Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 4:2 (2017) ► pp.257–272

Three Korean transcription systems for Mandarin loanwords

A comparative study

 | Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences
This paper investigates the factors involved in the adaptation of loanwords and how these factors influence each other through a case study of three systems of transcription for Mandarin loanwords in Korean. The result of this study demonstrates that perception, phonology, and source-language orthography are all important factors in the three systems of transcription. This study provides empirical evidence to what causes speakers of the same native language – in our case, Korean – to propose different adapted forms for the same source input and argues that variation in adaption patterns can be viewed as results of different constraints and different rankings of the same constraints. Last, this study invites researchers to pay more attention to the role of borrowers in the hope of building a more robust model of loanword adaptation.
Keywords: loanword, transcription, orthography, phonology, Mandarin, Korean
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Overview
  • 3.The transcription of Mandarin loanwords in Korean
    • 3.1Korean government’s transcription (KGT)
    • 3.2 Eom (1996)
    • 3.3 Eom (2002)
  • 4.Discussion
    • 4.1The factors in loanword adaptation
    • 4.2The variation in adaption patterns
      • 4.2.1The inventory of constraints
      • 4.2.2The ranking of constraints
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 30 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.16004.qia
References (24)
References
Cheng, Chin-chuan. (1973). A Synchronic Phonology of Mandarin Chinese. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Stuart and Mi-Hui Cho. (2006). Phonetics versus phonology: English word final /s/ in Korean loanword phonology. Lingua, 1161, 1008–1023. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dohlus, Kartrin. (2010). The Role of Phonology and Phonetics in Loanword Adaptation: German and French Front Rounded Vowels in Japanese. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Eom, Ik-sang. (1996). Junggugeo hangeul pyogibeobui munjejeomgwa gaeseon bang’an [The problem in the system of Koreanization of Mandarin Chinese: Revised proposal]. Jungguk eoneo yeongu [Journal of Chinese Linguistics in Korea], 41, 39–84.Google Scholar
. (2002). Jungguk eoneohak hanguksigeuro hagi [Chinese Linguistics from a Korean Perspective]. Seoul: hanguk munhwasa.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association, eds. (1999). Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ito, Chiyuki. (2007). Morpheme structure and co-occurrence restrictions in Korean monosyllabic stems. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 13.3, 373–394. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ito, Chiyuki and Michael Kenstowicz. (2009). Mandarin loanwords in Yanbian Korean II: tones. Language Research, 45.1, 85–109.Google Scholar
Ito, Junko and Armin Mester. (1995). The Core-periphery Structure of the Lexicon and Constraints on Reranking. In J. N. Beckman, L. Dickey and S. Urbanczyk (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 181, 181–209. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
Jeon, Gwangjin. (1999). Junggugeo jaeumui hangeul pyogibeobe daehan eumseonghakjeok daebi bunseok [Phonetical analysis on Sino-Korean notating systems for initial consonants]. Jungguk munhak yeongu [Journal of Chinese Literature], 191, 347–375.Google Scholar
Kang, Yoonjung. (2008). Tensification of voiced stops in English loanwords in Korean. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics XII, 179–192.Google Scholar
. (2010). The emergence of phonological adaptation from phonetic adaptation: English loanwords in Korean. Phonology 271, 225–253. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Mi-ryoung and San Duanmu. (2004). Tense and lax stops in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 131, 59–104. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Tae Eun. (2012). A Study of Mandarin Loanwords: Lexical Stratification, Adaptation and Factors. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
Lee, Iksop and Robert Ramsey. (2000). The Korean Language. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Yen-Hwei. (2007). The Sounds of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
. (2009). Loanword adaptation and phonological theory. Proceedings of the 21st North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics, 1–12.Google Scholar
Miao, Ruiqin. (2005). Loanword Adaptation in Mandarin Chinese: Perceptual, Phonological and Sociolinguistic Factors. Stony Brook University dissertation.Google Scholar
National Institute of Korean Language. (1986). Oeraeeo pyogibeop [Rules for writing foreign language words in Hangul]. Available from [URL]
Shin, Jiyoung, Jieun Kiaer and Jaeeun Cha. (2012). The Sounds of Korean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jennifer L. (2006). Loan phonology is not all perception: Evidence from Japanese loan doublets. Japanese and Korean Linguistics, 141, 63–74.Google Scholar
Synn, Asa. (2008). Junggugeo hangeul pyogibeobe daehayeo [Discussion on the Koreanization system of Modern Chinese]. Jungguk eomunhak nonjip [Journal of Chinese Language and Literature], 521, 83–108.Google Scholar
Vendelin, Inga and Sharon Peperkamp. (2006). The Influence of orthography on loanword adaptation. Lingua, 1161, 996–1007. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, Hui. (2014). Hanyu jieci yinxixue –yingyuan jieci de yuyin he yinxi fenxi [Chinese Loanword Phonology: A Phonetic and Phonological Analysis of English Loanword Adaptation in Chinese]. Nankai University Press.Google Scholar