Article published In:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 2:1 (2016) ► pp.130
References
Akbari, O
2009A Corpus-Based Study of Malaysian ESL Learners’ Use of Phrasal Verbs in Narrative Compositions. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.Google Scholar
Alejo Gonzáles, R
2010 “Making sense of phrasal verbs: A cognitive linguistic account of L2 learning”, AILA Review 231, 51–71.Google Scholar
Armstrong, K
2004 “Sexing up the dossier: A semantic analysis of phrasal verbs for language teachers”, Language Awareness 131, 213–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E
1999Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar
Bybee, J
1998 “The emergent lexicon”, CLS 34: The Panels. University of Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society, 421–435.Google Scholar
Cappelle, B
2006 “Particle placement and the case for allostructions”. In D. Schönefeld (Ed.), Constructions all Over: Case Studies and Theoretical Implications. [Special issue]. Constructions SV1-7/2006. 1–28. Available at: [URL] (accessed 24 June 2015).Google Scholar
Cappelle, B., Yury, S. & Pulvermüller, F
2010 “Heating up or cooling up the brain? MEG evidence that phrasal verbs are lexical units”, Brain and Langage 115(3), 189–201. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Celce-Murcia, M. & Larsen-Freeman, D
1999The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher’s Course (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle and Heinle.Google Scholar
Chen, P
1986 “Discourse and particle movement in English”, Studies in Language 101, 79–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Courtney, R
1983Longman Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ellis, N.C. & Ferreira-Junior, F
2009 “Constructions and their acquisitions”, Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 71, 187–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, S.D
1971The Acquisition of Verb-particle and Dative Constructions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Massachussetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G
2012 “Lexical infelicity in English causative constructions. Comparing native and learner collostructions”. In J. Leino & R. von Waldenfels (Eds.), Analytical Causatives. From ‘give’ and ‘come’ to ‘let’ and ‘make’. München: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
2014 “The use of phrasal verbs by French-speaking EFL learners. A constructional and collostructional corpus-based approach”, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 10(2). ISSN (Online) 1613-7035, ISSN (Print) 1613-7027. DOI logo.Google Scholar
Goldberg, A
2006Constructions at Work. The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Götz, S. & Schilk, M
2011 “Formulaic sequences in spoken ENL, ESL and EFL: Focus on British English, Indian English and learner English”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging the Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 79–100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., Dagneaux, E., Meunier, F. & Pacquot, M
2002The International Corpus of Learner English. Handbook and CD-ROM. Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gries, S.T
1999 “Particle movement: A cognitive and functional approach”, Cognitive Linguistics 101, 105–146. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2003Multifactorial Analysis in Corpus Linguistics. A Study of Particle Placement. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
2007Coll.analysis 3.2a. A program for R for Windows 2.x.Google Scholar
Gries, S.T. & Stefanowitsch, A
2004a “Extending collostructional analysis. A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’”, International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 9(1), 97–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004b “Covarying collexemes in the into-causative”. In M. Achard & S. Kemmer (Eds.), Language, Culture, and Mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 225–236.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, R
1997 “Twistin’ the night away”, Language 73(3), 534–559. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2002 “English particle constructions, the lexicon, and the autonomy of syntax”. In N. Dehé, R. Jackendoff, A. McIntyre, & S. Urban (Eds.), Verb-Particle Explorations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 67–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martinez-Garcia, T. & Wulff, S
2012 “Not wrong, yet not quite right: Spanish ESL students’ use of gerundial and infinitival complementation”, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 22(2), 225–244. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peters, J
2001 “Given vs. new information influencing constituent ordering in the verb-particle construction”. In R.M. Brend, A.K. Melby, & A.R. Lommel (Eds.), LACUS Forum XXVII: Speaking and Comprehending. Fullerton, CA: LACUS, 133–140.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J
1985A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
R Development Core Team
2013R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available at: [URL]Google Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A
2006 “Distinctive collexeme analysis and diachrony: A comment”, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 2(2), 257–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stefanowitsch, A. & Gries, S.T
2005 “Covarying collexemes”, Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 1(1), 1–43. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waibel, B
2007Phrasal Verbs in Learner English: A Corpus-Based Study of German and Italian Students. Freiburg: Albert-Ludwigs-Universität.Google Scholar
Wierszycka, J
2013“Phrasal verbs in learner English: A semantic approach. A study based on POS tagged spoken corpus of learner English”, Research in Corpus Linguistics 11, 81–93.Google Scholar
Zarifi, A
2013A Corpus-Based Study of Phrasal Verbs in Malaysian ESL Textbooks. Slangor: UPM.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 13 other publications

Deshors, Sandra C.
2017. Zooming in on Verbs in the Progressive: A Collostructional and Correspondence Analysis Approach. Journal of English Linguistics 45:3  pp. 260 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C.
2020. English as a Lingua Franca: A random forests approach to particle placement in multi‐speaker interactions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 30:2  pp. 214 ff. DOI logo
Deshors, Sandra C., Sandra Götz & Samantha Laporte
2016. Linguistic innovations in EFL and ESL. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2  pp. 131 ff. DOI logo
Gilquin, Gaëtanelle
2023. Second and foreign language learners: The effect of language exposure on the use of English phrasal verbs. International Journal of Bilingualism  pp. 136700692311691 ff. DOI logo
Hendrikx, Isa, Kristel Van Goethem & Stefanie Wulff
2019. Intensifying constructions in French-speaking L2 learners of English and Dutch. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 5:1  pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Hsu, Chan-Chia
2020. Exploring recurrent frames in written Chinese. Corpora 15:3  pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Dilin
2018. A corpus study of Chinese EFL learners’ use of circumstance, demand, and significant . Journal of Second Language Studies 1:2  pp. 310 ff. DOI logo
Liu, Dilin & Daniel Myers
2020. The most-common phrasal verbs with their key meanings for spoken and academic written English: A corpus analysis. Language Teaching Research 24:3  pp. 403 ff. DOI logo
Röthlisberger, Melanie & Sali A. Tagliamonte
2020. The social embedding of a syntactic alternation: Variable particle placement in Ontario English. Language Variation and Change 32:3  pp. 317 ff. DOI logo
Schneider, Gerold & Gaëtanelle Gilquin
2016. Detecting innovations in a parsed corpus of learner English. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2  pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Sung, Min-Chang
2020. Underuse of English verb–particle constructions in an L2 learner corpus: Focus on structural patterns and one-word preference. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 16:1  pp. 189 ff. DOI logo
Wulff, Stefanie & Stefan Th. Gries
2019. Particle Placement in Learner Language. Language Learning 69:4  pp. 873 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 1 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.