Cover not available
Part of
Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, processes and outcomes
Edited by Alexei Prikhodkine and Dennis R. Preston
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 39] 2015
► pp. 117–136

Applying the Implicit Association Test to language attitudes research

| Metropolitan State University of Denver
Incorporating concepts from the domain of Implicit Social Cognition (ISC), this quantitative study measured participants’ implicit attitudes (through an audio Implicit Association Test) and explicit attitudes (through self report questionnaires) toward foreign and U.S. accented speech stimuli. The study’s results revealed a pro-U.S. accent bias on the implicit measure, but a proforeign accent bias on explicit measures, supporting the conclusion that these are separable attitude constructs resulting from distinct mental processes. This distinction in attitude type explains previous inconsistencies in language attitudes research and is supported theoretically by the Associative Propositional Evaluation Model, a dynamic dual processing conceptualization of the attitude formation process consistent with ISC.
Published online: 16 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.39.05pan
References (56)
References
Banaji, Mahzarin R. 2001. Implicit attitudes can be measured. In The Nature of Remembering: Essays in Remembering, Robert G. Crowder, Henry L. Roediger III, James S. Nairne, Ian Neath & Aimée Surprenant (eds), 117-150. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Baron, Andrew Scott & Banaji, Mahzarin R. 2006. The development of implicit attitudes: Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood. Psychological Science 17(1): 53-58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Botvinick, Matthew M., Braver, Todd S., Barch, Deanna M., Carter, Cameron S. & Cohen, Jonathan D. 2001. Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychology Review 108(3):624-652. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Eileen M. & Brennan, John Stephen. 1981. Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican American English speech. Language and Speech 24(3):207-21.Google Scholar
Bresnahan, Mary Jiang, Ohashi, Rie, Nebashi, Reiko, Liu, Wen Ying & Shearman, Sachiyo Morinaga. 2002. Attitudinal and affective response toward accented English. Language and Communication 22(2):171-185. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cargile, Aaron Castelan & Giles, Howard. 1997. Understanding language attitudes: Exploring listener affect and identity. Language and Communication 17(3):195-217. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cargile, Aaron Castelan, Giles, Howard, Ryan, Ellen Bouchard & Bradac, James J. 1994. Language attitudes as a social process: A conceptual model and new directions. Language and Communication 14:211-236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catano, Victor M. 1980. Impact on simulated jurors of testimony as a function of non-evidential characteristics of witness and defendant. Psychology Report 46:343-348. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chaiken, Shelly & Stangor, Charles. 1987. Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology 38:575-630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeSantis, Andrea & Kayson, Wesley A. 1997. Defendants' characteristics of attractiveness, race, and sex and sentencing decisions. Psychology Report 81(2):679-683. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Devine, Patricia G. 1989. Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56:5-18. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Draine, Sean C. 1998. Inquisit. Seattle WA: Millisecond Software.Google Scholar
Eadie, Tanya L. & Doyle, Philip C. 2005. Classification of dysphonic voice: Acoustic and auditory-perceptual measures. Journal of Voice 19(1):1-14. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fazio, Russel H., Jackson, Joni R., Dunton, Bridget C. & Williams, Carol J. 1995. Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 69:1013-1027. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1984. The detection of French accent by American listeners. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 76(3):692-707. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fridland, Valerie & Bartlett, Kathryn. 2006. Correctness, pleasantness, and degree of difference ratings across regions. American Speech 81(4):358-386. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frumkin, Lara. 2007. Influences of accent and ethnic background on perceptions of eyewitness testimony. Psychology, Crime & Law 13(3):317-331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. The Effect of Eyewitnesses' Accent, Nationality, and Authority on the Perceived Favorability of their Testimony. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Gawronski, Bertram & Bodenhausen, Galen V. 2005. Accessibility effects on implicit social cognition: The role of knowledge activation and retrieval experiences. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 89(5):672-85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychology Bulletin 132(5):692-731. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Unraveling the processes underlying evaluation: Attitudes from the perspective of the APE model. Social Cognition 25(5):687-717. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, Bertram & Payne, B. Keith (eds). 2010. Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications. New York NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard & Ryan Ellen Bouchard. 1982. Prolegomena for developing a social psychological theory of language attitudes. In Attitudes toward Language Variation: Social and Applied Contexts, Ellen Bouchard Ryan & Howard Giles (eds),208-223. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Gluszek, Agata & Dovidio, John F. 2010. The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of nonnative accents in communication. Personal and Social Psychology Review 14(2):214-37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G. & Banaji, Mahzarin R. 1995. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102(1):4-26. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G., Nosek, Brian A. & Banaji, Mahzarin R. 2003. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 85(2):197-216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G., McGhee, Debbie E. & Schwartz, Jordan L.K. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 74(6):1464-1480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G., Banaji, Mazharin R., Rudman, Laurie A., Farnham, Shelly D. Nosek, Brian A. & Mellott, Deborah S. 2002. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept.Psychological Review 109(1):3-25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Jong, Peter J., van den Hout, Marcel,Rietbroek, Hans & Huijding, Jorg. 2003. Dissociations between implicit and explicit attitudes toward phobic stimuli. Cognition and Emotion 17(4):521-545. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Gitte. 2001. Social and linguistic stereotyping: A cognitive approach to accents. Estudios Ingleses De La Universidad Complutense 392(9):129-146.Google Scholar
Lambert, Wallace.E. 1967. A social psychology of bilingualism. Journal of Social Issues 23:91-109. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lane, Kristin A., Banaji, Mahzarin R.,Nosek, Brian A. & Greenwald, Anthony G. 2007. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: IV. What we know (so far) about the method. In Implicit Measures of Attitudes, Bernd Wittenbrink & Norbert Schwarz (eds), 59-102. New York NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Lavrakas, Paul J. & Bickman, Leonard. 1975. What makes a good witness? Eyewitness identification by elderly and young adults. Law & Human Behavior 4:359-371.Google Scholar
Lindemann, Stephanie. 2003. Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and ideologies about non-native English speakers in the United States. Journal of Sociolinguistics 7(3): 348-364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Newman, Matthew L., Pennebaker, James W., Berry, Diane S. & Richards, Jane M. 2003. Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin 29(5):665-75. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1):62-85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nosek, Brian A., Greenwald, Anthony G. & Banaji, Mahzarin R. 2005. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personal and Social Psychology Bulletin31(2):166-80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nosek, Brian A., Greenwald, Anthony G. & Banaji, Mahzarin. 2007. The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In Social Psychology and the Unconscious: The Automaticity of Higher Mental Processes, John A. Bargh (ed.),265-279. New York NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Pacini, Rosemary &Epstein, Seymour . 1999. The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias problem. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology 76:972-987. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pantos, Andrew J. 2012. Defining the cognitive mechanisms underlying reactions to foreign accented speech: An experimental approach. Review of Cognitive Linguistics 10(2):427–453. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pantos, Andrew J. & Franklin, Amy. 2009. The Effect of Foreign Accent on Witness Assessment. Cambridge: International Association for Forensic Phonetics and Acoustic (IAFPA) Conference.Google Scholar
Payne, B. Keith & Gawronski, Bertram. 2010. A history of implicit social cognition. In Gawronski & Payne (eds), 1-18.Google Scholar
Perkins, Andrew W. &Forehand, Mark R. 2010. Implicit social cognition and indirect measures in consumer behavior. In Gawronski & Payne (eds), 535-547.Google Scholar
Perugini, Marco, Richetin, Juliette & Zogmeister, Cristina. 2010. Prediction of behavior. In Gawronski & Payne (eds), 255-277.Google Scholar
Petty, Richard E. & Cacioppo, John T. 1986. Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. New York NY: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Posner, Michael I. & Snyder, Charles R.R. 1975. Attention and cognitive control. In Information Processing and Cognition: The Loyola Symposium, Robert L. Solso (ed.), 55-85. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1989. Perceptual Dialectology: Nonlinguists' Views of Areal Linguistics.Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reich, Alan R. 1981. Detecting the presence of vocal disguise in the male voice. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 69(5):1458-61. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rohner, Jean Christoph & Björklund, Fredrik. 2006. Do self-presentation concerns moderate the relationship between implicit and explicit homonegativity measures? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 47(5):379-85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Donald L. & Smith, Kim A. 1990. Effects of accent, ethnicity, and lecture topic on undergraduates' perceptions of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 14(3):337-353. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard. 1983. Social psychological mechanisms underlying native speaker evaluations of non-native speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 5(2): 148-59. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schiffrin, Richard & Schneider, Walter. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. Psychological Review 84:127-190. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vande K & Mark E. 2002. Auditory Implicit Association Tests. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.
Wells, Gary L. & Bradfield, Amy L. 1998. Good, you identified the suspect: Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology 83(3):360-376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wittenbrink, Bernd & Schwarz, Norbert (eds). 2007. Implicit Measures of Attitudes. New York NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Yarmey, A.Daniel & Kent, Judy. 1980. Eyewitness identification by elderly and young adults. Law and Human Behavior 4(4):359-371. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Sun, Chen, Linlin Wei & Richard F. Young
2022. Measuring teacher cognition: Comparing Chinese EFL teachers’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward English language teaching methods. Language Teaching Research 26:3 ► pp. 382 ff. DOI logo
Kristiansen, Tore
2020. Methods in language-attitudes research. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 3 ff. DOI logo
Kristiansen, Tore
2022. Methods in language-attitudes research. In Handbook of Pragmatics [Handbook of Pragmatics, ], ► pp. 1702 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.