Cover not available
Part of
Complement Clauses in Portuguese: Syntax and acquisition
Edited by Ana Lúcia Santos and Anabela Gonçalves
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 17] 2018
► pp. 295–320

The acquisition of infinitival complements to causative verbs in Mozambican Portuguese

 | University of Lisbon
 | University of Lisbon
 | University of Lisbon
 | University of Lisbon | Eduardo Mondlane University
This chapter aims at analyzing the acquisition of complements to causative verbs in Mozambican Portuguese (MozP) as L1 by pre-school children. By presenting the results of a completion task (Santos, Gonçalves, & Hyams, 2016), we show that Mozambican children, like Portuguese ones, take propositional complements as complete functional domains, which explains the high occurrence of inflected infinitives. However, MozP presents an innovative pattern in which the causative verb selects for a complement with the structure [DP XP]. We claim that this complement corresponds to a pseudo-relative, a structure which is severely constrained in Portuguese.
Keywords: acquisition, causative verbs, infinitival complements, Mozambican Portuguese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Complements to causative verbs in Portuguese
  • 3.Acquisition of Portuguese causative verbs: Facts and questions
    • 3.1Previous work on European Portuguese
    • 3.2Causative verbs in (the acquisition of) Mozambican Portuguese: Research questions
  • 4.Methodology
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
  • 7.Final remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 16 August 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.17.10gon
References (44)
References
Barbosa, P., & Cochofel, F. (2005). A Construção de Infinitivo Preposicionado em PE. In I. Duarte & I. Leiria (Eds.), Actas do XX Encontro Nacional da APL (pp. 387–400). Lisboa: APL.Google Scholar
Becker, M. (2005). Raising, control and the subset principle. In J. Alderete, C. Han, & A. Kochetov (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (pp. 52–60). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
(2006). There began to be a learnability puzzle. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 441–456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brito, A. M. (1995). Sobre algumas construções pseudorelativas em Português. Revista da Faculdade de Letras “Línguas e Literaturas”, XII, 25–54.Google Scholar
Casalicchio, J. (2011). Le frase gerundive e infinitive come alternativa alla pseudorelative in alcune varietà romanze (Unpublished manuscript). Università degli Studi di Padova.
(2013). The role of verb movement in the analysis of predicative gerunds and prepositional infinitives. Paper presented at International Workshop of The Syntactic Variation of Catalan and Spanish Dialects . Barcelona, June 2013.
Chimbutane, F. (2012). Panorama linguístico de Moçambique: Análise dos dados do III Recenseamento Geral da População e Habitação de 2007. Maputo: Instituto Nacional de Estatística.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
(2008). On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero, & M. L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. (1992). The pseudo-relative and Acc-ing construction after verbs of perception. CLI-91.I.2 Working Papers in Linguistics . University of Venice.
Costa, J., Fernandes, B., Vaz, S., & Grillo, N. (2016). (Pseudo-)Relatives and prepositional infinitival constructions in the acquisition of European Portuguese. Probus, 28(1), 119–143.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duarte, I. (1993). Complementos infinitivos preposicionados e outras construções temporalmente defectivas em Português europeu. Actas do VIII Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística , 145–158. Lisboa: APL.
Duarte, I., Gonçalves, A., Miguel, M., & Mota, M. A. (1999). ‘Não cheguei de aprender nada’: Áreas de variação e tendências de mudança em Português de Moçambique. Actas do XIV Encontro Nacional da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística (Vol. 1, pp. 477–493). Braga: APL.
Duarte, I., Santos, A. L., & Alexandre, N. (2015). How relative are relative purpose clauses? Probus, 27(2), 237–270. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernandes, B. (2012). O estatuto das pseudo-relativas em português europeu (Unpublished MA dissertation). FCSH, Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
Firmino, G. (2002). A questão linguística na África pós-colonial: O caso do português e das línguas autóctones em Moçambique. Maputo: Promédia.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, A. (2003). Defectividade funcional e predicados complexos em estruturas de Controlo do português. In I. Castro & I. Duarte (Eds.), Razões e emoção: Miscelânea de estudos em homenagem a Maria Helena Mateus (Vol. 1, pp. 347–366). Lisboa: IN-CM.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, P. (2001). Panorama geral do PM. Revue Belge de Philologie et d’Histoire, 79(3), 977–990. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). A génese do português de Moçambique. Lisboa: IN-CM.Google Scholar
(2013). O português em África. In E. Raposo, M. F. Bacelar do Nascimento, M. A. Mota, L. Segura, & A. Mendes (Eds.), Gramática do português (pp. 157–178). Lisboa: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, P., & Maciel, C. (1998). Estruturas de subordinação na aquisição do português/língua segunda. In P. Gonçalves (Ed.), Mudanças do português em Moçambique: Aquisição e formato de estruturas de subordinação (pp. 15–66). Maputo: UEM, Livraria Universitária.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, P., & Vicente, F. (s/d). Bibliografia sobre o português de Moçambique (a partir de 1964). <[URL]> Last update – January 2017 (Retrieved November 2017).
Grillo, N., & Costa, J. (2014). A novel argument for the universality of parsing principles. Cognition, 133, 156–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, M. T. (1988). La pseudorelative et les phènomènes d’accord. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa, 13, 35–57.Google Scholar
Hernanz, M. L. (1999). El infinitivo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 2197–2356). Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Hirsch, C., Orfitelli, R., & Wexler, K. (2007). When seem means think: The role of the experiencer-phrase in children’s comprehension of raising. In A. Belikova, L. Meroni, & M. Umeda (Eds.), Galana 2 –Proceedings of the conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition North America 2. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press. Google Scholar
(2008). The acquisition of raising reconsidered. In A. Gavarró & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Proceedings of the conference on Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (pp. 253–262). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Hirsch, C., & Wexler, K. (2007). The late acquisition of raising: What children seem to think about seem. In W. Davies & S. Dubinsky (Eds.), New horizons in the analysis of control and raising (pp. 35–70). Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Issak, A. (1998). Estruturas de complementação verbal do Português de Moçambique. In P. Gonçalves (Ed.), Mudanças do português em Moçambique: Aquisição e formato de estruturas de subordinação (pp. 67–110). Maputo: UEM, Livraria Universitária.Google Scholar
Kirby, S. (2011). Move over, control freaks: Syntactic raising as a cognitive default. In N. Denis, K. Mesh, & H. Sung (Eds.), Boston University Conference on Language Development 35 – Online proceedings supplement.Google Scholar
Landau, I., & Thornton, R. (2011). Early child Control. Lingua, 121, 920–941. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, H., & Saito, M. (1991). On the subject of infinitives. In L. M. Dobrin, L. Nichols, & R. R. Rodriguez (Eds.), CLS 27 – Proceedings of Chicago Linguistic Society 27 (pp. 324–343). Chicago, IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Orfitelli, R. (2012a). ‘Experiencing’ a slight delay: Intervening arguments and the acquisition of subject-to-subject raising. In A. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung, & A. E. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 374–386). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2012b). Argument intervention in the acquisition of A-movement (Unpublished PhD dissertation). UCLA.
Pérez-Leroux, A., Pirvulescu, M., & Roberge, Y. (2008). Null objects in child language: Syntax and the lexicon. Lingua, 118, 370–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Postal, P. (1974). On raising. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (1975). Pseudorelatives and the unity of subject raising. Archivum Linguisticum, 6, 32–64.Google Scholar
Raposo, E. (1989). Prepositional infinitival constructions in European Portuguese. In O. Jaeggli & K. Safir (Eds.), The null subject parameter (pp. 277–305). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (2000). Direct perception, government and thematic sharing. In L. Rizzi (Ed.), Comparative syntax and language acquisition (pp. 203–227). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rothman, J., Duarte, I., Pires, A., & Santos, A. L. (2013). How early after all? Inflected infinitives in European and Brazilian Portuguese L1 production. In S. Stavrakaki, M. Lalioti, & P. Konstatinopoulou (Eds.), Advances in language acquisition (pp. 164–172). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Santos, A. L., Gonçalves, A., & Hyams, N. (2016). Aspects of the acquisition of object control and ECM-type verbs in European Portuguese. Language Acquisition, 23(3), 199–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santos, A. L., Rothman, J., Pires, A., & Duarte, I. (2013). Early or late acquisition of inflected infinitives in European Portuguese?: Evidence from spontaneous production data. In M. Becker, J. Grinstead, & J. Rothman (Eds.), Generative linguistics and acquisition: Studies in honor of Nina M. Hyams (pp. 65–88). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Treviño, E. (2004). Las causativas del español con complemento infinitivo. México: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Wexler, K. (2004). Theory of phasal development: Perfection in child grammar. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 48, 159–209.Google Scholar