2000). The higher functional field in the northern Italian dialects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polinsky, M., & Potsdam, E. (2002). Backward control. Linguistic Inquiry, 33, 245–282. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pollock, J. Y. (1997). Langage et cognition: Introduction au programme minimaliste de la grammaire générative. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Postal, P. (1966). On so-called “pronouns” in English. In F. Dinneen (Ed.), Report on the seventeenth annual round table meeting on linguistics and language studies (pp. 177–206). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Raposo, E. (1994). Affective operators and clausal structure in European Portuguese and European Spanish. (Unpublished manuscript). University of California at Santa Barbara, CA.
Rigau, G. (1987). Sobre el carácter quantificador de los pronombres tónicos en Catalán. In V. Demonte & M. F. Lagunilla (Eds.), Sintaxis de las lenguas románicas. Madrid: Textos Universitarios.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, L. (1978). A restructuring rule in Italian syntax. In S. J. Keyser (Ed.), Recent transformational studies in European languages. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, L. (2005). On some properties of subjects and topics. In L. Brugé, G. Giusti, N. Munaro, W. Schweikert, & G. Turano (Eds.), Proceedings of the XXX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa. Venezia: Cafoscarina.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohrbacher, B. (1993). The Germanic VO languages and the full paradigm: A theory of V to I raising (Unpublished PhD dissertation). UMass at Amherst.
Sanchez, L. (1995). Syntactic structures and nominals: A comparative study of Spanish and Southern Quechua (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Southern California.
Solà, J. (1992). Agreement and subjects (Unpublished PhD dissertation). Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Speas, M. (1994). Null arguments in a theory of economy of projections. In E. Benedicto & J. Runner (Eds.), Functional projections (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 17, pp. 179–208). Cambridge, MA: MIT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szabolcsi, A. (1981). The semantics of Topic-Focus articulation. In J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Formal methods in the study of language (pp. 513–541). Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szabolcsi, A. (2009). Overt nominative subjects in infinitival complements cross-linguistically: Data, diagnostics, and preliminary analyses. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics – Papers in syntax Spring 2009, 2, 1–55.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Taraldsen, K. (1978). On the NIC, vacuous application and the that-trace Filter (Unpublished manuscript). MIT.
Torrego, E. (1985). Pronouns and determiners: A DP analysis of Spanish nominals (Unpublished MA dissertation). UMass at Boston.
Torrego, E. (1995). On the nature of clitic doubling. In H. Campos & P. Kempchinsky (Eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory (pp. 251–275). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Torrego, E. (1996). On quantifier float in control clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, 27(1), 111–126.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uriagereka, J. (1995). Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 26, 79–123.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vallduví, E. (1992). A preverbal landing site for quantificational operators. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 1992, 319–344. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wedgwood, D. (2005). Shifting the focus: From static structures to the dynamics of interpretation. Oxford: Elsevier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wedgwood, D. (2009). Variation in focus. In A. Riester & E. Onea (Eds.), Focus at the syntax-semantics interface, Working Papers of the SFB 732 (Vol. 3, pp. 101–119). University of Stuttgart.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zeijlstra, H. (2012). There is only one way to agree. The Linguistic Review, 29, 491–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zubizarreta, M. L. (1998). Word order, prosody and focus. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)