Cover not available
Part of
Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, processes and outcomes
Edited by Alexei Prikhodkine and Dennis R. Preston
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 39] 2015
► pp. 137–156

Implicit attitudes and the perception of sociolinguistic variation

| University of California-Davis
We investigated individual differences in processing the social dimensions of speech, addressing whether the degree of implicit stereotypical attitude towards language variants modulates brain activity during comprehension. Subjects listened to spoken stories, in which sentence-final critical words were manipulated for ing/in’ variant which was congruent/incongruent with the variants in the preceding discourse and which was typical/atypical of speaker dialect. Subjects participated in an Implicit Association Test as a measure of language attitudes towards ing/in’ variation and were classified as high or low stereotype. Results showed that listeners with low IAT scores had higher N400-like negativities while processing word variants that violated dialectal expectancies (ing uttered by a Southern speaker and in’ spoken by a Californian). Our results provide evidence that the cognitive mechanisms that support language comprehension are sensitive not just to what is said, but also to how it is said, who says it, and who hears it.
Published online: 16 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.39.06lou
References (44)
References
Amodio, David M. & Devine, Patricia G. 2006. Stereotyping and evaluation in implicit race bias: Evidence for independent constructs and unique effects on behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(4): 652-661. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Babel, Molly. 2010. Dialect convergence and divergence in New Zealand English. Language In Society 39: 437-456. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, Alan. 2012. Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology 63:1-29. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baugh, John. 2000. Racial identity by speech. American Speech 75: 362-364. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brown, Colin & Hagoort, Peter. 1993. The processing nature of the N400: Evidence from masked priming. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 34–44. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Camblin, Christine C., Gordon, Peter C. & Swaab, Tamara Y. 2007. The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. Journal of Memory and Language 56(1):103–128. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2009. The nature of sociolinguistic perception. Language Variation and Change 21:135-156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. The effect of speaker information on attitudes toward (ING). Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29(2): 214-223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. The Implicit Association Test and sociolinguistic meaning. Lingua 122(7): 753-763. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cherry, Colin. 1953. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25(5): 975-979. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, Nilanjana, McGhee, Debbie E., Greenwald, Anthony G. & Banaji, Mahzarin R. 2000. Automatic preference for White Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 36:316-328. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gardner, Richard G. & Lambert, Wallace E. 1972. Attitudes and Motivation in Second-language Learning. Rowley MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Garrett, Peter, Coupland, Nik & Williams, Angie. 2003. Investigating Language Attitudes: Social Meanings of Dialect, Ethnicity, and Performance. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G., Banaji, Mahzarin R. & Nosek, Brian A. 2003. Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85(2): 197-216. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G., McGhee, Debbie E. & Schwartz, Jordan L.K. 1998. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74: 1464-1480. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, Anthony G., Rudman, Laurie A., Nosek, Brian A., Banaji, Mahzarin R., Farnham, Shelley D. & Mellot, Deborah S. 2002. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review 109(1): 3-25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John J. 1968. The speech community. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences 9(3): 382-386.Google Scholar
Hagoort Peter, Hald, Lea A., Bastiaansen, Marcel & Petersson, Karl Magnus. 2004. Integration of word meaning and world knowledge in language comprehension. Science 304: 438-441. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hagoort Peter & Brown, Colin M. 1994. Brain responses to lexical-ambiguity resolution and parsing. In Perspectives on Sentence Processing, Charles Clifton Jr., Lyn Frazier & Keith Rayner (eds), 45–81. Hillsdale NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Hagoort, Peter & van Berkum, Jos J.A. 2007. Beyond the sentence given. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 362(1481): 801–811. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henerson, Marlene E., Morris, Lyn L. & Fitz-Gibbon, Carol T. 1987. How to Measure Attitudes. Newbury Park CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Holcomb, Philip J. & Neville, Helen J. 1991. The electrophysiology of spoken sentence processing. Psychobiology 19: 286-300.Google Scholar
Kinchla, Ronald A. 1992. Attention. Annual Review of Psychology 43(1): 711-742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Knops, Uus & van Hout, Roland. 1988. Language attitudes in the Dutch language area: An introduction. In Language Attitudes in the Dutch Language Area, Roland van Hout & Uus Knops (eds). Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, Marta & Federmeier, Kara D. 2011. Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP), Annual Review of Psychology 62: 621-647. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kutas, Marta & Hillyard, Steven A. 1980. Event-related potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology 11: 99-116. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1984. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307: 161–163. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, Baranowski, Maciej & Nagy, Naomi. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4): 431-463. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambert, Wallace, Hodgson, Ricard C., Gardner, Robert C. & Fillenbaum, Samuel. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60: 44-51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lee, Richard R. 1971. Dialect perception: A critical review and re-evaluation. Quarterly Journal of Speech 57: 410-417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieuwland, Mante S. & van Berkum, Jos J.A. 2006. When peanuts fall in love: N400 evidence for the power of discourse. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18(7): 1098–1111 DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ottaway, Scott A., Hayden, David C. & Oakes, Mark A. 2001. Implicit attitudes and racism: Effect of word familiarity and frequency on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition 19: 97-144. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pantos, Andrew. 2010. Measuring Implicit and Explicit Attitudes toward Foreign-accented Speech. PhD dissertation, Rice University.
Petty, Richard E., Briñol, Pablo & DeMarree, Kenneth G. 2007. The meta-cognitive model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition 25(5): 657-686. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Idsardi, William J. & Baugh, John. 1999. Perceptual and phonetic experiments on American English dialect identification. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18:10-30. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudman, Lea A., Greenwald, Anthony G., Mellott, Deborah S. & McGhee, Debbie E. 1999. Measuring the automatic components of prejudice: Flexibility and generality of the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition 17: 437- 465. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
St. George, Marie, Mannes, Suzanne & Hoffman, James E. 1994. Global semantic expectancy and language comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 6(1): 70-83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sriram, N. & Greenwald, Anthony G. 2009. The brief implicit association test. Experimental Psychology 56(4): 283-294. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, Henry. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
van Berkum, Jos J.A., Hagoort, Peter & Brown, Colin M. 1999. Semantic integration in sentences and discourse: Evidence from the N400. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11(6): 657-71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Berkum, Jos J.A., Zwitserlood, Pienie, Hagoort, Peter & Brown, Colin M. 2003. When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 17: 701–718. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, John K. & Themanson, Jason R. 2011. Neural correlates of the implicit association test: evidence for semantic and emotional processing. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 6(4): 468-476. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (11)

Cited by 11 other publications

Jurado-Bravo, María Ángeles
2024. Foreign accent identification, prototypicality, and lectometric methods. Cognitive Linguistic Studies 11:1 ► pp. 180 ff. DOI logo
Sun, Chen, Linlin Wei & Richard F. Young
2022. Measuring teacher cognition: Comparing Chinese EFL teachers’ implicit and explicit attitudes toward English language teaching methods. Language Teaching Research 26:3 ► pp. 382 ff. DOI logo
Kurinec, Courtney A. & Charles A. Weaver
2021. “Sounding Black”: Speech Stereotypicality Activates Racial Stereotypes and Expectations About Appearance. Frontiers in Psychology 12 DOI logo
Weirich, Melanie, Stefanie Jannedy & Gediminas Schüppenhauer
2020. The Social Meaning of Contextualized Sibilant Alternations in Berlin German. Frontiers in Psychology 11 DOI logo
Grondelaers, Stefan, Roeland van Hout & Paul van Gent
2019. Re-evaluating the Prestige of Regional Accents in Netherlandic Standard Dutch: The Role of Accent Strength and Speaker Gender. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38:2 ► pp. 215 ff. DOI logo
Rosseel, Laura & Stefan Grondelaers
2019. Implicitness and experimental methods in language variation research. Linguistics Vanguard 5:s1 DOI logo
Rosseel, Laura, Dirk Speelman & Dirk Geeraerts
2018. Measuring language attitudes using the Personalized Implicit Association Test: A case study on regional varieties of Dutch in Belgium. Journal of Linguistic Geography 6:1 ► pp. 20 ff. DOI logo
Preston, Dennis R.
2016. Whaddayaknow now?. In Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research, ► pp. 177 ff. DOI logo
Preston, Dennis R.
2018. Changing Research on the Changing Perceptions of Southern U.S. English. American Speech 93:3-4 ► pp. 471 ff. DOI logo
Preston, Dennis R.
2019. How to trick respondents into revealing implicit attitudes – talk to them. Linguistics Vanguard 5:s1 DOI logo
Preston, Dennis R.
2020. Language Prejudice. In The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.