Part of
Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 245264
References (37)
References
Colletta, J. M., Pellenq, C. and Guidetti, M. 2010. Age-related changes in co-speech gesture and narrative: Evidence from French children and adults. Speech Communication 52: 565–576. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Ruiter, J. P. 2000. The production of gesture and speech. In Language and Gesture, D. McNeill (ed), 284–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Efron, D. 1972. Gesture, Race and Culture. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. 1969. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior categories, origins, usage, and coding, Semiotica 1: 49–98. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fibigerova, K. and Guidetti, M. 2018. The impact of language on gesture in descriptions of voluntary motion in French and Czech adults and children. Language, Interaction et Acquisition / Language, Interaction and Acquisition 9 (1): 101–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fibigerova, K., Guidetti, M. and Šulová, L. 2012. Verbal and gestural expression of motion in French and Czech. In Space and Time across Languages and Cultures (vol.2): Language, Culture and Cognition, L. Filipović and K. M. Jaszczolt (eds), 251–268. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. 1978. The Language of Thought (2nd edition). Hassocks: The Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D. and Wagner, S. 2001. Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science 12 (6): 516–522. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M., Hendrix, H. and Hickmann, M. 2008. Learning to talk and gesture about motion in French. First Language 28 (2): 200–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M. 2006. The relativity of motion in first language acquisition. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, M. Hickmann and S. Robert (eds), 281–308. Amsterdam and Philadephia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H. and Gullberg, M. 2011. Developmental perspectives on the expression of motion in speech and gesture: A comparison of French and English. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 2 (1): 129–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hostetter, A. B. and Alibali, M. W. 2008. Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15 (3): 495–514. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1983. Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009. Kinesic Components of Multimodal Utterances. In Berkeley Linguistics Society Proceedings. Berkeley, California: Berkeley Linguistics Society. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, S. 2000. How representational gestures help speaking. In Language and Gesture, D. McNeill (ed), 162–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kita, S. and Özyürek, A. 2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language 48: 16–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. and Wilkins, D. 2006. Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Malá, M. 2015. Translation counterparts as indicators of the boundaries of units of meaning: A contrastive view of the position of ‘come V-ing’ among the patterns of the verb ‘come’. In Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Verb Constructions, S. Oksefjell Ebeling and H. Hasselgård (eds), 169–191. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Martinková, M. 2018. K tzv. sémantické typologii jazyků: Co česká slovesa pohybu mohou vypovídat o angličtině a španělštině. Studie z Aplikované Lingvistiky 2: 37–53.Google Scholar
McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McNeill, D. and Duncan, S. 2000. Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In Language and Gesture, D. McNeill (ed), 141–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melinger, A. and Kita, S. 2007. Conceptualisation load triggers gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes 22 (4): 473–500. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Morsella, E. and Krauss, R. M. 2004. The role of gestures in spatial working memory and Speech. The American Journal of Psychology 117 (3): 411–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Naidu, V., Zlatev, J., Duggirala, V., Van De Weijer, J., Devylder, S. and Blomberg, J. 2018. Holistic spatial semantics and post-Talmian motion event typology: A case study of Thai and Telugu. Cognitive Semiotics 11 (2): 1–27. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nöth, W. 1990. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R. and Ishizuka, T. 2008. Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology 44 (4): 1040–1054. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R. and Brown, A. 2005. How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures?: Insights from cross-linguistic variations and similarities. Gesture 5: 215–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paivio, A. 1986. Mental Representation: A Dual Coding Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Ch. S. 1960. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce 1931–1958. Ch. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds). Cambridge: The Belknap of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Poggi, I. 2008. Iconicity in different types of gestures. Gesture 8 (1): 45–61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pokorný, J. 2010. Lingvistická Antropologie: Jazyk, Mysl, Kultura. Prague: Grada Publishing.Google Scholar
Slobin, D. I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, S. Stromqvist and L. Verhoeven (eds), 219–257. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2006. What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, M. Hickmann and S. Robert (eds), 59–81. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description (vol. 3): Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed), 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar