Cover not available
Part of
Current Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics
Edited by Diego Pascual y Cabo and Idoia Elola
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 27] 2020
► pp. 39–62

Chapter 2
Organic models for measuring Spanish learners’ linguistic complexity

 | Northern Arizona University
 | Northern Arizona University
Second language acquisition (SLA) researchers measure linguistic complexity to assess pedagogical effectiveness and depict development (Norris & Ortega, 2009). Yet, from linguistic and cognitive perspectives, commonly used approaches oversimplify complexity. Furthermore, such approaches do not consider the morphological complexities of a highly inflected L2 like Spanish. Norris and Ortega (2009) encourage SLA researchers to develop empirically and theoretically valid measures of linguistic complexity through an organic (i.e., iterative and data-driven) investigative process; resulting models should be multidimensional and developmentally sensitive. This study delineates three multidimensional models of Spanish L2 linguistic complexity based on a principal component analysis of a corpus of learners participating in a task-based activity at the beginning, intermediate, and advanced levels of university instruction.
Keywords: linguistic complexity, second language learning, Spanish, corpus linguistics, developmental stage
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Literature review
    • 2.1Shortcomings in current metrics of linguistic complexity
    • 2.2Conceptualizing complexity
    • 2.3Cognitive characteristics of linguistic complexity
  • 3.An ‘organic’ approach to operationalizing L2 linguistic complexity
  • 4.Research questions
  • 5.Method
    • 5.1Participants
    • 5.2Task
    • 5.3Corpus
    • 5.4Dataset
    • 5.5Analysis
  • 6.Results
    • 6.1Syntax
    • 6.2Morphology
    • 6.3Corpus samples
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Note
  • References
Published online: 4 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.27.02col
References (22)
References
Asención-Delaney, Y., & Collentine, J. (2011). A Multi-dimensional analysis of a written L2 Spanish corpus. Applied Linguistics, 32(3), 299–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2006). Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora, 1, 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9, 2–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity. Language Learning, 33(1), 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring short-term changes in L2 writing complexity. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26(December), 42–65. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Collentine, J., & Collentine, K. (2015). Input and output grammar instruction in tutorial CALL with a complex grammatical structure. CALICO Journal, 32(2), 273–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferreira, F. (1991). Effects of length and syntactic complexity on initiation times for prepared utterances. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(2), 210–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Housen, A., & Kuiken, F. (2009). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 461–473. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Complexity, accuracy and fluency: Definitions, measurement and research. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Housen, A., Pierrard, M., & Van Daele, S. (2005). Rule complexity and the efficacy of explicit grammar instruction. In A. Housen & M. Pierrard (Eds.), Investigations in instructed second language acquisition (pp. 235–269). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackson, D., & Suethanapornkul, S. (2013). The cognition hypothesis: A synthesis and meta-analysis of research on second language task complexity. Language Learning, 63(2), 330–367. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marwa, R. (2014). Building a syntactically-annotated corpus of learner English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Indiana University.
Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2009). Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 555–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L. (2000). Understanding syntactic complexity: The measurement of change in the syntax of instructed L2 Spanish learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawaii at Manoa.
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining, and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, Y. (2017). Syntactic complexity as a predictor of second language writing proficiency and writing quality (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Reichenbach, H. (1947). Elements of symbolic logic. New York, NY: Macmillan & Co.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Wolfe-Quintero, K., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. (1998). Second language development in writing: Measures of fluency, accuracy, & complexity. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Restrepo-Ramos, Falcon & Nofiya Denbaum-Restrepo
2022. The Syntactic and Discourse Properties of Second Person Singular Forms of Address inPaisaSpanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 15:2 ► pp. 453 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.