Cover not available
Part of
Sound, Syntax and Contact in the Languages of Asturias
Edited by Guillermo Lorenzo
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 36] 2022
► pp. 15–44

Chapter 2
Asturian and Asturian Spanish at the syntax-phonology interface

Cliticization phenomena and beyond

 | Universidad de Oviedo | University of Manchester
 | Instituto Cervantes
A number of movement-related phenomena from Asturian as well as from the Spanish spoken in the Principality of Asturias are amenable to accounts where the Pronounce-Highest-Copy requirement in Phonetic Form can be overridden if convergence so demands. Therefore, the evidence adduced here supports the view that the requirements imposed by the Phonetic Form component may take precedence over purely syntactic requirements. In this connection, we argue for a novel analysis of the enclitic-proclitic contrast in Asturian and Asturian Spanish in finite and non-finite contexts, alongside extensions to other constructions, which add to the ample stock of phenomena supporting the rather successful Copy Theory of Movement.
Keywords: pronominal clitics, morphology, PF, copy theory, pronounce lower copy, subject-verb inversion, imperatives, enclisis, proclisis, Asturian, Asturian Spanish
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical background: The Copy Theory of Movement (CTM)
    • 2.1Pronounce lower copy/Lower copy pronunciation
  • 3.This is PF’s doing: Asturian and Asturian Spanish clitics
    • 3.1Proclisis and enclisis in Asturian finite contexts
    • 3.2Clitic directionality in infinitival imperatives in Asturian Spanish
    • 3.3Optionality in certain infinitival environments in Asturian
  • 4.Additional constructions amenable to a PLC/LCP account: The case of postverbal subjects in constituent questions in Asturian
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 1 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.36.02vil
References (62)
References
Academia de la Llingua Asturiana (2001). Gramática de la llingua asturiana (3rd edition). Academia de la Llingua Asturiana.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P. (1995). Null subjects [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
(2000). Clitics: A Window into the Null Subject Property. In J. Costa. (ed.). Portuguese syntax: New comparative studies (pp. 31–93). OUP.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, J. D. (1994). What does adjacency do? In H. Harley & C. Phillips. (eds.). MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 22, 1–32.Google Scholar
(2002). A-chains at the PF interface: Copies and ‘covert’ movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 20, 197–267. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric & Ángel J. Gallego. 2008. Clitic climbing by (long distance) agree. Linguistic Institute in the Old World. Workshop on explanatory proposals of clitics. Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, 18–29 August 2008.Google Scholar
Bonet, E. (1991). Morphology after syntax: Pronominal clitics in romance [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Bošković, Ž. & Jairo, N. (2007). The copy theory of movement: A view from PF. In N. Corver & J. Nunes. (eds.), The Copy Theory of movement (pp. 13–74). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Ž. (2001). On the nature of the syntax-phonology interface: Cliticization and related phenomena. Elsevier Science. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). On the clitic switch in Greek imperatives. In O. Tomić. (ed.). Balkan Syntax and Semantics (pp. 269–291). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Rescue by PF deletion, traces as (non-)interveners, and the that-trace effect. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 1–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). When are negative imperatives banned? In S. Halupka-Rešetar, M. Marković, T. Milićev and N. Milićević. (eds.). Selected papers from SinFonIJA 3 (pp. 6–17). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
(2015). Phrasal movement: Wh-movement. In A. Fábregas, J. Mateu, and M. Putnam. (eds.). Contemporary linguistic parameters (pp. 250–280). Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Brucart, J. M. (1993). Sobre la estructura de SCOMP en español. In A. Viana. (ed.). Sintaxi: Teoria i perspectives (pp. 59–102). Amadeu Pagès.Google Scholar
Buesa-García, C. (2008). The subject-gap restriction in Spanish Wh-questions: Some empirical and theoretical consequences. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Connecticut.
Campos, H. (1989). Clitic position in modern Gallegan. Lingua, 77, 13–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. MIT Press.Google Scholar
(2001). Beyond explanatory adequacy. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 20.Google Scholar
(2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corver, N. & Nunes, J. (eds.) (2007). The Copy Theory of movement. John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldhausen, I. (2016). The relation between prosody and syntax: The case of different types of left-dislocations in Spanish. In M. Amstrong, N. Henriksen, and M. M. Vanrell. (eds.), Intonational grammar in Ibero-Romance approaches across linguistic subfields (pp. 153–180). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fernández-Rubiera, F. J. (2009). Clitics at the edge: Clitic placement in Western Iberian Romance languages [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Georgetown University.
(2014). When phonology undergenerates: Evidence from Asturian enclitic structures. Proceedings of the 40th Berkeley Linguistics Society, 85–101. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franks, S. (1998). Clitics in Slavic. [Paper presentation] Comparative Slavic Morphosyntax Workshop, Spencer, Indiana.
Kayne, R. S. (1991). Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 647–686.Google Scholar
(1992). Italian negative infinitival imperatives and clitic climbing. In L. Tasmowski and A. Zribi-Hertz. (eds.). Hommages à Nicolas Ruwet (pp. 300–312). Communication & Cognition.Google Scholar
(2013). Comparative Syntax. Lingua, 130, 132–151. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koopman, H. & Sportiche, D. (1991). The position of subjects. Lingua, 85, 211–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lorenzo, G. (1994). Optionality in the Placement of Asturian Clitics. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(1), 93–120.Google Scholar
(in progress). Generalized Clicitization: A contiguity view of Asturian clitics. [Manuscript in preparation] University of Oviedo.
Nunes, J. (2004). Linearization of chains and sideward movement. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, F. & Olarrea, A. (2006). Microvariation in Caribbean/non Caribbean Spanish interrogatives. Probus, 18, 59–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, F. (1997). Word order and clausal structure of Spanish and other Romance languages [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. City University of New York.
Ortega-Santos, I. (2006a). On new information focus, sentence stress sssignment conditions and the Copy Theory: A Spanish conspiracy. University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics, 14, 188–212.Google Scholar
(2006b). On postverbal subjects, PF and the Copy Theory: The Spanish case. In N. Sagarra, and A. J. Toribio. (eds.). Proceedings of the Joint Meeting of The Hispanic Linguistics Symposium & The Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 56–66). Cascadilla University Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. (1997). Optimality theory and syntax: Movement and pronunciation. In D. Archangeli and T. Langendoen. (eds.). Optimality theory: An overview (pp. 134–170). Blackwell.Google Scholar
(1998). Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. In P. Barbosa, D. Fox, P. Hagstrom, M. McGinnis and D. Pesetsky. (eds.). Is the best good enough (pp. 337–383). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Radford, A. (2016). Analysing English sentences. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Real Academia Española (RAE) and Asociación de Academias de la Lengua Española (ASALE) (2009). Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Espasa.Google Scholar
Reglero, L. (2004). On A’ dependencies in Spanish and Basque [Unpublished doctoral dissertation] University of Connecticut.
(2007). Wh-in-situ interrogatives in Spanish. Probus, 19, 267–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rivero, M. L. (1986). Parameters in the typology of clitics in Romance and Old Spanish. Language, 62, 774–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1982). Issues in Italian syntax. Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, I. (2010). Agreement and head movement: Clitics, incorporation, and defective goals. MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saab, A. (2008). Hacia una teoría de la identidad parcial en la elipsis [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidad de Buenos Aires.
Stjepanović, S. (1999). What do second position cliticization, scrambling, and multiple wh-fronting have in common? [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Connecticut.
Suñer, M. (1994). V-movement and the licensing of argumental wh-phrases in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 12, 335–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teso, E. del (2015). L’amestáu urbanu. Cuestiones de normativa y llingua escrita. Lletres asturianes, 113, 11–26.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1984). On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry, 15, 103–129.Google Scholar
Trinh, T. (2011). Edges and linearization. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation] Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Villa-García, J. (2013). On inversion in Spanish, the Copy Theory of movement, and salvation in PF. In D. García Velasco, S. González y Fernández-Corugedo, F. Martín Miguel, A. Ojea and R. Pérez Lorido. (eds.). A life in language. Estudios homenaje al Prof. José Luis González Escribano (pp. 387–407). Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo.Google Scholar
(2018). Properties of the extended verb phrase: Agreement, the structure of INFL, and subjects. In K. L. Geeslin. (ed.). The Cambridge handbook of Spanish linguistics (pp. 329–350). Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019a). Clitic climbing (or lack thereof) and the Copy Theory of movement. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019b). Dialectal variation in clitic placement in Andalusian and Asturian Spanish negative infinitival imperatives. In Á. Gallego. (ed.). The syntactic variation of Spanish dialects (pp. 127–158). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019c). Spanglish, la encrucijada del bilingüismo (Spanglish: the crossroads of bilingualism). [Conference session]. The Cultural Classroom Series, La Voz de Avilés – El Comercio.Google Scholar
Villa-García, J. & Ott, D. (in progress). A biclausal account of recomplementation in Spanish. [Manuscript in preparation] University of Manchester and University of Ottawa.
Zubizarreta, M. L. & Vergnaud, J. -R. (2000). Phrasal stress and syntax. [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, M. L. (2012). A note on the Spanish left periphery. In L. Brugé, A. Cardinaletti, G. Giusti, N. Munaro and C. Poletto. (eds.). Functional heads. The cartography of syntactic structures, vol. 7. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar