Part of
Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic SystemsEdited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 245–264
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 245–264
Iconicity in gesture
How Czech children and adults use iconic gestures to deal with a gap between mental and linguistic representations of motion events
Our paper contributes to the discussion about iconicity by bringing attention to iconic co-speech gestures. We investigate their role in situations where mental representation becomes difficult to fully express through words only. For instance, when Czech speakers describe Motion, the lexicon most often does not allow them to verbalize Path of Motion without indicating Manner of Motion at the same time.
In this context, we asked 72 Czech children and adults to watch and describe Motion video clips where Manner was visually backgrounded in favor of Path. Although adults found a way to verbalize Path without Manner more often than children, Czech participants altogether typically verbalized both Path and Manner but they preferred to gesture about Path only. Gesturing about both Path and Manner was generally marginal and more used by adults than by children. When it occurred, gesturally conveyed Manner tended to be different from spoken Manner and closer to actually viewed Manner. We discuss the ability of creative non-arbitrary iconic gesture to modulate verbal content so that the final polysemiotic message is more satisfactory than the verbal message alone would be.
Article outline
- 1.Iconic gesture, speech, and mind
- 2.Gesturing when talking about motion events
- 3.The present study: Focus on speakers of Czech
- 4.Methodology
- 5.Questions and hypotheses
- 6.Quantitative results
- 7.Analysis of the results and discussion
- 8.Summary and conclusion
-
References
References (37)
Colletta, J. M., Pellenq, C. and Guidetti, M. 2010. Age-related changes in co-speech gesture and narrative: Evidence from French children and adults. Speech Communication 52: 565–576. 
De Ruiter, J. P. 2000. The production of gesture and speech. In Language and Gesture, D. McNeill (ed), 284–311. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Efron, D. 1972. Gesture, Race and Culture. The Hague: Mouton.
Ekman, P. and Friesen, W. V. 1969. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior categories, origins, usage, and coding, Semiotica 1: 49–98.
Fibigerova, K. and Guidetti, M. 2018. The impact of language on gesture in descriptions of voluntary motion in French and Czech adults and children. Language, Interaction et Acquisition / Language, Interaction and Acquisition 9 (1): 101–136.
Fibigerova, K., Guidetti, M. and Šulová, L. 2012. Verbal and gestural expression of motion in French and Czech. In Space and Time across Languages and Cultures (vol.2): Language, Culture and Cognition, L. Filipović and K. M. Jaszczolt (eds), 251–268. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Fodor, J. A. 1978. The Language of Thought (2nd edition). Hassocks: The Harvester Press.
Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D. and Wagner, S. 2001. Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science 12 (6): 516–522.
Gullberg, M., Hendrix, H. and Hickmann, M. 2008. Learning to talk and gesture about motion in French. First Language 28 (2): 200–236.
Hickmann, M. 2006. The relativity of motion in first language acquisition. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, M. Hickmann and S. Robert (eds), 281–308. Amsterdam and Philadephia: John Benjamins.
Hickmann, M., Hendriks, H. and Gullberg, M. 2011. Developmental perspectives on the expression of motion in speech and gesture: A comparison of French and English. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 2 (1): 129–156.
Hostetter, A. B. and Alibali, M. W. 2008. Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15 (3): 495–514.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. 1983. Mental Models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kendon, A. 2004. Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2009. Kinesic Components of Multimodal Utterances. In Berkeley Linguistics Society Proceedings. Berkeley, California: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Kita, S. 2000. How representational gestures help speaking. In Language and Gesture, D. McNeill (ed), 162–185. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kita, S. and Özyürek, A. 2003. What does cross-linguistic variation in semantic coordination of speech and gesture reveal: Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language 48: 16–32.
Levinson, S. C. and Wilkins, D. 2006. Grammars of Space: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malá, M. 2015. Translation counterparts as indicators of the boundaries of units of meaning: A contrastive view of the position of ‘come V-ing’ among the patterns of the verb ‘come’. In Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Verb Constructions, S. Oksefjell Ebeling and H. Hasselgård (eds), 169–191. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Martinková, M. 2018. K tzv. sémantické typologii jazyků: Co česká slovesa pohybu mohou vypovídat o angličtině a španělštině. Studie z Aplikované Lingvistiky 2: 37–53.
McNeill, D. 1992. Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal about Thought. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
2005. Gesture and Thought. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
McNeill, D. and Duncan, S. 2000. Growth points in thinking-for-speaking. In Language and Gesture, D. McNeill (ed), 141–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Melinger, A. and Kita, S. 2007. Conceptualisation load triggers gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes 22 (4): 473–500.
Morsella, E. and Krauss, R. M. 2004. The role of gestures in spatial working memory and Speech. The American Journal of Psychology 117 (3): 411–424.
Naidu, V., Zlatev, J., Duggirala, V., Van De Weijer, J., Devylder, S. and Blomberg, J. 2018. Holistic spatial semantics and post-Talmian motion event typology: A case study of Thai and Telugu. Cognitive Semiotics 11 (2): 1–27.
Nöth, W. 1990. Handbook of Semiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Brown, A., Furman, R. and Ishizuka, T. 2008. Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: Motion events in English and Turkish. Developmental Psychology 44 (4): 1040–1054.
Özyürek, A., Kita, S., Allen, S., Furman, R. and Brown, A. 2005. How does linguistic framing of events influence co-speech gestures?: Insights from cross-linguistic variations and similarities. Gesture 5: 215–237.
Paivio, A. 1986. Mental Representation: A Dual Coding Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peirce, Ch. S. 1960. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce 1931–1958. Ch. Hartshorne and P. Weiss (eds). Cambridge: The Belknap of Harvard University Press.
Poggi, I. 2008. Iconicity in different types of gestures. Gesture 8 (1): 45–61.
Pokorný, J. 2010. Lingvistická Antropologie: Jazyk, Mysl, Kultura. Prague: Grada Publishing.
Slobin, D. I. 2004. The many ways to search for a frog: Linguistic typology and the expression of motion events. In Relating Events in Narrative: Typological and Contextual Perspectives, S. Stromqvist and L. Verhoeven (eds), 219–257. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2006. What makes manner of motion salient? Explorations in linguistic typology, discourse, and cognition. In Space in Languages: Linguistic Systems and Cognitive Categories, M. Hickmann and S. Robert (eds), 59–81. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Talmy, L. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical form. In Language Typology and Syntactic Description (vol. 3): Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, T. Shopen (ed), 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2000. Towards a Cognitive Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.