Cited by

Cited by 101 other publications

Abdumanapovna, Sharipova Aziza
2019. 2019 International Conference on Information Science and Communications Technologies (ICISCT),  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Albakry, Mohammed
2015. Telling by omission. In Corpus-based Research in Applied Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 66],  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
Andersen, Gisle
2017. A corpus study of pragmatic adaptation: The case of the Anglicism [ jobb ] in Norwegian. Journal of Pragmatics 113  pp. 127 ff. DOI logo
AYTAÇ DEMİRÇİVİ, Kadriye
2022. A Corpus-Based Comparative Analysis of Dedikodu and Gıybet in Turkish. Dil Eğitimi ve Araştırmaları Dergisi 8:2  pp. 249 ff. DOI logo
Bartley, Leanne & Encarnación Hidalgo-Tenorio
2016. “To be Irish, gay, and on the outside”. Journal of Language and Sexuality 5:1  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Blinder, Scott & William L. Allen
2016. Constructing Immigrants: Portrayals of Migrant Groups in British National Newspapers, 2010–2012. International Migration Review 50:1  pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Bondi, Marina & Leonardo Sanna
2022. Chapter 7. Exploring the echo chamber concept. In Conspiracy Theory Discourses [Discourse Approaches to Politics, Society and Culture, 98],  pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Braun, Nadine, Martijn Goudbeek & Emiel Krahmer
2022. Affective Words and the Company They Keep: Studying the Accuracy of Affective Word Lists in Determining Sentence and Word Valence in a Domain-Specific Corpus. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing 13:3  pp. 1440 ff. DOI logo
Carr, Georgia & Monika Bednarek
2019. Beyond risk and safety? Identifying shifts in sex education advice targeted at young women. Discourse & Society 30:3  pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Chen, Yaoyao & Svenja Adolphs
2023. Towards a corpus-based description of speech-gesture units of meaning. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 28:2  pp. 172 ff. DOI logo
Cheong, Euijung
2013. Review. English for Specific Purposes 32:3  pp. 190 ff. DOI logo
Diaz, Brett A.
2021. Corpus Linguistic Methodology as an Advanced Conversion Design for Social Science Research. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 13:3  pp. 254 ff. DOI logo
Dong, Jihua & Louisa Buckingham
2018. The collocation networks of stance phrases. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 36  pp. 119 ff. DOI logo
Dushku, Silvana & Youngshil Paek
2021. Investigating ESL learners’ awareness of semantic prosody across proficiency levels. Language Awareness 30:3  pp. 234 ff. DOI logo
Egbert, Jesse, Tove Larsson & Douglas Biber
2020. Doing Linguistics with a Corpus, DOI logo
Ethelston, Graham
2009. Appraisal in evangelical sermons: the projection and functions of misguided voices. Text & Talk - An Interdisciplinary Journal of Language, Discourse & Communication Studies 29:6  pp. 683 ff. DOI logo
Forchini, Pierfranca
2013. A diachronic study of familiarizers (‘man’, ‘guys’, ‘buddy’, ‘dude’) in movie language. Perspectives 21:4  pp. 504 ff. DOI logo
Freitas, Cláudia
2013. Sobre a construção de um léxico da afetividade para o processamento computacional do português. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada 13:4  pp. 1031 ff. DOI logo
Giovanelli, Marcello
2022. Blame. In The Language of Siegfried Sassoon [Palgrave Studies in Language, Literature and Style, ],  pp. 111 ff. DOI logo
Grabowski, Łukasz
2022. Provoke or encourage improvements? On semantic prosody in English-to-Polish translation. Perspectives 30:1  pp. 120 ff. DOI logo
Guo, Xiuyan, Li Zheng, Lei Zhu, Zhiliang Yang, Chao Chen, Lei Zhang, Wendy Ma & Zoltan Dienes
2011. Acquisition of conscious and unconscious knowledge of semantic prosody. Consciousness and Cognition 20:2  pp. 417 ff. DOI logo
GÜNDOĞDU, Ayşe Eda
2020. Karşıtlıkların Anlambilimsel Söylem Ezgisi: Hafif ve Ağır Düğüm Sözcükleri Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Söylem Filoloji Dergisi 5:2  pp. 415 ff. DOI logo
Hathaway, Yulia
2021. “They Made us into a Race. We Made Ourselves into a People”: A Corpus Study of Contemporary Black American Group Identity in the Non-Fictional Writings of Ta-Nehisi Coates. Corpus Pragmatics 5:3  pp. 313 ff. DOI logo
Hauser, David J. & James Hillman
2024. What Does It Mean to Be “Utterly Content”? Semantic Prosody Impacts Nuanced Inferences Beyond Just Valence. Social Cognition 42:1  pp. 61 ff. DOI logo
Heaton, Dan, Elena Nichele, Jeremie Clos & Joel E. Fischer
2023. “The pingdemic has been a greater challenge than Covid itself”: semantic prosodies in UK newspaper articles during the pandemic. SN Social Sciences 3:9 DOI logo
Hobbs, Valerie
2015. Characterizations of Feminism in Reformed Christian Online Media. Journal of Media and Religion 14:4  pp. 211 ff. DOI logo
Isam, Hishamudin, Mohd Izani Mohd Zain, Mashetoh Abd Mutalib & Rohaidah Haron
2014. Semantic Prosody of [pendidikan/education] from Khaled Nordin's Perspective: An Analysis of Speech Texts based on Corpus Linguistic Methodology. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 118  pp. 172 ff. DOI logo
Jiuding, Quan & Anastassia Zabrodskaja
2024. Bilingual translations of intensifiers in Dong-A Ilbo’s news about China: A corpus-based discourse analysis approach. PLOS ONE 19:2  pp. e0292603 ff. DOI logo
Jurko, Primož
2017. Pragmatic meaning in contrast: semantic prosodies of Slovene and English. Perspectives 25:1  pp. 157 ff. DOI logo
Jurko, Primož
2022. Semantic prosody of Slovene adverb–verb collocations: introducing the top-down approach. Corpora 17:1  pp. 39 ff. DOI logo
Krishnamurthy, Ramesh
2019. Collocations and Lexicography: Sinclairian Theory in Practice. In International Handbook of Modern Lexis and Lexicography,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lan, Xijun & Yuanqi Wang
2021. 2021 2nd Asia-Pacific Conference on Image Processing, Electronics and Computers,  pp. 590 ff. DOI logo
Lehecka, Tomas
2015. Collocation and colligation. In Handbook of Pragmatics, DOI logo
Lehto, Anu
2019. Chapter 10. The representation of citizens and monarchy in Acts of Parliament in 1800 to 2000. In Corpus-based Research on Variation in English Legal Discourse [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 91],  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Lehto, Anu
2022. Chapter 9. Unhappy patients and eminent physicians. In Corpus Pragmatic Studies on the History of Medical Discourse [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 330],  pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Li, Xiaohong & Naixing Wei
2020. Exploring the Roles of Semantic Prosody and Semantic Preference for Achieving Cross-Language Equivalence: A Corpus-based Contrastive Analysis of Translation Pairs in English and Chinese. In Corpus-based Translation and Interpreting Studies in Chinese Contexts,  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Lima-Lopes, Rodrigo Esteves, Karen Tank Mercuri & Maristella Gabardo
2021. Avaliatividade em comentários sobre postagens dedicadas à verificação de notícias falsas nas eleições presidenciais de 2018. Cadernos de Linguística 1:4  pp. 01 ff. DOI logo
Littlemore, Jeannette, Paula Pérez Sobrino, David Houghton, Jinfang Shi & Bodo Winter
2018. What makes a good metaphor? A cross-cultural study of computer-generated metaphor appreciation. Metaphor and Symbol 33:2  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
Lugea, Jane & Brian Walker
2023. Style: Text, Cognition and Corpora. In Stylistics,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
MacLeod, Nicci
2024. Intentionally Encouraging or Assisting Others to Commit an Offence: The Anatomy of a Language Crime. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 37:2  pp. 677 ff. DOI logo
Malory, Beth
2023. Polarized Discourses of Abortion in English: A Corpus-based Study of Semantic Prosody and Discursive Salience. Applied Linguistics DOI logo
Marko, Karoline
2021. Serving the Public Good?—A Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analysis of Private Prisons and For-Profit Incarceration in the United States. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
Martič, Matjaž
2022. Semantična prozodija v specializiranih besedilih. Journal for Foreign Languages 14:1  pp. 7 ff. DOI logo
Mason, Jon
2014. The why dimension, dialogic inquiry, and technology supported learning. In Educating in Dialog [Dialogue Studies, 24],  pp. 51 ff. DOI logo
McGee, Iain
2012. Should We Teach Semantic Prosody Awareness?. RELC Journal 43:2  pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
McIntyre, Dan
2007. Review of Sinclair & Carter ((2004)): Trust the Text: Language, Corpus and Discourse. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12:4  pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
McIntyre, Dan
2014. The year’s work in stylistics 2013. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 23:4  pp. 389 ff. DOI logo
McIntyre, Dan
2018. Chapter 5. Irony and semantic prosody revisited. In The Pragmatics of Irony and Banter [Linguistic Approaches to Literature, 30],  pp. 81 ff. DOI logo
Omidian, Taha & Anna Siyanova‐Chanturia
2020. Semantic Prosody Revisited: Implications for Language Learning. TESOL Quarterly 54:2  pp. 512 ff. DOI logo
Oster, Ulrike
2010. Using corpus methodology for semantic and pragmatic analyses: What can corpora tell us about the linguistic expression of emotions?. cogl 21:4  pp. 727 ff. DOI logo
Partington, Alan
2011. Phrasal irony: Its form, function and exploitation. Journal of Pragmatics 43:6  pp. 1786 ff. DOI logo
Partington, Alan
2014. Evaluative prosody. In Corpus Pragmatics,  pp. 279 ff. DOI logo
Partington, Alan
2014. Mind the gaps. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 19:1  pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Partington, Alan
2017. Evaluative clash, evaluative cohesion and how we actually read evaluation in texts. Journal of Pragmatics 117  pp. 190 ff. DOI logo
Partington, Alan
2017. Varieties of non-obvious meaning in CL and CADS: from ‘hindsight post-dictability’ to sweet serendipity. Corpora 12:3  pp. 339 ff. DOI logo
Räikkönen, Jenni
2023. Chapter 5. Leaving the EU out of the ingroup. In Exploring Language and Society with Big Data [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 111],  pp. 142 ff. DOI logo
Sayaheen, Bilal & Mona Nabeel Malkawi
2019. Understanding the Nature of Arab-Israeli Conflict: A Corpus-based Study of Semantic Prosody in Arabic Political Discourse. Lebende Sprachen 64:2  pp. 309 ff. DOI logo
Schmitt, Norbert
2012. Formulaic Language and Collocation. In The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics, DOI logo
Shin, Yu Kyoung
2020. Evaluative prosody and semantic preference: Extending the analysis of recurrent multiword sequences. English for Specific Purposes 59  pp. 45 ff. DOI logo
Sivaieva, Olga
2020. CORPUS ANALYSIS OF COLLOCATIONS WITH HEALTH IN THE MEDIA TEXTS. Studia Philologica 2:15  pp. 14 ff. DOI logo
Snefjella, Bryor & Victor Kuperman
2016. It’s all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing. Cognition 156  pp. 135 ff. DOI logo
Snefjella, Bryor, Nadia Lana & Victor Kuperman
2020. How emotion is learned: Semantic learning of novel words in emotional contexts. Journal of Memory and Language 115  pp. 104171 ff. DOI logo
Soro, Tommie
2021. How symbolic value is constructed through utterances: Discursive power and performances of reputation in the field of online art magazines. Poetics 89  pp. 101572 ff. DOI logo
Soro, Tommie, Tim Stott & Brendan K. O’Rourke
2021. The rules of the game: discursive norms and limits in the field of online art magazines. Social Semiotics 31:2  pp. 324 ff. DOI logo
Stubbs, Michael
2009. Memorial Article: John Sinclair (1933–2007). Applied Linguistics 30:1  pp. 115 ff. DOI logo
Stubbs, Michael
2015. Computer‐Assisted Methods of Analyzing Textual and Intertextual Competence. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis,  pp. 486 ff. DOI logo
Su, Hang & Susan Hunston
2019. Adjective complementation patterns and judgement: Aligning lexical-grammatical and discourse-semantic approaches in appraisal research. Text & Talk 39:3  pp. 415 ff. DOI logo
Tang, Xuri
2017. Lexeme-based collexeme analysis with DepCluster. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 13:1 DOI logo
Tang, Xuri & Gaixiang Liu
2018. Solving contradictions in semantic prosody analysis with prosody concord. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 23:4  pp. 437 ff. DOI logo
Vessey, Rachelle
2016. Approaches to Language Ideology. In Language and Canadian Media,  pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana
2019. Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner, DOI logo
Vetchinnikova, Svetlana & Turo Hiltunen
2020. ELF and Language Change at the Individual Level. In Language Change,  pp. 205 ff. DOI logo
Wei, Naixing
2015. Review of Xiao & McEnery ((2010)): A Corpus-based Contrastive Study of English and Chinese. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 20:2  pp. 260 ff. DOI logo
Weizman, Elda & Marjut Johansson
2019. Constructing ordinariness in online commenting in Hebrew1 and Finnish. In The Construction of ‘Ordinariness’ across Media Genres [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 307],  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Wild, Kate, Andrew Church, Diana McCarthy & Jacquelin Burgess
2013. Quantifying lexical usage: vocabulary pertaining to ecosystems and the environment. Corpora 8:1  pp. 53 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo
2016. Taste and smell words form an affectively loaded and emotionally flexible part of the English lexicon. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 31:8  pp. 975 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo, Martin H. Fischer, Christoph Scheepers & Andriy Myachykov
2023. More is Better: English Language Statistics are Biased Toward Addition. Cognitive Science 47:4 DOI logo
Wu, Yayin & Yi Zhang
2023. 2023 7th International Conference on Digital Technology in Education,  pp. 118 ff. DOI logo
Yan, Mengzhu & Xue Wu
2024. Prosody in linguistic journals: a bibliometric analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11:1 DOI logo
Yu, Yating, Dennis Tay & Qian Yue
2023. Media representations of China amid COVID-19: A corpus-assisted critical discourse analysis. Media International Australia  pp. 1329878X2311599 ff. DOI logo
Zanettin, Federico
2021. News Media Translation, DOI logo
Zhang, Dan
2022. Multiculturalism in media representation. Chinese Language and Discourse. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal 13:1  pp. 99 ff. DOI logo
Zhang, Hong
2021. “What do you know about semantic prosody?” Teaching and evaluating implicit knowledge of English with corpus-assisted methods. English in Education 55:4  pp. 337 ff. DOI logo
마승혜
2014. Corpus-Based Semantic Prosody Teaching, Necessary to be Incorporated into Translation Courses. The Journal of Translation Studies 15:5  pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
신수영
2014. A corpus-based study on semantic prosodies of Chinese near-synonym : with daozhi(導致)and yinqi(引起) as an example. The Journal of Study on Language and Culture of Korea and China null:36  pp. 79 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2019. A Sample Word Association Task. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 220 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Meaning-Based Responses Are ‘Harder’ to Give. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 239 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Meaning-Shift Units in L2 Learning and Use: Usage vs. Exposure. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 101 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Towards the Bigger Picture. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 206 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Introduction. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. L2 Use and Processing of Multi-Word Units. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 38 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Chapter 18. Conclusion. In Sensory Linguistics [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 20],  pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Meaning-Shift Units in L2 Processing: Usage vs. Word Association Responses. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Usage Concgrams Compared to Exposure Corpus. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 224 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. From a Unit of Meaning to a Meaning-Shift Unit. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 9 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. References. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 245 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Index. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 264 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. Triangulating Usage, Exposure and Processing. In Phraseology and the Advanced Language Learner,  pp. 66 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 29 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.