References (52)
References
Aske, J. (1989). Path predicates in English and Spanish: A closer look. Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 15, 1–14.Google Scholar
Athanasopoulos, P., & Bylund, E. (2013). Does grammatical aspect affect motion event cognition? A cross-linguistic comparison of English and Swedish speakers. Cognitive Science, 37, 286–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berman, R.A., & Slobin, D.I. (1994). Development of linguistic forms: English. In R.A. Berman & D.I. Slobin (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: A Crosslinguistic Developmental Study. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E. (2008). Procesos de conceptualización de eventos en sueco y en español: Diferencias translingüísticas [Event conceptualization processes in Swedish and Spanish: Crosslinguistic differences]. Revue Romane, 43(1), 1–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2009). The effects of age of L2 acquisition on L1 event conceptualization principles. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 305–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E., & Athanasopoulos, P. (2014). Language and thought in a multilingual context: The case of isiXhosa. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 431–441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E., & Jarvis, S. (2011). L2 effects on L1 event conceptualization. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14, 47–59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bylund, E., Athanasopoulos, P., & Oostendorp, M. (2013). Motion event cognition and grammatical aspect. Evidence from Afrikaans. Linguistics, 51, 929–955. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T. (2004). Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective. In M. Achard & S. Niemeier (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition, and Foreign Language Teaching (pp. 13–49). SOLA Studies on Language Acquisition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2010). Motion in Danish as a second language: Does the learner’s L1 make a difference? In Z. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking (pp. 1–33). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cadierno, T., & Ruiz, L. (2006), Motion events in Spanish L2 acquisition. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 4, 183–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M., & von Stutterheim, C. (2006). The impact of grammaticalized temporal categories on ultimate attainment in advanced L2 acquisition. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Educating for Advanced Foreign Language Capacities (pp. 40–53). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, M., von Stutterheim, C., & Nüse, R. (2004). The language and thought debate: A psycholinguistic approach. In C. Habel & T. Pechmann (Eds.), Multidisciplinary Approaches to Language Production (pp. 183–218). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M., Weimar, K., Flecken, M., Lambert, M., & von Stutterheim, C. (2012). Tracing trajectories: Motion event construal by advanced L2 French-English and L2 French-German speakers. Language, Interaction and Acquisition, 3(2), 202–230. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasselgård, H., Johansson, S., Behrens, B., & Fabricius-Hansen, C. (Eds.). (2002). Information Structure in a Cross-linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam: Rodopi. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hendriks, H., & Hickmann, M. (2011). Space in second language acquisition. In V. Cook & B. Bassetti (Eds.). Language and Bilingual Cognition (pp. 315–339). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hijazo-Gascón, A. (2011). La expresión de eventos de movimiento y su adquisición en segundas lenguas. Unpublishd Ph.D. dissertation. Universidad de Zaragoza.
Hohenstein, J., Eisenberg, A., & Naigles, L. (2006). Is he floating across or crossing afloat? Cross-influence of L1 and L2 in Spanish–English bilingual adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 9, 249–261. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. (2004). Dicotomías frente a continuos en la lexicalización de los eventos de movimiento. Revista Española de Lingüística, 34(2), 481–510.Google Scholar
. (2009). Path salience in motion events. In J. Guo, E. Lieven, N. Budwig, S. Ervin-Tripp, K. Nakamura, & S. Özçalişkan (Eds.), Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Psychology of Language: Research in the Tradition of Dan Isaac Slobin (pp. 403–414). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ijaz, H. (1986). Linguistic and cognitive determinants of lexical acquisition in a second language. Language Learning, 36, 401–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Odlin, T. (2000). Morphological type, spatial reference, and language transfer. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 535–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S., & Pavlenko, A. (2008). Crosslinguistic Influence in Language and Cognition. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jovanovic, J., & Martinovic-Zic, A. (2004). Why manner matters. Contrasting English and Serbo-Croatian typology in motion description. In C.L. Moder & A. Martinovic-Zic (Eds.), Discourse across Languages and Cultures (pp. 211–226). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. (2000). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larrañaga, P., Treffers-Daller, J., Tidball, F., & Ortega, M. (2012). L1 transfer in the acquisition of manner and path in Spanish by native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(1), 117–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayer, M. (1969). Frog: Where are you? New York, NY: Dial Press.Google Scholar
Naigles, L., & Terrazas, P. (1998). Motion-verb generalizations in English and Spanish: The influence of language and syntax. Psychological Science, 9(5), 363–369. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naigles, L., Eisenberg, A., Kako, E., Highter, M., & McGraw, N. (1998). Speaking of motion: Verb use in English and Spanish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13(5), 521–549. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Navarro, S., & Nicoladis, E. (2005). Describing motion events in adult L2 Spanish narratives. In D. Eddington (Ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second languages (pp. 102–107). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Negueruela, E., Lantolf, J.P., Jordan, S., & Gelabert, J. (2004). The “private function” of gesture in second language speaking activity: A study of motion verbs and gesturing in English and Spanish. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(1), 113–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Odlin, T. (1989). Language Transfer: Cross-linguistic Influence in Language Learning. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (2003). Crosslinguistic influence. In C. Doughty & M. Long (Eds.), The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 436–486). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, J. (2012). Spanish expressions of directed motion revisited – variable type framing. In H. Boas & F. Gonzálvez-García (Eds.), Constructional Approaches to Romance Languages (pp. 269–304). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ragnarsdóttir, H., & Strömqvist, S. (2004). Time, space and manner in Icelandic and Swedish. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives (pp. 113–141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Schmiedtová, B., & Flecken, M. (2008). The role of aspectual distinctions in event encoding: Implications for second language acquisition. In S. de Knop & T. de Rycker (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Pedagogical Grammar (pp. 357–384). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmiedtová, B., von Stutterheim, C., & Carroll, M. (2011). Language-specific patterns in event construal of advanced second language speakers. In A. Pavlenko (Ed.), Thinking and Speaking in Two Languages (pp. 112–141). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sjöström, S. (1990). Spatial Relations. Towards a Theory of Spatial Verbs, Prepositions and Pronominal Adverbs in Swedish. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Gothenburg University, Sweden.
Slobin, D. (1996). Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish. In M. Shibatani & S. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions. Their Form and Meaning (pp. 195–219). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
. (2003). Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity. In D. Gentner & S. Goldin-Meadow (Eds.), Language in Mind (pp. 157–191). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. (2004). How people move. In C.L. Moder & A. Martinovic-Zic (Eds.), Discourse across Languages and Cultures (pp. 195–210). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stam, G. (2010). Can an L2 speaker’s patterns of thinking for speaking change? In Z. Han & T. Cadierno (Eds.), Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking (pp. 59–83). Bristol: Multilingual Matters. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Strömqvist, S., & Verhoeven, L. (2004). Relating Events in Narrative, Vol. 2: Typological and Contextual Perspectives. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Semantic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 36–149). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 480–519). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C. (2003). Linguistic structure and information organisation. The case of very advanced learners. In S. Foster-Cohen & S. Pekarek Dohler (Eds.), EuroSLA Yearbook (pp. 183–206). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., & Nüse, R. (2003). Processes of conceptualization in language production: Language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics, 41(5), 851–881. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, C., Andermann, M., Carroll, M., Flecken, M., & Schmiedtová, B. (2012). How grammaticized concepts shape event conceptualization in language production: Insights from linguistic analysis, eye tracking data, and memory performance. Linguistics, 50(4), 833–867. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, J., & Yangklang, P. (2004). A third way to travel: The place of Thai in motion event typology. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating Events in Narrative. Typological and Contextual Perspectives (pp. 159–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M.L., & Oh, E. (2007). On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Stam, Gale, Kimberly Urbanski, James Lantolf & Tetyana Smotrova
2023. How concept-based language instruction works in teaching thinking for speaking in an L2. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 61:1  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Vallerossa, Francesco & Camilla Bardel
2023. Always trust your gut?. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 14:1  pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Lewandowski, Wojciech
2022. Bilingual patterns of path encoding: A study of Polish L1-German L2 and Polish L1-Spanish L2 speakers . International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 60:3  pp. 679 ff. DOI logo
Lewandowski, Wojciech & Şeyda Özçalışkan
2021. How language type influences patterns of motion expression in bilingual speakers. Second Language Research 37:1  pp. 27 ff. DOI logo
Bylund, Emanuel & Panos Athanasopoulos
2015. Motion event categorisation in a nativised variety of South African English. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 18:5  pp. 588 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 11 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.