Review published In:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 5:1 (2019) ► pp.104108


Bates, E. & MacWhinney, B.
(1989) “Functionalism and the Competition Model”. In B. MacWhinney & E. Bates (Eds.), The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–76.Google Scholar
Depraetere, I. & Reed, S.
(2011) “Towards a more explicit taxonomy of root possibility”, English Language and Linguistics 15(1): 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gisborne, N.
(2007) “Dynamic modality”, SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4(2) [online]. Available at: [URL] (accessed July 2018).
Granger, S.
(1996) “From CA to CIA and back: An integrated approach to computerized bilingual and learner corpora”. In K. Aijmer, B. Altenberg & M. Johansson (Eds.), Languages in Contrast. Papers from a Symposium on Text-based Cross-linguistic Studies. Lund: Lund University Press [Lund Studies in English 88], 37–51.Google Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E. & Meunier, F.
(Eds.) (2002) The International Corpus of Learner English. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gries, S. & Divjak, D.
(2009) “Behavioral profiles: A corpus-based approach to cognitive semantic analysis”. In V. Evans and S. Pourcel (Eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 57–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S.
(2000) “Methodological rigor in the study of transfer: identifying L1 influence in the interlanguage lexicon”, Language Learning 50(2): 245–309. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2010) “Comparison-based and detection-based approaches to transfer research”. In L. Roberts, M. Howard, M. Ó Laoire & D. Singleton (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 101. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 169–192.Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S.
(2003) “Collostructions: Investigating the interaction between words and constructions”. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8(2), 209–243. DOI logoGoogle Scholar