Cover not available
Part of
Operationalizing Iconicity
Edited by Pamela Perniss, Olga Fischer and Christina Ljungberg
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 17] 2020
► pp. 3–20

Modality-specificity of iconicity

The case of motion ideophones in Japanese

| Nagoya University
This study examines the semantic variety and specificity of Japanese ideophones for spatial motion events to illustrate the modality-specificity of iconicity. As verbal icons, motion ideophones tend to depict dynamic (e.g., auditory, spatio-temporal) aspects of motion events. Suprasegmental features that elaborate ideophonic depiction also exhibit this tendency. In contrast, manual icons, such as iconic gestures and sign language, are more expressive of visual information, both dynamic and static. Motion events, which involve various concepts, allow us to observe this semiotic contrast clearly and reinforce the modality-specific view of iconicity.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Iconicity and modalities
  • 3.Semantic variety of motion ideophones
    • 3.1Motion ideophones
    • 3.2Semantic specifications of motion ideophones
  • 4.Semantic specificity of motion ideophones
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Abbreviations
  • Notes
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Published online: 13 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.17.01aki
References (65)
References
Ahlner, F. and Zlatev, J. 2010. Cross-modal iconicity: A cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38: 298–348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Akita, K. 2009. A Grammar of Sound-Symbolic Words in Japanese: Theoretical Approaches to Iconic and Lexical Properties of Mimetics. Ph.D. dissertation, Kobe University.Google Scholar
2010. An embodied semantic analysis of psychological mimetics in Japanese. Linguistics 48: 1195–1220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Toward a frame-semantic definition of sound-symbolic words: A collocational of Japanese mimetics. Cognitive Linguistics 23: 67–90. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013. The lexical iconicity hierarchy and its grammatical correlates. In Iconic Investigations, L. Elleström, O. Fischer, and C. Ljungberg (eds), 331–349. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. The typology of manner expressions: A preliminary look. In Motion and Space across Languages: Theory and Applications, I. Ibarretxe-Antuñano (ed.), 39–60. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergman, B. and Dahl, Ö. 1994. Ideophones in sign language? The place of reduplication in the tense-aspect system of Swedish Sign Language. In Tense, Aspect and Action: Empirical and Theoretical Contributions to Language Typology, C. Bache, H. Basbøll, and C.-E. Lindberg (eds), 397–422. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boas, H. C. 2008. Toward a frame-constructional approach to verb classification. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 57: 17–48.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. 1972. Degree Words. The Hague: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Börstell, C. and Östling, R. 2017. Iconic locations in Swedish Sign Language: Mapping form to meaning with lexical databases. In Proceedings of the 21st Nordic Conference of Computational Linguistics, 221–225. Gothenburg: Linköping University Electronic Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, J., Perkins, R. and Pagliuca, W. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Childs, G. T. 1994. African ideophones. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 178–204. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cienki, A. 2013a. Cognitive Linguistics: Spoken language and gesture as expressions of conceptualization. In Body – Language – Communication: An International Handbook on Multimodality in Human Interaction, Volume 1, C. Müller, A. Cienki, E. Fricke, S. Ladewig, D. McNeill, and S. Tessendorf (eds), 182–201. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2013b. Image schemas and mimetic schemas in cognitive linguistics and gesture studies. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 11: 417–432. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. and Gerrig, R. J. 1990. Quotations as demonstrations. Language 66: 764–805. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H. H. 2016. Depicting as a method of communication. Psychological Review 123: 324–347. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cuskley, C. 2013. Mappings between linguistic sound and motion. The Public Journal of Semiotics 5: 39–62. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Jong, N. 2001. The ideophone in Didinga. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 121–138. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M. 2011. The Meaning and Use of Ideophones in Siwu. Ph.D. dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics and Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 654–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF – Language Typology and Universals 70: 363–384.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. and Akita, K. 2017. An inverse relation between expressiveness and grammatical integration: On the morphosyntactic typology of ideophones, with special reference to Japanese. Journal of Linguistics 53: 501–532. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Monaghan, P., Lupyan, G. and Christiansen, M. H. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity and systematicity in language: empirical and theoretical advances. Trends in Cognitive Science 19: 603–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Schuerman, W., Reinisch, E., Tufvesson, S. and Mitterer, H. 2016. What sound symbolism can and cannot do: Testing the iconicity of ideophones from five languages. Language 92: e117–e133. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elliott, E. A. and Jacobs, A. M. 2013. Facial expressions, emotions, and sign languages. Frontiers in Psychology 4: Article 115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, O. 2011. Cognitive iconic grounding of reduplication in language. In Semblance and Signification, P. Michelucci, O. Fischer, and C. Ljungberg (eds), 55–81. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gasser, M., Sethuraman, N. and Hockema, S. 2010. Iconicity in expressives: An empirical investigation. In Experimental and Empirical Methods in the Study of Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, S. Rice and J. Newman (eds), 163–180. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Güldemann, T. 2008. Quotative Indexes in African Languages: A Synchronic and Diachronic Survey. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamano, S. 1998. The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hinton, L., Nichols, J. and Ohala, J. J. 1994. Introduction: Sound-symbolic processes. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 1–12. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2006. Sound Symbolism and Motion in Basque. München: LINCOM Europa.Google Scholar
Ibarretxe-Antuñano, I. 2017. Basque ideophones from a typological perspective. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 62: 196–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2019. Towards a semantic typological classification of motion ideophones : The motion semantic grid In Ideophones, Mimetics, and Expressives K. Akita and P. Pardeshi (eds), 137–166 Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kadooka, K. 2007. Nihongo-onomatope-goi-ni okeru keitai-teki/on’in-teki-taikeisei-ni tuite [On the morphological and phonological systematicity of the Japanese ideophonic lexicon]. Tokyo: Kurosio Publishers.Google Scholar
Kakehi, H., Tamori, I. and Schourup, L. 1996. Dictionary of Iconic Expressions in Japanese. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, S. and Braver, A. 2013. The phonetics of multiple vowel lengthening in Japanese. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics 3: 141–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Durational properties of emphatically lengthened consonants in Japanese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 44: 237–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, S. 1997. Two-dimensional semantic analysis of Japanese mimetics. Linguistics 35: 379–415. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Martin, S. E. 1975. A Reference Grammar of Japanese. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, Y. 2003. Typologies of lexicalization patterns and event integration: Clarifications and reformulations. In Empirical and Theoretical Investigations into Language: A Festschrift for Masaru Kajita, S. Chiba et al. (eds), 403–417. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
Mikone, E. 2001. Ideophones in the Balto-Finnic languages. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 223–234. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nasu, A. 2002. Nihongo-onomatope-no gokeisei-to inritu-koozoo [Word formation and prosodic structure of Japanese mimetics]. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tsukuba.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B. 1996. Sounds like Life: Sound-Symbolic Grammar, Performance, and Cognition in Pastaza Quechua. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2014. Ideophones’ challenges for typological linguistics: The case of Pastaza Quichua. Pragmatics and Society 5: 355–383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ortega, G., Sümer, B. and Özyürek, A. 2017. Type of iconicity matters in the vocabulary development of signing children. Developmental Psychology 53: 89–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1932. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, Volume 2: Elements of Logic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perniss, P., Thompson, R. L. and Vigliocco, G. 2010. Iconicity as a general property of language: Evidence from spoken and signed languages. Frontiers in Psychology 1: Article 227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Perniss, P. and Vigliocco, G. 2014. The bridge of iconicity: From a world of experience to the experience of language. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369: 20130300. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, R. 1994. Aural images. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 276–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubino, C. 2001. Iconic morphology and word formation in Ilocano. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 303–320. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saji, N., Akita, K., Imai, M., Kantartzis, K. and Kita, S. 2013. Cross-linguistically shared and language-specific sound symbolism for motion: An exploratory data mining approach. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci 2013), 1253–1258.Google Scholar
Schaefer, R. P. 2001. Ideophonic adverbs and manner gaps in Emai. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 339–354. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schultze-Berndt, E. 2001. Ideophone-like characteristics of uninflected predicates in Jaminjung (Australia). In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 355–374. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, S. Strömqvist and L. Th. Verhoeven (eds), 219–257. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description, Vol. 3: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed.), 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. II: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Toratani, K. 2012. The role of sound-symbolic forms in Motion event descriptions: The case of Japanese. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10: 90–132. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tsujimura, N. and Deguchi, M. 2007. Semantic integration of mimetics in Japanese. Papers from the Thirty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 339–353.Google Scholar
Usuki, T. and Akita, K. 2015. What’s in a mimetic? On the dynamicity of its iconic stem. In Iconicity: East Meets West, M. K. Hiraga, W. J. Herlofsky, K. Shinohara, and K. Akita (eds), 109–123. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
van Gijn, R. 2010. Middle voice and ideophones, a diachronic connection: The case of Yurakaré. Studies in Language 34: 273–297. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilcox, S. 2004. Cognitive iconicity: Conceptual spaces, meaning, and gesture in signed languages. Cognitive Linguistics 15: 119–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Winter, B., Perlman, M., Perry, L. K. and Lupyan, G. 2017. Which words are most iconic? Iconicity in English sensory words. Interactional Studies 18: 432–453.Google Scholar
Zwicky, A. M. and Pullum, G. K. 1987. Plain morphology and expressive morphology. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 330–339. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Akita, Kimi
2021. A typology of depiction marking. Studies in Language 45:4 ► pp. 865 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.