Cover not available
Part of
Endangered Languages and Languages in Danger: Issues of documentation, policy, and language rights
Edited by Luna Filipović and Martin Pütz
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 42] 2016
► pp. 249–279

Measuring and understanding ethnolinguistic vitality in Papapana

| University of Newcastle
This paper presents a sociolinguistic profile of Papapana, spoken in Bougainville, Papua New Guinea, and investigates why and to what extent Papapana is endangered. Language endangerment is the result of complex and interrelated sociolinguistic variables. The study of language contact and use in the Papapana speech community demonstrates the unique ways in which these variables interact and provides crucial insights into factors affecting linguistic vitality in general. The assessment of Papapana using some of the many ethnolinguistic vitality assessment frameworks challenges the assumptions and definitions of these frameworks, and suggests they need re-evaluating, particularly as they often fail to distinguish symptoms and causes of linguistic endangerment. It is vital to make this separation as predictive and diagnostic assessments may have different applications.
Keywords: causes, endangerment, ethnolinguistic vitality, language contact, Papua New Guinea, status, use
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 3 October 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.42.11smi
References (45)
References
Baker, P. & Mühlhäusler, P. 1996. The origins and diffusion of Pidgin English in the Pacific. In Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas, Vol II(1), S.A. Wurm, P. Mühlhäusler & D.T. Tryon (eds), 551–583. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Barrena, A., Amorrortu, E., Ortega, A., Uranga, B., Izagirre, E. & Idiazabal, I. 2007. Does the number of speakers of a language determine its fate? International Journal of the Sociology of Language 186: 125–139.Google Scholar
Bauer, W. 2008. Is the health of Te Reo Māori improving? Te Reo 51: 33–73.Google Scholar
Brenzinger, M., Yamamoto, A., Aikawa, N., Koundiouba, D., Minasyan, A., Dwyer, A., Grinevald, C., Krauss, M., Miyaoka, O., Sakiyama, P., Smeets, R. & Zepeda, O. 2003. Language vitality and endangerment. Document submitted to the International Expert Meeting on UNESCO Programme Safeguarding of Endangered Languages , Paris, 10–12 March. <[URL]>
Campbell, L. & Muntzel, M.C. 1989. The structural consequences of language death. In Investigating Obsolescence: Studies in Language Contraction and Death, N.C. Dorian (ed.), 181–196. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. 2000. Language Death. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R.M.W. 1991. The endangered languages of Australia, Indonesia and Oceania. In Endangered Languages, R.H. Robins & E.M. Uhlenbeck (eds), 229–255. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Evans, B. 2009. Beyond pronouns: Further evidence for South Bougainville. In Discovering History through Language: Papers in Honour of Malcolm Ross, B. Evans (ed.), 73–101. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fishman, J.A. 1991. Reversing Language Shift. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Florey, M. 2005. Language shift and endangerment. In The Austronesian Languages of Asia and Madagascar, K.A. Adelaar & N.P. Himmelmann (eds), 43–64. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foley, W.A. 2004. Language endangerment, language documentation and capacity building: challenges from New Guinea. In Language Documentation and Description, P.K. Austin (ed.), 28–38. London: Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project, Department of Linguistics. Google Scholar
Grenoble, L.A. & Whaley, L.J. 1998. Toward a typology of language endangerment. In Endangered Languages: Current Issues and Future Prospects, L.A. Grenoble & L.J. Whaley (eds), 22–54. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. Savings Languages: An Introduction to Language Revitalization. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Himmelmann, N.P. 2010. Language endangerment scenarios: A case study from Northern Central Sulawesi. In Endangered Languages of Austronesia, M. Florey (ed.), 45–72. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kibrik, A.E. 1991. The problem of endangered languages in the USSR. In R.H. Robins & E.M. Uhlenbeck (eds), Endangered Languages, 257–273. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Krauss, M. 1992. The world’s languages in crisis. Language 68: 4–10. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1997. The indigenous languages of the North: A report on their present state. Northern minority languages: problems of survival. Senri Ethnological Studies 44: 1–34.Google Scholar
. 2007. Classification and terminology for degrees of language endangerment. In Language Diversity Endangered, M. Brenzinger (ed.), 1–8. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. Google Scholar
Kulick, D. 1992. Language Shift and Cultural Reproduction: Socialization, Self, and Syncretism in a Papua New Guinean Village. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Landweer, M.L. 2012. Methods of language endangerment research: A perspective from Melanesia. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 214: 153–178.Google Scholar
Laracy, H. 1976. Marists and Melanesians: A History of Catholic Missions in the Solomon Islands. Honolulu HI: The University Press of Hawai’i.Google Scholar
. 2005a. 1914: Changing the guard at Kieta. In Bougainville Before the Conflict, A.J. Reagan & H.M. Griffin (eds), 136–140. Canberra: Pandanus Books.Google Scholar
. 2005b. ‘ Imperium in Imperio’? The catholic church in Bougainville. In Bougainville Before the Conflict, A.J. Reagan & H.M. Griffin (eds), 125–135. Canberra: Pandanus Books,Google Scholar
Lee, N.H. & Way, J.V. 2016. Assessing levels of endangerment in the Catalogue of Endangered Languages (ELCat) using the Language Endangerment Index (LEI). Language in Society 45(2): 271–292. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M.P. 2006. Towards a categorization of endangerment of the world’s languages. SIL Electronic Working Papers 2006-002: 31.Google Scholar
Lewis, M.P. & Simons, G.F. 2010. Assessing endangerment: Expanding Fishman’s GIDS. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique 2: 103–120.Google Scholar
Lewis, M.P., Simons, G.F. & Fennig, C.D. 2014. Ethnologue: Languages of the World. 17th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Lynch, J. 1998. Pacific Languages: An Introduction. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Lynch, J., Ross, M. & Crowley, T. (eds). 2002. The Oceanic Languages. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Matras, Y. 2005. Language contact, language endangerment, and the role of the ‘salvation linguist’. In Language Documentation and Description, P.K. Austin (ed.), 225–251. London: Hans Rausing Endangered Languages Project, Department of Linguistics, SOAS. Google Scholar
McHardy, E. 1935. Blazing the Trail in the Solomons. Sydney: Visitor Printing Company.Google Scholar
Mühlhäusler, P. 1976. Samoan Plantation Pidgin and the origins of New Guinea Pidgin: An introduction. Journal of Pacific History 11(2): 122–125. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Milroy, L. 1987. Language and Social Networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
NDOE. 2003. Elementary Language Syllabus. Waigani: National Department of Education (NDOE).Google Scholar
Nettle, D. & Romaine, S. 2000. Vanishing Voices: The Extinction of the World’s Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Oliver, D. 1991. Black Islanders: A Personal Perspective of Bougainville 1937–1991. Melbourne: Hyland House.Google Scholar
Regan, A.J. & Griffin, H.M. (eds). 2005. Bougainville before the Conflict. Canberra: Pandanus Books.Google Scholar
Ross, M. 1996. Mission and church languages in Papua New Guinea. In Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas, Vol II, S.A. Wurm, P. Mühlhäusler & D.T. Tryon (eds), 595–617. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tryon, D. 2005. The languages of Bougainville. In Bougainville Before the Conflict, A.J. Reagan & H.M. Griffin (eds), 31–46. Canberra: Pandanus Books.Google Scholar
Vernon, D. 2005. The Panguna mine. In Bougainville Before the Conflict, A.J. Reagan & H.M. Griffin (eds), 258–273. Canberra: Pandanus Books.Google Scholar
Winford, D. 2003. An Introduction to Contact Linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wurm, S.A. 1979. The language situation in the New Guinea area. In New Guinea and Neighboring Areas: A Sociolinguistic Laboratory, S.A. Wurm (ed.), 3–10. Paris: Mouton. Google Scholar
. 1998. Methods of language maintenance and revival, with selected cases of language endangerment in the world. In Studies in Endangered Languages: Papers from the International Symposium on Endangered Languages , Tokyo Nov 18–20 1995, K. Matsumura (ed.). Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
. 2003. The language situation and language endangerment in the Greater Pacific area. In Language Death and Language Maintenance: Theoretical, Practical and Descriptive Approaches [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 240], M. Janse & S. Tol (eds), 15–47. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. Australasia and the Pacific. In Encyclopedia of the World’s Endangered Languages, C. Moseley (ed.), 425–466. Oxon: Routledge. Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Smith-Dennis, Ellen
2021.  Don’t feel obligated, lest it be undesirable: the relationship between prohibitives and apprehensives in Papapana and beyond. Linguistic Typology 25:3 ► pp. 413 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.