The three chapters in this section make a mutually informing set that is as intellectually rewarding as it is fun to read. They share a center-periphery analytic frame with other contributions in the volume, but they are distinguished as a set by their shared focus on what Sari Pietikäinen (2016) calls carnivalesque critique, quite literally in the Limburgian event that Lotte Thissen examines. In all of these cases, minoritized speakers use humor, parody, and/or ritualized spectacle to disrupt the center-periphery framework and to subvert peripheralization. In turn, the three cases differ from and complement each other by revealing varying techniques that actors in specific marginalized communities use to carry out such disruption. In the following sections of this commentary I will first examine some facets of the center-periphery theoretical framework that seem especially relevant to sociolinguistic work. I will then consider both the shared and the different techniques of humorous contestation that these papers illuminate.
2001Dialect stylization in radio talk. Language in Society 30: 345–375.
Debord, G.
1994The Society of the Spectacle. New York NY: Zone Books.
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F.
1987A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Frank, A. G.
1969Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Galtung, J.
1971A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research 8(2): 81–117.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A.
2000Empire. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Hill, J. H.
2008The Everyday Language of White Racism. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Irvine, J. T. & Gal, S.
2000Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Regimes of Language, P. V. Kroskrity (ed.), 35–84. Santa Fe NM: School of American Research.
Jaffe, A.
2007Corsican on the airwaves: Media discourse in a context of minority language shift. In Language in the Media. Representations, Identities, Ideologies, S. Johnson & A. Ensslin eds. 149–172. London: Continuum.
McKenzie, N.
1977Center and periphery: The marriage of two minds. Acta Sociologica 20(1): 55–74.
Pietikäinen, S.
2016Critical debates: Discourse, boundaries and social change. In Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates, N. Coupland (ed.), 263–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wallerstein, I.
1974The Modern World-System, Vol. I: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York NY: Academic Press.
Woolard, K. A.
2008Language and identity choice in Catalonia: The interplay of contrasting ideologies of linguistic authority. In Lengua, nación e identidad. La regulación del plurilingüismo en España y América Latina, K. Süselbeck, U. Mühlschlegel & P. Masson eds., 303–323. Frankfurt & Madrid: Vervuert & Iberoamericana.
Woolard, K. A.
2016Singular and Plural:Ideologies of Linguistic Authority in 21st Century Catalonia. Oxford: OUP.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Al-Alawi, Wafa
2023. English at the center of the periphery: ‘Chicken nuggets’, chronotopes, and scaling English in Bahraini youth. Language in Society 52:4 ► pp. 645 ff.
Cornips, Leonie
2020. Dialect acquisition by ‘new speakers’ of Dutch and their linguistic othering. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development► pp. 1 ff.
2023. Investment and the inaudible mother tongue: Carving out a space for Kurdish in the soundscape of an Istanbul kebab restaurant. Language in Society► pp. 1 ff.
van de Weerd, Pomme
2019. “Those foreigners ruin everything here”: Interactional functions of ethnic labelling among pupils in the Netherlands. Journal of Sociolinguistics 23:3 ► pp. 244 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.