Cover not available
Part of
Language Development: The lifespan perspective
Edited by Annette Gerstenberg and Anja Voeste
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 37] 2015
► pp. 9–38

Disassociating the effects of age from phonetic change

A longitudinal study of formant frequencies

Our study aimed at disassociating age-related from phonetic changes in broadcasts by British-American radio commentator Alistair Cooke, spanning 60 years. Both the first formant (F1) and fundamental frequency (f0) in non-low vowels showed a falling-rising pattern with increasing age. We argue that this covariation may have a perceptual origin because the distance between F1 and f0 is a perceptual cue to vowel height. A covariation of F1 and F2 in low back vowels is also consistent with a perceptual explanation. By contrast, F1 changes in low vowels may be associated with physiological changes to the jaw-opening mechanisms. Finally, we discuss phonetic changes, showing accent reversion from General American towards Cooke’s former Received Pronunciation over a thirty-year period.
Published online: 22 July 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.37.02reu
References (60)
References
Baayen, R.H. 2009. Analyzing Linguistic Data. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bailey, G., Wikle, T., Tillery, J. & Sand, L. 1991. The apparent time construct. Language Variation and Change 3(3): 241–264. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Bot, K.D. & Clyne, M. 1989. Language Reversion Revisited. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 11(2): 167–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cedergren, H. 1987. The spread of language change: Verifying inferences of linguistic diffusion. In Language Spread and Language Policy: Issues, Implications and Case Studies, P.H. Lowenberg (ed.), 45–60. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Chistovich, L.A. & Lublinskaya, V.V. 1979. The “center of gravity” effect in vowel spectra and critical distance between the formants: Psychoacoustical study of the perception of vowel-like stimuli. Journal of Hearing Research 1(3): 185–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clarke, N. 2000. Alistair Cooke: The Biography. London: Orion.Google Scholar
Clyne, M. 2011. Bilingualism, code-switching and aging. A myth of attrition and a tale of collaboration. In Modeling Bilingualism: From Structure to Chaos – In Honor of Kees de Bot [Studies in Bilingualism 43], M. Schmid & W. Lowie (eds), 201–220. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cooke, A. 2007. Letter from America, 1946–2004. St. Ives: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Di Benedetto, M.G. 1987. On vowel height: Acoustic and perceptual representation by the fundamental and the first formant frequency. In Proceedings of the XIth International Congress on Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 5, 198–201. Tallinn: The International Phonetic Association.Google Scholar
. 1994. Acoustic and perceptual evidence of a complex relation between F1 and F2 in determining vowel height. Journal of Phonetics 22: 205–224.Google Scholar
. 2003. Vowels: A Revisit. In Studi in Onore di Franco Ferrero, P. Cosi, E.M. Caldognetto & A. Zamboni (eds), 143–148. Rome: Unipress.Google Scholar
Evans, B.G. & Iverson, P. 2007. Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121(6): 3814–3826. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fahey, R.P., Diehl, R.L. & Traunmüller, H. 1996. Perception of back vowels: Effects of varying F1-F0 Bark distance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 99(4): 2350–2357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, S.H. & Kewley-Port, D. 2007. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 50: 1241–1255. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrod, S. & Pickering, M. 2009. Joint action, interactive alignment, and dialog. Topics in Cognitive Science 1(2): 292–304. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. & Coupland, N. 1991. Language: Contexts and Consequences. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, H., Coupland, N. & Coupland, J. 1991. Accommodation theory: Communication, context and consequences. In Contexts of Accommodation, H. Giles, J. Coupland & N. Coupland (eds), 1–68. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J. 2006. An acoustic analysis of ‘happY-tensing’ in the Queen’s Christmas broadcasts. Journal of Phonetics 34: 439–457. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Evidence for a relationship between synchronic variability and diachronic change in the Queen’s annual Christmas broadcasts. In Laboratory Phonology 9, J. Cole & J.I. Hualde (eds), 125–143. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., Kleber, F. & Reubold, U. 2008. Compensation for coarticulation, /u/-fronting, and sound change in standard southern British: An acoustic and perceptual study. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123(5): 2825–2835. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S. & Watson, C. 2000a. Does the Queen speak the Queen’s English? Nature 408: 927–928. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000b. Monophthongal vowel changes in Received Pronunciation: an acoustic analysis of the Queen’s Christmas broadcasts. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30: 63–78. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Deepening or lessening the divide between diphthongs? An analysis of the Queen’s annual Christmas broadcasts. In A Figure of Speech: A Festschrift for John Laver, W.J. Hardcastle & J. Beck (eds), 227–261. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Harrington, J., Palethorpe, S. & Watson. C. 2007. Age-related changes in fundamental frequency and formants: A longitudinal study of four speakers. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association (Interspeech 2007), 2753–2756. Antwerp: International Speech Communication Association.Google Scholar
Hay, J., Jannedy, S. & Mendoza-Denton, N. 1999. Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design, and style. In Proceedings of the XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 1389–1392. San Francisco CA: The International Phonetic Association.Google Scholar
. 2010. Oprah and /ay/: Lexical frequency, referee design and style. In The Sociolinguistics Reader, M. Meyerhoff & E. Schleef (eds), 53–58. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hoemeke, K.A. & Diehl, R.L. 1994. Perception of vowel height: The role of F1-F0 distance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 96(2): 661–674. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Howell, P., Barry, W. & Vinson, D. 2006. Strength of British English accents in altered listening conditions. Perception and Psychophysics 68(1): 139–153. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keijzer, M. 2011. Language reversion versus general cognitive decline: Towards a new taxonomy of language change in elderly bilingual immigrants. In Modeling Bilingualism: From Structure to Chaos – In Honor of Kees de Bot [Studies in Bilingualism 43], M. Schmid & W. Lowie (eds), 221–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. 1994. Principles of Linguistic Change, Vol. 1: Internal Factors. Malden MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. 2001. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Speech Production and Speech Modelling, W.J. Hardcastle & A. Marchal (eds), 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. & Sundberg, J. 1971. Acoustical consequences of lip, tongue, jaw, and larynx movement. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 50(4): 1166–1179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linville, S.E. & Fisher, H. 1985. Acoustic characteristics of women’s voices with advancing age. Journal of Gerontology 40(3): 324–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Linville, S.E. & Rens, J. 2001. Vocal tract resonance analysis of aging voice using long-term average spectra. Journal of Voice 15(3): 323–330. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Liss, J.M., Weismer, G. & Rosenbek, J.C. 1990. Selected acoustic characteristics of speech production in very old males. Journal of Gerontology 45(2): 35–45. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mariën, P., Verslegers, L., Moens, M., Dua, G., Herregods, P. & Verhoeven, J. 2013. Posterior fossa syndrome after cerebellar stroke. The Cerebellum 12(5): 686–691. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mioche, L., Bourdiol, P., Monier, S., Martin, J.-F. & Cormier, D. 2004. Changes in jaw muscles activity with age: Effects on food bolus properties. Physiology & Behavior 82(4): 621–627. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Monemi, M., Thornell, L.-E. & Eriksson, P.-O. 1999. Diverse changes in fibre type composition of the human lateral pterygoid and digastric muscles during aging. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 171(1): 38–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pardo, J.S. 2006. On phonetic convergence during conversational interaction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119(4): 2382–2393. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Measuring phonetic convergence in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 559.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pardo, J.S., Gibbons, R., Suppes, A. & Krauss, R.M. 2012. Phonetic convergence in college roommates. Journal of Phonetics 40(1): 190–197. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G.E. & Barney, H.L. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24(2): 175–184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pickering, M.J. & Garrod, S. 2004. Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27(2): 169–226. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prescher, P. 2007. Identity, immigration and first language attrition. In Language Attrition: Theoretical Perspectives [Studies in Bilingualism 33], B. Köpke, M. Schmid, M. Keijzer & S. Dostert (eds), 189–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rastatter, M.P. & Jacques, R.D. 1990. Formant frequency structure of the aging male and female vocal tract. Folia phoniatrica 42: 312–319. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reubold, U., Harrington, J. & Kleber, F. 2010. Vocal aging effects on F0 and the first formant: A longitudinal analysis in adult speakers. Speech Communication 52(7–8): 638–651. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roth, E.J., Fink, K., Cherney, L.R. & Hall, K.D. 1997. Reversion to a previously learned foreign accent after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 78(5): 550–552. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sankoff, G. 2004. Adolescents, young adults and the critical period: Two case studies from “Seven Up”. In Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical reflections, C. Ford (ed.), 121–139. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. & Blondeau, H. 2007. Language change across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language 83(3): 560–588. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiel, F., Draxler, C. & Harrington, J. 2011. Phonemic segmentation and labelling using the MAUS technique. Paper presented at the Workshop ‘New Tools and Methods for Very-Large-Scale Phonetics Research’ , University of Pennsylvania, January 28–31, 2011. <[URL]> (21 August 2014).
Scukanec, G., Petrosino, L. & Squibb, K. 1991. Formant frequency characteristics of children, young adult, and aged female speakers. Perceptual and Motor Skills 73(1): 203–208. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Syrdal, A.K. & Gopal, H.S. 1986. A perceptual model of vowel recognition based on the auditory representation of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79(4): 1086–1100. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Traunmüller, H. 1981. Perceptual dimension of openness in vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69(5): 1465–1475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1991. The context sensitivity of the perceptual interaction between f0 and F1. In Proceedings of the XIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 5, 62–65. Aix-en-Provence: The International Phonetic Association.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. 1992. Norwich revisited: Recent linguistic changes in an English urban dialect. In Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution: Studies in Honour of René Dirven on the Occasion of His Sixtieth Birthday, M. Pütz (ed.), 361–377. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W. & Herzog, M. 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics, W.P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (eds), 95–188. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wells, J.C. 1982. Accents of English. Cambridge: CUP. Standard lexical sets online: <[URL]> (21 August 2014). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wright, J. 1905. The English Dialect Grammar. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Xue, S.A. & Hao, G.J. 2003. Changes in the human vocal tract due to aging and the acoustic correlates of speech production: A pilot study. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 46(3): 689–701. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xue, S.A., Jiang, J., Lin, E., Glassenberg, R. & Mueller, P.B. 1999. Age-related changes in human vocal tract configurations and the effects on speakers’ vowel formant frequencies: A pilot study. Logopedics Phoniatrics Vocology 24(3): 132–137. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (8)

Cited by eight other publications

Cheng, Andrew
2023. Second Dialect Acquisition “in Real Time”: Two Longitudinal Case Studies from YouTube. American Speech: A Quarterly of Linguistic Usage 98:2 ► pp. 194 ff. DOI logo
Kendall, Tyler, Nicolai Pharao, Jane Stuart-Smith & Charlotte Vaughn
2023. Advancements of phonetics in the 21st century: Theoretical issues in sociophonetics. Journal of Phonetics 98 ► pp. 101226 ff. DOI logo
Albuquerque, Luciana, António Teixeira, Catarina Oliveira & Daniela Figueiredo
2022. Age and vowel classification improvement by the inclusion of vowel dynamic features. International Journal of Speech Technology 25:4 ► pp. 1025 ff. DOI logo
Riverin-Coutlée, Josiane & Jonathan Harrington
2022. Phonetic change over the career: a case study. Linguistics Vanguard 8:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo
Stanley, Joseph A., Margaret E. L. Renwick, Katherine Ireland Kuiper & Rachel M. Olsen
2021. Back Vowel Dynamics and Distinctions in Southern American English. Journal of English Linguistics 49:4 ► pp. 389 ff. DOI logo
Valente, Ana Rita, Catarina Oliveira, Luciana Albuquerque, António Teixeira & Plínio A. Barbosa
2021. Prosodic Changes with Age: A Longitudinal Study on a Famous European Portuguese Native Speaker. In Speech and Computer [Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12997], ► pp. 726 ff. DOI logo
Ruch, Hanna, Yvonne Zürcher & Judith M. Burkart
2018. The function and mechanism of vocal accommodation in humans and other primates. Biological Reviews 93:2 ► pp. 996 ff. DOI logo
Cox, Felicity & Sallyanne Palethorpe
2017. Open Vowels in Historical Australian English. In Listening to the Past, ► pp. 502 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 8 january 2025. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.