Cover not available
Part of
Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, processes and outcomes
Edited by Alexei Prikhodkine and Dennis R. Preston
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 39] 2015
► pp. 37–54

REACT – A constructivist theoretic framework for attitudes

| University of Luxembourg
This text is devoted to a new theoretical framework for (language) attitudes (REACT) integrating both the traditional idea of attitudes as (more or less stable) cognitive assessment categories and the constructivist view on attitudes as situated evaluative practices. The text discusses five constitutive elements to the theory (Relevance, Evaluation, Activation, Construction, and Targeting) against the background of respective theories: a theory of actional relevance (cf. Schütz 1970), a listener judgment theory (cf. Purschke 2011), a model for cognitive activation (cf. Kroeber-Riel et al. 2009), a constructivist symbol theory (cf. Cassirer 1953–57 |1923–29|), and a model for attitude functions (cf. Katz 1960). The paper then concludes with proposing an integrative definition of attitudes as evaluation routines in social practices that conforms to the constructivist criticism of classic attitude theory, while at the same time taking account of the fundamental structuring patterns of social interaction that also determine the structure and dynamics of attitudes.
Published online: 16 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.39.02pur
References (53)
References
Albarracín, Dolores, Johnson, Blair T. & Zanna, Mark P. (eds). 2005. The Handbook of Attitudes. Mawah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Allport, Gordon. 1935. Attitudes. In A Handbook of Social Psychology, Carl Murchison (ed.), 789-844. Worcester MA: Clark University Press.Google Scholar
. 1967. Attitudes. In Readings in Attitude, Theory and Measurement, Martin Fishbein (ed.), 1-13. New York NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Auer, Peter & di Luzio, Aldo (eds). 1992. The Contextualization of Language [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 22]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bayer, Thora Hin. 2001. Cassirer's Metaphysics of Symbolic Forms. A Philosophical Commentary. New Haven CT: Yale University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bergson, Henri. 1896. Matière et mémoire. Essai sur la relation du corps à l'esprit. Paris: F. Alcan.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brentano, Franz. 1995[1874]. Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1953–57[1923–29]. Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, 3 Vols. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
. 1923[1910]. Der Begriff der symbolischen Form im Aufbau der Geisteswissenschaften. In Vorträge der der Bibliothek Warburg, Vol. 1, Friedrich Saxl (ed.), 11-39. Leipzig: Winter.Google Scholar
Cunningham, William, Zelazo, Philip David, Packer, Dominic J. & Van Bavel, Jay J. 2007. The iterative reprocessing model: A multilevel framework for attitudes and behavior. Social Cognition 25(5): 736–760. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eagly, Alice & Chaiken, Shelly. 1993. The Psychology of Attitudes. Fort Worth TX: Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
. 2007. The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition 25(5): 582–602. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 453–476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, Michael. 1982. Attention and Arousal. Cognition and Performance. Berlin: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fazio, Russel H. 2000. Accessible attitudes as tools for object appraisal: Their costs and benefits. In Why We Evaluate: Functions of Attitudes, Gregory Maio & James Olson (eds), 1-36. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Fishbein, Martin & Ajzen, Icek. 1975. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading MA:Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Gee, Philip, Stephensen, David & Wright, Donald E. 1994. Temporal discrimination learning of operant feeding in goldfish (Carassius auratus). Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior 62: 1–13. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1997. Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hartmann, Dirk. 1996. Kulturalistische Handlungstheorie. In Methodischer Kulturalismus – Zwischen Naturalismus und Postmoderne, Dirk Hartmann & Peter Janich (eds), 70-114. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. Introduction: Inventing traditions. In The Invention of Tradition, Eric Hobsbawm & Terence Ranger (eds), 1-14. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund 1982[1913]. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy – First Book: General Introduction to a Pure Phenomenology. Translated by Fred Kersten. The Hague: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra. 2013. Introduction. In Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, Alexandra Jaffe (ed.), 1-28. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
James, William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology, 2 Vols. New York NY: Henry Holt & Company. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jung, Carl. 1971[1921]. Psychological Types [The collected works of C. G. Jung 6]. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kahnemann, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
Kasper, Simon. 2015. Instruction Grammar. From Perception via Grammar to Action [Trends in Linguistics: Studies and Monographs 293]. Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. DOI logo
Katz, Daniel. 1960. The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly 24: 163–204. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kroeber-Riel, Werner, Weinberg, Peter & Gröppel-Klein, Andrea. 2009. Konsumentenverhalten, 9th edn. München: Vahlen.Google Scholar
Markard, Morus. 1984. Einstellung. Kritik eines sozialpsychologischen Grundkonzepts. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Myers, David. 2006. Social Psychology, 9th edn. New York NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pfaff, Donald. 2006. Brain Arousal and Information Theory: Neural and Genetic Mechanisms. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan. 1998. Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology 9(1):233–66. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potter, Jonathan & Wetherell, Margaret. 1987. Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 2011. The power of language regard – Discrimination, classification, comprehension, and production. Dialectologia 2: 9-33. Special issue, Production, Perception and Attitude, John Nerbonne, Stefan Grondelaers & Dirk Speelman (eds).Google Scholar
Purschke, Christoph. 2011. Regionalsprache und Hörerurteil. Grundzüge einer perzeptiven Variationslinguistik [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik. Beihefte 149]. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
. 2015. Das Holz, die Axt, der Hieb. Über den Zusammenhang von Einstellung und Handeln am Beispiel des Handlungsschemas ‘Holz hacken.’ In Sprache, Literatur, Raum. Festgabe für Willy Diercks, Robert Langhanke (ed.), 145-162. Bielefeld: Verlag für Regionalgeschichte.Google Scholar
. 2014a. “I remember it like it was interesting.” Zur Theorie von Salienz und Pertinenz. In Die Vermessung der Salienz(forschung), Helen Christen & Evelyn Ziegler (eds). Linguistik Online 66: 31–50.Google Scholar
. 2014b. REACT – Einstellungen als evaluative Routinen in sozialen Praxen. In Sprechen über Sprache: Perspektiven und neue Methoden der linguistischen Einstellungsforschung, Christina Cuonz & Rebekka Studler (eds), 123-142. Tübingen: Stauffenberg.Google Scholar
. In preparation. Kognition, Kommunikation, Kultur – Eine Philosophie der Selbstbehauptung. Habilitation, University of Luxemburg.
Rosenberg, Milton & Hovland, Carl. 1960. Cognitive, affective, and behavioral components in attitudes. In Attitude Organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency among Attitude Components, Carl Hovland & Milton Rosenberg (eds), 1-14. New Haven CT: Yale University Press,Google Scholar
Schmidt, Jürgen Erich & Herrgen, Joachim. 2011. Sprachdynamik. Eine Einführung in die moderne Regionalsprachenforschung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred. 1970. Reflections on the Problem of Relevance, edited, annotated, and with an introduction by Richard Zaner. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schütz, Alfred & Luckmann, Thomas. 1973. The Structures of the Life-world, Vol. 1. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
. 1989. The Structures of the Life-world, Vol. 2. Evanston IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1903. Soziologie des Raumes. Jahrbuch für Gesetzgebung, Verwaltung und Volkswirtschaft im Deutschen Reich 27(1): 27–71.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1981. The Limits of Awareness [Sociolinguistic Working Paper 84]. Austin TX: ERIC.Google Scholar
. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23:193–229. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, Brewster, Bruner, Jerome S. & White, Robert W. 1956. Opinions and Personality. New York NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Soukup, Barbara. 2012. Current issues in the social psychological study of ‘language attitudes’: Constructionism, context, and the attitude-behavior link. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(4): 212–224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Bavel, Jay J., Xi, Jenny Xiao & Cunningham, William A. 2012. Evaluation is a dynamic process: Moving beyond dual systems models. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 6(6): 438–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Krammer, Lisa
2022. Formen, Verwendungen und Funktionen von Sprachvariation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 2022:76 ► pp. 30 ff. DOI logo
Entringer, Nathalie, Peter Gilles, Sara Martin & Christoph Purschke
2021.  Schnëssen. Surveying language dynamics in Luxembourgish with a mobile research app. Linguistics Vanguard 7:s1 DOI logo
Hoffmeister, Toke
2021. Gerd Antos, Thomas Niehr, Jürgen Spitzmüller (Hg.). 2019. Handbuch Sprache im Urteil der Öffentlichkeit (Sprache und Wissen 10). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. 471 S.. Zeitschrift für Rezensionen zur germanistischen Sprachwissenschaft 13:1-2 ► pp. 37 ff. DOI logo
Purschke, Christoph
2017. (T)Apping the linguistic landscape. Linguistic Landscape. An international journal 3:3 ► pp. 246 ff. DOI logo
Purschke, Christoph
2020. Attitudes Toward Multilingualism in Luxembourg. A Comparative Analysis of Online News Comments and Crowdsourced Questionnaire Data. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 3 DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.