Cover not available
Article published In:
Linguistic Innovations: Rethinking linguistic creativity in non-native Englishes
Edited by Sandra C. Deshors, Sandra Götz and Samantha Laporte
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 2:2] 2016
► pp. 302–322

The fate of linguistic innovations

Jersey English and French learner English compared

| University of Freiburg
Drawing on spoken corpus data, this study traces the emergence and development of Norman French-influenced innovations in the nativised L2 variety of Jersey English and compares them to features in the speech of French-speaking learners of English. The comparison shows that such innovations do not differ from errors in a learner variety on a formal linguistic level and that they arguably result from the same processes as are present in foreign language acquisition, such as transfer or simplification. The paper therefore argues that innovations can only be identified reliably in retrospect, once they are more widely accepted in the speech community. It also points to the social factors that are crucial in shaping the use and probable fates of former innovations in Jersey English and suggests a typology of innovations according to their developments.
Keywords: Jersey English, error, linguistic innovation, transfer, French learner English
Published online: 20 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.2.2.08ros
References (41)
Barbé, P. 1993. Exploring Variation in Guernsey English Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of London.Google Scholar
. 1995. “Guernsey English: A syntax exile?”, English World-Wide 16(1), 1–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Leech, G. 2002. The Longman Student Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Biewer, C. 2011. “Modal auxiliaries in second language varieties of English. A learner’s perspective”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 7–33. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bongartz, C. & Buschfeld, S. 2011. “English in Cyprus: Second language variety or learner English?”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 35–54. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
British National Corpus. Version 4.3 (BNCweb CQP-edition). 2013. Developed by S. Hoffmann and S. Evert. Available at [URL].
Bruthiaux, P. 2003. “Squaring the circles: Issues in modeling English worldwide”, International Journal of Applied Linguistics 13(2), 159–178. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davydova, J. 2012. “Englishes in the Outer and the Expanding Circles: A comparative study”, World Englishes 31(3), 366–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Cock, S., Granger, S., Leech, G. & McEnery, T. 1998. “An automated approach to the phrasicon of EFL learners”. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on Computer. London: Longman, 67–79.Google Scholar
Deshors, S. 2014. “A case for a unified treatment of EFL and ESL: A multifactorial approach”, English World-Wide 35(3), 277–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dubois, S. & Horvath, B. 2008. “Cajun Vernacular English: Phonology”. In E. Schneider (Ed.), Varieties of English 2. The Americas and the Caribbean. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 208–218.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G. 2011. “Corpus linguistics to bridge the gap between World Englishes and Learner Englishes”, Communicación en el siglo XXI 21: 638–642.Google Scholar
Gilquin, G., De Cock, S. & Granger, S. (Eds.). 2010. Louvain International Database of Spoken English Interlanguage (CD-ROM + Handbook). Louvain-la-Neuve: Presses universitaires de Louvain.Google Scholar
Gold, E. 2008. “Canadian eh? From eh to zed”, Anglistik 19(2), 141–156.Google Scholar
Gut, U. 2011. “Studying structural innovations in New English Varieties”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 101–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilbert, M. 2011. “Interrogative inversion as a learner phenomenon in English contact varieties. A case of Angloversals?”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 125–143. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hundt, M. & Vogel, K. 2011. “Overuse of the progressive in ESL and learner Englishes – fact or fiction?”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 145–165. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, M.C. 2001. Jersey Norman French: A Linguistic Study of an Obsolescent Dialect. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2010. “Channel Island English”. In D. Schreier, P. Trudgill, E. Schneider & J. Williams (Eds.), The Lesser-Known Varieties of English. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 35–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kachru, B. 1982. “Models for non-native Englishes”. In B. Kachru (Ed.), The Other Tongue. English across Cultures. Urbana, Chicago and London: University of Illinois Press, 31–57.Google Scholar
. 1985. “Standards, codification and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle”. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the World: Teaching and Learning the Language and Literatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 11–30.Google Scholar
Kachru, Y. & Nelson, C. 2006. World Englishes in Asian Contexts. Aberdeen and Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Krug, M. & Rosen, A. 2012. “Standards of English in Malta and the Channel Islands”. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Standards of English – Codified Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 117–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Laporte, S. 2012. “Mind the gap! Bridge between World Englishes and Learner Englishes in the making”, English Text Construction 5(2), 265–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Ruez, N. 2003. Jersey Occupation Diary. Her Story of the German Occupation, 1940–1945. Bradford on Avon: Seaflower Books.Google Scholar
Macaulay, R. 1989. “He was some man him: Emphatic pronouns in Scottish English”. In T. Walsh (Ed.), Synchronic and Diachronic Approaches to Linguistic Variation and Change. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press, 179‒187.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, R. 1992. English in Language Shift. The History, Structure and Sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, R. & Bhatt, R.M. 2008. World Englishes. The Study of New Linguistic Varieties. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mukherjee, J. & Hundt, M. (Eds.). 2011. Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C. 1982. “Intelligibility and non-native varieties of English”. In B. Kachru (Ed.), The Other Tongue. English across Cultures. Urbana, Chicago and London: University of Illinois Press, 58–73.Google Scholar
Ramisch, H. 1989. The Variation of English in Guernsey/Channel Islands. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Rosen, A. 2014. Grammatical Variation and Change in Jersey English [Varieties of English around the World G48]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schneider, E. 2003. “The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth”, Language 79(2), 233–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Postcolonial English. Varieties around the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. 2008. WordSmith Tools version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software.Google Scholar
Sridhar, K. & Sridhar, S. 1986. “Bridging the paradigm gap: Second language acquisition research and indigenized varieties of English”, World Englishes 5(1), 3–14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Szmrecsanyi, B. & Kortmann, B. 2011. “Typological profiling: Learner Englishes versus indigenized L2 varieties of English”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 167–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Van Rooy, B. 2011. “A principled distinction between error and conventionalized innovation in African Englishes”. In J. Mukherjee & M. Hundt (Eds.), Exploring Second-Language Varieties of English and Learner Englishes: Bridging a Paradigm Gap. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 189–207. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Viereck, W. 1988. “The Channel Islands: an Anglicist’s no-man’s land.” In J. Klegraf & D. Nehls (Eds.), Essays on the English Language and Applied Linguistics on the Occasion of Gerhard Nickel’s 60th Birthday. Heidelberg: Groos, 468–478.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Ndoci, Rexhina
2023. An Albanian Ethnolect of Modern Greek? Testing the Waters Perceptually. Languages 8:1 ► pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2021. Corpora, Constructions, New Englishes [Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 100], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.