Conceptualizations of sociopolitical culture in Hong Kong and Mainland China
An analysis of the Occupy Central Movement in the Western press
This study of media discourse focuses on how the sociopolitical culture in Hong Kong and Mainland China is conceptualized by the English-speaking press. To this end, the present research studies newspaper articles on the Hong Kong Occupy Central Movement published in Britain, the United States, and Australia. Cultural Linguistics, combined with corpus analytical techniques, is used to examine the construals of hong kong and mainland china. A 303,455-word corpus which contains 402 articles was compiled for data analysis. It is found that the disagreement between the Hong Kong civilians and the Mainland Chinese government is often reported with metonymical conceptualizations (place for inhabitants versus place for the institution). In general, the sociopolitical culture in Hong Kong and Mainland China is imbued with negative emotions, disharmony, and power differences, as is evident from the body, illness, disease, container, and possession conceptualizations. At the end of this paper, issues about researching conceptualizations in newspaper texts, such as the journalistic input, are discussed.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Theoretical background
- 2.1Cultural Linguistics
- 2.2Empirical studies
- 3.Data and methodology
- 4.Findings and discussion
- 4.1Conceptualizations of hong kong
- 4.2Conceptualizations of mainland china
- 5.Conclusion
- Notes
-
References
References (39)
References
Bednarek, M., & Caple, H. (2012). News discourse. London: Continuum International.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bhatia, A. (2015). Construction of discursive illusions in the ‘Umbrella Movement.’ Discourse & Society, 26(4), 407–427. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cameron, L. (1999). Identifying and describing metaphor in spoken discourse. In L. Cameron & G. Low (Eds.), Researching and applying metaphor (pp. 105–132). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Charteris-Black, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cheng, W., & Ho, J. (2014). Brainwashing or nurturing positive values: Competing voices in Hong Kong’s national education debate. Journal of Pragmatics, 741, 1–14. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ding, Y., Noël, D., & Wolf, H.-G. (2010). Patterns in metaphor translation: Translating fear metaphors between English and Chinese. In R. Xiao (Ed.), Using corpora in contrastive and translation studies (pp. 40–61). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dirven, R., Polzenhagen, F., & Wolf, H.-G. (2007). Cognitive linguistics, ideology, and critical discourse analysis. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 1222–1240). Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dow Jones. (2016). Faktiva: Global News Database & Licensed Content. Available at [URL]. Accessed April 10, 2016.
Flowerdew, J., & Leong, S. (2007). Metaphors in the discursive construction of patriotism: The case of Hong Kong’s constitutional reform debate. Discourse & Society, 18(3), 273–294. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Goatly, A. (2002–2005). METALUDE: Metaphor at Lingnan University, Department of English. [Retrieved June 13, 2017, from [URL]].
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar. 4th ed. Abingdon: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hart, C. (2010). Critical discourse analysis and cognitive science: New perspectives on immigration discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hart, C. (2014). Discourse, grammar and ideology: Functional and cognitive perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Academic.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hart, C. (2015). Discourse. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 322–346). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hong Kong Basic Law. (2012). Chapter IV: Political Structure. [Retrieved January 12, 2017, from [URL]].
Jeffries, L. (2010). Critical stylistics: The power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koller, V., & Semino, E. (2009). Metaphor, politics and gender: A case study from Germany. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 9–35). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lazar, M. (2009). Gender, war and body politics: A critical multimodal analysis of metaphor in advertising. In K. Ahrens (Ed.), Politics, gender and conceptual metaphors (pp. 209–234). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, F. (2015). Media communication and the Umbrella Movement: Introduction to the special issue. Chinese Journal of Communication, 8(4), 333–337. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, P., So, C., & Leung, L. (2015). Social media and Umbrella Movement: Insurgent public sphere in formation. Chinese Journal of Communication, 8(4), 356–375. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis: A multimodal introduction. Los Angeles: Sage.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Markert, K., & Nissim, M. (2006). Metonymic proper names: A corpus-based account. In A. Stefanowitsch & S. Gries (Eds.), Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy (pp. 152–174). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mey, J., & Ladegaard, H. (2015). Discourse, democracy and diplomacy: A pragmatic analysis of the Occupy Central movement in Hong Kong. Word, 61(4), 319–334. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Musolff, A. (2010). Metaphor, nation and the holocaust: The concept of the body politic. New York: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pragglejaz Group. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1–39. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sharifian, F. (2015a). Cultural Linguistics. In F. Sharifian (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of language and culture (pp. 473–492). Abingdon: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sharifian, F. (2015b). Cultural Linguistics and World Englishes. World Englishes, 34(4), 515–532. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sing, M. (2009). Hong Kong at the crossroads: Public pressure for democratic reform. In M. Sing (Ed.), Politics and government in Hong Kong: Crisis under Chinese sovereignty (pp. 112–135). London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, G., & Wong, J. (2013). After smooth handover, now the hard part. In Y. Zheng & C. Yew (Eds.), Hong Kong under Chinese rule: Economic integration and political gridlock (pp. 3–19). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolf, H.-G., & Chan, T. (2016). Understanding Asia by means of cognitive sociolinguistics and cultural linguisticsthe example of ghosts in Hong Kong English. In G. Leitner, A. Hashim & H.-G. Wolf (Eds.), Communicating with Asia: The future of English as a global language (pp. 249–266). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolf, H.-G., & Juffermans, K. (2008). Conceptions of globalization in African and Western newspaper corpora: A case study. In H.-G. Wolf, L. Peter & F. Polzenhagen (Eds.), Focus on English: Linguistic structure, language variation and discursive use (pp. 133–149). Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wolf, H.-G., & Polzenhagen, F. (2007). Fixed expressions as manifestations of cultural conceptualizations: Examples from African varieties of English. In P. Skandera (Ed.), Phraseology and culture in English (pp. 399–435). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Latić, Denisa, Frank Polzenhagen, Hans‐Georg Wolf & Arne Peters
2024.
A research bibliography for World Englishes and Cultural Linguistics.
World Englishes ![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.