Cover not available
Part of
Sound, Syntax and Contact in the Languages of Asturias
Edited by Guillermo Lorenzo
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 36] 2022
► pp. 45–72

Chapter 3
Semantic anchoring

Evidence from Asturian clitic placement

 | University of Central Florida
In Asturian, and differently from its western Iberian neighbors (i.e., Galician and European Portuguese), enclisis (or postverbal clitics) is also attested in embedded contexts. This syntactic structure is shown to give rise to a [+epistemic] reading of the content in the embedded clause, an interpretation that may be anchored either to the speaker, to the matrix subject, or to an intermediate subject. Following previous work, I show that both the different clitic patterns attested and the [±epistemic] anchoring these patterns give rise to can receive a principled account under the analysis entertained. In turn, this chapter contributes to further our understanding of how syntax works in parallel with semantics to derive these syntactic structures and their interpretation.
Keywords: enclisis, epistemicity, syntax-semantics interface, embedded clauses, left-periphery, Asturian
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Previous approaches to enclisis/proclisis alternations
  • 3.Fin° and clitics: A cartographic account of enclisis/proclisis
  • 4.The role of Fin° in deriving enclisis/proclisis in matrix and embedded contexts
  • 5.Force°/Fin° selection and semantic [epistemic] interpretation
  • 6.Further evidence: Multiple embedding in Asturian
  • 7.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 1 March 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.36.03fer
References (46)
References
Academia de la Llingua Asturiana [ALLA] (2001). Gramática de la llingua asturiana [Tercera edición]. Academia de la Llingua Asturiana.Google Scholar
Andrés Díaz, R. d’. (1993). Allugamientu de los pronomes átonos col verbu n’asturianu. Publicaciones del Departamentu de filoloxía española.Google Scholar
Barbosa, P. (1995). Null subjects [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Campos, H. (1989). Clitic position in modern Gallegan. Lingua, 77(1), 13–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In R. Freidin, C. P. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta. (eds.). Foundational issues in linguistics theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud (pp. 133–166). MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Contreras, H. (1978). El orden de las palabras en español. Cátedra.Google Scholar
Costa, J. & Martins, A. M. (2011). On Focus movement in European Portuguese. Probus, 23(2), 217–245. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demonte, V. & Fernández-Soriano, O. (2009). Force and Finiteness in the Spanish complementizer system. Probus, 21(1), 23–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duarte, I. (1987). A construção de topicalização na gramática do portugués [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidade de Lisboa.
Fernández-Rubiera, F. J. (2009). Clitics at the edge: Clitic placement in western Iberian Romance languages. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Georgetown University.
(2010). Forceº, Finitenessº, and the placement of clitics in Western Iberian. Estudos de Lingüística Galega, 2(1), 75–95.Google Scholar
(2012). La conexión germánico-románica: Fenómenos matriz en contextos subordinados. In X. Viejo. (ed.). Estudios sobre variación sintáctica peninsular (pp. 9–30). Trabe.Google Scholar
(2013). Clisis revisited: Root and embedded contexts in western Iberian. In C. M. Salvesen & H. P. Helland. (eds.). Challenging clitics (pp. 55–86). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). CP-complements to assertive predicates: Their syntax and interpretation. Revista Internacional de Lingüística Iberoamericana, 26(2), 187–202.Google Scholar
Fernández Soriano, O. (ed.). (1993). Los pronombres átonos. Taurus.Google Scholar
González i Planas, F. (2007). Sintaxis de los clíticos pronominales en asturleonés. Ianua. Revista de filología románica, 7, 15–35.Google Scholar
Haegeman, L. (2012). Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and the composition of the left periphery. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heycock, C. (2006). Embedded root phenomena. In M. Everaert and H. van Riemsdijk. (eds.). The Blackwell companion to syntax. Volume II (pp. 174–209). Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hooper, J. & Thompson, S. (1973). On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry, 4(4), 465–497.Google Scholar
Kayne, R. S. (1991). Romance clitics, Verb-movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry, 22(4). 647–686Google Scholar
Lema, J. & Rivero, M. L. (1990). Long head movement: ECP vs. HMC. Cahiers Linguistiques d’Ottawa, 18, 61–78.Google Scholar
(1991). Types of verbal movement in Old Spanish: Modals, futures, and perfects. Probus, 3(3), 237–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longa, V. M. & Lorenzo, G. (2001). Movimiento nuclear y economía: Valor de la concordancia y movilidad de los clíticos en los romances occidentales. Verba, 28, 101–124.Google Scholar
Lorenzo, G. (1994). Optionality in the placement of Asturian clitics. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics, 4(1), 93–120.Google Scholar
(1995). La sintaxis de los clíticos del asturiano en el contexto de las lenguas romances. Desarrollo y evaluación de algunas hipótesis. Verba, 22, 191–227.Google Scholar
Martins, A. M. (1994a). Enclisis, VP-deletion and the nature of Sigma. Probus, 6(2–3), 173–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1994b). Clíticos na história do português. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Universidade de Lisboa.
Olarrea, A. (1997). Pre- and postverbal subject positions in Spanish: A minimalist account. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Washington.
Ordóñez, F. (1998). Word order and clause structure in Spanish and other Romance languages. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. CUNY. Published as Ordóñez (2000).
(2000). The clausal structure of Spanish: A comparative study. Garland.Google Scholar
Raposo, E. P. (2000). Clitic positions and verb movement. In J. Costa. (ed.). Portuguese syntax: New comparative studies (pp. 266–298). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Raposo, E. P. & Uriagereka, J. (2005). Clitic placement in western Iberian: A minimalist view. In G. Cinque. and R. S. Kayne. (eds.). The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax (pp. 639–697). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left-periphery. In L. Haegeman. (ed.). Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax (pp. 281–337). Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Locality and left periphery. In A. Beletti. (ed.). Structures and beyond: The cartography of syntactic structures (pp. 223–251). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rouveret, A. (1992). Clitic placement, focus and the Wackernagel position in European Portuguese. In L. Rizzi. (ed.). Clitics in Romance and Germanic. Eurotyp working papers [Theme Group 8: Clitics], 3, 103–139.Google Scholar
Sirguðsson, H. Á. (2004). Meaningful silence, meaningless sounds. In P. Pica. (ed.). Linguistic variation yearbook. Volume 4 (pp. 235–359). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sportiche, D. (1996). Clitic constructions. In J. Rooryck & L. Zaring. (eds.). Phrase structure and the lexicon (pp. 213–276). Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uriagereka, J. (1988). On Government. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Connecticut.
(1995a). An F position in western Romance. In K. Kiss. (ed.). Discourse configurational languages (pp. 153–176). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
(1995b). Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry, 26(1), 79–123.Google Scholar
Viejo Fernández, X. (2008). Pensar asturiano. Ensayos programáticos de sintaxis asturiana. Trabe.Google Scholar
Villa-García, J. (2012). Recomplementation and locality of movement in Spanish. Probus, 24(2), 257–314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wackernagel, J. (1892). Über ein Gesetz der indogermanischen Wortstellung, Indogermanische Forschungen, 1(1), 333–436. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, R. (1991). Syntactic properties of sentential negation: A comparative study of Romance languages. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pennsylvania.
(1997). Negation and clausal structure: A comparative study of Romance languages. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar