Cover not available
Part of
The Portuguese Language Continuum in Africa and Brazil
Edited by Laura Álvarez López, Perpétua Gonçalves and Juanito Ornelas de Avelar
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 20] 2018
► pp. 43–64

Chapter 2
Research on L2 varieties of European languages

From descriptive to formal grammars

| Universidade Eduardo Mondlane
This chapter shows how the concepts of Internalized and Externalized language (Chomsky, 1986), while making clear the distinction between the products of language behaviour and the system of knowledge represented in the mind of individuals, can provide an adequate background to account for the formal grammars of L2 varieties and for the role of L1 transfer in their genesis. To support this approach, I will present linguistic innovations in the realization of different types of verbal arguments in Mozambican Portuguese, an African L2 variety typically acquired by Bantu L1 speakers. The evidence of the study draws upon observational data produced by L2 speakers of Portuguese.
Keywords: L2 varieties, Internalized/Externalized language, L1 transfer, descriptive/formal grammars
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical framework
  • 3.Critical issues in the grammatical description of L2 varieties
  • 4.From descriptive to formal grammars of L2 varieties
    • 4.1A descriptive grammar of MP
    • 4.2A formal grammar of MP
      • Case study 1 – Goal/beneficiary arguments
      • Case study 2 – Theme argument
      • Case study 3 – Locative/directional arguments
    • 4.3Conclusions
  • 5.Potential of formal grammars for the recognition of L2 varieties
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 22 November 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.20.03gon
References (50)
References
Avelar, J. (2017). Complementos direcionais em afro-variedades de português e espanhol. Moderna Språk, 111(2), 15–44.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1988). Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carvalho, M. J. (1991). Aspectos sintáctico-semânticos dos verbos locativos no Português oral de Maputo. Lisbon: I.C.A.L.P./Angolê – Artes e Letras.Google Scholar
Chimbutane, F. (2015). Línguas e educação em Moçambique: Uma perspectiva sócio-histórica. In P. Gonçalves, & F. Chimbutane (Eds.), Multilinguismo e multiculturalismo em Moçambique: Em direcção a uma coerência entre discurso e prática (pp. 35–75). Maputo: Alcance Editores.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York, NY: Praeger.Google Scholar
(2006). Language and mind (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, D. (2006). World Englishes and descriptive grammars. In B. Kachru, Y. Kachru, & C. Nelson (Eds.), The handbook of world Englishes (pp. 509–525). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M. (Ed.). (1999a). Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1999b). Creolization, language change and language acquisition: An Epilogue. In M. DeGraff (Ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony and development (pp. 473-543). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, S., Flynn S., & Martohardjono, G. (1998). The strong continuity hypothesis: Some evidence concerning functional categories in adult L2 acquisition. In S. Flynn, G. Martohardjono, & W. O’Neil (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 61–77). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Foley, C., & Flynn, S. (2013). The role of the native language. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 97–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gass, S. (1996). Second language acquisition and linguistic theory: The role of language transfer. In W. Ritchie & T. Bathia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 317–345). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gass, S., & Selinker, L. (Eds.). (1994). Language transfer in language learning. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, P. (1990). A construção de uma gramática do Português em Moçambique: Aspectos da estrutura argumental dos verbos. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
(2010). A génese do português de Moçambique. Lisbon: Imprensa Nacional/Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar
(2013). O Português em África. In E. B. P. Raposo, M. F. Bacelar do Nascimento, M. A. C. da Mota, L. Segura, & A. Mendes (Eds.), Gramática do português (pp. 157–168). Lisbon: Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, P., & Chimbutane, F. (2004). O papel das línguas bantu na génese do português de Moçambique: O comportamento sintáctico de constituintes locativos e direccionais. Papia, 14, 7–30.Google Scholar
Gonçalves, P., & Justino, V. (n.d.). Dicionário de regências de verbos do português de Moçambique (a partir de 1986). Retrieved from <[URL]>
Gonçalves, R. (2016). Construções ditransitivas no português de São Tomé. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gut, U. (2011). Studying structural innovations in New Englishes varieties. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring second-language varieties and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap (pp. 101–124). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kouwenberg, S., & Singler, J. V. (Eds.), (2009). The handbook of pidgin and creole studies. Oxford:Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kroch, A. (1989). Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change, 1, 199–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, C. (1998). Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian Creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2011). The problem of the typological classification of creoles. In C. Lefebvre (Ed.), Creoles, their substrates and language typology (pp. 3–33). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1999). The development of language. Acquisition, change and evolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2006). How new languages emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Long, M. (2003). Stabilization and fossilization in interlanguage development. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 487–535). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lunkenheimer, K. (2012). Typological profile: L2 varieties. In B. Kortmann & K. Lunkenheimer (Eds.), The Mouton world atlas of variation in English (pp. 844–872). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mesthrie, R. (1992). English in language shift: The history, structure and sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
(2004). Synopsis: Morphological and syntactic variation in Africa and South and Southeast Asia. In E. Schneider & B. Kortman (Eds.), A handbook of varieties of English: Morphology and syntax (Vol. II, pp. 1132–1141). Berlin:Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, R., & Bhatt, R. (2008). World Englishes: The study of new linguistic varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. (1997). Jargons, pidgins, creoles, and koines: What are they? In A. Spears & D. Winford (Eds.), The structure and status of pidgins and creoles (pp. 35–69). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1998). What research on creole genesis can contribute to historical linguistics. In M. Schmid, J. Austin, & D. Stein (Eds.), Historical Linguistics 1997 (pp. 315–338). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010). SLA and the emergence of creoles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 359–400. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, J., & Hundt, M. (Eds.). (2011). Exploring second-language varieties and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T. (2003). Cross-linguistic influence. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 436–486). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12, 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siegel, J. (1999). Transfer constraints and substrate influence in Melanesian Pidgin. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 14, 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A. (1995). Acquiring linking rules and argument structures in a second language. In L. Eubank, L. Selinker, & M. Smith (Eds.), The current state of interlanguage (pp. 153–175). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2003). Near-nativeness. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 130–151). Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, K., & Sridhar, S. (1986). Bridging the paradigm gap: Second language acquisition theory and indigenized varieties of English. World Englishes, 5, 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sridhar, S., & Sridhar, K. (1994). Indigenized Englishes as second languages: Toward a functional theory of second language acquisition in multilingual contexts. In R. Agnihotri & A. Khanna (Eds.), Second language acquisition: Socio-cultural and linguistic aspects of English in India (pp. 41–63). Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Stroud, C., & Gonçalves, P. (1997). Panorama do português oral de Maputo – Volume I: Objectivos e métodos. Maputo: Instituto Nacional do Desenvolvimento da Educação.Google Scholar
Van Rooy B. (2011). A principled distinction between error and conventionalized innovation in African Englishes. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring second-language varieties and learner Englishes: Bridging a paradigm gap (pp. 189–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C. (2002). Grammar competition and language change. In D. Lightfoot (Ed.), Syntactic effects of morphological change (pp. 367–380). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar