Cover not available
Article published In:
International Journal of Learner Corpus Research
Vol. 7:2 (2021) ► pp.230–258

Lexical diversity in an L2 Spanish learner corpus

The effect of topic-related variables

 | University of California at Davis
 | University of California at Davis
 | University of California at Davis
 | Creighton University
 | University of California at Davis
 | University of California at Davis
 | University of California at Davis
This study examines the impact of two topic-related variables (i.e., valence polarity and everyday-life closeness) on the lexical diversity scores (i.e., MTLD) of learners of L2 Spanish at different proficiency levels. The analysis included 3,045 texts written in response to two pairs of prompts by 1,165 students enrolled in an L2 Spanish program. The first pair of prompts asked learners to narrate an event: prompt 1 focused on a perfect vacation (positive event), while prompt 2 asked participants to tell a terrible story (negative event). The second pair asked to describe a person: prompt 1 required that the subject be famous, thus not close to the writer, whereas prompt 2 required that the subject be special and close to the writer. Results indicate that lexical diversity scores were higher for the texts written about the positive event and the famous subject across all proficiency levels.
Keywords: L2 Spanish, lexical diversity, topic-related variables, writing, learner corpus
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background
    • 2.1Spanish learner corpora and writing prompts
    • 2.2Lexical diversity
    • 2.3Task – and topic-related variables that influence writing outcomes and lexical diversity
    • 2.4Topic-related variables: Valence and closeness
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1 Corpus of written Spanish of L2 and Heritage speakers (COWS-L2H)
    • 3.2Measure of textual lexical diversity (MTLD)
    • 3.3Analytical procedure
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Research question 1: Valence condition
    • 4.2Research question 2: Closeness
  • 5.Discussion and limitations
    • 5.1RQ 1: How does the valence polarity (positive vs. negative) associated with a narrated event affect the LD of the texts written by L2 Spanish learners at different proficiency levels?
    • 5.2RQ 2: How does the everyday-life closeness with the person described affect the LD of the texts written by L2 Spanish learners at different proficiency levels?
    • 5.3Topic-related effects by proficiency level
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 11 October 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.20017.fer
References (58)
References
Alonso-Ramos, M. (2016). Spanish learner corpus research: Current trends and future perspectives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anooshian, L. J., & Hertel, P. T. (1994). Emotionality in free recall: Language specificity in bilingual memory. Cognition & Emotion, 8(6), 503–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bell, P., Collins, L., & Marsden, E. (2021). Building an oral and written learner corpus of a school programme : Methodological issues. In B. Le Bruyn & M. Paquot (Eds.), Learner corpus research meets second language acquisition (pp. 214–242). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buyse, K., & González Melón, E. (2012). El corpus de aprendices Aprescrilov y su utilidad para la didáctica de ELE en la Bélgica multilingüe. Congreso de ASELE: Multilingüismo y enseñanza de ELE en contextos multiculturales 2012, 247–261.Google Scholar
Castañeda-Jiménez, G., & Jarvis, S. (2014). Exploring lexical diversity in second language Spanish. In K. Geeslin (Ed.), The handbook of Spanish second language acquisition (pp. 498–513). Malden, MA: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cestero, A., & Penadés, I. (2009). Corpus de textos escritos para el análisis de errores de aprendices de E/LE (CORANE) [CD-ROM]. Alcalá de Henares: Universidad de Alcalá.Google Scholar
Cheng, Y.-S. (2008). Factors associated with foreign language writing anxiety. Foreign Language Annals, 35(5), 647–656. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, M. (2019). The effects of prompts on L2 writing performance and engagement. Foreign Language Annals, 52(3), 576–594. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Conrad, M., Recio, G., & Jacobs, A. (2011). The time course of emotion effects in first and second language processing: A cross cultural ERP study with German–Spanish bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 21, 351. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cortes, V. (2004). Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing: Examples from history and biology. English for Specific Purposes, 23(4), 397–423. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crossley, S. A., Salsbury, T., McNamara, D. S., & Jarvis, S. (2010). Predicting lexical proficiency in language learner texts using computational indices. Language Testing, 28(4), 561–580. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davidson, S., Yamada, A., Fernández-Mira, P., Carando, A., Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C. H., & Sagae, K. (2020). Developing NLP tools with a new corpus of learner Spanish. Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference 2020, 7238–7243.Google Scholar
Degner, J., Doycheva, C., & Wentura, D. (2012). It matters how much you talk: On the automaticity of affective connotations of first and second language words. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15(1), 181–189. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, J. M., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 237–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Mello, S., & Mills, C. (2014). Emotions while writing about emotional and non-emotional topics. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 140–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emmersion. (2020). WebCAPE/CEFR Equivalencies. Retrieved on 27 July 2021 from [URL]
Frens, J. (2017). Lexical diversity [GitHub repository]. Retrieved on 27 July 2021 from [URL]
Granger, S. (2011). How to use foreign and second language learner corpora? In A. Mackey & S. Gass (Eds.), A guide to research methods in second language acquisition (pp. 7–29). Oxford: Basil Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (2015). Introduction: Learner corpus research– past, present and future. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of learner corpus research (pp. 1–5). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gregori-Signes, C., & Clavel-Arroitia, B. (2015). Analysing lexical density and lexical diversity in university students’ written discourse. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1981, 546–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hashemian, M., & Heidari, A. (2013). The relationship between L2 learners’ motivation/attitude and success in L2 writing. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 701, 476–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Instituto Cervantes. (2020). El español: Una lengua viva. Informe 2020. Madrid: Instituto Cervantes. Retrieved on 27 July 2021 from [URL]
Ishikawa, T. (2006). The effect of task complexity and language proficiency on task-based language performance. Journal of Asia TEFL, 3(4), 193–225.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S. (2002). Short texts, best-fitting curves and new measures of lexical diversity. Language Testing, 19(1), 57–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koizumi, R., & In’nami, Y. (2012). Effects of text length on lexical diversity measures: Using short texts with less than 200 tokens. System, 40(4), 554–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J. (2011). Task complexity and linguistic and discourse features of narrative writing performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(2), 148–161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 390–403. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J., & Trebits, A. (2012). The role of task complexity, modality and aptitude in narrative task performance. Language Learning, 62(2), 439–472. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kousta, S. T., Vinson, D. P., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words. Cognition, 112(3), 473–481. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2008). Cognitive task complexity and written output in Italian and French as a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(1), 48–60. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuperman, V., Estes, Z., Brysbaert, M., & Warriner, A. B. (2014). Emotion and language: Valence and arousal affect word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1065–1081. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kyle, K. (2020). Measuring lexical richness. In S. Webb (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp. 454–476). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production. Applied linguistics, 16(3), 307–322. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lozano, C. (2009). CEDEL2: Corpus Escrito del Español como L2. In C. M. Bretones Callejas, J. F. Fernández Sánchez, J. R. Ibáñez Ibáñez, M. E. García Sánchez, M. E. Cortés de los Ríos, S. Salaberri Ramiro, M. S. Cruz Martínez, N. Perdú Honeyman, & B. Cantizano Márquez (Eds.), Applied linguistics now: Understanding language and mind/La lingüística aplicada actual: Comprendiendo el lenguaje y la mente (pp. 197–212) Almería: Universidad de Almería.Google Scholar
Mavrou, I., & Bustos-López, F. (2019). La influencia de la memoria operativa y de la inteligencia emocional en la expresión de la emoción en español como segunda lengua. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 141, 117–129. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, P. M. (2005). An assessment of the range and usefulness of lexical diversity measures and the potential of the measure of textual, lexical diversity (MTLD) (Doctoral dissertation). Memphis: University of Memphis Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R., Tracy-Ventura, N., & McManus, K. (2017). Anglophone students abroad: Identity, social relationships, and language learning. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M. (2014). Cross-linguistic influence and formulaic language: Recurrent word sequences in French learner writing. In L. Roberts, I. Vedder, & J. Hulstijn (Eds.), EuroSLA Yearbook (pp. 216–237). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). L1 frequency in foreign language acquisition: Recurrent word combinations in French and Spanish EFL learner writing. Second Language Research 33(1), 13–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paquot, M., Naets, H., & Gries, S. T. (2021). Using syntactic co-occurrences to trace phraseological complexity development in learner writing: Verb + object structures in LONGDALE. In B. Le Bruyn & M. Paquot (Eds.), Learner corpus research meets second language acquisition (pp. 122–147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A. (2012). Affective processing in bilingual speakers: Disembodied cognition? International Journal of Psychology, 47(6), 405–428. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rojo, G., & Palacios, I. M. (2016). Learner Spanish on computer: The CAES Corpus de Aprendices de Español project. In M. Alonso-Ramos (Ed.), Spanish learner corpus research: Current trends and future perspectives (pp. 55–87). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sadeghi, K., & Dilmaghani, S. (2013). The relationship between lexical diversity and genre in Iranian EFL Learners’ writings. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(2), 328–334. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R. (2005). Generalizability of writing scores: An application of structural equation modeling. Language Testing, 22(1), 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schoonen, R., van Gelderen, A., de Glopper, K., Hulstijn, J., Simis, A., Snellings, P., & Stevenson, M. (2003). First language and second language writing: The role of linguistic knowledge, speed of processing, and metacognitive knowledge. Language Learning, 53 (1), 165–202. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N., Trofimovich, P., Gatbonton, E., & Sokolovskaya, A. (2008). Feeling affect in a second language: The role of word recognition automaticity. The Mental Lexicon, 3(1), 47–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheikh, N. A., & Titone, D. (2016). The embodiment of emotional words in a second language: An eye-movement study. Cognition and Emotion, 30(3), 488–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1998). Task-based instruction. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 181, 268–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., Imbault, C., Sánchez, M. A. P., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Norms of valence and arousal for 14,031 Spanish words. Behavior Research Methods, 49(1), 111–123. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tabari, M., & Wang, Y. (2021). The effects of prompt types on L2 learners’ textual emotionality and lexical complexity. Journal of Second Language Studies.Google Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N., Mitchell, R., & McManus, K. (2016). The LANGSNAP Longitudinal Learner Corpus: Design and use. In Alonso Ramos, M. (Ed.), Spanish learner corpus research: Current trends and future perspectives (pp. 117–142). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tracy-Ventura, N., & Myles, F. (2015). The importance of task variability in the design of learner corpora for SLA research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 58–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamada, A., Davidson, S., Fernández-Mira, P., Carando, A., Sagae, K., & Sánchez-Gutiérrez, C. (2020). COWS-L2H: A corpus of Spanish learner writing. Research in Corpus Linguistics, 8(1), 17–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yu, G. (2010). Lexical diversity in writing and speaking task performances. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 236–259. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zhan, J., Sun, Q., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Effects of manipulating writing task complexity on learners’ performance in completing vocabulary and syntactic tasks. Language Teaching Research. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (7)

Cited by seven other publications

Minnillo, Sophia, Claudia Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Ana Ruiz-Alonso-Bartol, Emily Morgan & Carmen González Gómez
2024. Predictors of accuracy in L2 Spanish preterit-imperfect production. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 10:2 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Claudia H., Sophia Minnillo, Paloma Fernández Mira & Andrea Hernández
2024. Prompt response variation in learner corpus research: Implications for data interpretation. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics 3:3 ► pp. 100134 ff. DOI logo
Carando, Agustina, Sophia Minnillo, Paloma Fernández-Mira, Sam Davidson, Kenji Sagae & Claudia Sánchez-Gutiérrez
2023. Writing development in Spanish as a second and heritage language: a corpus study on complexity. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 10:1 ► pp. 59 ff. DOI logo
Gudmestad, Aarnes
2022. Development of grammar, vocabulary, and pragmatics in an additional language: insights from Spanish learner corpus research. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 9:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Lozano, Cristóbal & Paloma Fernández-Mira
2022. Designing, compiling and interrogating corpora in L2 Spanish acquisition research. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 9:2 ► pp. 190 ff. DOI logo
Minnillo, Sophia, Claudia Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Agustina Carando, Samuel Davidson, Paloma Fernández Mira & Kenji Sagae
2022. Preterit-imperfect acquisition in L2 Spanish writing: Moving beyond lexical aspect. Research in Corpus Linguistics 10:1 ► pp. 156 ff. DOI logo
Sánchez-Gutiérrez, Claudia, Barbara De Cock & Nicole Tracy-Ventura
2022. Spanish corpora and their pedagogical uses: challenges and opportunities. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 9:2 ► pp. 105 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 november 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.