Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 25:2 (2020) ► pp.216–230
short paper
Methodological issues in contrastive lexical bundle research
The influence of corpus design on bundle identification
This study explores the influence of corpus design when comparing lexical bundle use across groups, examining how the number of texts and average length of texts can impact conclusions about group differences. The study compares the use of lexical bundles by L1-English versus L2-English writers, based on analysis of two sub-corpora of academic articles that are matched for discipline, writer expertize, time of publication, and audience. However, the two sub-corpora differ with respect to the number of texts and the average length of texts. Three experiments examined the influence of differences in corpus composition. The results show that differences in the number of words and number of texts across sub-corpora can have a strong effect on claimed differences in bundle use across groups. This effect is found even when the texts in the corpora are closely matched for their register and topic.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Methodology
- 2.1Corpora
- 2.2Overview of the experiments
- 3.Results and discussion
- 4.Conclusions
- Acknowledgements
-
References
References
Ädel, A., & Erman, B.
(2012) Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach. English for Specific Purposes, 31(2), 81–92. 
Altenberg, B.
(1998) On the phraseology of spoken English: The evidence of recurrent word-combinations. In A. Cowie (Ed.), Phraseology: Theory, Analysis and Applications (pp. 101–122). Oxford University Press.
Biber, D.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Cortes, V.
(2004) If you look at…: Lexical bundles in university teaching and textbooks. Applied Linguistics, 25(3), 371–405.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E.
(1999) Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Pearson.
Chen, Y.-H., & Baker, P.
(2010) Lexical bundles in L1 and L2 academic writing. Language Learning and Technology, 14(2), 30–49.
Ellis, N. C., & Simpson-Vlach, R.
(2009) Formulaic language in native speakers: Triangulating psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and education. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 51, 61–78.
Ellis, N. C., Simpson-Vlach, R., & Maynard, C.
(2008) Formulaic language in native and second-language speakers: Psycholinguistics, corpus linguistics, and TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 41(3), 375–396.
Granger, S., & Paquot, M.
(2008) Disentangling the phraseological web. In S. Granger & F. Meunier (Eds.), Phraseology: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. John Benjamins.
Lu, X., Kisselev, O., Yoon, J., & Amory, M.
(2018) Investigating effects of criterial consistency, the diversity dimension, and threshold variation in formulaic language research: Extending the methodological considerations of O’Donnell et al. (2013). International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 23(2), 158–182.
Mahlberg, M., Wiegand, V., Stockwell, P., & Hennessey, A.
(2019) Speech bundles in the 19th-century English novel. Language and Literature, 28(4), 326–353.
Miller, D., & Biber, D.
(2015) Evaluating reliability in quantitative vocabulary studies: The influence of corpus design and composition. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 20(1), 30–53.
O’Donnell, M., Römer, U., &. Ellis, N. C.
(2013) The development of formulaic sequences in first and second language writing: Investigating effects of frequency, association, and native norm. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(1): 83–108.
Pan, F., Reppen, R., & Biber, D.
(2016) Comparing patterns of L1 versus L2 English academic professionals: Lexical bundles in Telecommunications research journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 211, 60–71.
Schmitt, N.
Scott, M.
Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C.
(2010) An academic formulas list (AFL). Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512.
Stubbs, M.
(2007) An example of frequent English phraseology: Distribution, structures and functions. In R. Facchinetti (Ed.), Corpus Linguistics 25 Years on (pp. 89–105). Rodopi.
Wray, A.
(2002) Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
(2008) Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries. Oxford University Press.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Dahunsi, Toyese Najeem & Thompson Olusegun Ewata
2022. An exploration of the structural and colligational characteristics of lexical bundles in L1–L2 corpora for English language teaching. Language Teaching Research ► pp. 136216882110665 ff. 
Freitas, Ana Luiza Pires de
2020. The spread of Brazilian science through the advancement of written proficiency in English:
a matter that cannot be postponed. Jornal Brasileiro de Doenças Sexualmente Transmissíveis 32
Wang, Ying & Henrik Kaatari
2021. Let's say: Phraseological patterns of say in academic ELF communication. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 54 ► pp. 101046 ff.
Wang, Ying & Josep Soler
2021. Investigating predatory publishing in political science: a corpus linguistics approach. Applied Corpus Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 100001 ff.
Yin, Xiaoyi & Shuangling Li
2021. Lexical bundles as an intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary mark: A corpus-based study of research articles from business, biology, and applied linguistics. Applied Corpus Linguistics 1:1 ► pp. 100006 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.