Cover not available
Part of
New Perspectives on the Study of Ser and Estar
Edited by Isabel Pérez-Jiménez, Manuel Leonetti and Silvia Gumiel-Molina
[Issues in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics 5] 2015
► pp. 147–172

Location and the estar/ser alternation

This article is concerned with the syntactic factors that underlie the Spanish ser ‘BESER’/estar ‘BEESTAR’ alternation. In line with recent studies which have argued that a prepositional feature is crucial to the alternation, it is argued here following Zagona (2012) that a syntactic process of Locative agreement is crucial to the alternation: a light verb BE that agrees with either a spatial or a temporal locative constituent is spelled out as estar ‘BEESTAR’. This approach permits a unified account of copular and auxiliary estar ‘BEESTAR’. In addition, it accounts for the fact that the stage-level effect that is often attributed to estar is not found in contexts where the copula agrees with a predicate of spatial location.
Keywords: estar, individual-level predicates, locative agreement, locatives, ser, stage-level predicates
Published online: 28 October 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ihll.5.06zag
References (31)
References
Bello, A. (1908). Gramática de la lengua castellana: destinada al uso de los americanos. Paris, France: R. Roger & F. Chernoviz.Google Scholar
Bosque, I. (1999). El sintagma adjetival. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Dir.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 217–310). Madrid, Spain: RAE/Espasa.Google Scholar
Brucart, J.M. (2012). Copular alternation in Spanish and Catalan attributive sentences, Linguística . Revista de Estudos Linguísticos da Universidade do Porto, vol. 7 (pp. 9–43).Google Scholar
Camacho, J. (2012). Ser and estar: Individual/stage level predicates or aspect? In J.I. Hualde, A. Olarrea & E. O’Rourke (Eds.), The handbook of hispanic linguistics (Blackwell handbooks in linguistics) (pp. 453–476). Oxford, England: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1994). Aspectual licensing of predicates in Spanish. In V. Samiian (Ed.), Proceedings of the Western Conference on Linguistics (WECOL), 23 (pp. 26–38). Fresno, CA: Department of Linguistics, CalState University.Google Scholar
Carrasco Gutiérrez, A., Camus Bergareche, B., Martínez-Atienza, M., & García García-Gutiérrez, M. (2006). Diccionario de perífrasis verbales. Madrid, Spain: Gredos.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (2008). On phases. In R. Freiden, C. Otero & M.L. Zubizarreta (Eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory (pp. 133–166). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Contreras, H., & Zagona, K. (2014). A note on participial adjectives. Paper presented at the Coloquium on Generative Grammar Workshop in Honor of Violeta Demonte. Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, Madrid, Spain: May 30, 2014.
Demirdache, H., & Uribe-Etxebarria, M. (2000). The primitives of temporal relations. In R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (Eds.), Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik (pp. 157–186). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Demonte, V. (1999). El adjetivo. In I. Bosque & V. Demonte (Dir.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 129–217). Madrid, Spain: RAE/Espasa.Google Scholar
Embick, D., & Marantz, A. (2008). Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry, 39(1), 1–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Á., & Uriagereka, J. (2011). The lexical syntax of ser and estar (Unpublished manuscript). Barcelona, Spain: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona and College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Gehrke, B. (2008). Ps in motion: On the semantics and syntax of P elements and motion events. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Utrecht, The Netherlands: LOT, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics. Retrieved from <[URL]> Google Scholar
Gumiel-Molina, S., Moreno-Quibén, N., & Pérez-Jiménez, I. (2015). Comparison classes and the relative/absolute distinction: A degree-based compositional account of the ser/estar alternation in Spanish. To appear in B. Gehrke & E. Castroviejo (eds.), Degree and manner modification across categories, special volume of Natural Language and Linguistic Theory. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hale, K. (1986). Notes on world view and semantic categories: Some Warlpiri examples. In P. Muysken & H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.), Features and projections (pp. 233–254). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.Google Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1998). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In K. Hale & S.J. Keyser (Eds.), The view from Building 20 (pp. 53–109). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, R.S. (1993). Towards a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica, 47(1), 3–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, R.K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), 335–391.Google Scholar
Lloyd, P. (1987). From Latin to Spanish. Philadeplphia, PE: Memoirs of the American Philosophical Society, Vol. 173.Google Scholar
Luján, M. (1981). The Spanish copulas as aspectual indicators. Lingua, 54, 165–210. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Miguel, E. (1990). El aspecto verbal en una gramática generativa del español (Doctoral Dissertation). Madrid, Spain: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the semantics of English. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Roby, D.B. (2009). Aspect and the categorization of states: The case of ser and estar in Spanish. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, C. (2005). Semi-copulas. In P. Kempchinsky & R. Slabakova (Eds.), Aspectual inquiries (pp. 121–145). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. (1992). Ser and estar: A matter of aspect. In NELS 22 Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 411–425). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
Smith, C.S. (1997). The parameter of aspect (2nd ed.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
di Tulio, A. (1997). La estructura del sintagma adjetivo: Adjetivo+DE+X. In O. Kovacci (Ed.), La gramática: desarrollos actuales, Signo y Seña, 7, 189–231.Google Scholar
Vlach, F. (1981). The semantics of the progressive. In P. Tedeschi & A. Zaenen (Eds.), Tense and aspect (Syntax and semantics 14) (pp. 271–292). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zagona, K. (2012). Ser and estar: Phrase structure and aspect. In C. Nishida & C. Russi (Eds.), Building a bridge between linguistic communities of the Old and the New World, Cahiers Chronos, 25 (pp. 303–327). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Zagona, K., & Contreras, H. (2011). Sobre la incompatibilidad entre ser y los adjetivos con complemento. In M.V. Escandell-Vidall, M. Leonetti & C. Sánchez López (Eds.), 60 problemas de gramática(pp. 106–110). Madrid, Spain: Akal.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Bartens, Angela & Ilpo Kempas
2022. «A praia está perto»: Zum Gebrauch des Verbsestarin Ausdrücken der statischen Lage im Portugiesischen. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 138:3 ► pp. 851 ff. DOI logo
Mangialavori Rasia, M. Eugenia
2018. (And yet) another proposal for ser/estar . In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 13 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 13], ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 6 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.