Adams, M.P
(1987) Old French, Null Subjects and Verb-second Phenomena. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. UCLA, Berkeley.
Adjémian, C
(1976) On the nature of interlanguage systems. Language Learning, 26, 297–320. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Adjémian, C., & Liceras, J.M
(1984) Universal grammar, the intake component and L1: Accounting for adult acquisition of relative clauses. In F. Eckman, L. Bell, & D. Nelson (Eds.), Universals of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 101–118). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Aissen, J
(2003) Differential object marking: Iconicity vs. economy. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alba de la Fuente, A
(2010). More on the clitic combination puzzle: Evidence from Spanish, Catalan and Romanian. In S. Colina, A. Olarrea, & A.M. Carvalho (Eds.), Romance Linguistics 2009. Selected papers from the 39th Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Tuscon, Arizona, March 2009. (pp. 203–215). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012) Clitic Combinations in Spanish: Syntax, Processing and Acquisition. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Ottawa, Ottawa.
Alonso-Ovalle, L., Fernández-Solera, S. Frazier, L., & Clifton. C
(2002) Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Journal of Italian Linguistics, 14,151–170.Google Scholar
Anderson, S.R
(1993) Wackernagel’s revenge: Clitics, morphology, and the syntax of second position. Language, 69(1), 68–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulou, A., Español-Echevarría, M., & Prévost, P.H
(2010) The syntax/morphology interface in Spanish L2 acquisition: Focus on quantified DPs. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 55(2), 149–180. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Authier, M
(1992) A parametric account of V-governed arbitrary null arguments. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory, 10(3), 345–374. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, M.C
(1996) The Polysynthesis Parameter. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belleti, A., Bennati, E., & Sorace, A
(2007) Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 25, 657–689. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R
(1990) The logical problem of foreign language learning. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 3–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bonet, E
(1991) Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance Languages. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. MIT.
(1994) The person-case constraint: A morphological approach. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 22. The Morphology-Syntax Connection (pp. 33–52).Google Scholar
(2008) The person-case constraint and repair strategies. In R. D’Alessandro, S. Fischer, & G. Hrafnbjargarson (Eds.), Agreement Restrictions (pp. 103–128). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J
(1999) The Syntax of Spanish Multifunctional Clitics and Near-native Competence. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. McGill University, Montreal.
(2008) Acquisition of the Spanish plural by French L1 speakers: The role of transfer. In J.M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 270–298). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Camacho Taboada, V
(2006) La arquitectura de la gramática. Los clíticos pronominales románicos y eslavos. Sevilla: Publicaciones de la Universidad de Sevilla.Google Scholar
Carminati, M.N
(2002) The Processing of Italian Subject Pronouns. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Chomsky, N
(1981) Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1986) Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York, NY: Praeger. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1995) The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Lasnik, H
(1977) Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 425–504. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H
(1993) Principles and parameters theory. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, & T. Vennemann (Eds.), Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, Vol.1 (pp. 506–569). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Desrochers, A., Liceras, J.M., Spradlin, K.T., & Fernández, R
(2003) Can an on-line response latency task shed light on native and non-native competence in the deverbal compounds of Spanish? In J.M. Liceras, H. Zobl, & H. Goodluck (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2002. Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA-6) Conference: L2 Links (pp. 64–70). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, R
(1994) The Study of second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fontana, J
(1994) A variationist account of the development of the Spanish clitic system. In K. Beals (Ed.), Papers from the 13th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Vol. 2: The Parasession on Variation in Linguistic Theory (pp. 87–100). Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
(1997) On the integration of second position phenomena. In A. Kemenade & N. Vincent (Eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change (pp. 207–249). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Goodluck, H
(1986) Language acquisition and linguistic theory. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language Acquisition (2nd ed.) (pp. 49–68). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J
(1963) Universals of Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guijarro-Fuentes, P
(2012) The acquisition of interpretable features in L2 Spanish: Personal a*. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(4), 701–720. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Han, Z.-H
(2013) Forty years later: Updating the Fossilization Hypothesis. Language Teaching, 46, 133–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, A
(2005) Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry, 36, 533–64. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, R
(1975) French Syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1976) French relative que. In M. Luján & F. Hensey (Eds.), Current Studies in Romance Linguistics (pp. 255–299). Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, E., & Comrie, B
(1977) Noun phrase accessibility and universal grammar. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 63–99.Google Scholar
Kellerman, E
(1979) Transfer and non-transfer: Where we are now. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 2, 37–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, A
(1994) Morphosyntactic variation. In K. Beals (Ed.), Papers from the 30th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society (pp. 180–201). Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
(2001) Syntactic change. In M. Baltin & C. Collins (Eds.), Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory (pp. 699–729). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M.H
(1991) An Introduction to Second Language Research. London: Longman. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leonetti, M
(2004) Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 3, 75–114.Google Scholar
Liceras, J.M
(1985) The value of clitics in non-native Spanish. Second Language Research, 1(2), 151–168.Google Scholar
(1986) Linguistic Theory and Second Language Acquisition: The Spanish Nonnative Grammar of English Speakers. Tubingen: Gunter Narr. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1989) On some properties of the pro-drop parameter: Looking for missing subjects in non-native Spanish. In S. Gass & J. Schachter (Eds.), Language Acquisition: A Linguistic Approach (pp. 109–133). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2014) The Multiple Grammars Theory and the nature of L2 grammars. Commentary to L. Amaral and T. Roeper’s Multiple Grammars and second language representation. Second Language Research, 30(1), 47–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liceras, J.M., & Alba de la Fuente, A
Forthcoming). Native and non-native acceptability judgments on the anaphoric value of null and overt Spanish subject pronouns.
Liceras, J.M., & Fernández-Fuertes, R
(2013) Subject omission/production in child bilingual English and child bilingual Spanish: The view from linguistic theory. Workshop on Cross-linguistic influence in language contact. 19th International Congress of Linguistics (ICL 2013) – Geneva, July 2013.
Liceras, J.M., Mongeon, C., Cuza, A., Senn, C., & Spradlin, K.T
(2004) La adquisición en el aula sin input formal: Los compuestos exocéntricos de las interlenguas del español. Red-ELE, 0, 1–28.Google Scholar
Martínez-Sanz, C
(2011) Null and Overt Subjects in a Variable System: The Case of Dominican Spanish. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. University of Ottawa, Ottawa.
Montrul, S., & Bowles, M
(2009) Back to basics: Incomplete knowledge of differential object marking in Spanish heritage speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 363–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F.J
(1990) Explaining language universals. Journal of Linguistics, 26, 203–222. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perales, S., & Liceras, J.M
(2010) Looking for universals in the acquisition of L2 Spanish object clitics. In P. Guijarro-Fuentes & L. Dominguez (Eds.), New Directions in Language Acquisition: Romance Languages in the Generative Perspective (pp. 419–452). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A.T., & Liceras, J.M
(2002) The Acquisition of Spanish Morphosyntax: The L1/L2 Connection. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pomerleau, J
(2000) La adquisición del español en el aula: Los compuestos nominales de los franceses de Canadá. Unpublished Master thesis. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona.
Rivero, M.L
(1986) Parameters in the typology of clitics in Romance and Old Spanish. Language, 62(4), 774–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997) On two locations for complement clitic pronouns: Serbo-Croatian, Bulgarian and Old Spanish. In A. Kemenade & N. Vincent (Eds.), Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change (pp. 170–206). Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
(2004) Spanish quirky subjects, person restrictions and the person-case constraint. Linguistic Inquiry, 35(3), 494–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008) Oblique subjects and person restrictions in Spanish: A morphological approach. In R. D’Alessandro, S. Fischer, & G. Hrafnbjargarson (Eds.), Agreement Restrictions (pp. 215–250). Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberge, Y
(1986) Subject doubling, free inversion and null argument languages. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 31(1), 54–79.Google Scholar
(1990) The Syntactic Recoverability of Null Arguments. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I
(1993) Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French. Dorcrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothman, J
(2011) L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: the typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013) Cognitive economy, non-redundancy and typological primacy in L3 acquisition: evidence from initial stages of L3 Romance. In S. Baauw, F.A.C. Drijkoningen, & M. Pinto (Eds.), Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory (pp. 217–247). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
In press). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the typological primacy model of third language (L3) transfer: considering the role of timing of acquisition and proficiency in the previous languages. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. DOI logo
Schwartz, B., & Sprouse, R
(1994) L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L
(1972) Interlanguage. IRAL, 10(2), 209–231. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Selinker, L., & Lamendella, J
(1978) Two perspectives on fossilization in interlanguage learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 3(2), 143–191. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, M
(2006) The EPP and Null Subjects in Romance. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Newcastle University, UK.
Slabakova, R
(2009) L2 fundamentals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(2), 155–173. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sorace, A., & Filiaci, F
(2006) Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research, 22(3), 339–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E
(1982) Systematicity and attention in interlanguage. Language Learning, 32(1), 69–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, E
(1998) Nominative subjects and pro-drop Infl. Syntax, 1(2), 206–219. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A
(2006) On the second language acquisition of Spanish reflexive passives and reflexive impersonals by French- and English-speaking adults. Second Language Research, 22(1), 30–63. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela, E., Liceras, J.M., & López-Morelos, L.P
(2011) Ambiguous anaphora in L2 English and L2 Spanish. Paper presented at the BUCLD 36.
Wackernagel, J
(1892) Uber ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung. Indogermanische Forschungen, 1, 333–436.Google Scholar
White, L
(1985) The pro-drop parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 35(1), 47–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yang, C
(2002) Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Zobl, H., & Liceras, J.M
(2006) Competing grammars and parametric shifts in second language acquisition and the history of English and Spanish. In D. Bamman, T. Magnitskaia, & C. Zaller (Eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD) (pp. 713–724). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 3 other publications

Amenós-Pons, José, Aoife Ahern & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
2019. Feature reassembly across closely related languages: L1 French vs. L1 Portuguese learning of L2 Spanish Past Tenses. Language Acquisition 26:2  pp. 183 ff. DOI logo
Diaubalick, Tim & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes
2019. The strength of L1 effects on tense and aspect: How German learners of L2 Spanish deal with acquisitional problems. Language Acquisition 26:3  pp. 282 ff. DOI logo
Poeste, Meike, Natascha Müller & Laia Arnaus Gil
2019. Code-mixing and language dominance: bilingual, trilingual and multilingual children compared. International Journal of Multilingualism 16:4  pp. 459 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.