Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Chinese Linguistics
Vol. 7:2 (2020) ► pp.187–222

The syntax of Mandarin dative alternation

An argument from quantifier scope interpretation

| City University of Hong Kong
| City University of Hong Kong
This paper investigates the syntax of dative constructions (DCs) in Mandarin from the perspective of quantifier scope interpretation. In the literature, doubly quantified DCs such as Xiaoming ji-le yi-zhang mingxinpian gei mei-yi-wei laoshi ‘Xiaoming mailed one postcard to every teacher’ have been claimed to be scopally ambiguous, and different syntactic analyses have been proposed based on this observation. Crucially, however, DCs with the universal direct object (DO) preceding the existential indirect object (IO), e.g., Xiaoming ji-le mei-yi-zhang mingxinpian gei yi-wei laoshi ‘Xiaoming mailed every postcard to one teacher’, appear to be not ambiguous, where only the existential IO seems to take wide scope. This problem, which we call the dative puzzle, has not been systematically explored, either theoretically or experimentally. To fill this gap, we conducted an experiment on the scope interpretation of dative sentences in Mandarin, which confirms the above observation. A syntactic analysis for Mandarin DCs is proposed accordingly, where it is argued that (i) DCs share the same underlying structure with shift constructions (SCs) of the form [Subj V-gei IO DO], both containing a causative vP embedded under an action verb (cf. Cheng et al. 1999); (ii) the surface form of a DC is derived by an optional, vP-internal scrambling of the DO from the lowest complement position to an adjunct position; and (iii) such scrambling does not affect scope interpretation. Our proposal suggests that, insofar as inherently ditransitive verbs are concerned, Mandarin DCs and SCs are derivationally related, and the observed dative puzzle is shown to follow from the structural hierarchy of the advocated base syntax of DCs.
Keywords: dative alternation, dative construction, shift construction, quantifier scope, Mandarin
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Quantifier scope interpretation in dative constructions: The dative puzzle
    • 2.1Scope ambiguity in Mandarin DCs
    • 2.2The dative puzzle
  • 3.Experiment: Scope interpretation of Mandarin dative sentences
    • 3.1Method
      • 3.1.1Participants
      • 3.1.2Materials
      • 3.1.3Procedure
      • 3.1.4Grammaticality rating
    • 3.2Predictions
    • 3.3Results
      • 3.3.1Doubly quantified DCs
      • 3.3.2Doubly quantified SCs
    • 3.4Discussion
  • 4.Proposal
    • 4.1The event syntax of dative constructions
    • 4.2Revisiting the dative puzzle
    • 4.3Further consequences
    • 4.4Scrambling and scope
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 10 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijchl.20006.gan
References (54)
References
Anderson, C. (2004). The structure and real-time comprehension of quantifier scope ambiguity. Doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Aoun, J., & Li, Y.-H. A. (1989). Scope and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(2), 141–172.Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, L.-S. L., Huang, C.-T. J., Li, Y.-H. A., & Tang, C.-C. J. (1999). Hoo, hoo, hoo: Syntax of the causative, dative, and passive constructions in Taiwanese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series, 141, 146–203.Google Scholar
Chiba, F. (千叶史子). (2012). A contrastive analysis of “gei” in Mandarin Chinese and its counterparts in Japanese with pedagogical implications (现代汉语「给」与日语相对应形式之对比分析与教学应用). Master’s thesis, National Taiwan Normal University.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. MIT press.Google Scholar
Harley, H. (2005). How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation, and the ontology of verb roots in English. In N. Erteschik-Shir, & T. R. Rapoport (Eds.) The syntax of aspect: Deriving thematic and aspectual interpretation (pp. 42–64). Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Her, O.-S. (1999). Interaction of thematic structure and syntactic structures: On Mandarin dative alternations. Chinese languages and linguistics V: Interaction of form and function, 373–412.Google Scholar
(2006). Justifying part-of-speech assignments for Mandarin gei. Lingua, 116(8), 1274–1302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-R., & Ahrens, K. (1999). The function and category of gei in Mandarin ditransitive constructions. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 27(2), 1–26.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. J. (1982). Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
(1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(4), 531–574.Google Scholar
(1992). Complex predicates in control. In R. Larson, S. Iatridou, U. Lahiri, & J. Higginbotham (Eds.), Control and grammar (pp. 109–147). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(1997). On lexical structure and syntactic projection. Chinese Languages and Linguistics, 31, 45–89.Google Scholar
(2006). Resultatives and unaccusatives: A parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan, 2531, 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Hanyu dongci de tiyuan jiegou yu qi jufa biaoxian (汉语动词的题元结构与其句法表现) [The structures of verbs in Chinese and their syntactic projections]. Linguistic Sciences (语言科学), 6(4), 3–21.Google Scholar
(2015). On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In A. Li, A. Simpson, & D. Tsai (Eds.), Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 1–48). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huang, S.-F. (1981). On the scope phenomena of Chinese quantifiers. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 9(2), 226–243.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroch, A. S. (1974). The semantics of scope in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Kung, H.-I. (1993). The mapping hypothesis and postverbal structures in Mandarin Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
Kurtzman, H. S., & MacDonald, M. C. (1993). Resolution of quantifier scope ambiguities. Cognition, 48(3), 243–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larson, R. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), 335–391.Google Scholar
Larson, R., & Wu, H. (2018). Quantifier scope and topicality in Mandarin. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Conference of International Association of Chinese Linguistics.
Lee, H.-T. T. (1986). Studies on quantification in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
(1989). The role of linear order in the acquisition of quantifier scope in Chinese. CUHK Papers in Linguistics, 11, 18–45.Google Scholar
Lee, H.-T. T., & Lei, K.-Y. M. (2015). Scope (dis)ambiguity in Chinese datives: The view from language acquisition. Paper presented at the East Asian Language Acquisition Workshop, held in conjunction with the 2015 International Conference on Language Form and Function, Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Lee, Y. S. (1993). Scrambling as case-driven obligatory movement. IRCS Technical Reports Series, 151.Google Scholar
Li, Y.-H. A. (1990). Order and constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Springer Science & Business Media. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lin, T.-H. J. (2001). Light verb syntax and the theory of phrase structure. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
(2013). QR and finiteness. In Y. Miyamoto et al. (Eds.), Deep insights, broad perspectives: Essays in honor of Mamoru Saito (pp. 275–291).Google Scholar
Lin, T.-H. J., & Huang, Y.-S. (2015). Structures of the Mandarin gei constructions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 24(3), 309–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liu, F.-H. (2006). Dative constructions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 7(4), 863–904.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., & Wu, H. (2016). Quantifier scope in Mandarin ditransitives. Paper presented at the 28th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics.
Lü, S.-X. (1980). Xiandai hanyu babai ci (现代汉语八百词) [Eight hundred words in modern Chinese]. Beijing: The commercial press (商务印书馆).Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1992). Justifying part-of-speech assignments in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 20(2), 211–246.Google Scholar
Miyagawa, S. (1991). Case realization and scrambling. Manuscript, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
(1997). Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry, 28(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. M. (1976). The syntactic domain of anaphora. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Scontras, G., Polinsky, M., Tsai, C.-Y. E., & Mai, K. (2017). Cross-linguistic scope ambiguity: When two systems meet. Glossa, 2(1), 1–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shen, J.-X. (1999). Zaizi ju he geizi ju (“在”字句和“给”字句) [ Zai sentences and gei sentences]. Studies of the Chinese Language (中国语文), 21, 94–102.Google Scholar
Soh, H. L. (1998). Object scrambling in Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Su, Y.-C. (2001). Scope and specificity in child language: A cross-linguistic study on English and Chinese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.Google Scholar
Tai, H.-Y. J. (1984). Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. In D. Testen, V. Mishra, & J. Drogo (Eds.), Papers from the Para session on Lexical Semantics. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society, 1984, pp. 289–296.Google Scholar
Tang, C.-C. J. (1990). Chinese phrase structure and the extended X’-theory. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Tang, T.-C. (1979). Guoyu yufa yanjiu lunji (Studies in Chinese syntax). Student Books, Taipei.Google Scholar
Tsai, W.-T. D. (2008). Tense anchoring in Chinese. Lingua, 118(5), 675–686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tunstall, S. L. (1998). The interpretation of quantifiers: semantics and processing. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Xu, L.-J., & Lee, H.-T. T. (1989). Scope ambiguity and disambiguity in Chinese. In Papers from the General Session at the 25th Annual Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society (CSL) (pp. 451–466).Google Scholar
Yang, S.-Y. (1991). “Dative alternation” in Chinese and English. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Zhu, D.-X. (1979). Yu dongci “gei” xiangguan de jufa wenti (与动词“给”相关的句法问题) [Some syntactic issues related to the verb “GEI”]. Fangyan (方言) [Dialect], 21, 81–87.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Li, Haoze
2022. Relative measurement and scope in Mandarin. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics 7:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.