Cover not available
Part of
East and West of The Pentacrest: Linguistic studies in honor of Paula Kempchinsky
Edited by Timothy Gupton and Elizabeth Gielau
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 33] 2021
► pp. 157–188

Chapter 8
Case assignment in Spanish nominalizations

A self-paced reading investigation

 | University of Nevada, Reno
 | Augustana College
Spanish nominalizations, structures in which a determiner precedes an infinitive (el susurrar de Mario “Mario’s whispering”), present a syntactic contradiction in which a verb exists within a Determiner Phrase (DP). Speakers attest two types: nominalizations co-occurring with nominal modifiers (e.g., adjectives, genitive case for argument expression) and those whose modifiers are verbal (adverbs, nominative/accusative arguments). Absent cartographic approaches (Cinque, 2002) predetermining the order of functional heads, the point in the derivation at which verbal categories transition into nominal ones, and this transition’s effect on case assignment, are thus far unanswered empirical questions. Using a self-paced reading task, we adopt Alexiadou et al.’s (2011) proposal to experimentally determine the cases available in each nominalization type. Results show that speakers process nominal nominalizations as expected but may allow for the possibility of adverbial adjunction, as suggested by Ramírez (2003). We propose that this data reveals the value of empirically testing syntactic proposals.
Keywords: Verbal nominalization, Nominal nominalization, self-paced reading, experimental syntax
Article outline
  • Dedication
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Internal structure of the Spanish Determiner Phrase
  • 3.Data and nominalization paradigms
  • 4.Additional nominal properties
  • 5.Additional verbal properties
    • 5.1Agents/subjects
    • 5.2Themes/objects
    • 5.3Adverbs, tense, and outer/inner aspect
  • 6. Alexiadou et al. (2011)
  • 7.Methodology and predictions
    • 7.1Participants
    • 7.2Materials
  • 8.Results
    • 8.1Data treatment and analysis
    • 8.2Results: Analysis of reading times
  • 9.Discussion and conclusions
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 10 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.33.08lea
References (43)
References
Adger, D. (2003). Core syntax: A minimalist approach. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, A. (2010). Nominalizations: A probe into the architecture of grammar part II: The aspectual properties of nominalizations, and the lexicon vs. syntax debate. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(7), 512–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Iordăchioaia, G., & Schäfer, F. (2011). Scaling the variation in Romance and Germanic nominalizations. In P. Sleeman & H. Perridon (Eds.), The noun phrase in Romance and Germanic: Structure, variation, and change (pp. 25–40). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, A., Iordăchioaia, G., & Soare, E. (2010). Number/aspect interactions in the syntax of nominalizations: A distributed morphology approach. Journal of Linguistics, 46(3), 537–574. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, M., & Vinokurova, N. (2009). On agent nominalizations and why they are not like event nominalizations. Language, 85(3), 517–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. C. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, M. (2015). The subject position in Spanish nominalized infinitives. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 21(1.2).Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. (1993). The syntactic role of word markers in null nominal constructions. Probus, 5, 5–38. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borsley, R. D., & Kornfilt, J. (2000). Mixed extended projections. In R. D. Borsley (Ed.), Syntax and semantics, 32: The nature and functions of syntactic categories (pp. 101–131). Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., & Lasnik, H. (1993). The theory of principles and parameters. In J. Jacobs, A. von Stechow, W. Sternefeld, & T. Vennemann (Eds.), Syntax: An international handbook of contemporary research (1st ed., pp. 506–569). De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(Ed.). (2002). Functional structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures, 1. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, M. (2006). A frequency dictionary of Spanish: Core vocabulary for learners. Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Miguel, E. (1996). Nominal infinitives in Spanish: An aspectual constraint. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La Revue Canadienne de Linguistique, 41(1), 29–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A., & Varela, S. (2006). Verb classes with eventive infinitives in Spanish. In N. Sagarra & A. J. Toribio (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 9th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 24–33). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Ferreira, F., & Clifton Jr., C. (1986). The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 25(3), 348–368. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fine, A. B., Jaeger, F. T., Farmer, T. A., & Qian, T. (2013). Rapid expectation adaptation during syntactic comprehension. PLoS ONE, 8(10), Article e77661. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S. J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (pp. 111–176). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, H. (2007). External arguments: On the independence of voice and v. Paper presented at the XXX GLOW Colloquium, University of Tromsø, 2007.
Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 111(2), 228–238. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kempchinsky, P. (2000). Aspect projections and predicate type. In H. Campos, E. Herburger, A. Morales-Front, & T. J. Walsh (Eds.), Hispanic linguistics at the turn of the millennium: Papers from the 3rd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 171–187). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
(2004). Romance SE as an aspectual element. In J. Auger, C. J. Clements, & B. Vance (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the 33rd linguistic symposium on Romance languages (LSRL), Bloomington, Indiana, April 2003 (pp. 239–256). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lenth, R. V. (2016). Least-squares means: the R package lsmeans. Journal of Statistical Software, 69(1), 1–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López, L. (2018). Case and the event structure of nominalizations. Linguistic Inquiry, 49(1), 85–121. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, A. (2005). Objects out of the lexicon: Objects as event. Ms, New York University.Google Scholar
Masullo, P., & Depiante, M. (2004). Variable vs. intrinsic features in Spanish nominal ellipsis. Ms, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, I. (1999). On the constituent structure of Catalan verbs. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 33, 279–322.Google Scholar
Pakulak, E., & Neville, H. J. (2010). Proficiency differences in syntactic processing of monolingual native speakers indexed by event-related potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(12), 2728–2744. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez Vázquez, E. (2001). A mixed extended projection: The nominalized infinitive in Spanish and Italian. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica, 2, 143–158.Google Scholar
Piñeros, C. (2009). Estructura de los sonidos del español [Structure of the sounds of Spanish]. Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Plann, S. (1981). The two el + infinitive constructions in Spanish. Linguistic Analysis, 7(3), 203–240.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. (1991). The syntax of event structure. Cognition, 4, 47–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. <[URL]>
Ramírez, C. J. (2003). The Spanish nominalized infinitives: A proposal for clarification. Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, 117–133.Google Scholar
Rohde, D. (2005). Linger experiment presentation software. <[URL]>
Street, J. A., & Dąbrowska, E. (2010). More individual differences in language attainment: How much do adult native speakers of English know about passives and quantifiers? Lingua, 120(8), 2080–2094. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ticio, E. M. (2005). Locality and anti-locality in Spanish DPs. Syntax, 8(3), 229–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Travis, L. (2000). Event structure in syntax. In C. L. Tenny, & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Events as grammatical objects: The converging perspectives of lexical semantics and syntax (pp. 145–185). CSLI.Google Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in philosophy. Cornell University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoon, J. H. S., & Bonet-Farran, N. (1991). The ambivalent nature of Spanish infinitives. In D. Wanner & D. A. Kibbee (Eds.), New analyses in Romance linguistics: Selected papers from the linguistic symposium on Romance languages XVIII, Urbana-Champaign, April 7–9, 1988 (pp. 353–370). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zagona, K. (1999). Voice and aspect. In J. A. Franco, A. Landa, & J. Martín (Eds.), Grammatical analyses in Basque and Romance linguistics: Papers in honor of Mario Saltarelli (pp. 279–293). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar