Article published In:
International Journal of Learner Corpus ResearchVol. 2:1 (2016) ► pp.1–30
Inside phrasal verb constructions
A co-varying collexeme analysis of verb-particle combinations in EFL and their semantic associations
This study investigates 2,909 phrasal verbs [PVs] in (in)transitive constructions across native English and French- and German-English interlanguages (ILs). Recent work by Gilquin (2014) shows that, as verb-particle combinations, PVs associate more or less strongly with particular syntactic constructions. Further, those association patterns vary across native and learner Englishes. Building on Gilquin (2014), the present study digs deeper into PV constructions by assessing degrees of mutual attraction between verbs and particles as well as between PVs and their semantic uses. Degrees of association are measured using a co-varying collexeme analysis approach (Stefanowitsch & Gries 2005). Generally, it emerges that within given syntactic constructions (e.g. verb-particle-object constructions), different verbs and particles (i.e. bring and up in the case of build up or bring and about for bring about) combine in different degrees, suggesting that, as cognitive routines, those combinations are not equally entrenched. In addition, French and German English learners seem to operate at different levels of semantic complexity when using PVs in their L2. Ultimately, the study bears important pedagogical implications, namely the need (i) to focus on phrasal verbs’ aspectual uses to help learners develop a more confident use of PVs in completive, inceptive and continuative semantic contexts and (ii) to develop resources that help learners improve their uses of PVs in verb-object-particle constructions.
References (34)
Akbari, O. 2009. A Corpus-Based Study of Malaysian ESL Learners’ Use of Phrasal Verbs in Narrative Compositions. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Alejo Gonzáles, R. 2010. “Making sense of phrasal verbs: A cognitive linguistic account of L2 learning”, AILA Review 231, 51–71.
Armstrong, K. 2004. “Sexing up the dossier: A semantic analysis of phrasal verbs for language teachers”, Language Awareness 131, 213–224. 
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.
Bybee, J. 1998. “The emergent lexicon”, CLS 34: The Panels. University of Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 421–435.
Cappelle, B. 2006. “Particle placement and the case for allostructions”. In D. Schönefeld (Ed.), Constructions all Over: Case Studies and Theoretical Implications. [Special issue]. Constructions SV1-7/2006. 1–28. Available at: [URL] (accessed 24 June 2015).
Cappelle, B., Yury, S. & Pulvermüller, F. 2010. “Heating up or cooling up the brain? MEG evidence that phrasal verbs are lexical units”, Brain and Langage 115(3), 189–201.
Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D. 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.
Chen, P. 1986. “Discourse and particle movement in English”, Studies in Language 101, 79–95.
Courtney, R. 1983. Longman Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs. London: Longman.
Ellis, N.C. & Ferreira-Junior, F. 2009. “Constructions and their acquisitions”, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 71, 187–220.
Fischer, S.D. 1971. The Acquisition of Verb-particle and Dative Constructions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Massachussetts Institute of Technology.
Gilquin, G. 2012. “Lexical infelicity in English causative constructions. Comparing native and learner collostructions”. In J. Leino & R. von Waldenfels (Eds.), Analytical Causatives. From ‘give’ and ‘come’ to ‘let’ and ‘make’. München: Lincom Europa.
. 2014. “The use of phrasal verbs by French-speaking EFL learners. A constructional and collostructional corpus-based approach”, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 10(2). ISSN (Online) 1613-7035, ISSN (Print) 1613-7027. .
.Goldberg, A. 2006. Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Götz, S. & Schilk, M. 2011. “Formulaic sequences in spoken ENL, ESL and EFL: Focus on British English, Indian English and learner English”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 79–100.
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Pacquot, M. 2002. The International Corpus of Learner English. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.
Gries, S.T. 1999. “Particle movement: A cognitive and functional approach”, Cognitive Linguistics 101, 105–146.
. 2003. Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics. A Study of Particle Placement. London and New York: Continuum.
. 2007. Coll.analysis 3.2a. A program for R for Windows 2.x.
Gries, S.T. & Stefanowitsch, A. 2004a. “Extending collostructional analysis. A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1), 97–129.
. 2004b. “Covarying collexemes in the into-causative”. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, Culture, and Mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 225–236.
Jackendoff, R. 1997. “Twistin’ the night away”, Language 73(3), 534–559.
. 2002. “English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax”. In N. Dehé, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre, & S. Urban (Eds.), Verb-Particle Explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 67–94.
Martinez-Garcia, T. & Wulff, S. 2012. “Not wrong, yet not quite right: Spanish ESL students’ use of gerundial and infinitival complementation”, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 22(2), 225–244.
Mukherjee, J. & Hundt, M. 2011. Exploring Second Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Peters, J. 2001. “Given vs. new information influencing constituent ordering in the verb-particle construction”. In R.M. Brend, A.K. Melby, & A.R. Lommel (Eds.), LACUS Forum XXVII: Speaking and Comprehending. Fullerton, CA: LACUS, 133–140.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
R Development Core Team. 2013. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: [URL]
Stefanowitsch, A. 2006. “Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony: A comment”, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(2), 257–262.
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S.T. 2005. “Covarying collexemes”, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1), 1–43.
Waibel, B. 2007. Phrasal Verbs in Learner English: A Corpus-Based Study of German and Italian Students. Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität.
Wierszycka, J. 2013. “Phrasal verbs in learner English: A semantic approach. A study based on POS tagged spoken corpus of learner English”, Research in Corpus Linguistics 11, 81–93.
Zarifi, A. 2013. A Corpus-Based Study of Phrasal Verbs in Malaysian ESL Textbooks. Slangor: UPM.
Cited by (13)
Cited by 13 other publications
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2023. Second and foreign language learners: The effect of language exposure on the use of English phrasal verbs. International Journal of Bilingualism 
Hsu, Chan-Chia
2020. Exploring recurrent frames in written Chinese. Corpora 15:3 ► pp. 291 ff.
Liu, Dilin & Daniel Myers
2020. The most-common phrasal verbs with their key meanings for spoken and academic written English: A corpus analysis. Language Teaching Research 24:3 ► pp. 403 ff.
Röthlisberger, Melanie & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2020. The social embedding of a syntactic alternation: Variable particle placement in Ontario English. Language Variation and Change 32:3 ► pp. 317 ff.
Sung, Min-Chang
2020. Underuse of English verb–particle constructions in an L2 learner corpus: Focus on structural patterns and one-word preference. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1 ► pp. 189 ff.
Hendrikx, Isa, Kristel Van Goethem & Stefanie Wulff
2019. Intensifying constructions in French-speaking L2 learners of English and Dutch. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:1 ► pp. 63 ff.
Wulff, Stefanie & Stefan Th. Gries
2019. Particle Placement in Learner Language. Language Learning 69:4 ► pp. 873 ff.
Liu, Dilin
2018. A corpus study of Chinese EFL learners’ use of circumstance, demand, and significant
. Journal of Second Language Studies 1:2 ► pp. 310 ff.
McAndrews, Mark M.
2018. Nick C. Ellis, Ute Römer and Matthew Brook O’Donnell, Usage-based Approaches to Language Acquisition and Processing: Cognitive and Corpus Investigations of Construction Grammar
. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4:1 ► pp. 133 ff.
Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Zooming in on Verbs in the Progressive: A Collostructional and Correspondence Analysis Approach. Journal of English Linguistics 45:3 ► pp. 260 ff.
Deshors, Sandra C.
2020. English as a Lingua Franca: A random forests approach to particle placement in multi‐speaker interactions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:2 ► pp. 214 ff.
Deshors, Sandra C., Sandra Götz & Samantha Laporte
2016. Linguistic innovations in EFL and ESL. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2 ► pp. 131 ff.
Schneider, Gerold & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
2016. Detecting innovations in a parsed corpus of learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2 ► pp. 177 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.