Cover not available
Part of
Responses to Language Varieties: Variability, processes and outcomes
Edited by Alexei Prikhodkine and Dennis R. Preston
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 39] 2015
► pp. 219–242

Attitudes and language detail

Effects of specifying linguistic stimuli

| University of Geneva
In this chapter, I explore to what extent different levels of language detail in the presentation of attitude targets have an impact on the expression of language attitudes. Results from the research carried out in the Frenchspeaking part of Switzerland (Suisse romande) reveal that the evaluation of a given language variety through a global category name does not equal the sum of average evaluations of each specific feature composing that variety. Being ideologically loaded concepts, global category names (like accent) tend to elicit, in the Suisse romand context, attitudes mostly having for their target stigmatized patois features, while Swiss prestigious features are not mobilized by these concepts. Thus, the use of global category names for attitude elicitation in previous studies may have been a determining factor for the outcome of locating Standard French outside the Swiss community. Finally, results from my study indicate that the validity of language attitude data will be enhanced by taking into account ideology loaded in the process of sociolinguistic interpretation of global stimuli by lay persons, and by assigning to linguistic features under study the same level of specificity in terms of language regard as well as production.
Published online: 16 December 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.39.10pri
References (68)
References
Ajzen, Icek & Fishbein, Martin. 2005.The influence of attitudes on behavior. In Handbook of Attitudes, Dolores Albarracin, Blair T. Johnson & Mark P. Zanna (eds), 173-221. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
Androutsopoulos, Jannis K. 2000. Non-standard spellings in media texts: The case of German fanzines. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4(4): 514-533. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, Nigel & Pooley, Tim. 2010. Social and Linguistic Change in European French. London: Palgrave Macmillan. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Auer, Peter. 2005. Europe’s sociolinguistic unity, or: A typology of European dialect/standard constellations. In Perspectives on Variation: Sociolinguistic, Historical, Comparative, Nicole Delbecque, Johan van der Auwera & Dirk Geeraerts (eds), 7-42. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Hywel, Coupland, Nik & Garrett, Peter. 2005. Conceptual accent evaluation: Thirty years of accent prejudice in the UK. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 37(1):131–154. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Pierre, Harmegnies, Bernard, Moreau, Marie-Louise Alexei Prikhodkine & Singy, Pascal. 2004. La norme dans la francophonie périphérique: Externe ou interne? Une étude expérimentale en Belgique, au Québec et en Suisse. In La variation dans la langue standard, Pierre Bouchard (ed.), 51-71. Québec: Office québécois de la langue française.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1982. Ce que parler veut dire. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Bourhis, Richard & Giles, Howard. 1977. The language of intergroup distinctiveness. In Language, Ethnicity and Intergroup Relations, Howard Giles (ed.), 119-136. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, Jack K. & Trudgill, Peter. 1998. Dialectology. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chambon, Jean-Pierre. 1997. La lexicographie des variétés géographiques du français en France (1983-1993): Éléments pour un bilan méthodologique et desiderata. In Lalies, Actes des sessions de linguistique et de littérature 17: 7-31. Paris: Presses de l’Ecole Normale Supérieure.Google Scholar
Collectif. 1991. Dictionnaire féminin-masculin des professions, des titres et des fonctions. Genève: Editions Metropolis.Google Scholar
Corbeil, Jean-Claude. 1984. Le ‘français régional’ en question. Cahiers de l’Institut de Linguistique de Louvain 9(3-4): 31-44.Google Scholar
Coupland, Nik & Kristiansen, Tore. 2011. SLICE: Critical perspectives on language (de)standardisation. In Standard Languages and Language Standards in a Changing Europe, Tore Kristiansen & Nik Coupland (eds), 11-35. Oslo: Novus.Google Scholar
David, Matthew & Sutton, Carol D. 2004. Social Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Deumert, Ana & Vandenbussche, Wim (eds) 2003. Germanic Standardizations, Past to Present [Impact: Studies in Language and Society 18]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltan. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fairclough, Norman. 1992. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Francard, Michel. 1998. Entre pratiques et représentations linguistiques: Le lexique des Belges francophones. In Linguistic Identities and Policies in France and the French-speaking World, Dawn Marley, Marie-Anne Hintze & Gabrielle Parker (eds), 149-159. London: CILT.Google Scholar
. 2001. Français de frontière: La Belgique et la Suisse francophones. Présence Francophone 56: 27-54.Google Scholar
Garrett, Peter. 2010. Attitudes to Language. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Garrett, Peter, Coupland, Nik & Williams, Angie. 2003. Investigating Language Attitudes. Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Google Scholar
Giles, Howard. 1970. Evaluative reactions to accents. Educational Review 22: 211-227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Einar. 1966. Dialect, language, nation. American Anthropologist 68(4): 922–935. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Irvine, Judith T. & Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Polities, and Identities, Paul V. Kroskrity (ed.), 35-84. Santa Fe NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
John, Oliver P. & Benet-Martinez, Veronica. 2000. Measurement: Reliability, construct validation, and scale construction. In Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology, Harry T. Reis & Charles M. Judd (eds), 339-369. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Knecht, Pierre. 1996. La Suisse romande: Aspects d’un paysage francophone conservateur. In Le français dans l’espace francophone, Vol. 2, Didier de Robillard & Michel Beniamino (eds), 759-770. Paris: Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore. 1997. Language attitudes in a Danish cinema. In Sociolinguistics. A Reader and Coursebook, Nik Coupland & Adam Jaworski (eds), 291-305. New York NY: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
. 2011. Attitude, ideology, and awareness. In The Sage Handbook of Sociolinguistics, Ruth Wodak, Barbara Johnstone & Paul Kerswill (eds), 265-278. London: Sage. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kristiansen, Tore. & Jørgensen, Jens Normann. 2008. Subjective factors in dialect convergence and divergence. In Dialect Change. Convergence and Divergence in European Languages, Peter Auer, Frans Hinskens & Paul Kerswill (eds), 287-302. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lambert, Wallace E., Hodgson, Richard C., Gardner, Robert C. & Fillenbaum, Samuel. 1960. Evaluational reactions to spoken languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 60(1): 44-51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William.1971.The study of language in its social context. In Advances in the Sociology of Language, Vol. 1, Joshua A. Fishman (ed.), 152-216. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lafontaine, Dominique. 1991. Les mots et les Belges. Bruxelles: Service de la langue française.Google Scholar
L’Eplattenier-Saugy, Caroline. 1999. A perceptual dialect study of French in Switzerland. In Handbook of Perceptual Dialectology, Vol. 2, David Long & Dennis R. Preston (eds), 351-365. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leyens, Jacques-Philippe & Yzerbyt, Vincent. 1997. Psychologie sociale. Sprimont: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Lippi-Green, Rosina. 2012. English with an Accent. Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lorenzi-Cioldi, Fabio. 1997. Questions de méthodologie en sciences sociales. Lausanne & Paris: Delachaux & Niestlé.Google Scholar
Mattheier, Klaus J. 1997. Über Destandardisierung, Umstandardisierung und Standardisierung in modernen europäischen Standardsprachen. In Standardisierung und Destandardisierung europäischer Nationalsprachen, Klaus J. Mattheier & Edgar Radtke (eds), 1-9. Frankfurt: Peter Lang,Google Scholar
Milroy, James. 2001. Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics 5(4): 530–555. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley. 1987. Authority in Language: Investigating Language Prescription and Standardization. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Moliner, Pascal, Rateau, Patrick & Cohen-Scali, Valérie. 2002. Les représentations sociales. Pratique des études de terrain. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
Moreau, Marie-Louise, Bouchard, Pierre, Demartin, Stéphanie, Gadet, Françoise, Guerin, Emmanuelle, Harmegnies, Bernard, Huet, Katy F. Laroussi, Prikhodkine, Alexei, Singy, Pascal, Thiam, Ndiassé & Tyne, Harry. 2007. Les accents dans la francophonie. Une enquête internationale. Bruxelles: Service de la langue française.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18(1): 62-85. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Niedzielski, Nancy & Preston, Dennis R. 2000. Folk Linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Office fédéral de la statistique. <[URL]>
Oppenheim, Abraham Naftali. 1986. Questionnaire Design and Attitude Measurement. Hampshire: Gower.Google Scholar
Paquot, Annette. 1988. Les Québécois et leurs mots. Etude sémiologique et sociolinguistique des régionalismes lexicaux au Québec. Québec: Presses de l’Université de Laval.Google Scholar
Pöll, Bernhard. 1998. Le français ou les français? La difficile naissance de la pluricentricité. Lengas 43: 163-182.Google Scholar
Preston, Dennis R. 1996. Whaddayaknow? The modes of folk linguistic awareness. Language Awareness 5(1): 40-74. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Variation in language regard. In Variatio delectat: Empirische Evidenzen und theoretische Passungen sprachlicher Variation, Evelyn Zeigler, Peter Gilles & Joachim Scharloth (eds), 7-27. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Price, Susan, Fluck, Michael & Giles, Howard. 1983. The effects of language of testing on bilingual pre-adolescents’ attitudes towards Welsh and varieties of English. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 4(2-3): 149-161. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prikhodkine, Alexei. 2012. Autonomisation du français en usage en Suisse romande: Quelle évidence? Journal of French Language Studies 22(3): 395-417. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. Dynamique normative du français en usage en Suisse romande. Enquête sociolinguistique dans les cantons de Vaud, Genève et Fribourg. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Provost, Valérie, Yzerbyt, Vincent, Corneille, Olivier, Désert, Michel & Francard, Michel. 2003. Stigmatisation sociale et comportements linguistiques: Le lexique menacé. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale 16(1): 177-200.Google Scholar
Racine, Isabelle & Andreassen, Helene. In press. Swiss French. In Varieties of Spoken French, Sylvain Detey, Jacques Durand, Bernard Laks & Chantal Lyche (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Rosch, Eleanor. 1978. Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, Eleanor Rosch & Barbara B. Lloyd (eds), 27-48. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Rubin, Donald L., 1992. Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates' judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 33 (4): 511-531. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ryan, Ellen Bouchard, Giles, Howard & Sebastian, Richard. 1982. An integrative perspective for the study of attitudes toward language variation. In Attitudes towards Language Variation, Ellen Bouchard Ryan & Howard Giles (eds), 1-19. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1996. Monoglot “standard” in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In The Matrix of Language: Contemporary Linguistic Anthropology, Donald Brenneis & Ronald K.S. Macaulay (eds), 284-306. Boulder CA: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Singy, Pascal. 1996. L’image du français en Suisse romande. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Singy, Pascal, Mottaz Baran, Arlette, Amstalden, Martine, Prikhodkine, Alexei & Jufer, Nicole. 2004. Identités de genre, identités de classe et insécurité linguistique. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Singy, Pascal, Bourquin, Céline, Prikhodkine, Alexei, Schaffter, Manuel & Spencer, Brenda. 2006. Le sens des messages préventifs du sida: consensus et dissensions au sein de la population générale et chez les intervenants. UNIL-CHUV: Rapport de recherche.Google Scholar
Soukup, Barbara. 2012. Current issues in the social psychological study of ‘language attitudes’: Constructionism, context, and the attitude-behavior link. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(4): 212-224. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Speelman, Dirk, Spruyt, Adriaan, Impe, Leen & Geeraerts, Dirk. 2013. Language attitudes revisited: Auditory affective priming. Journal of Pragmatics 52: 83-92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibault, André. 1998. Légitimité linguistique des français nationaux hors de France: le français de Suisse romande. Revue québécoise de linguistique 26(2): 25-42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thibault, André & Knecht, Pierre. (eds). 2004. Dictionnaire suisse romand, nouvelle édition. Genève: Zoé.Google Scholar
Tuaillon, Gaston. 1977. Réflexions sur le français régional. In Les français régionaux, Gerard Taverdet & George Straka (eds), 7-29. Paris: Librairie Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Tourangeau, Roger & Rasinski, Kenneth A. 1988. Cognitive processes underlying context effects in attitude measurement. Psychological Bulletin 103(3): 299-314. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voillat, François. 1971. Aspects du français régional actuel. In Actes du colloque de dialectologie francoprovençale, 216-246. Neuchâtel: Université de Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Prikhodkine, Alexei
2021. Attitudes to accents. In Pragmatics of Accents [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series, 327], ► pp. 19 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.