Article published In:
International Journal of Corpus LinguisticsVol. 21:2 (2016) ► pp.192–218
Profiling verb complementation constructions across New Englishes
A two-step random forests analysis of ing vs. to complements
In this paper, we explore verb complementation patterns with to and ing in native English (British and American English) as compared to three Asian Englishes (Hong Kong, Indian, and Singaporean English). Based on data from the International Corpus of English annotated for variables describing the matrix verb and the complement, we run two random forests analyses to determine where the Asian Englishes have developed complementation preferences different from the two native speaker varieties. We find not only a variety of differences between the Asian and the native Englishes, but also that the Asian Englishes are more similar (i.e. ‘better predicted by’) the American English data. Further, as the first study of its kind to extend the MuPDAR approach from the now frequent regression analyses to random forests analysis, this study adds a potentially useful analytical tool to the often messy and skewed observational data corpus linguists need to deal with.
Keywords: random forests, MuPDAR, New (Asian) Englishes, ing vs. to, verb complementation
References (55)
Bernaisch, T., Gries, St. Th., & Mukherjee, J. (2014). The dative alternation in South Asian English(es): Modelling predictors and predicting prototypes. English World-Wide, 35(1), 7–31. 
Bolton, K. (2008). Varieties of World Englishes. In B.B. Kachru, Y. Kachru & C.L. Nelson (Eds.), The Handbook of World Englishes (pp. 289–312). Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bresnan, J., Cueni A, Nikitina, T., & Baayen, R.H. (2007). Predicting the dative alternation. In G. Bourne, I. Kraemer & J. Zwarts (Eds.), Cognitive Foundations of Interpretation (pp. 69–94). Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Science.
Burnham, K.P., & Anderson, D.R. (2002). Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-theoretic Approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.
Collins, P. (1995). The indirect object construction in English: An informational approach. Linguistics, 33(1), 35–49.
Cuyckens, H., Frauke D., & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2014). Variability in verb complemention in late modern English: Finite vs. non-finite patterns. In M. Hundt (Ed.), Late Modern English Syntax (pp. 182–204). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Smet, H. (2013). Spreading Patterns: Diffusional Change in the English System of Complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deshors, S.C. (2014a). Towards an identification of prototypical non-native modal constructions in EFL: A corpus-based approach. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 11(1), 19–50.
. (2014b). A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach. English World Wide, 35(3), 279–307.
. (2015). A constructionist approach to gerundial and infinitival verb-complementation patterns in native and Hong Kong English varieties. English Text Construction, 8(2), 207–235.
Divjak, D.S., & Arppe, A. (2013). Extracting prototypes from exemplars: What can corpus data tell us about concept representation? Cognitive Linguistics, 24(2), 221–274.
Duffley, P. (1999). The use of the infinitive and the -ing after verbs denoting the beginning, middle and end of an event. Folio Linguistica, 23(3), 295–331.
Edwards, A. (2014). The progressive aspect in the Netherlands and the ESL/EFL continuum. World Englishes, 33(2), 173–94.
Green, G.M. (1974). Semantic and Syntactic Irregularity. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Greenbaum, S. (Ed.) (1996). Comparing English Worldwide: The International Corpus of English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gries, St. Th. (2003). Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics: A Study of Particle Placement. London: Continuum Press.
. (2015a). Quantitative linguistics. In J.D. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 725–732). Oxford: Elsevier.
. (2015b). The role of quantitative methods in Cognitive Linguistics: Corpus and experimental data on (relative) frequency and contingency of words and constructions. In J. Daems, E. Zenner, K. Heylen, D. Speelman, & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), Change of Paradigms - New Paradoxes: Recontextualizing Language and Linguistics (pp. 311–325). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Gries, St. Th., & Adelman, A.S. (2014). Subject realization in Japanese conversation by native and non-native speakers: Exemplifying a new paradigm for learner corpus research. In J. Romero-Trillo (Ed.), Yearbook of Corpus Linguistics and Pragmatics 2014: New Empirical and Theoretical Paradigms (pp. 35–54). Cham: Springer.
Gries, St. Th., & Bernaisch, T. (2016). Exploring epicenters empirically: Focus on South Asian Englishes. English World-Wide, 37(1), 1–25.
Gries, St. Th., & Deshors, S.C. (2014). Using regressions to explore deviations between corpus data and a standard/target: Two suggestions. Corpora, 9(1), 109–136.
. (2015). EFL and/vs. ESL? A multi-level regression modeling perspective on bridging the paradigm gap. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 130–159.
Gries, St. Th., & Wulff, S. (2013). The genitive alternation in Chinese and German ESL learners: Towards a multifactorial notion of context in learner corpus research. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 18(3), 327–356.
Hoffmann, T. (2014). The cognitive evolution of Englishes: The role of constructions in the Dynamic Model. In S. Buschfeld, T. Hoffmann, M. Huber & A. Kautzsch (Eds.), The Evolution of Englishes: The Dynamic Model and Beyond (pp. 160–180). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kaleta, A. (2012). The English gerund vs. the to-infinitive: The case of aspectual constructions. Selected papers from
UK-CLA Meetings
. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed June 2014).
Khamis, A. (2015, July). Cross-varietal variation in English verb complementation: A multivariate corpus analysis. Paper presented at the
International Cognitive Linguistics Conference 2015
, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Koch, C. (2015). Routines in lexis and grammar: A ‘gravity’ approach within the International Corpus of English. Paper presented at the
ICAME 36 conference
, Universität Trier, 27-29 May 2015.
Kuperman, V., & Bresnan, J. (2012). The effects of construction probability on word durations during spontaneous incremental sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 588–611.
Langacker, R. (1991). Cognitive Grammar 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Liaw, A., & Wiener, M. (2015). randomForest. Version 4.6-12. A package for R. Retrieved from [URL] (last accessed February 2016).
Mair, C. (2002). Three changing patterns of verb complementation in Late Modern English: A real-time study based on matching text corpora. English Language and Linguistics, 6(1), 105–131.
. (2013). The world system of English. English World-Wide, 34(3), 253–278.
Martínez-García, M.T., & Wulff, S. (2012). Not wrong, yet not quite right: Spanish ESL students’ use of gerundial and infinitival complementation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 22(2), 225–244.
Matsuki, K., Kuperman, V., & Van Dyke, J.A. (2016). The Random Forests statistical technique: An examination of its value for the study of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 20(1), 20–33.
Mindt, D. (2000). An Empirical Grammar of the English Verb. Berlin: Cornelsen.
Mukherjee, J., & Gries, St. Th. (2009). Collostructional nativisation in New Englishes: Verb-construction associations in the International Corpus of English. English World-Wide, 30(1), 27–51.
Mukherjee, J., & Hoffmann, S. (2006). Describing verb-complementational profiles of New Englishes: A pilot study of Indian English. English World-Wide, 27(2), 147–173.
Mukherjee, J., & Schilk, M. (2008). Verb-complementational profiles across varieties of English: Comparing verb classes in Indian English and British English. In T. Nevalainen, I Taavitsainen, P. Pahta & M. Korhonen (Eds.), The Dynamics of Linguistic Variation: Corpus Evidence on English Past and Present (pp. 163–181). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Nam, C., Mukherjee, S., Schilk, M., & Mukherjee, J. (2013). Statistical analysis of varieties of English. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 176(3), 777–793.
Noël, D. (2003). Is there semantics in all syntax? The case of accusative and infinitive constructions vs. that-clauses. In G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (Eds.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description: Vol.2, Complex Constructions (pp. 52–150). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Noonan, M. (1985). Complementation. In T. Shopen (Ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Vol. 2. Complex Constructions (pp. 42–110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olavarría de Ersson, E., & Shaw, P. (2003)). Verb complementation patterns in Indian standard English. English World-Wide, 24(2), 137–161.
R Development Core Team. 2012. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. <[URL]> (last accessed July 2012)
Ransom, E. (1979). Definiteness and animacy constraints on passives and double object constructions in English. Glossa, 13(2), 215–240.
Rohdenburg, G. (1995). On the replacement of finite complement clauses by infinitives in English. English Studies, 76(4), 367–388.
Schilk, M., Bernaisch, T., & Mukherjee, J. (2012). Mapping unity and diversity in South Asian English lexicogrammar. In M. Hundt & U. Gut (Eds.), Mapping Unity and Diversity World-wide: Corpus-based Studies of New Englishes (pp. 137–166). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schilk, M., Mukherjee, J., Nam, C., & Mukherjee, S. (2013). Complementation of ditransitive verbs in south Asian Englishes: A multifactorial analysis. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 9(2), 187–225.
Shastri, S.V. (1996). Using computer corpora in the description of language with special reference to complementation in Indian English. In R.J. Baumgardner (Ed.), South Asian English: Structure, Use, and Users (pp. 70–81). Urbana & Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Schneider, E. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, M.B., & Escobedo, J. (2002). The semantics of to-infinitival vs. -ing verb complement constructions in English. In M. Andronis, C. Ball, H. Elston & S. Neuvel (Eds.), Proceedings from the Main Session in the Chicago Linguistics Society’s Thirty-Seventh Meeting (pp. 549–564). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Szmrecsanyi, B., & Kortmann, B. (2011). Typological profiling: Learner Englishes versus L2 varieties of English. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap (pp. 167–207). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. Linguistics in Philosophy, 66(2). 143–160.
Vosberg, U. (2003). The role of extractions and horror aequi in the evolution of -ing complements in modern English. In G. Rohdenburg & B. Mondorf (Eds.), Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English (pp. 329–345). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Wierzbicka, A. (1988). The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wulff, S., & Gries, St. Th. (2015). Prenominal adjective order preferences in Chinese and German L2 English: A multifactorial corpus study. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5(1), 122–150.
Cited by (40)
Cited by 40 other publications
Adolf, Philippa
2024. Differential object marking in the L2 Spanish of L1 German speakers: A corpus-based analysis. In Spanish as a second and third language [Romanistik, 42], ► pp. 39 ff. 
Bernaisch, Tobias & Nina Funke
2024. Particle Placement in Hong Kong English: Independence from Great Britain as a Trigger of Structural Change?. Journal of English Linguistics 52:2 ► pp. 137 ff.
Ivaska, Ilmari & Anne Tamm
P. Romasanta, Raquel
2024. A dialectological approach to complement variability in global web-based English. Research in Corpus Linguistics 13:1 ► pp. 197 ff.
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2021. Substrate Language Influence in Postcolonial Asian Englishes and the Role of Transfer in the Complementation System. English Studies 102:8 ► pp. 1151 ff.
Romasanta, Raquel P.
2023. A morphosyntactic approach to language contact in African varieties of English. Studia Neophilologica 95:1 ► pp. 146 ff.
Partridge, Maristi
2024. Chapter 4. Investigating the complementiser that in the verb complementation of Black South African English. In Constraints on Language Variation and Change in Complex Multilingual Contact Settings [Contact Language Library, 60], ► pp. 87 ff.
Ivaska, Ilmari, Mirva Johnson & Tommi Kurki
2023. Identifying the dialectal background of American Finnish speakers using a supervised machine-learning model. Nordic Journal of Linguistics ► pp. 1 ff.
Laliberté, Catherine, Melanie Keller & Diana Wengler
2023. “So, I trucked out to the border, learned to say ain’t, came to find work”: the sociolinguistics of Firefly
. Linguistics Vanguard 9:s3 ► pp. 275 ff.
Moretti, Lorenzo
2023. The Functions of Auxiliary Do in Middle English Poetry: A Quantitative Study. Journal of English Linguistics 51:1 ► pp. 3 ff.
Youssef, Chadi Ben & Stefan Th. Gries
2023. Code-switching in Tunisian Arabic: a multi-factorial random forest analysis. Corpora 18:3 ► pp. 297 ff.
Kekki, Niina & Ilmari Ivaska
2022. The use of synonymous adjectives by learners of Finnish as a second language. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 8:1 ► pp. 67 ff.
Gardner, Matt Hunt, Eva Uffing, Nicholas Van Vaeck, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Stefan Th. Gries
2021. Variation isn’t that hard: Morphosyntactic choice does not predict production difficulty. PLOS ONE 16:6 ► pp. e0252602 ff.
Shadrova, Anna, Pia Linscheid, Julia Lukassek, Anke Lüdeling & Sarah Schneider
2021. A Challenge for Contrastive L1/L2 Corpus Studies: Large Inter- and Intra-Individual Variation Across Morphological, but Not Global Syntactic Categories in Task-Based Corpus Data of a Homogeneous L1 German Group. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Béchet, Christophe
2020. An empirical perspective on the contact between English and French: a case study on substitutive complex prepositions. Linguistics Vanguard 6:s2
Deshors, Sandra C. & Stefan Th. Gries
2020. Mandative subjunctive versus should in world Englishes: a new take on an old alternation. Corpora 15:2 ► pp. 213 ff.
Deshors, Sandra C. & Sandra Götz
2020. Common ground across globalized English varieties: A multivariate exploration of mental predicates in World Englishes. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Egbert, Jesse & Luke Plonsky
2020. Bootstrapping Techniques. In A Practical Handbook of Corpus Linguistics, ► pp. 593 ff.
García‐Castro, Laura
2020. Finite and non‐finite complement clauses in postcolonial Englishes. World Englishes 39:3 ► pp. 411 ff.
Gries, Stefan Th., Santa Barbara, Justus Liebig & Sandra C. Deshors
2020. There’s more to alternations than the main diagonal of a 2×2 confusion matrix: Improvements of MuPDAR and other classificatory alternation studies. ICAME Journal 44:1 ► pp. 69 ff.
Wulff, Stefanie & Stefan Th. Gries
2020. Exploring Individual Variation in Learner Corpus Research: Methodological Suggestions. In Learner Corpus Research Meets Second Language Acquisition, ► pp. 191 ff.
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019. New Light on -Ing Complements of Prevent, with Recent Data from Large Corpora. In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English, ► pp. 105 ff.
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019. Conclusion. In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English, ► pp. 131 ff.
Kaunisto, Mark & Juhani Rudanko
2019. Introduction. In Variation in Non-finite Constructions in English, ► pp. 1 ff.
Lester, Nicholas A.
Deshors, Sandra C. & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
2018. Modeling World Englishes in the 21st century. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61], ► pp. 281 ff.
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2018. American and/or British influence on L2 Englishes – Does context tip the scale(s)?. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61], ► pp. 187 ff.
Grafmiller, Jason & Benedikt Szmrecsanyi
2018. Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis. Language Variation and Change 30:3 ► pp. 385 ff.
Gries, Stefan Th., Tobias Bernaisch & Benedikt Heller
2018. A corpus-linguistic account of the history of the genitive alternation in Singapore English. In Modeling World Englishes [Varieties of English Around the World, G61], ► pp. 245 ff.
Kruger, Haidee & Gert De Sutter
2018. Alternations in contact and non-contact varieties. Translation, Cognition & Behavior 1:2 ► pp. 251 ff.
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Zooming in on Verbs in the Progressive: A Collostructional and Correspondence Analysis Approach. Journal of English Linguistics 45:3 ► pp. 260 ff.
Deshors, Sandra C.
Deshors, Sandra C.
2018. Does the passé composé influence L2 learners’ use of English past tenses?. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1 ► pp. 23 ff.
Gries, Stefan Th.
Gries, Stefan Th.
2022. MuPDAR for corpus-based learner and variety studies. In Broadening the Spectrum of Corpus Linguistics [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 105], ► pp. 256 ff.
Heller, Benedikt, Tobias Bernaisch & Stefan Th. Gries
2017. Empirical perspectives on two potential epicenters: The genitive alternation in Asian Englishes. ICAME Journal 41:1 ► pp. 111 ff.
Lee,Yong-hun & 유지희
2017. A Random Forest Analysis of Can and May in Korean EFL Learners’ Writings. English Language and Linguistics 23:3 ► pp. 81 ff.
MERILÄINEN, LEA
2017. The progressive form in learner Englishes: Examining variation across corpora. World Englishes 36:4 ► pp. 760 ff.
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.