Cover not available
Part of
Current Theoretical and Applied Perspectives on Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics
Edited by Diego Pascual y Cabo and Idoia Elola
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 27] 2020
► pp. 295–318

Chapter 14
No es tan simple como parece

The effect of duration of one-closure rhotics on the perception of Spanish /ɾ/ and /r/

| Indiana University
| Indiana University

This study analyzes the effect of duration on the perception of Spanish /ɾ/ and /r/. A total of 143 participants completed a questionnaire with 183 stimuli. The stimuli were Spanish words with one single intervocalic tap whose duration was manipulated. Participants listened to each stimulus once, selected the word they heard, and rated its pronunciation. The results suggest that the perception of /r/ significantly increases as duration increases. However, those stimuli identified as /r/ were not considered good exemplars of such category. The stimuli identified as /ɾ/ that had shorter duration were perceived as good instances of such category, but as duration increased, the ratings for /ɾ/ decreased. The phonological implications of these results are discussed in this article.

Keywords: perception, rhotics, Spanish phonology, tap, trill
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1.Spanish alveolar trill
    • 2.2Variable production of Spanish trills among native speakers
    • 2.3Spanish rhotics among second language learners
    • 2.4About the duration of rhotics
  • 3.The present study
  • 4.Method
    • 4.1Instrument
    • 4.2Participants
    • 4.3Procedure
    • 4.4Analysis
  • 5.Results
  • 6.Discussion
    • 6.1Phonological implications
  • 7.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • References
Published online: 4 June 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.27.14mel
References
Amengual, M.
(2016) Acoustic correlates of the Spanish tap-trill contrast: Heritage and L2 Spanish speakers. Heritage Language Journal, 13(2), 88–112.Google Scholar
Best, C. T.
(1995) A direct realist view of cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 171–204). Baltimore, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Blecua Falgueras, B.
(2001) Las vibrantes del español: Manifestaciones acústicas y procesos fonéticos (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa). (Accession No. 10803.4859).
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D.
(2017) Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program] (Version 6.0.36). Retrieved from [URL]> (16 December, 2017).Google Scholar
Bongiovanni, S., Long, A., Solon, M., & Willis, E. W.
(2015) The effect of short-term study abroad on second language Spanish phonetic development. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8, 243–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, T. G., & Willis, E. W.
(2012) Rhotic variation and contrast in Veracruz Mexican Spanish. Estudios de Fonética Experimental, 21, 43–74.Google Scholar
Díaz-Campos, M.
(2008) Variable production of the trill in spontaneous speech: Sociolinguistic implications. In L. Colantoni & J. Steele (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology (pp. 47–58). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Face, T. L.
(2006) Intervocalic rhotic pronunciation by adult learners of Spanish as a second language. In C. A. Klee & T. L. Face (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 47–58). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Hammond, R.
(1999) On the non-occurrence of the phone [r] in the Spanish sound system. In J. Gutiérrez-Rexach & F. Martínez-Gil (Eds.), Advances in Hispanic linguistics: Papers from the 2nd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 290–304). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Henriksen, N.
(2014) Sociophonetic analysis of phonemic trill variation in two sub-varieties of Peninsular Spanish. Journal of Linguistic Geography, 2(1), 4–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015) Acoustic analysis of the rhotic contrast in Chicagoland Spanish: An intergenerational study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(3), 285–321. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, N. C., & Willis, E. W.
(2010) Acoustic characterization of phonemic trill production in Jerezano Andalusian Spanish. In M. Ortega-Llebaria (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 4th Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology (pp. 115–127). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I.
(2005) The Sounds of Spanish with Audio CD. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hurtado, L., & Estrada, C.
(2010) Factors influencing the second language acquisition of Spanish vibrants. The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 74–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, A. M.
(2004) Coarticulatory effects on Spanish trill production. In A. Agwuele, W. Warren, & S. H. Park (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Texas Linguistics Society Conference (pp. 116–127). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Lord, G.
(2005) (How) can we teach foreign language pronunciation? On the effects of a Spanish phonetics course. Hispania, 88(3), 557–567. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melero-García, F.
(2015) Análisis acústico de la vibrante múltiple en el español de Valencia (España). Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8(1), 183–206.Google Scholar
(2018) Caracterización sociofonética de la vibrante alveolar múltiple en Madrid: un análisis variacionista. IULC Working Papers, 18(1), 1–41.Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, T.
(1956) Apuntes sobre el español dominicano. Revista Iberoamericana, 21(41), 417–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Qualtrics [Computer software]
(2015) Provo, UT. Available from [URL] (14 November, 2019).
Rose, M.
(2010) Differences in discriminating L2 consonants: A comparison of Spanish taps and trills. In M. T. Prior, Y. Watanabe, & S.-L. Lee (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2008 Second Language Research Forum: Exploring SLA perspectives, positions and practices (pp. 181–196). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Willis, E. W.
(2006) Trill variation in Dominican Spanish: An acoustic examination and comparative analysis. In N. Sagarra & A. J. Toribio (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 121–131). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla.Google Scholar
(2007) An acoustic study of the ‘pre-aspirated trill’ in narrative Cibaeño Dominican Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 37(1), 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Willis, E. W., & Bradley, T. G.
(2008) Contrast maintenance of taps and trills in Dominican Spanish: Data and analysis. In L. Colantoni & J. Steele (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology (pp. 87–100). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Zahler, S., & Daidone, D.
(2014) A variationist account of trill /r/ usage in the Spanish of Málaga. IULC Working Papers, 14(2).Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Daidone, Danielle & Sara Zahler
2021. A Variationist Analysis of Second Language Spanish Trill Production. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 14:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Henriksen, Nicholas, Shayna Greenley & Amber Galvano
2023. Sociophonetic Investigation of the Spanish Alveolar Trill /r/ in Two Canonical-Trill Varieties. Language and Speech 66:4 ► pp. 896 ff. DOI logo
Pollock, Matthew, Gibran Delgado-Díaz, Iraida Galarza, Manuel Díaz-Campos & Erik W. Willis
2023. Chapter 5. The emergence of sound change in two varieties of Spanish. In Innovative Approaches to Research in Hispanic Linguistics [Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 38], ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.