Part of
Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, processes and outcomesEdited by Alexei Prikhodkine and Dennis R. Preston
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 39] 2015
► pp. 159–174
Edited by Alexei Prikhodkine and Dennis R. Preston
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 39] 2015
► pp. 159–174
Got class? Community-shared conceptualizations of social class in evaluative reactions to sociolinguistic variables
In recent years, researchers have successfully used information about cultural identity and consumption behavior to uncover class-based variation in linguistic production data. Is this variation reflected in implicit class-related language attitudes, of which listeners may not even be aware? And which types of evaluative conceptualizations of class membership do listeners in fact use? In a two-alternative forced choice task, we compared how listeners associate linguistic variables with both more classic and newer conceptualizations of class membership. High social class responses were significantly more likely for standard linguistic variants than for nonstandard linguistic variants (for all five types of social class conceptualizations we used). The fact that there was no difference between the class conceptualizations indicates that conceptualizations in terms of economic production, culture, and consumption were equally successful in probing evaluative reactions to class-based linguistic variation in the region investigated.
References (27)
Adank, Pati, van Hout, Roland & van de Velde, Hans. 2004. An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116(3): 1729-1738. 
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2007. Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82(1): 32-64.
. 2008. I'll be the judge of that: Diversity in social perceptions of (ING). Language in Society 37(5): 637-659.
Dodsworth, Robin. 2009. Modeling socioeconomic class in variationist sociolinguistics. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(5): 1314-1327.
Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice. Malden MA: Blackwell.
Garrett, Peter. 2005. Attitude measurement. In Sociolinguistics: An International Handbook of the Science of Language and Society, Ulrich Ammon, Norbert Dittmar, Klaus Mattheier & Peter Trudgill (eds), 1251-1260. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Greenwald, Anthony G. & Banaji, Mahzarin R. 1995. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102: 4-27.
Grondelaers, Stefan. 2013. Attitude measurements in the Low Countries. In Language and Space: Dutch, Johan Taeldeman & Frans Hinskens (eds), 586-602. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Grondelaers, Stefan & Kristiansen, Tore. 2013. On the need to access deep evaluations when searching for the motor of standard language change. In Kristiansen & Grondelaers (eds), 9-52.
Grondelaers, Stefan & Speelman, Dirk. 2013. Can speaker evaluation return private attitudes towards stigmatised varieties? Evidence from emergent standardization in Belgian Dutch. In Kristiansen & Grondelaers (eds), 171-191.
Jacobi, Irene. 2009. On Variation and Change in Diphthongs and Long Vowels of Spoken Dutch. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Knops, Uus. 1984. Taalattitudes in Vlaanderen en Nederland (Language attitudes in Flanders and The Netherlands). Tijdschrift voor Taal- en Tekstwetenschap 4: 335-353.
. 1988. Attitudes towards regional variation in Dutch pronunciation. In Language Attitudes in the Dutch Language Area, Roeland van Hout & Uus Knops (eds), 105-120. Dordrecht: Foris.
Kristiansen, Tore & Grondelaers, Stefan (eds). 2013. Language (De)standardisation in Late Modern Europe: Experimental Studies. Oslo: Novus.
Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Lambert, Wallace E., Hodgson, Richard C., Gardner, Robert C. & Fillenbaum, Samuel. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60(1): 44-51.
Mallinson, Christine. 2007. Social class, social status, and stratification: Revisiting familiar concepts in sociolinguistics. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 13(2): 149–163.
Mallinson, Christine & Dodsworth, Robin. 2010. Revisiting the need for new approaches to social class in variationist sociolinguistics. Sociolinguistic Studies 3(2): 253-278.
Pantos, Andrew J. & Perkins, Andrew W. 2013. Measuring implicit and explicit attitudes toward foreign accented speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 32(1): 3-32.
Rickford, John R. 1986. The need for new approaches to social class analysis in sociolinguistics. Journal of Communication 6: 215–221.
Smakman, Dick. 2006. Standard Dutch in the Netherlands. A Sociolinguistic and Phonetic Description. Utrecht: LOT.
Squires, Lauren. 2014. Processing, evaluation, knowledge: Testing the perception of English subject–verb agreement variation. Journal of English Linguistics 42(2): 144-172.
Strack, Fritz & Deutsch, Roland. 2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 8: 220-247.
van de Velde, Hans. 1996. Variatie en Verandering in het Gesproken Standaard-Nederlands. PhD dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
van de Velde, Hans & van Hout, Roland. 1999. The pronunciaton of (r). In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Renée van Bezooijen & René Kager (eds), 177-188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
van de Velde, Hans, van Hout, Roeland & Gerritsen, Marinel. 1997. Watching Dutch change: a real time study of variation and change in Standard Dutch pronunciation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 1(3): 361-393.
van den Berg, Rob & van Bezooijen, Renée. 2004. De Gooise R: Wie ziet er wat in en waarom? Taal en Tongval 17: 86-108.