Cover not available
Part of
Ideophones, Mimetics and Expressives
Edited by Kimi Akita and Prashant Pardeshi
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 16] 2019
► pp. 13–34

Chapter 1
‘Ideophone’ as a comparative concept

| Radboud University | Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
This chapter makes the case for ‘ideophone’ as a comparative concept: a notion that captures a recurrent typological pattern and provides a template for understanding language-specific phenomena that prove similar. It revises an earlier definition to account for the observation that ideophones typically form an open lexical class, and uses insights from canonical typology to explore the larger typological space. According to the resulting definition, a canonical ideophone is a member of an open lexical class of marked words that depict sensory imagery. The five elements of this definition can be seen as dimensions that together generate a possibility space to characterise cross-linguistic diversity in depictive means of expression. This approach allows for the systematic comparative treatment of ideophones and ideophone-like phenomena. Some phenomena in the larger typological space are discussed to demonstrate the utility of the approach: phonaesthemes in European languages, specialised semantic classes in West-Chadic, diachronic diversions in Aslian, and depicting constructions in signed languages.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.‘Ideophone’ as a typological concept
    • 2.1Five key properties of ideophones
    • 2.2Refining the definition
    • 2.3Ideophones are not (just) iconic signs
  • 3.Ideophones and related phenomena
    • 3.1Phonaesthemes
    • 3.2Semantic subclasses: The case of Mwaghavul
    • 3.3Diachronic diversions: An Aslian parallel
    • 3.4Are there ideophones in signed languages?
  • 4.In closing
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 6 May 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.16.02din
References (95)
References
Ahlner, F. and Zlatev, J. 2010. Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38: 298–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ajello, R., Mazzoni, L. and Nicolai, F. 2001. Linguistic gestures: Mouthing in Italian Sign Language. In The Hands Are the Head of the Mouth: The Mouth as Articulator in Sign Languages, P. Boyes Braem and R. L. Sutton-Spence (eds), 231–246. Hamburg: Signum Verlag.Google Scholar
Akita, K. 2008. Phonosemantic evidence for the mimetic stratum in the Japanese lexicon. In Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Sarah Berson et al. (eds), 1–12. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
2009. A grammar of sound-symbolic words in Japanese: Theoretical approaches to iconic and lexical properties of Japanese mimetics. Ph.D. dissertation, Kobe University. [URL]
2011. Toward a phonosemantic definition of iconic words. In Semblance and Signification [Iconicity in Language and Literature 10], P. Michelucci, O. Fischer and C. Ljungberg (eds), 3–18. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2015. Sound symbolism. In Handbook of Pragmatics, J. -O. Östman and J. Verschueren (eds), 1–24. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alpher, B. 1994. Yir-Yoront ideophones. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 161–177. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ameka, F. K. 2001. Ideophones and the nature of the adjective word class in Ewe. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 25–48. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armoskaite, S. and Koskinen, P. 2017. Structuring sensory imagery: Ideophones across languages and cultures. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62: 149-153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barrett, R. 2014. Ideophones and (non-)arbitrariness in the K’iche’ poetry of Humberto Ak’abal. Pragmatics and Society 5: 406–418. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergen, B. K. 2004. The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80: 290–311. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergman, B. and Dahl, Ö. 1994. Ideophones in sign language? The place of reduplication in the tense-aspect system of Swedish Sign Language. In Tense, Aspect and Action: Empirical and Theoretical Contributions to Language Typology, C. Bache, H. Basbøll and C. -E. Lindberg (eds), 397–422. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blench, R. 2013. Mwaghavul expressives. In Chadic Linguistics 8, H. Tourneux (ed.), 53–75. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. 1961. Generality, Gradience, and the All-or-None. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Bowler, M. and Gluckman, J. 2018. Intensifying ideophones in three Luhya languages. In Proceedings of TripleA 4, E. Bogal-Allbritten and E. Coppock (eds), 31–47. Göteborg: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Brown, D. and Chumakina, M. 2013. What there might be and what there is: An introduction to Canonical Typology. In Canonical Morphology and Syntax, D. Brown, M. Chumakina and G. G. Corbett (eds), 1–19. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. 1934. Sprachtheorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
Burenhult, N. and Majid, A. 2011. Olfaction in Aslian ideology and language. The Senses and Society 6: 19–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Childs, G. T. 1994. African ideophones. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 178–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. 2016. Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review 123: 324–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66: 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. G. 2007. Canonical typology, suppletion, and possible words. Language 83: 8–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeCamp, D. 1974. Neutralization, iteratives, and ideophones: The locus of language in Jamaica. In Pidgins and Creoles: Current Trends and Prospects, D. DeCamp and I. F. Hancock (eds), 46–60. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Diffloth, G. 1972. Notes on expressive meaning. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of Chicago Linguistic Society, P. M. Peranteau, J. N. Levi, and G. C. Phares (eds), 440–447. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
1976. Expressives in Semai. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 13: 249–264.Google Scholar
2001. Les expressifs de Surin, et où cela conduit. Bulletin de l’Ecole Française d’Extrême-Orient 88: 261–269. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M. 2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 654–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Making new ideophones in Siwu: Creative depiction in conversation. Pragmatics and Society 5: 384–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70: 363–384. sDOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Redrawing the margins of language: Lessons from research on ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3: 4. 1–30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doke, C. M. 1935. Bantu Linguistic Terminology. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
Dryer, M. S. 1997. Are grammatical relations universal? In Essays on Language Function and Language Type, J. Bybee, J. Haiman and S. A. Thompson (eds), 115–143. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, L. and Halvorsen, R. P. 2017. Depicting and describing meanings with iconic signs in Norwegian Sign Language. Gesture 17: 375–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrara, L. and Hodge, G. 2018. Language as description, indication, and depiction. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 716. 1–716.15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. 1978. On the universal character of phonetic symbolism with special reference to vowels. Studia Linguistica 32: 80–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Güldemann, T. 2008. Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 34]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gxowa, N. C. 1994. Ideophones in Xhosa. M.A. thesis, University of Stellenbosch.Google Scholar
Hamano, S. 1998. The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 2007. Pre-established categories don’t exist: Consequences for language description and typology. Linguistic Typology 11: 119–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010. Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies. Language 86: 663–687. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hogue, R. L. 2011. OOs and AAs: Mouth gestures as ideophones in American Sign Language. Ph.D. dissertation, Gallaudet University. [URL]
Hyman, L. M. 1975. Phonology: Theory and Analysis. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2017. Basque ideophones from a typological perspective. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62: 196–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Iwasaki, N., Sells, P. and Akita, K. (eds). 2017. The Grammar of Japanese Mimetics: Perspectives from Structure, Acquisition, and Translation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, N., Vinson, D. P. and Vigliocco, G. 2007. What do English speakers know about gera-gera and yota-yota?: A cross-linguistic investigation of mimetic words for laughing and walking. Japanese-Language Education around the Globe 17: 53–78.Google Scholar
Jacques, G. 2013. Ideophones in Japhug Rgyalrong. Anthropological Linguistics 55: 256–287. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jespersen, O. 1921. Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin. London: George Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. R. 1976. Toward a definition of the ideophone in Bantu. Working Papers in Linguistics 21: 240–253.Google Scholar
Kilian-Hatz, C. 1999. Ideophone: Eine typologische Untersuchung unter besonderer Berücksichtigung afrikanischer Sprachen. Habilitationsschrift, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Kita, S. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35: 379–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Klamer, M. 2002. Semantically motivated lexical patterns: A study of Dutch and Kambera expressives. Language 78: 258–286. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruspe, N. 2004. A Grammar of Semelai. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kunene, D. P. 1965. The ideophone in Southern Sotho. Journal of African Languages 4: 19–39.Google Scholar
Kwon, N. 2015. The natural motivation of sound symbolism. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Queensland.Google Scholar
2017. Total reduplication in Japanese ideophones: An exercise in Localized Canonical Typology. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2: 40. 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kwon, N. and Round, E. R. 2015. Phonaesthemes in morphological theory. Morphology 25: 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Guen, O. 2012. Ideophones in Yucatec Maya. In Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Indigenous Languages of Latin America (CILLA V). Austin, TX: University of Texas at Austin. [URL]Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. 1980. On-line processing constraints on the properties of signed and spoken language. In Signed and Spoken Language: Biological Constraints on Linguistic Form, U. Bellugi and M. Studdert-Kennedy (eds), 141–160. Weinheim: Verlag Chemie.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. 1975. The intonational system of English. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Lu, J. C. and Goldin-Meadow, S. 2018. Creating images with the stroke of a hand: Depiction of size and shape in sign language. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1276. 1–15. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Maffi, L. 1990. Tzeltal Maya affect verbs: Psychological salience and expressive functions of language. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on General Topics in American Indian Linguistics, D. J. Costa (ed.), 61–72. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Matisoff, J. A. 2003. Aslian: Mon-Khmer of the Malay Peninsula. Mon-Khmer Studies 33: 1–58.Google Scholar
Mattes, V. 2018. Iconicity in the lexicon: The semantic categories of lexical reduplication. Studies in Language 41: 813–842. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1968. The Phonological Component of a Grammar of Japanese. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Mihas, E. 2012. Ideophones in Alto Perene (Arawak) from Eastern Peru. Studies in Language 36: 300–344. . DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Moshi, L. 1993. Ideophones in KiVunjo-Chaga. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 3: 185–216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, P. 1968. Ideophones from a syntactic point of view. Journal of West African Languages 5: 107–117.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B. 1996. Sounds like Life: Sound-Symbolic Grammar, Performance, and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
1999. The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology 28: 225–252. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004. To be or not to be ideophonically impoverished. In Texas Linguistic Forum 47: Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual Symposium about Language and Society, W. F. Chiang, E. Chun, L. Mahalingappa and S. Mehus (eds), 131–142. Austin: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B., Nielsen, E., Stanley, J. A. and Hopper, R. 2016. The systematic stretching and contracting of ideophonic phonology in Pastaza Quichua. International Journal of American Linguistics 82: 95–116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Okrent, A. 2002. A modality-free notion of gesture and how it can help us with the morpheme vs. gesture question in sign language linguistics (or at least give us some criteria to work with). In Modality and Structure in Signed and Spoken Languages, R. P. Meier, K. Cormier, and D. Quinto-Pozos (eds), 175–198. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1955. Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Perlman, M., Little, H., Thompson, B. and Thompson, R. L. 2018. Iconicity in signed and spoken vocabulary: A comparison between American Sign Language, British Sign Language, English, and Spanish. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 1433. 1–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L. and Vigliocco, G. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1: 227. 1–15.
CrossRef DOI logo with hyperlink to permanent DOI
.Google Scholar
Perry, L. K., Perlman, M. and Lupyan, G. 2015. Iconicity in English and Spanish and its relation to lexical category and age of acquisition. PLoS ONE 10: e0137147. 1–17. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rai, N. K., Bickel, B., Banjade, G., Gaenszle, M., Lieven, E., Paudyal, N., Rai, I. and Stoll, S. 2005. Triplication and ideophones in Chintang. In Contemporary Issues in Nepalese Linguistics, Y. Yadava, G. Bhattarai, R. R. Lohani, B. Prasain and K. Parajuli (eds), 205–209. Kathmandu: Linguistic Society of Nepal.Google Scholar
Reiter, S. 2012. Ideophones in Awetí. Ph.D. dissertation, Kiel: University of Kiel.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, T. 1913. History as Literature, and Other Essays. New York: C. Scribner’s sons.Google Scholar
Samarin, W. J. 1969. The art of Gbeya insults. International Journal of American Linguistics 35: 323–329. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1970. Inventory and choice in expressive language. Word 26: 153–169. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sien, N. -C. 1997. An autosegmental analysis of ideophones in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Stokoe, W. 1960. Sign language structure: An outline of the visual communication systems of the American deaf. Studies in Linguistics, Occasional Papers 8. Silver Spring, MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Taub, S. F. 2001. Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tedlock, D. 1999. Ideophone. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 9: 118–120. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tufvesson, S. 2011. Analogy-making in the Semai sensory world. The Senses and Society 6: 86–95. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Uhlenbeck, E. M. 1952. The study of wordclasses in Javanese. Lingua 3: 322–354. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waugh, L. R. 1994. Degrees of iconicity in the lexicon. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 55–70. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Webster, A. K. 2017. “So it’s got three meanings dil dil”: Seductive ideophony and the sounds of Navajo poetry. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62: 173–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Werner, H. and Kaplan, B. 1963. Symbol Formation: An Organismic-Developmental Approach to Language and the Expression of Thought. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wescott, R. W. 1977. Ideophones in Bini and English. Forum Linguisticum 2: 1–13.Google Scholar
Westermann, D. H. 1927. Laut, Ton und Sinn in westafrikanischen Sudansprachen. In Festschrift Meinhof, F. Boas (ed.), 315–328. Hamburg: L. Friederichsen.Google Scholar
Wnuk, E. 2016. Semantic specificity of perception verbs in Maniq. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University.Google Scholar
Wnuk, E. and Majid, A. 2014. Revisiting the limits of language: The odor lexicon of Maniq. Cognition 131: 125–138. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (37)

Cited by 37 other publications

Börstell, Carl
2024. Better letter: iconicity in the manual alphabets of American Sign Language and Swedish Sign Language. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Dewey, Dan P., Jeffrey J. Green, Janis Nuckolls, Auna Nygaard & Todd D. Swanson
2024. Neurological evidence for the context-independent multisensorial semantics of ideophones in Pastaza Kichwa: an fNIRS study in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Di Paola, Giovanna, Ljiljana Progovac & Antonio Benítez-Burraco
2024. Revisiting the hypothesis of ideophones as windows to language evolution. Linguistics Vanguard DOI logo
Menete, Sérgio N. & Guiying Jiang
2024. Another member out of the family: the description of manner of gait in Changana verbs of motion. Folia Linguistica 58:2 ► pp. 401 ff. DOI logo
Van Hoey, Thomas, Xiaoyu Yu, Tung-Le Pan & Youngah Do
2024. What ratings and corpus data reveal about the vividness of Mandarin ABB words. Language and Cognition ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Barnes, Kathryn & Cornelia Ebert
2023. The information status of iconic enrichments: modelling gradient at-issueness. Theoretical Linguistics 49:3-4 ► pp. 167 ff. DOI logo
Corver, Norbert
2023. Some remarks on the fine structure of ideophones and the meaning of structure. Theoretical Linguistics 49:3-4 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo
Gunnink, Hilde
2023.  The adoption and proliferation of clicks in Bantu languages: the role of hlonipha revisited . South African Journal of African Languages 43:3 ► pp. 216 ff. DOI logo
Heine, Bernd
2023. The Grammar of Interactives, DOI logo
Inglese, Guglielmo
2023. The journey of the middle voice: from antiquity to linguistic typology. Language & History 66:2 ► pp. 201 ff. DOI logo
Inglese, Guglielmo
2023. The rise of middle voice systems. Diachronica 40:2 ► pp. 195 ff. DOI logo
Jiang, Di
2023. Where Do Chinese Doublets Come From?—The Doublets from Prehistory to the Era of the Book of Poetry. Nature Anthropology 1:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Lahaussois, Aimée
2023. Ideophonic patterns in Kiranti languages and beyond. Folia Linguistica 57:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
McLean, Bonnie, Michael Dunn & Mark Dingemanse
2023. Two measures are better than one: combining iconicity ratings and guessing experiments for a more nuanced picture of iconicity in the lexicon. Language and Cognition 15:4 ► pp. 716 ff. DOI logo
Mokhathi-Mbhele, Masechaba Mahloli L
2023. Sesotho ideophones as personal names: A systemic functional linguistics approach. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 41:4 ► pp. 448 ff. DOI logo
Steinbach, Markus
2023. At-issueness across modalities – are gestural components (more) at-issue in sign languages?. Theoretical Linguistics 49:3-4 ► pp. 291 ff. DOI logo
Van Hoey, Thomas
2023. ABB, a salient prototype of collocate–ideophone constructions in Mandarin Chinese. Cognitive Linguistics 0:0 DOI logo
Van Rooy, Raf
2023. Introduction: the crosslinguistic application of grammatical categories in the history of linguistics. Language & History 66:2 ► pp. 89 ff. DOI logo
Winter, Bodo, Gary Lupyan, Lynn K. Perry, Mark Dingemanse & Marcus Perlman
2023. Iconicity ratings for 14,000+ English words. Behavior Research Methods 56:3 ► pp. 1640 ff. DOI logo
Badenoch, Nathan
2022. Silence, Cessation and Stasis: The Ethnopoetics of “Absence” in Bit Expressives. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 32:1 ► pp. 94 ff. DOI logo
Hodge, Gabrielle & Lindsay Ferrara
2022. Iconicity as Multimodal, Polysemiotic, and Plurifunctional. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Poulton, Thomas
2022. Jędrzejowski, Łukasz and Przemysław Staniewski: The linguistics of olfaction: Typological and diachronic approaches to synchronic diversity . Linguistic Typology 26:3 ► pp. 693 ff. DOI logo
Thompson, Arthur L., May Pik Yu Chan, Ping Hei Yeung & Youngah Do
2022. Structural markedness and depiction. The Mental Lexicon 17:2 ► pp. 300 ff. DOI logo
Toratani, Kiyoko
2022. Introduction to the volume. In The Language of Food in Japanese [Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research, 25], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Vandenitte, Sébastien
2022. Making Referents Seen and Heard Across Signed and Spoken Languages: Documenting and Interpreting Cross-Modal Differences in the Use of Enactment. Frontiers in Psychology 13 DOI logo
Bahón Arnaiz, Cristina
2021. Un análisis lingüístico de los ideófonos coreanos en un fragmento de un cuento de Park Min-Gyu. Estudios de Asia y África 57:1 ► pp. 5 ff. DOI logo
Ferrada, Juan Sebastian
2021. Resignifications: Linguistic Resistance and Queer Expressions of Latinidad. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Sexuality, DOI logo
Haspelmath, Martin
2021. Towards standardization of morphosyntactic terminology for general linguistics. In Linguistic Categories, Language Description and Linguistic Typology [Typological Studies in Language, 132], ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Hsu, Hui-Chieh, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
2021. When Gesture “Takes Over”: Speech-Embedded Nonverbal Depictions in Multimodal Interaction. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Hsu, Hui-Chieh, Geert Brône & Kurt Feyaerts
2021.  In other gestures: Multimodal iteration in cello master classes. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s4 DOI logo
Kuteva, Tania & Bernd Heine
2021. On the Structure of Early Language. In Oxford Handbook of Human Symbolic Evolution, ► pp. 731 ff. DOI logo
McLean, Bonnie
2021. Revising an implicational hierarchy for the meanings of ideophones, with special reference to Japonic. Linguistic Typology 25:3 ► pp. 507 ff. DOI logo
Thompson, Arthur Lewis, Thomas Van Hoey & Youngah Do
2021. Articulatory features of phonemes pattern to iconic meanings: evidence from cross-linguistic ideophones. Cognitive Linguistics 32:4 ► pp. 563 ff. DOI logo
DINGEMANSE, MARK, MARCUS PERLMAN & PAMELA PERNISS
2020. Construals of iconicity: experimental approaches to form–meaning resemblances in language. Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
DINGEMANSE, MARK & BILL THOMPSON
2020. Playful iconicity: structural markedness underlies the relation between funniness and iconicity. Language and Cognition 12:1 ► pp. 203 ff. DOI logo
Naser, Angelo Ali & Sharon Rose
2020. Ideophones in Moro. Faits de Langues 51:1 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Thompson, Arthur Lewis, Kimi Akita & Youngah Do
2020. Iconicity ratings across the Japanese lexicon: A comparative study with English. Linguistics Vanguard 6:1 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.