Cover not available
Part of
Advancedness in Second Language Spanish: Definitions, challenges, and possibilities
Edited by Mandy R. Menke and Paul A. Malovrh
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 31] 2021
► pp. 367–396

Chapter 16
Individual characteristics in advanced Spanish proficiency

Cluster and case-matching analyses on 127 advanced learners

ORCID logo | Michigan State University
ORCID logo | Michigan State University
ORCID logo | Michigan State University
In this article we investigated the learner characteristics of 127 Spanish language learners who achieved “advanced” in at least one tested skill (speaking, reading, or listening). We compared their profiles with case-control-matched non-advanced peers. All students took a background survey on their abroad experience, heritage status, use of Spanish-language resources outside of class, and learning interest. We performed a cluster analysis to map the learners’ profiles and found four clusters, one that achieved advanced in at least one skill, and three clusters that did not. An important factor that predicted overall cluster membership was outside-of-class use of Spanish-language resources, with the advanced Spanish learners using authentic Spanish-language resources significantly more. We discuss ways that programs can foster diverse advancedness profiles.
Keywords: advancedness, L2 Spanish, proficiency, learner profile, individual characteristics
Article outline
  • Background
    • Defining advanced proficiency as compared to intermediate proficiency
    • Why studying advanced proficiency attainment is important
  • The context of the current study
    • Variables: Learning interest/motivation, abroad experience, heritage status, and L2 resources
  • Method
    • Participants
    • Materials
    • Procedure
    • Analyses
  • Results
    • Results for advanced students (N = 127)
    • Cluster analysis
    • Results for non-advanced students (N = 127)
    • Cluster analysis
  • Discussion
  • Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 February 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.31.16win
References (39)
References
ACTFL & LTI. (n.d.). Alignment of the ACTFL proficiency ratings to the Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB). Retrieved from <[URL]> (10 July, 2020).
ACTFL (2012). ACTFL proficiency guidelines, 2012. Alexandria, VA: ACTFL. Retrieved from <[URL]> (10 July, 2020).
Aoki, M. A. (2013). The role of testing language proficiency as part of teacher certification. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 539–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M. T. (2011). Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 347–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bärenfänger, O., & Tschirner, E. (2012). Assessing evidence of validity of assigning CEFR ratings to the ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview (OPI) and the Oral Proficiency Interview by computer (OPIc) (Technical Report 2012-US-PUB-1). Leipzig, Germany: Institute for Test Research and Test Development.Google Scholar
Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Brooks, F. B., & Darhower, M. A. (2014). It takes a department! A study of the culture of proficiency in three successful foreign language teacher education programs. Foreign Language Annals, 47, 592–613. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carreira, M., & Kagan, O. (2018). Heritage language education: A proposal for the next 50 years. Foreign Language Annals, 51, 152–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cox, T. L. (2017). Understanding Intermediate-level speakers’ Strengths and weaknesses: An examination of OPIc tests from Korean learners of English. Foreign Language Annals, 50, 84–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, D. E. (2010). Study abroad: When, how long, and with what results? New data from the Russian front. Foreign Language Annals, 43, 6–26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). The development of L2 proficiency and literacy within the context of the federally supported overseas language training programs for Americans. In T. Brown & J. Brown (Eds.), To advanced proficiency and beyond: Theories and methods for developing superior second language ability (pp. 117–150). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
(2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. In N. C. Ellis & D. Larsen-Freeman (Eds.), Language as a complex adaptive system (pp. 230–248). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gilsan, E. W., Swender, E., & Surface, E. A. (2013). Oral proficiency standards and foreign language teacher candidates: Current findings and future research directions. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 264–289. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Herzog, M. (n.d.). An overview of the history of the ILR Language proficiency skill level descriptions and scale. Retrieved from: <[URL]> (10 July, 2020).
IBM SPSS. (n.d.). The SPSS TwoStep cluster component. Retrieved from <[URL]> (10 July, 2020).
Isbell, D., Winke, P., & Gass, S. (2019). Using the ACTFL OPIc to assess proficiency and monitor progress in a tertiary foreign languages program. Language Testing, 36, 439–465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
IBM. (n.d.). TwoStep cluster analysis. Retrieved from <[URL]> (10 July, 2020).
Isabelli, C. (2004). Study abroad for advanced foreign language majors: Optimal duration for developing complex structures. In H. Byrnes & H. H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 114–130). Boston, MA: Heinle.Google Scholar
Kagan, O. (2012). Intercultural competence of heritage language learners: Motivation, identity, language attitudes, and the curriculum. Proceedings of Intercultural Competence Conference, 2, 72–84.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., & Hansen, C. (2015). Developing superior language proficiency and analytical skills for the federal workforce. In T. Brown & J. Brown (Eds.), To advanced proficiency and beyond: Theory and methods for developing superior second language ability (pp. 43–72). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Kinginger, C. (2008). Language learning in study abroad: Case studies of Americans in France. The Modern Language Journal, 92, monograph. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kondo-Brown, K. (2005). Differences in language skills: Heritage language learner subgroups and foreign language learners? The Modern Language Journal, 89, 563–581. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Loomis, S. (2015). Using speaking test data to define the advanced proficiency level for L2 Arabic speakers. Foreign Language Annals, 48, 604–617. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moeller, A. J. (2013). Advanced low language proficiency: An achievable goal? The Modern Language Journal, 97, 549–553. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Magnan, S. S., Murphy, D., & Sahakyan, N. (2014). Introduction: Goals of collegiate learners and the standards for foreign language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 98(S1), 1–11. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maxim, H. H. (2004). Expanding visions for collegiate advanced foreign language learning. In H. Byrnes & H. H. Maxim (Eds.), Advanced foreign language learning: A challenge to college programs (pp. 180–193). Boston, MA: Heinle.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R., Myles, F., & Marsden, E. (2013). Second language learning theories (3rd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Norris, J. (2006). Assessing advanced foreign language learning and learners: From measurement constructs to educational uses. In H. Byrnes, H. D. Weger-Guntharp, & K. Sprang (Eds.), Educating for advanced foreign language capacities (pp. 167–187). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Ortega, L., & Byrnes, H. (2008). The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities: An introduction. In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 3–20). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Pearson, L., Fonseca-Greber, B., & Foell, K. (2006). Advanced proficiency for foreign language teacher candidates: What can we do to help them achieve this goal. Foreign Language Annals, 39, 507–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shively, R. L. (2013). Learning to be funny in Spanish during study abroad: L2 humor development. The Modern Language Journal, 97, 930–946. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Spenader, A. J. (2008). Acquiring oral language skills over the course of a high school year abroad: What’s in it for absolute beginners? In L. Ortega & H. Byrnes (Eds.), The longitudinal study of advanced L2 capacities (pp. 247–263). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strawbridge, T., Soneson, D., & Griffith, C. (2019). Lasting effects of pre-university language exposure on undergraduate proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 52, 776–797. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. L., & Reinhardt, J. (2008). Bridging activities: New media literacies, and advanced foreign language proficiency. CALICO Journal, 25, 558–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torres, J., Estremera, R., & Mohamed, S. (2019). The contribution of psychosocial and biographical variables to heritage language learners’ linguistic knowledge of Spanish. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 695–719. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valdés, G. (2001). Heritage language students: Profiles and possibilities. In J. Peyton, D. Ranard, & S. McGinnis (Eds.), Heritage languages in America preserving a national resource (pp. 37–57). Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Winke, P., & Gass, S. (2018). Individual differences in advanced proficiency. In P. A. Malovrh & A. Benati (Eds.), The handbook of advanced proficiency in second language acquisition (pp. 157–178). Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons. DOI logoGoogle Scholar