Gaze selects the next speaker in answers to questions pronominally addressed to more than one co-participant
Like many other languages, but unlike modern (standard) English, German has a distinct second person plural pronoun
(
ihr, ‘you guys’), contrasting with the second person singular pronoun (
du). The second person plural
pronoun addresses a turn to more than one, and possibly all co-present participants. This paper investigates turn-taking after such multiply
addressed turns, taking as an example information-seeking questions, i.e., a sequential context in which a specific next action is relevant
in the adjacent position. It might appear that in such a context, self-selection applies (
Schegloff
1992: 122); more than one co-participant is addressed, but none selected as next speaker. In this paper, I show on the basis of
spontaneous interactions recorded with mobile eye-tracking equipment that this is not the case and that TCU-final gaze is employed to select
the next speaker. The participant not being gazed at TCU-finally is addressed, but not selected as the answerer in next position and may
provide an answer in a sequential position after the first answer. The article demonstrates that gaze is an efficient way to allocate turns
in the absence of verbal cues and thus contributes to our understanding of turn-taking from a multimodal perspective.
Article outline
- 1.Second person pronouns, gaze and next speaker selection
- 2.Quantitative results
- 2.1Data
- 2.2Methods
- 2.3Results
- 3.First and second answers after ihr-questions
- 4.Simultaneous answers to ihr-questions
- 5.Negotiating speakership in delayed responses
- 6.Conclusions
- Notes
-
References
References (48)
References
Auer, P. (2021). Turn-allocation and gaze: A multimodal revision of the ‘current-speaker-selects-next’ rule of the turn-taking system of conversation analysis. Discourse Studies,
23
(2), 117–140. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Auer, P. & Lindström, J. (to appear). On agency and affiliation in second assessments. German and Swedish opinion verbs in talk-in-interaction. In J. Lindström, R. Lauri, A. Peräkylä & M.-L. Sorjonen (Eds.), Intersubjectivity in Action. Amsterdam: Benjamins (Pragmatics & Beyond, N.S.).
Blythe, J., Garnder, R., Mushin, I. & Sterling, L. (2018). Tools of engagement: Selecting a next speaker in Australian aboriginal multiparty conversations. Research on Language and Social Interaction
51
(2), 145–170. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brône, G., Oben, B., Jehoul, A., Vranjes, J. & Feyaerts, K. (2017). Eye gaze and viewpoint in multimodal interaction management. Cognitive Linguistics
28
(3). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clayman, Steven E. 2010. Address terms in the service of other actions: The case of news interview talk. Discourse & Communication 4(2), 161–183. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clayman, Steven E. 2012. Address terms in the organization of turns at talk: The case of pivotal turn extensions, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 44, no. 13, 1853–1867. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Couper-Kuhlen, E. & Barth-Weingarten, D. (2011). A system for transcribing talk-in-interaction: GAT 2 translated and adapted for English. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion
12
1, 1–51 ([URL])
Deppermann, A. & Helmer, H. (2013). Zur Grammatik des Verstehens im Gespräch: Inferenzen anzeigen und Handlungskonsequenzen ziehen mit „also“ und „dann“. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft
32
(1), 1–40. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duncan, S. (1975). Interaction units during speaking turns in dyadic, face-to-face conversations. In A. Kendon, R. M. Harris & M. R. Key (Eds.), Organization of Behavior in Face-to-Face Interaction (pp. 199–212). The Hague: Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Günthner, S. (2000). Form concessive connector to discourse marker: The use of obwohl in everyday German interaction. In E. Couper-Kuhlen & B. Kortmann (Eds.), Cause, Condition, Concession, Contrast. Cognitive and Discourse Perspectives (pp. 439–468). Berlin, New York: de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Günthner, S. (2016). Praktiken erhöhter Dialogizität: onymische Anredeformen als Gesten personifizierter Zuwendung. Zeitschrift für Germanistische Linguistik
44
(4), 406–436. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Günthner, S. (2019). Namentliche Anreden in onkologischen Aufklärungsgesprächen: eine interaktional ausgerichtete Studie zu Formen und Funktionen onymischer Anreden. Online: [URL]. (retrieved May 26, 2020).
Hayashi, M., Mori, J. & Tagaki, T. (2002). Contingent achievement of co-tellership in a Japanese conversation: An analysis of talk, gaze and gesture. In C. Ford, B. A. Fox & S. Thompson (Eds.), The Language of Turn and Sequence (pp. 81–122). New York: Oxford University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Heritage, J. (2012). Epistemics in action: action formation and territories of knowledge. Reseach on Language and Social Interaction,
45
(1), 1–29. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holler, J. & Kendrick, K. (2015). Unaddressed participants’ gaze in multi-person interaction: Optimizing recipiency. Frontiers in Psychology,
6
(98). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kendon, A. (1967). Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica
26
1, 22–63. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kendon, A. (1990). Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lerner, G. H. (1992). Assisted storytelling: Deploying shared knowledge as a practical matter. Qualitative Sociology
15
(3), 247–271. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lerner, G. H. (2003). Selecting next speaker: The context sensitive operation of a context-free organization. Language in Society
32
1, 177–201. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Link, G. (1991). Plurals. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung (pp. 418–440). Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levinson, S. (2016). Turn-taking in human communication – origins and implications for language processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences
20
(1), 6–14. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mondada, L. (2019). Conventions for multimodal transcription. ([URL])
Raymond, G. T. (2003). Grammar and social organzation: Yes/no interrogatives and the structure of responding. American Sociological Review
68
(6), 939–976. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Robinson, J. D. (2020). Revisiting preference organization in context: A qualitative and quantitative examination of responses to information seeking. Research on Language and Social Interaction
53
(2), 197–222. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rossano, F. (2012). Gaze behavior in face-to-face interaction. Unpublished PhD, MPI for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rossano, F., Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (2009). Gaze, questioning and culture. In J. Sidnell (Ed.), Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives (pp. 187–249). Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn taking for conversation. Language
50
(4), 696–735. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in Conversational openings. American Anthropologist
70
(6), 1075–1095. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selting, M., et al. (2009). Gesprächsanalytisches Transkriptionssystem 2 (GAT2). Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion
10
1, 353–401. ([URL]).
Stivers, T. (2021). Is conversation built for two? The partitioning of social interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction
54
(1), 1–19. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stivers, T. & Rossano, F. (2010). Mobilizing response. Research on Language and Social Interaction
43
(1), 3–31. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stukenbrock, A. (2018a). Blickpraktiken von SprecherInnen und AdressatInnen bei der Lokaldeixis. Mobile Eye Tracking-Analysen zur Herstellung von joint attention
. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion
19
1, 132–168. ([URL])
Stukenbrock, A. (2020). Deixis, meta-perceptive gaze practices, and the interactive achievement of joint attention. Frontiers in Psychology
11
1(1779). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stukenbrock, A. & Dao, A. N. (2019). Joint attention in passing: What dual mobile eye tracking reveals about gaze in coordinating embodied activities at a market. In Elisabeth Reber & Cornelia Gerhardt (Eds.), Embodied Activities in Face-to-Face and Mediated Settings (pp. 177–216). London etc.: Palgrave Macmillan. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tiitinen, S. & Ruusovuori, J. (2012). Engaging parents through gaze: Speaker selection in three-party interactions in maternity clinics. Patient Education and Counseling
89
(1), 38–43. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weiß, C. (2018). When gaze-selected next speakers do not take the turn. Journal of Pragmatics
133
1, 28–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weiß, C. (2019). Blickverhalten des nicht-blickselegierten Sprechers während Korrekturen und Elaborierungen. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion
20
1, 1–28. ([URL])
Weiß, C. (2020). Blick und Turn-Taking in Face-to-Face-Interaktionen. Multimodale Interaktionsanalysen triadischer Gesprächssituationen mit Hilfe von Eye-Tracking. Göttingen: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung. ([URL])
Wittenburg, P., Burgman, H., Russel, A., Klassmann, A., & Sloetjes, H. (2006). ELAN: A professional framework for multimodality research. Proc. 5th Intern. Conf. Lg. Resources and Evaluation (LREC).![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zima, E. (2018). Multimodale Mittel der Rederechtsaushandlung im gemeinsamen Erzählen. Gesprächsforschung – Online-Zeitschrift zur verbalen Interaktion
18
1, 241–273. ([URL])
Cited by (3)
Cited by three other publications
Blythe, Joe, Fakry Hamdani & Scott Barnes
2023.
Tactile engagement of prospective next speakers in Indonesian multiparty conversations.
Language in Society ► pp. 1 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Kendrick, Kobin H., Judith Holler & Stephen C. Levinson
2023.
Turn-taking in human face-to-face interaction is multimodal: gaze direction and manual gestures aid the coordination of turn transitions.
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 378:1875
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Dahmen, Josua & Joe Blythe
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.