Cover not available
Part of
Iconicity in Cognition and across Semiotic Systems
Edited by Sara Lenninger, Olga Fischer, Christina Ljungberg and Elżbieta Tabakowska
[Iconicity in Language and Literature 18] 2022
► pp. 369–388

The phonosemantics of the Korean monosyllabic ideophone ttak

ORCID logo | Nagoya University
The aim of this study is to show how the Korean monosyllabic ideophone ttak functions in spoken register. Ttak is the most frequent ideophone in Korean everyday conversation. Using a spoken corpus, it is proposed that (i) ttak functions as an epistemic modality marker that expresses certainty and the speaker’s belief or confidence in the truth-value of the proposition; (ii) the meaning of certainty is based on language-specific and universal form-meaning correspondences; (iii) there is a correlation between the epistemic marker ttak and its morphosyntactic integration.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Monosyllabic ideophones in Korean
    • 2.1Morphology
    • 2.2Phonology
      • 2.2.1Initial consonants
      • 2.2.2Vowels
      • 2.2.3Final consonants
    • 2.3Epistemic modality
  • 3.Data
  • 4.Epistemic modality marker ttak
  • 5.The form-meaning mappings in epistemic ttak
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • The abbreviations and symbols used in this paper are as follows
  • References
  • Corpus
Published online: 10 November 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/ill.18.17par
References (56)
References
Aoyama, H. 1977. Tyoosengo-no onsei-syootyoo [Sound symbolism of Korean]. Gengo [Linguistics] 6 (10): 26–33.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. 1997. Evaluative morphology: In search of universals. Studies in Language 21: 533–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Böhmerová, A. 2011. Suffixal diminutives and augmentatives in Slovak: A systemic view with some cross-linguistic considerations. Lexis: Journal in English Lexicology 6: 1–29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cho, M. H. 1994. Vowel harmony in Korean: A grounded phonology approach. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Chung, C. W. 2000. An optimality-theoretic account of vowel harmony in Korean ideophones. Studies in Phonetics, Phonology and Morphology 6: 431–450.Google Scholar
Coates, J. 1983. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
De Haan, F. 1999. Evidentiality and epistemic modality: Setting boundaries. Southwest Journal of Linguistics 18 (1): 83–101.Google Scholar
de Jong, N. 2001. The ideophone in Didinga. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 121–138. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dhoorre, C. S., and Tosco, M. 1998. 111 Somali ideophones. Journal of African Cultural Studies 11 (2): 125–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diffloth, G. 1972. Notes on expressive meaning. Chicago Linguistic Society 8: 440–447.Google Scholar
1979. Expressive phonology and prosaic phonology in Mon-Khmer. In Studies in Mon-Khmer and Thai Phonology and Phonetics in Honor of E. Henderson, T. L. Thongkum (ed), 49–59. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
1994. i: big, a: small. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols, and J. J. Ohala (eds), 107–114. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dingemanse, M. 2011. The meaning and use of ideophones in Siwu. Nijmegen: Radboud University dissertation.
2012. Advances in the cross-linguistic study of ideophones. Language and Linguistics Compass 6: 654–672. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Making new ideophones in Siwu: Creative depiction in conversation. Pragmatics and Society 5 (3): 384–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2017. Expressiveness and system integration: On the typology of ideophones, with special reference to Siwu. STUF: Language Typology and Universals 70 (2): 363–384. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dingemanse, M., Blasi, D. E., Lupyan, G., Christiansen, M. H., and Monaghan, P. 2015. Arbitrariness, iconicity, and systematicity in language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 19 (10): 603–615. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamano, S. 1998. The Sound-Symbolic System of Japanese. Stanford CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Hayano, K. 2013. Territories of knowledge in Japanese conversation. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Hyland, K., and Milton, J. 1997. Qualification and certainty in L1 and L2 students’ writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 6 (2): 183–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jung, S. H. 2014. Hyentay Hankwuke Pwusa-ey tayhan Kyeylyangene-hak-cek Yenkwu: Hwaklyul Thongkyey Mohyeng-kwa Neythuwekhu-lul Iyong-han Pwunsek [A quantitative linguistic study on Modern Korean adverbs: A using probability-statistical and network model]. Ph.D. dissertation, Seoul National University.
Kim, I. H. 1995. Hyentay Hankwuke-uy Umsengsangcinge Yenkwu [A study on the lexicon exhibiting phonetic symbolism in Modern Korean]. Ph.D. dissertation, Ehwa Womans University.
Kim, J. K. 2000. Quantity-sensitivity and feature-sensitivity of vowels: A constraint-based approach to Korean vowel phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Kim, K. O. 1977. Sound symbolism in Korean. Journal of Linguistics 13 (1): 67–75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim-Renaud, Y. K. 1976. Semantic features in phonology: Evidence from vowel harmony in Korean. In Papers from the Regional Meeting 12: 397–412.Google Scholar
Koo, H. J. 2007. Force dynamics as a variational factor: A case in Korean. LACUS Forum 33: 201–210.Google Scholar
Kwon, N. H. 2018. Iconicity correlated with vowel harmony in Korean ideophones. Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 9 (1): 1–18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Larsen, D., and Heinz, J. 2012. Neutral vowels in sound symbolic vowel harmony in Korean. Phonology 29 (3): 433–464. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Le Guen, O. 2011. Materiality vs. expressivity: The use of sensory vocabulary in Yucatec Maya. The Senses and Society 6 (1): 117–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. 2017. Epistemic congruence as motivation for grammar use: A study of the final suffix kel in Korean conversation. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Los Angeles.
Lee, J. S. 1992. Phonology and sound symbolism of Korean ideophones. Ph.D. dissertation, Indiana University.
Lee, Y. K. 2002. Hankwuke-uy tan-umcel sangcinge-uy umso-sangcing yenkwu [A study on the meaning of consonants in Korean monosyllabic symbolic words]. The Journal of Modern British and American Language and Literature 20 (3): 249–266.Google Scholar
Lim, G. H. 2013. Kwuke sangcinge-uy uymi-ceni yangsang [On shifts in meaning of Korean symbolic words]. The Journal of Linguistic Science 67: 223–250.Google Scholar
Martin, S. E. 1962. Phonetic symbolism in Korean. American Studies in Altaic Linguistics 13: 177–189.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. J. 1983. Phonological features and morphological structure. Chicago Linguistic Society 19: 135–161.Google Scholar
Mihas, E. 2012. Ideophones in Alto Perené (Arawak) from eastern Peru. Studies in Language 36 (2): 300–344. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
National Institute of Korean Language: Republic of Korea. Phyocwun Kwuke Taysacen [Standard Korean Dictionary].
Noma, H. 1990. Tyoosengo-no onomatope: Gisei/gitaigo-no kyookai-kakutei, oto-to keisiki, oto-to imi-ni tuite [Onomatopoeia in the Modern Korean language]. Bulletin of the Language Institute of Gakushuin University 13: 23–47.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, J. B. 2001. Ideophones in Pastaza Quechua. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 271–286. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuyts, J. 2000. Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oswalt, Robert L. 1994. Inanimate imitatives in English. In Sound symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 293–306. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 2001. Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Park, D. G. 1994. ‘-Hata, -tayta, -kelita, -ita’ yenkwu (1): Hwungnaymal-kwauy hyengthay/thonge-lon-cek thukseng-ey ttalun kyelhap kyuchik [A study on ‘-hada, -taeda, -korida, -ida’: Word formation rules with symbolic words by their morphosyntactic properties]. Kenkwuk Tayhakyo Tayhakwen Nonmwuncip [Bulletin of the Graduate School of Konkuk University] 38: 9–22.Google Scholar
1997. Hyentay Hankwuke Hyungnaymal-uy Yenkwu [A study of symbolic words in Modern Korean]. Ph.D. dissertation, Konkuk University.
2015. Hankwuke uysenge-wa uythaye-uy umwun pikyo [A phonological comparison between onomatopoetic and imitative words of Korean]. Hanmal Yenkwu 37: 177–203.Google Scholar
Rhee, S. H. 2018. On the emergence of discourse markers of emphasis in Korean. The 26th Japanese/Korean Linguistics Conference. University of California, Los Angeles. Nov. 30, 2018.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Richard. 1994. Aural images. In Sound Symbolism, L. Hinton, J. Nichols and J. J. Ohala (eds), 276–292. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubino, C. 2001. Iconic morphology and word formation in Ilocano. In Ideophones, F. K. E. Voeltz and C. Kilian-Hatz (eds), 303–320. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shon, D. I. 2012. Hyentay-Kwuke Uysenguythaye-uy Hyengthay-wa Umwun Yenkwu [A study on the morphological and phonological characteristics of onomatopoeia in Modern Korean]. Ph.D. dissertation, Ehwa Womans University.
Sohn, H. S. 1986. Toward an integrated theory of morphophonology: Vowel harmony in Korean. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 16 (2): 157–184.Google Scholar
Sohn, H. M. 1999. The Korean Language. Cambridge: Cambridge Language Surveys.Google Scholar
Thompson, A. L., and Do, Y. 2019. Defining iconicity: An articulation-based methodology for explaining the phonological structure of ideophones. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 4 (1): 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traugott, E. C. 1995. Subjectification in grammaticalization. In Subjectivity and Subjectivisation in Language, D. Stein and S. Wright (eds), 31–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yamamoto, Kyosuke. 2016. Irokano-go-no ideofon [Ideophones in Ilocano]. Kyoto University Linguistic Research 35: 35–57.Google Scholar
Yu, J. W. 1985. Wulimal Yekswun Sacen [Korean Reverse Dictionary]. Seoul: Jungumsa.Google Scholar
Corpus
Sejong Corpus. National Institute of Korean Language Republic of Korea. Seoul, South Korea.