Cover not available
Part of
Innovative Approaches to Research in Hispanic Linguistics: Regional, diachronic, and learner profile variation
Edited by Sara Fernández Cuenca, Tiffany Judy and Lauren Miller
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 38] 2023
► pp. 196–224

Chapter 9
Individual differences do not affect trill variation by advanced learners of Spanish

 | SUNY Albany
 | University of North Carolina Wilmington
The current study analyzed whether variation in trill pronunciation by advanced learners of Spanish is conditioned by individual differences in phonological short-term memory, executive working memory, second language vocabulary score, and years of study, as well as five linguistic variables. We found that none of the individual difference variables significantly affected variation, while surrounding phonetic context and lexical stress were important predictors of this variation. The findings suggest that these individual differences do not impact trill variation by advanced learners, possibly because these factors are more important at lower levels of proficiency, or because trill variability is largely impacted by phonetic factors due to the well-known articulatory difficulty of this sound.
Keywords: trill, second language acquisition, individual differences, variation
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Native speaker trill production
  • 3.Second language learner trill production
  • 4.Individual differences and L2 phonological skills
    • 4.1Working memory
    • 4.2Phonological short-term memory
    • 4.3Executive working memory
    • 4.4Vocabulary size
  • 5.The current study
  • 6.Methods
    • 6.1Participants
    • 6.2Tasks
    • 6.3Phonological short-term memory
    • 6.4Working memory
    • 6.5Vocabulary measure
    • 6.6Oral response prompt task
    • 6.7Background questionnaire
    • 6.8Coding
      • 6.8.1Dependent variable
      • 6.8.2Independent variables
    • 6.9Analysis
  • 7.Results
    • 7.1Distribution of variants
    • 7.2Regression analyses
  • 8.Discussion
  • 9.Conclusion
  • References
Published online: 7 June 2023
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.38.09zha
References (46)
References
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). Academic Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2019). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 6.0.46, retrieved 15 February 2019 from [URL]
Bongiovanni, S., Long, A. Y., Solon, M., & Willis, E. W. (2015). The effect of short-term study abroad on second language Spanish phonetic development. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8(2), 243–283. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bradley, T. G. (2006). Phonetic realizations of /sr/ clusters in Latin American Spanish. In M. Díaz-Campos (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonetics and Phonology (pp. 1–13). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., Kroos, C., & Tyler, M. D. (2012). Second language learners’ vocabulary expansion is associated with improved second language vowel intelligibility. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33(3), 643–664. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bundgaard-Nielsen, R. L., Best, C. T., & Tyler, M. D. (2011). Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33(3), 433–461. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cerviño-Povedano, E., & Mora, J. C. (2011). Investigating Catalan learners of English over-reliance on duration: Vowel cue weighting and phonological short-term memory. In K. Dziubalska-Kolaczyk, M. Wrembel & M. Kul (Eds.), Achievements and perspectives in SLA of speech: New Sounds 2010 (Vol. 1, pp. 56–64). Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2015). Spanish EFL learners’ categorization of /i:-ɪ/ and phonological short-term memory. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 18–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cowan, N. (2017). The many faces of working memory and short-term storage. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 24, 1158–1170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daidone, D., & Darcy, I. (2021). Vocabulary size is a key factor in predicting second language lexical encoding accuracy. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 688356. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Daidone, D., & Zahler, S. (2021). A variationist analysis of second language Spanish trill production. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 14(1), 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Darcy, I., Park, H., & Yang, C. L. (2015). Individual differences in L2 acquisition of English phonology: The relation between cognitive abilities and phonological processing. Learning and Individual Differences, 40, 63–72. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Campos, M. (2008). Variable production of the trill in spontaneous speech: Sociolinguistic implications. In L. Colantoni & J. Steele (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology (pp. 47–58). Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Diez Canseco, S. (1997). Language variation: The influence of speakers’ attitudes and gender on sociolinguistic variables in the Spanish of Cusco, Perú [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Pittsburgh.
Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). EsPal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods 45(4), 1246–1258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Face, T. L. (2006). Intervocalic rhotic pronunciation by adult learners of Spanish as a second language. In C. A. Klee & T. L. Face (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 7th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese as First and Second Languages (pp. 47–58). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Georgiou, G. P., Perfilieva, N. V., & Tenizi, M. (2020). Vocabulary size leads to better attunement to L2 phonetic differences: Clues from Russian learners of English. Language Learning and Development, 16(4), 382–398. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, N. (2014). Sociophonetic analysis of phonemic trill variation in two sub-varieties of Peninsular Spanish. Journal of Linguistic Geography, 2(1), 4–24. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, N., & Willis, E. W. (2010). Acoustic characterization of phonemic trill production in Jerezano Andalusian Spanish. In M. Ortega-Llebaria (Ed.), Selected proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Laboratory Approaches to Spanish Phonology (pp. 115–127). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Hualde, J. I. (2005). The sounds of Spanish. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hurtado, L. M., & Estrada, C. (2010). Factors influencing the second language acquisition of Spanish vibrants. The Modern Language Journal, 94(1), 74–86. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Inceoglu, S. (2019). L2 French vowel production: The relationship with speech perception and phonological memory. In J. Levis, C. Nagle, & E. F. Todey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th Pronunciation in Second Language Learning and Teaching Conference (pp. 147–157). Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Izura, C., Cuetos, F., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). Lextale-Esp: A test to rapidly and efficiently assess the Spanish vocabulary size. Psicológica, 35(1), 49–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. E. (2009). Getting off the GoldVarb standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 359–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, P., & Johnson, K. (2010). A course in phonetics (6th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Lamy, D. (2015). A sociophonetic analysis of trill production in Panamanian Spanish. In R. Klassen, J. M. Liceras & E. Valenzuela (Eds.), Hispanic linguistics at the crossroads: Theoretical linguistics, language acquisition and language contact. Proceedings of the Hispanic Linguistics Symposium 2013 (pp. 313–336). John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, A. M. (2004). Coarticulatory effects on Spanish trill production. In A. Augustine, W. Warren & S.-H. Park (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Texas Linguistics Society conference (pp. 116–127). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Lipski, J. (1994). Latin American Spanish. Longman.Google Scholar
Llompart, M. (2021). Phonetic categorization ability and vocabulary size contribute to the encoding of difficult second-language phonological contrasts into the lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 24(3), 481–496. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavioral Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melero García, F. (2015). Análisis acústica de la vibrante múltiple en el español de Valencia (España). Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 8(1), 183–206. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Caracterización sociofonética de la vibrante múltiple en Madrid: Un análisis variacionista. IULC Working Papers, 18(1), 1–41.Google Scholar
Meuller, S. T., & Piper, B. J. (2014). The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL test battery. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 250–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mora, J. C., & Darcy, I. (2017). The relationship between cognitive control and pronunciation in a second language. In T. Isaacs & P. Trofimovich (Eds.), Second language pronunciation assessment: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 95–120). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Nagle, C. (2013). A reexamination of ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: Length of immersion, motivation, and phonological short-term memory. In E. Voss, S.-J. D. Tai, & Z. Li (Eds.), Selected proceedings of the 2011 Second Language Research Forum: Converging theory and practice (pp. 148–161). Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Olsen, M. K. (2016). Limitations of the influence of English phonetics and phonology on L2 Spanish rhotics. Borealis: An International Journal of Hispanic Linguistics, 5(1), 313–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posedel, J., Emery, L., Souza, B., & Fountain, C. (2012). Pitch perception, working memory, and second language phonological production. Psychology of Music, 40(4), 508–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rose, M. (2010). Intervocalic tap and trill production in the acquisition of Spanish as a second language. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3(2), 379–419. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Simard, D., Molokopeeva, T., & Zhang, Y. Q. (2020). The contribution of working memory to L2 French pronunciation among adult language learners. Canadian Modern Language Review, 76(1), 50–69. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Solé, M.-J. (2002). Aerodynamic characteristics of trills and phonological patterning. Journal of Phonetics, 30(4), 655–688. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trude, A. M., & Tokowicz, N. (2011). Negative transfer from Spanish and English to Portuguese pronunciation: The roles of inhibition and working memory. Language Learning, 61(1), 259–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weech, A. M. (2009). Second language acquisition of the Spanish tap and trill in a contact learning environment [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Brigham Young University.
Willis, E. W. (2007). An acoustic study of the “pre-aspirated trill” in narrative Cibaeño Dominican Spanish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 37(1), 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zahler, S., & Daidone, D. (2014). A variationist account of trill /r/ usage in the Spanish of Málaga. IULC Working Papers, 14(2), 17–42.Google Scholar
Zahler, S., & Lord, G. (2022). The role of phonological short-term memory in second language phonology: Exploring vowel quality among English-speaking learners of Spanish. Revista Española de Lingüistica Aplicada, 35(1), 173–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar