Cover not available
Article published In:
Interactional Linguistics
Vol. 1:1 (2021) ► pp.90–122

The emancipation of gestures

ORCID logo | The University of Texas at Austin
Interactional linguists are interested in ways in which communicative resources emerge from interactional practice. This paper defines a place for the study of gesture within interactional linguistics, conceived as ‘linguistics of time’ (Hopper, 2015). It shows how hand gestures of a certain kind – conceptual gestures – emerge from ‘hands-on’ instrumental actions, are repeated and habitualized, and are taken to other communicative contexts where they enable displaced reference and conceptual representation of experiences.
The data for this study is a video-recording of one work-day of an auto-shop owner (Streeck, 2017). The corpus includes auto-repair sequences in which he spontaneously improvises new gestures in response to situated communication needs, and subsequent narrative sequences during which he re-enacts them as he explains his prior actions. He also makes numerous ‘pre-fabricated’ gestures, gestures that circulate in the society at large and that are acquired by copying other conversationalists. They are ready-made manual concepts. The paper explains the life-cycle of conceptual gestures from spontaneous invention to social sedimentation and thereby sheds light on the ongoing emergence of symbolic forms in corporeal practice and intercorporeal communication.
Keywords: gesture, conceptualization, grammaticalization, interaction, evolution
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Conceptual gestures
  • 3.The emancipation of conceptual gestures in an auto-shop
    • 3.1First abstraction: From action to gesture
    • 3.2Second abstraction: Iconicity and displacement
    • 3.3Third abstraction: Generalization across contexts
  • 4.Parallels between grammaticalization and the emancipation of gestures
    • 4.1Repetition and habitualization
    • 4.2Bleaching
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References


This article is available free of charge.

Published online: 6 May 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/il.20013.str
References (75)
References
Andrén, M. (2017). Children’s expressive handling of objects in a shared world. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction (pp. 105–142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986 [1952–3]). The problem of speech genres. In C. Emerson & M. Holquist (Eds.), Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barsalou, L. W., Kyle Simmons, W., Barbey, A. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2003). Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(2), 84–91. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bavelas, J., Chovil, N., Lawrie, D. A., & Wade, A. (1992). Interactive gestures. Discourse Processes, 151, 469–489. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality. Garden City: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Birdwhistell, R. (1970). Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Bressem, J., & Mueller, C. (2014). A repertoire of German recurrent gestures with pragmatic functions. In C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. H. Ladewig, D. McNeill & J. Bressem (Eds.), Body language communication. An international handbook on multimodality in human interaction (Vol. Volume 21, pp. 1575–1591). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brookes, H. J. (2004). A repertoire of South African quotable gestures. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 14(2), 186–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. (1998). Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The New Psychology of Language (Vol. 21, pp. 145–168). Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Calbris, G. (1990). The semiotics of French gestures. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
(2011). Elements of meaning in gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins B.V.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cienki, A., & Müller, C. (Eds.). (2008). Metaphor and gesture. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuffari, E., & Streeck, J. (2017). Taking the world by hand: How (some) hand gestures mean. In C. Meyer, J. Streeck & J. S. Jordan (Eds.), Intercorporeality: Emerging socialities in interaction (pp. 173–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De Jorio, A. (2000 [1832]). Gesture in Naples and gesture in classical antiquity (A. Kendon, Trans.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-world. A commentary on Heidegger’s “Being and time”. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Efron, D. (1972 [1941]). Gesture, race and culture. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 11, 49–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Galantucci, B. (2005). An experimental study of the emergence of human communication systems. Cognitive Science, 291, 737–767. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 455–479. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Givon, T., & Malle, B. F. (2002). The evolution of language out of pre-Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Goodman, N. (1976 (1968)). Languages of art (2 ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language: Essays in honor of David McNeill (pp. 195–212). Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haiman, J. (1994). Ritualization and the development of language. In W. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization (pp. 3–28). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2011). Grammaticalization theory as a tool for reconstructing language evolution. In K. R. Gibson & M. Tallermann (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopper, P. J. (1994). Phonogenesis. In W. Pagliuca (Ed.), Perspectives on grammaticalization (pp. 29–45). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2011). Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In P. Auer & S. Pfänder (Eds.), Constructions. Emerging and emergent (pp. 22–44). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2015). Hermann Paul’s emergent grammar. In P. Auer & R. W. Murray (Eds.), Hermann Paul’s Principles of language history revisited (pp. 237–256). Berlin: de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E., & Johnson, C. M. (2009). Modeling the emergence of language as an embodied collective cognitive activity. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11, 523–546. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2011). Being alive. Essays on movement, knowledge, and description. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keller, R. (1994). On language change: the invisible hand in language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1988). How gestures can become like words. In F. Poyatos (Ed.), Crosscultural perspectives on nonverbal communication (pp. 131–141). Toronto: C. J. Hogrefe.Google Scholar
(1995). Gestures as illocutionary and discourse structure markers in Southern Italian conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(3), 247–279. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2004). Gesture: Visible action as utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Manual actions, speech and the nature of language In D. Gambarara & A. Givigliano (Eds.), Origine e sviluppo del linguaggio, fra teoria e storia. Società di Filosofia del Linguaggio, atti del XV congresso nazionale. Arcavata di Rende (CS), 15-17 settembre 2008 (pp. 19–33). Rome: Aracne editrice s.r.l.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. (1982). Categories: An essay in cognitive linguistics. In T. L. S. O. Korea (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 139–193). Seoul: Hanshin.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laland, K. N. (2017). Darwin’s unfinished symphony: How culture made the human mind. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R. W. (1998). Conceptualization, symbolization, and grammar. In M. Tomasello (Ed.), The New psychology of language (Vol. 11, pp. 1–40). Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
LeBaron, C. D. (1998). Building communication: Architectural gestures and the embodiment of new ideas. Ph.D. Dissertation: The University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
LeBaron, C. D., & Streeck, J. (2000). Gestures, knowledge, and the world. In D. McNeill (Ed.), Language and gesture (pp. 118–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A. (1993). Gesture and speech. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Luria, A. (1973). The working brain. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1973 (1935)). The techniques of the body. Economy and Society, 2(1), 70–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind. What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Müller, C. (2003). Forms and uses of the Palm Up Open Hand. In C. Müller & R. Posner (Eds.), The semantics and pragmatics of everyday gestures. The Berlin Conference (pp. 234–256). Berlin: Weidler.Google Scholar
Nuñez, R. (2008). A fresh look at the foundations of mathematics: Gesture and the psychological reality of conceptual metaphor. In A. Cienki & C. Müller (Eds.), Metaphor and gesture (pp. 55–93). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Olson, D. (1994). The world on paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Padden, C., Hwang, S.-O., Lepic, R., & Seegers, S. (2014). Tools for language: Patterned iconicity in sign languages nouns and verbs. Topics in Cognitive Science, 71, 81–94. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. (1995 [1940]). Philosophical writings. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Perniss, P., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). The bridge of iconicity: from a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 369(1651), 1–13.Google Scholar
Reddy, M. (1979). The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 284–324). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London.Google Scholar
Schütz, A. (1945). On multiple realities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 5(4), 533–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheets-Johnstone, M.. (2010). Thinking in movement: Further analyses and validations. In J. Stewart, O. Gapenne & E. Di Paolo (Eds.), Enaction. Toward a new paradigm for Cognitive Science (pp. 165–181). Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2012). Kinesthetic memory. Further critical reflections and constructive analyses In T. F. Sabine, C. Koch, M. Summa and C. Müller (Eds.), Body memory, metaphor and movement (pp. 43–72). Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. (1996). From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking”. In J. J. Gumperz & S. Levinson (Eds.), Rethinking linguistic relativity (pp. 97–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sowa, T. (2006). Understanding coverbal iconic gestures in shape descriptions. Berlin: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft.Google Scholar
Streeck, J. (1993). Gesture as communication I: Its coordination with gaze and speech. Communication Monographs, 601(December 1993), 275–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2002). Grammars, words, and embodied meanings. On the evolution and uses of so and like . Journal of Communication, 52(3), 581–596. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2007). Geste und verstreichende Zeit. Innehalten und Bedeutungswandel der “bietenden Hand”. In H. Hausendorf (Ed.), Gespraech als Prozess (pp. 157–180). Tuebingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
(2008). Depicting by gestures. Gesture, 8(3), 285–301. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2009). Gesturecraft. The manu-facture of meaning. Amsterdam: Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2013). Interaction and the living body. Journal of Pragmatics, 461, 69–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). Self-making man. A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (2008). Origins of human communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, G. (2015). A million years of music. The emergence of human modernity. New York: Zone Books. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wehling, E. (2017). Discourse management gestures. Gesture, 16(2), 245–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Cited by (15)

Cited by 15 other publications

Choi, Yoon-Sung
2024. Descriptive Characteristics of Systematic Functional Gestures Used by Pre-Service Earth Science Teachers in Classroom Learning Environments. Journal of the Korean earth science society 45:4 ► pp. 377 ff. DOI logo
Glasson, Nicholas & Katherine Halley
2024. Less talk, more action? Exploring proficiency scores and embodied resources in online L2 interactions. Classroom Discourse ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Janin, Loanne
2024. A multimodal perspective on adult learners’ vocabulary explanations in the beginner-level L2 classroom. Classroom Discourse 15:1 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Löfgren, Agnes
2024.  The Interactional Histories of Performance Bodies : From Describing to Depicting Proposed Ideas at Opera Rehearsals . Research on Language and Social Interaction 57:3 ► pp. 301 ff. DOI logo
Stamp, Rose, Adi Ben Israel, Klil Eden, Lilyana Khatib, Vera Karpova & Hagit Hel Or
2024. Embodiment of sexuality by Israeli Sign Language signers and hearing Hebrew speakers. Journal of Sociolinguistics DOI logo
Tancredi, Sofia & Dor Abrahamson
2024. Stimming as Thinking: a Critical Reevaluation of Self-Stimulatory Behavior as an Epistemic Resource for Inclusive Education. Educational Psychology Review 36:3 DOI logo
Tolvanen, Eveliina
2024. ‘I think’ in Swedish L1 and L2 group interactions. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) 34:4 ► pp. 615 ff. DOI logo
Geva, Yuval
2023. Syntax and music for interaction. Pragmatics. Quarterly Publication of the International Pragmatics Association (IPrA) DOI logo
Kelly, Spencer D. & Quang‐Anh Ngo Tran
2023. Exploring the Emotional Functions of Co‐Speech Hand Gesture in Language and Communication. Topics in Cognitive Science DOI logo
Youn, Soo Jung
2023. Grammar as validity evidence for assessing L2 interactional competence. Applied Pragmatics 5:2 ► pp. 174 ff. DOI logo
Eskildsen, S. W.
2021. Embodiment, Semantics and Social Action: The Case of Object-Transfer in L2 Classroom Interaction. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
Harrison, Simon & Silva H. Ladewig
2021. Recurrent gestures throughout bodies, languages, and cultural practices. Gesture 20:2 ► pp. 153 ff. DOI logo
Harrison, Simon, Silva H. Ladewig & Jana Bressem
2021. The diversity of recurrency. Gesture 20:2 ► pp. 143 ff. DOI logo
Stukenbrock, Anja
2021. Multimodal Gestalts and Their Change Over Time: Is Routinization Also Grammaticalization?. Frontiers in Communication 6 DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Beyond Disfluency [Advances in Interaction Studies, 11], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.