Cover not available
Part of
Dimensions of Iconicity
Edited by Angelika Zirker, Matthias Bauer, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 15] 2017
► pp. 119–134

The ocean of surging emotion

The iconic representation of Symbolist transcendence in the poem “Feather Grass” by Konstantin Bal’mont

 | University of Hawaii
This article explores how Symbolist cognitive poetics governs links between the form of the poem and the visual and non-visual imagery pertaining to spiritual transcendence. It investigates how this experience is iconically represented via the blending of human and water ontologies in the poem “Feather Grass” (1895) by the Russian Symbolist poet Konstantin Bal'mont. The emergent structure of this blend, observed throughout Bal'mont’s poetry, points to flux and permeability of the human emotional terrain, including emotional memory. The blend consistently maps the transition from the earthly to the spiritual as a continuous fluid transmutation or liquescence (Kostetskaya 2015: 413). It facilitates the dissolution of various boundaries and the removal of the central Symbolist duality of realia (concrete reality) versus realiora (the true reality of the innermost and supra-material spheres). The liquescence of emotional fabric manifests itself across various features of the poem, such as prosody, rhyme, sound pattern and repetition. The structure of the poem blends various liquescent topologies in order to render non-representational sensations associated with the evocation of emotional memory: it is circular, reminiscent of rings formed on a water surface when a stone is thrown in; simultaneously, it is vertical representing the dynamics of sinking and rising; it also evokes the idea of water as a prototypical mirror.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The poem
  • 3.From emotion to iconicity via blending of the senses
  • 4.Phonetic, semantic and prosodic features of the poem
  • 5.The structure of the poem
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 September 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.15.07kos
References (31)
References
Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays, M. Holquist (ed.). Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bal'mont, K. D. 2011. Feather grass. In Polnoe Sobranie Poezii i Prozy v Odnom Tome. (Complete Collection of Poetry and Prose in a Single Volume). Moskow: Al'fa-Kniga.Google Scholar
. 2011. Through my dreams I attempted to catch fleeting shadows. In Polnoe Sobranie Poezii i Prozy v Odnom Tome. (Complete Collection of Poetry and Prose in a Single Volume). Moskow: Al'fa-Kniga.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, Charles. 1857. Les Fleurs du mal. Paris: Poulet-Malassis et de Broise.Google Scholar
Baudelaire, C. 1931[1857]. Flowers of Evil, transl. L. P. Shanks & M. Felten. New York NY: Ives Washburn.Google Scholar
. 1952[1857]. Poems of Baudelaire: A Translation of Les Fleurs Du Mal, transl. R. Campbell. New York NY: Pantheon Books.
Benzon, W. L. 2013. The jasmine papers: Notes on the study of poetry in the age of cognitive science. SSRN November 2013. DOI logo (10 August 2016).Google Scholar
Berdiaev, N. A. 1918. O Vlasti Prostranstv nad Russkoi Dushoi (About the power Russian expanses have over the Russia’s soul). In Sud’ba Rossii. Biblioteka Iakova Krotova. 〈[URL]〉 (30 September 2015).Google Scholar
Bowlt, J. E. 1991. The Moscow art market. In Between Tsar and People: Educated Society and the Quest for Public Identity in Late Imperial Russia, E. W. Clowes, S. D. Kassow & J. L. West (eds), 108–128. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bunin, I. A. 1967. Kovyl'. Slovo o polku Igoreve. (The Song of Igor’s Campaign). Leningrad: Sovetskii pisatel', Leningrad chapter.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. 2007. Thinking in Circles: An Essay on Ring Composition. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, M. H. 2007. Poetic iconicity. In Cognition in Language: Volume in Honour of Professor Elżbieta Tabakowska, W. Chłopick, A. Pawelec & A. Pokojska (eds), 472–501. Kraków: Tertium.Google Scholar
. 2008. Revisiting/revisioning the icon through metaphor. Metaphor and Iconicity: A Cognitive Approach in Analysing Texts. Poetics Today 29(2): 353–370.Google Scholar
. 2009. Minding: Feeling, form, and meaning in the creation of poetic iconicity. Applications of Cognitive Linguistics 10: 169–196.Google Scholar
. 2011. The role of metaphor in poetic iconicity. In Beyond Cognitive Metaphor Theory: Perspectives on Literary Metaphor, M. Fludernik (ed.), 158–175. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Isham, H. F. 2004. Image of the Sea: Oceanic Consciousness in the Romantic Century. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Ivanov, V. I. & Tolmachevа, V. M. 1994. Rodnoe i Vselenskoe (The Native and the Universal). Moskow: Izd-vo “Respublika”.Google Scholar
Kostetskaya, A. 2015. Russian symbolism in flux: Emotional fluidity across media, genre and realities. Slavic and Eastern European Journal (SEEJ) 59(2): 413–430.Google Scholar
. 2016. A Woman in Nature / a woman is nature: The eternal feminine as a conceptual blend of human and liquescent ontologies in the Russian symbolist poetics. In Meanings and Values of Water in Russian Culture, J. Costlow & A. Rosenholm (eds). New York NY: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Kövecses, Z. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Mints, Z. G. & Bogomolv, N. A. 2004. Poetika Russkogo Simvolizma (The Poetics of Russian Symbolism). Sankt-Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPB.Google Scholar
Moon, D. 2014. The Plough that Broke the Steppes: Agriculture and Environment on Russia’s Grasslands, 1700–1914. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Norwick, S. A. 2006. The History of Metaphors of Nature: Science and Literature from Homer to Al Gore. Lewiston NY: Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
Ortony, A. 2001. Why metaphors are necessary and not just nice. In Cultural Metaphors: Readings, Research Translations, and Commentary, M. Gannon (ed.), 9–22. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Rodari, G. 1996. The Grammar of Fantasy: An Introduction to the Art of Inventing Stories. New York NY: Teachers & Writers Collaborative.Google Scholar
Starr, G. G. 2010. Multisensory imagery. In Introduction to Cognitive Cultural Studies, L. Zunshine (ed.), 275–292. Baltimore MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. 2013. Kierkegaard’s Influence on Literature, Criticism and Art – Sweden and Norway, Vol. 3. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tojner, P. E. (ed.). 2001. Munch in His Own Words. Munich: Prestel.Google Scholar
Toporov, V. N. 1995. Mif, ritual, simvol, obraz: issledovaniia v oblasti mifopoeticheskogo: izbranno (Myth, Ritual, Symbol, Image: Research in Mythopoetics: Selected Works). Moskow: Progress.Google Scholar
Turner, M. 2013. Iconicity by blending. In Iconic Investigations [Iconicity in Language and Literature 12], L. Elleström, O. Fischer & C. Ljungberg (eds), 13–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
West, M. C. 2007. Edvard Munch's “To the Forest”: Nature as Medium and Metaphor. MA thesis, University of North Carolina.