Recent research in construction grammar has been marked by increasing efforts to create constructicons: detailed
inventories of form-meaning pairs to describe the grammar of a given language, following the principles of construction grammar.
This paper describes proposals for building a new constructicon of English, based on the combination of the COBUILD Grammar
Patterns and the semantic frames of FrameNet. In this case study, the valency information from FrameNet was automatically matched
to the verb patterns of COBUILD, in order to identify the frames that each pattern is associated with. We find that the automatic
procedure must be complemented by a good deal of manual annotation. We examine the “V that” pattern in particular, illustrating
how the frame information can be used to describe this pattern in terms of constructions.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J. (2013). Usage-based theory and exemplar representations of constructions. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar (pp. 49–69). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bybee, J., & Eddington, D. (2006). A usage-based approach to Spanish verbs of ‘becoming’. Language,
82
(2), 323–355.
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Croft, W. (2003). Lexical rules vs. constructions: A false dichotomy. In H. Cuyckens, T. Berg, R. Dirven, & K.-U. Panther (Eds.), Motivation in Language: Studies in Honour of Günter Radden (pp. 49–68). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Fillmore, C. J. (1985). Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di Semantica,
VI
(2), 222–254.
Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Inversion and constructional inheritance. In G. Webelhuth, J.-P. Koenig & A. Kathol (Eds.), Lexical and Constructional Aspects of Linguistic Explanation (pp. 113–128). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T. (1992). Towards a frame-based Lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors. In A. Lehrer & E. Kittay (Eds.), Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization (pp. 75–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., & O’Connor, M. C. (1988). Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language,
64
(3), 501–538.
Fillmore, C. J., Lee-Goldman, R. R., & Rhomieux, R. (2012). The FrameNet Constructicon. In I. A. Sag & H. C. Boas (Eds.), Sign-Based Construction Grammar (pp. 283–322). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
Francis, G., Hunston, S. & Manning, E. (1996). Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.
Francis, G., Hunston, S. & Manning, E. (1998). Collins COBUILD Grammar Patterns 2: Nouns and Adjectives. London: HarperCollins.
Fried, M., & Östman, J.-O. (2004). Construction grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In M. Fried & J.-O. Östman (Eds.), Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective (pp. 11–86). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar (4th Edition). London & New York, NY: Routledge.
Healy, A. & Miller, G. (1970). The verb as the main determinant of sentence meaning. Psychonomic Science,
20
(6), 372.
Hunston, S. & Su, H. (2017). Patterns, Constructions, and Local Grammar: A case study of ‘evaluation’. Applied Linguistics. Advance online publication.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2006). Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A. E., Casenhiser, D. M., & Sethuraman, N. (2004). Learning argument structure generalizations. Cognitive Linguistics,
15
(3), 289–316.
Kay, P., & Fillmore, C. J. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What’s X doing Y? construction. Language,
75
(1), 1–33.
Langacker, R. W. (2000). A dynamic usage-based model. In M. Barlow & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Usage-based Models of Language (pp. 1–63). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
Lee-Goldman, R., & Petruck, M. R. L. (2018). The FrameNet Constructicon in action. In B. Lyngfelt, L. Borin, K. Ohara & T. T. Torrent (Eds.), Constructicography: Constructicon Development Across Languages (pp. 19–40). Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: Benjamins.
Lyngfelt, B., Borin, L., Forsberg, M., Prentice, J., Rydstedt, R., Sköldberg, E., & Tingsell, S. (2012). Adding a Constructicon to the Swedish resource network of Språkbanken. In Proceedings of KONVENS 2012 (LexSem 2012 workshop) (pp. 452–461). Vienna. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed April 2019).
Perek, F., & Lemmens, M. (2010). Getting at the meaning of the English at-construction: The case of a constructional split. CogniTextes,
5
1. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed April 2019).
Ruppenhofer, J., Ellsworth, M., Petruck, M. R. L., Johnson, C. R., & Scheffczyk, J. (2016). FrameNet II: Extended theory and practice. Berkeley: ICSI. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed April 2019).
Talmy, L. (1996). The windowing of attention in language. In M. Shibatani & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning (pp. 235–287). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Song, Jie, Congcong Yang, Yichu Sun, Yunhua Qu, Kuizi Ma & Huiying Cai
2024. Quantitative Research on Chinese Sentences Structure Based on Pattern Grammar. Sage Open 14:3
Su, Hang, Jun Ye & Naixing Wei
2024. Integrating pattern grammar and local grammar into the identification of constructions and the development of a pedagogical constructicon in EAP context: An exploratory study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 70 ► pp. 101401 ff.
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana
2024. Idiosyncratic entrenchment: tracing change in constructional schematicity with nested random effects. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory
Yan, Hengbin & Yinghui Li
2024. Constraction: a tool for the automatic extraction and interactive exploration of linguistic constructions. Linguistics Vanguard 9:1 ► pp. 215 ff.
2023. ‘Oscar sent Venice an elephant’: Construction Grammars and Second Language Learning. In Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Second Language Learning and Teaching, ► pp. 231 ff.
Liu, Yingying & Kevin McManus
2023. Investigating the psychological reality of argument structure constructions and N1 of N2 constructions: a comparison between L1 and L2 speakers of English. Cognitive Linguistics 34:3-4 ► pp. 503 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.