Review published In:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 4:1 (2018) ► pp.133136
References
Eskildsen, S. W.
2014 “What’s new? A usage-based classroom study of linguistic routines and creativity in L2 learning”, International Review of Applied Linguistics 52(1), 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eskildsen, S. W., Cadierno, T., & Li, P.
2015 “On the development of motion constructions in four learners of L2 English”. In T. Cadierno & S. W. Eskildsen (Eds.), Usage-Based Perspectives on Second Language Learning. Berlin: De Gruyter, 207–232. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Deshors, S. C.
2016 “Inside phrasal verb constructions”, International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2(1), 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feldweg, H.
1991The European Science Foundation Second Language Database. Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G.
2016 “Input-dependent L2 acquisition: Causative constructions in English as a foreign and second language”. In S. De Knop & G. Gilquin (Eds.), Applied Construction Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter, 115–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
MacWhinney, B.
2000The CHILDES Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk, Vol 2: The database (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S. Th.
2003 “Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2), 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G. K.
1935The Psycho-Biology of Language: An Introduction to Dynamic Philology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1949Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort: An Introduction to Human Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar