Cover not available
Introduction published In:
Segmental, prosodic and fluency features in phonetic learner corpora
Edited by Jürgen Trouvain, Frank Zimmerer, Bernd Möbius, Mária Gósy and Anne Bonneau
[International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 3:2] 2017
► pp. 105–117
Introduction

Segmental, prosodic and fluency features in phonetic learner corpora

Introduction to the special issue

| Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
| Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
| Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany
| Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary
| LORIA, Nancy, France
Article outline
  • 1.Phonetic learner corpora as a special type of corpora
  • 2.Analysing phonetic learner corpora
    • 2.1Analysing fluency
    • 2.2Analysing prosody
    • 2.3Analysing vowels and consonants
  • 3.Conclusions and outlook
    • 3.1Data size and diversity of user groups
    • 3.2Phenomena of investigation
    • 3.3Availability
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 4 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.3.2.01tro
References (28)
References
Ballier, N., & Martin, Ph. 2015. “Speech annotation of learner corpora”. In S. Granger, G. Gilquin, & F. Meunier (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 107–134. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belz, M., Sauer, S., Lüdeling, A., & Mooshammer, C. this volume. “Fluently disfluent? Pauses and repairs of advanced learners and native speakers of German”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2). DOI logo
Best, C. T. 1995. A direct realist perspective on cross-language speech perception. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. York: Timonium, MD, 167–200.Google Scholar
Carranza, M., Cucchiarini, C., Burgos, P., & Strik, H. 2014. “Non-native speech corpora for the development of computer assisted pronunciation training systems”. In L. Gómez Chova, A. López Martínez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies Edulearn 2014. Barcelona: IATED Academy, 3624–3633.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Delais-Roussarie, E., Avanzi, M., & Herment, S. (Eds.) 2015. Prosody and Language in Contact. L2 Acquisition, Attrition and Languages in Multilingual Situations. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. 2015. Pronunciation Fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 Teaching and Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Díaz-Negrillo, A., Ballier, N., & Thompson, P. (Eds.) 2013. Automatic Treatment and Analysis of Learner Corpus Data. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Draxler, C. 2008. Korpusbasierte Sprachverarbeitung. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Gunter Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Durand, J., Gut, U., & Kristoffersen, G. (Eds.) 2014. Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology. (Oxford Handbook of Linguistics). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. 1995. “Second language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems”. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. York: Timonium, MD, 233–272.Google Scholar
García Lecumberri, M. L., Cooke, M., & Wester, M. this volume. “A bi-directional task-based corpus of learners’ conversational speech”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2).
Gósy, M., Gyarmathy, D., & Beke, A. this volume. “Phonetic analysis of filled pauses based on a Hungarian-English learner corpus”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2). DOI logo
Granger, S., Gilquin, G., & Meunier, F. (Eds.) 2015. The Cambridge Handbook of Learner Corpus Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. 2012. “The LeaP corpus. A multilingual corpus of spoken learner German and learner English”. In T. Schmidt, & K. Wörner (Eds.), Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 3–23. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gut, U. this volume. “Phonological development in different learning contexts – a corpus-based study”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2). DOI logo
Kuhl, P., & Iverson, P. 1995. “Linguistic experience and the ‘perceptual magnet effect’”. In W. Strange (Ed.), Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience Theoretical and Methodological Issues in Cross-language Speech Research. York: Timonium, MD, 91–120.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, O., Alm, M., Schümchen, N., & Fischer, K. this volume. “Comparing visualization techniques for learning second language prosody – first results”. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 4(2). DOI logo
Quené, H., & Orr, R. 2014. Long-term convergence of speech rhythm in L1 and L2 English. In N. Campbell, D. Gibbon, & D. Hirst (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Speech Prosody, Dublin, 342–346. [URL] (last accessed 11 July 2017)
Raab, M., Gruhn, R., & Noeth, E. 2007. Non-native speech databases. In S. Furui, & T. Kawahara (Eds.), Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU), Kyoto/Japan. 413–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, T., & Wörner, K. (Eds.) 2012. Multilingual Corpora and Multilingual Corpus Analysis. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tono, Y., Kawaguchi, Y., & Minegishi, M. (Eds.) 2012. Developmental and Crosslinguistic Perspectives in Learner Corpus Research. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Trouvain, J., Bonneau, A., Colotte, V., Fauth, C., Fohr, D., Jouvet, D., Jügler, J., Laprie, Y., Mella, O., Möbius, B., & Zimmerer, F. 2016. The IFCASL corpus of French and German non-native and native read speech. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, T. Declerck, S. Goggi, M. Grobelnik, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, H. Mazo, A. Moreno, J. Odijk, & S. Piperidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC), Portorož, 1333–1338. [URL] (last accessed 11 July 2017)
Trouvain, J., & Zimmerer, F. 2016. “Phonetische Lernerkorpora und ihr Nutzen im DaF-Bereich”. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 53(4), 204–212.Google Scholar
Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., & Bradlow, A. R. 2010. “The Wildcat Corpus of native- and foreign-accented English: communicative efficiency across conversational dyads with varying language alignment profiles”. Language and Speech 53(4), 510–540. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wagner, P. Trouvain, J., & Zimmerer, F. 2015. “In defense of stylistic diversity in speech research”. Journal of Phonetics 481, 1–12. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zimmerer, F., & Trouvain, J. 2015. Productions of /h/ in German: French vs. German speakers. In Möller, S., Ney, H., Möbius, B., Nöth, E., & Steidl, S. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech), Dresden, 1922–1926. [URL]Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Cavicchio, Federica & Maria Grazia Busà
2023. Lending a hand to speech. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 14:2 ► pp. 218 ff. DOI logo
Gudmestad, Aarnes
2022. Development of grammar, vocabulary, and pragmatics in an additional language: insights from Spanish learner corpus research. Journal of Spanish Language Teaching 9:2 ► pp. 161 ff. DOI logo
Trouvain, Jürgen
2022. Das IFCASL-Korpus als phonetisches Lernerkorpus. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 50:1 ► pp. 82 ff. DOI logo
Herry-Bénit, Nadine, Stéphanie Lopez, Takeki Kamiyama & Jeff Tennant
2021. The interphonology of contemporary English corpus (IPCE-IPAC). International Journal of Learner Corpus Research 7:2 ► pp. 275 ff. DOI logo
Romero-Trillo, Jesús
2018. Corpus Pragmatics and Second Language Pragmatics: A Mutualistic Entente in Theory and Practice. Corpus Pragmatics 2:2 ► pp. 113 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.