Transitional probability between characters as a component of
sentence processing in Chinese
This study explores the role of transitional probability (TP) in
sentence processing in Chinese, a writing system that presents unique challenges
due to its character-based structure and lack of word boundaries. The research
investigates how the statistical regularities of character meaning, as captured
by TP, aid in word segmentation and impact reading comprehension. Utilizing a
moving window task, the study examines the processing speed of characters in
high versus low TP conditions. Findings reveal that characters in high TP bigram
conditions (indicating a consistent semantic association within a bigram) are
processed more quickly, underscoring the importance of this statistical property
of characters in Chinese sentence reading. These findings challenge conventional
notions in Chinese linguistics concerning the relationship between characters,
morphemes, and semantics, and suggests an alternative perspective on (and the
need for reevaluation of) character-level semantics. The study also highlights
the influence of prosodic context on reading speed, indicating that anticipatory
linguistic patterns shape reader processing.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Method
- 2.1Participants
- 2.2Materials
- 2.3Design and procedure
- 3.Results
- 3.1Data preprocessing
- 3.2Data analysis
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (38)
References
Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing
reaction times. International journal of
psychological
research,
3
(2), 12–28. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bai, X. J., Tian, J., Yan, G. L., & Wang, T. L. (2009). The
effect of word segmentation on Chinese text reading: Evidence from American
students’ eye movements. Nankai
Linguistics,
1
1, 140–185.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading
spaced and unspaced Chinese text: Evidence from eye
movements. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance,
34
(5), 1277–1287. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bai, X., Zhang, T., Tian, L., Liang, F., & Wang, T. (2010). Effect
of word segmentation on American students reading Chinese: Evidence from eye
movements. Psychological
Research,
5
1, 25–30.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bloomfield, L. (1935). Language. George Allen & Unwin, London. Linguistic Inquiry Monographs.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (2007). Construction
morphology and the lexicon. Selected
proceedings of the 5th
Décembrettes: Morphology in Toulouse, 34–44.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Booij, G. (2012). The
grammar of words: An introduction to linguistic
morphology. Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brown, M., Salverda, A. P., Dilley, L. C., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (2011). Expectations
from preceding prosody influence segmentation in online sentence
processing. Psychonomic Bulletin &
Review,
18
(6), 1189–1196. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chen, K., Gu, L. & Bai, Q. (2023). Processing
Chinese formulaic sequences in sentence context: a comparative study of
native and non-native speakers. Humanit Soc
Sci
Commun
10
1, 622. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conway, C. M., Bauernschmidt, A., Huang, S. S., & Pisoni, D. B. (2010). Implicit
statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the
key. Cognition,
114
(3), 356–371. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conway, C. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Modality-constrained
statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory
sequences. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
31
(1), 24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Conway, C. M., & Pisoni, D. B. (2008). Neurocognitive
basis of implicit learning of sequential structure and its relation to
language processing. Annals of the New York
Academy of
Sciences,
1145
(1), 113–131. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Da, J. (2004). Chinese
text computing. Online version
at: [URL]
Da, J. (2004). A
corpus-based study of character and bigram frequencies in Chinese e-texts
and its implications for Chinese language
instruction. In Proceedings
of the fourth international conference on new technologies in teaching and
learning
Chinese (pp. 501–11). Beijing: Tsinghua University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
DeFrancis, J. (1984). The
Chinese language: Fact and
fantasy. University of Hawaii Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fine, A. B., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). The
role of verb repetition in cumulative structural priming in
comprehension. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
42
(9), 1362.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fine, A. B., Jaeger, T. F., Farmer, T. A., & Qian, T. (2013). Rapid
expectation adaptation during syntactic
comprehension. PloS
One,
8
(10), e77661. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frank, S. L., Fernandez Monsalve, I., Thompson, R. L., & Vigliocco, G. (2013). Reading
time data for evaluating broad-coverage models of English sentence
processing. Behavior research
methods,
45
1, 1182–1190. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gao, X. Y., Li, M. F., Chou, T. L., & Wu, J. T. (2016). Comparing
the Frequency Effect Between the Lexical Decision and Naming Tasks in
Chinese. JoVE (Journal of Visualized
Experiments), (
110
), e53815–e53815.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Graf Estes, K., Evans, J. L., Alibali, M. W., & Saffran, J. R. (2007). Can
infants map meaning to newly segmented words? Statistical segmentation and
word learning. Psychological
science,
18
(3), 254–260. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuo, W. J., Yeh, T. C., Lee, C. Y., Wu, Y. T., Chou, C. C., Ho, L. T., … & Hsieh, J. C. (2003). Frequency
effects of Chinese character processing in the brain: an event-related fMRI
study. Neuroimage,
18
(3), 720–730. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leong, C. K. (1997). Paradigmatic
analysis of Chinese word reading: Research findings and classroom
practices. In Cross-language
studies of learning to read and
spell (pp. 379–417). Springer Netherlands. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McBride-Chang, C., Bialystok, E., Chong, K. K., & Li, Y. (2004). Levels
of phonological awareness in three
cultures. Journal of experimental child
psychology,
89
(2), 93–111. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meng, X., Shu, H., & Zhou, X. (2000). The
relationship between tasks in Chinese reading developmental
research. Psychological Science
(China).
23
(6), 677–681![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pacton, S., Perruchet, P., Fayol, M., & Cleeremans, A. (2001). Implicit
learning out of the lab: the case of orthographic
regularities. Journal of experimental
psychology:
General,
130
(3), 401. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Patterson, K., Plaut, D. C., Mcclelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., Behrmann, M., & Hodges, J. R. (1996). Connections
and disconnections: A connectionist account of surface
dyslexia. Neural Modeling of Brain and
Cognitive
Disorders (pp. 177–199). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Perfetti, C. A., & Zhang, S. (1991). Phonological
processes in reading Chinese
characters. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition,
17
(4), 633–643.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Redington, M., & Chater, N. (1997). Probabilistic
and distributional approaches to language
acquisition. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences,
1
(7), 273–281. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rohde, D. (2005). Linger
experiment presentation software. [URL]
Rueckl, J. G., Paz-Alonso, P. M., Molfese, P. J., Kuo, W. J., Bick, A., Frost, S. J., … & Lee, J. R. (2015). Universal
brain signature of proficient reading: Evidence from four contrasting
languages. Proceedings of the National
Academy of
Sciences,
112
(50), 15510–15515. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical
learning by 8-month-old
infants. Science,
274
1, 5294. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schielzeth, H., Dingemanse, N. J., Nakagawa, S., Westneat, D. F., Allegue, H., Teplitsky, C., … & Araya-Ajoy, Y. G. (2020). Robustness
of linear mixed-effects models to violations of distributional
assumptions. Methods in ecology and
evolution,
11
(9), 1141–1152. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shu, H. (2003). Chinese
writing system and learning to
read. International Journal of
Psychology,
38
(5), 274–285. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tan, L. H., Liu, H. L., Perfetti, C. a, Spinks, J. a, Fox, P. T., & Gao, J. H. (2001). The
neural system underlying Chinese logograph
reading. NeuroImage,
13
(5), 836–46. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tan, L. H., Spinks, J. a, Gao, J. H., Liu, H. L., Perfetti, C. a, Xiong, J., … Fox, P. T. (2000). Brain
activation in the processing of Chinese characters and words: a functional
MRI study. Human brain
mapping,
10
(1), 16–27. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, T., Cooper Borkenhagen, M., Barker, M., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2022). Meanings
within meanings: skilled readers activate irrelevant meanings of radicals in
Chinese. Reading and
Writing,
35
(6), 1381–1399. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Yang, J., Cai, Q., & Tian, X. (2020). How
do we segment text? Two-stage chunking operation in
reading. eNeuro,
11
1, 0425. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zhou, X., Shu, H., Bi, Y., & Shi, D. (1999). Is
there phonologically mediated access to lexical semantics in reading
Chinese. Reading Chinese Script: A Cognitive
Analysis, 135–171.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Wang, Tianlin
2024.
Introduction.
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics 11:1
► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.