Cover not available
Part of
Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Aspects of Ethiopian Languages
Edited by Derib Ado, Almaz Wasse Gelagay and Janne Bondi Johannessen †
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 48] 2021
► pp. 229–244

Case-marking in Semitic in the light of the evidence in the Ethiopian language area

Linguistic convergence and divergence

| University of Erlangen-Nürnberg
Languages in the Ethiopian language area typically exhibit a two-case system from a morphological point of view. This paper discusses the question as to how this observation can be aligned with the circumstance that, for Semitic in general, a three-case system is usually reconstructed. It will be argued that case endings can also emerge in a secondary process, as is widely recognised in typological linguistics, and that the cyclicity observed in this context can well be framed in terms of processes of linguistic convergence and divergence. Thereby, both the morphological aspects of case as well as the thematic roles of case will be discussed.
Keywords: Amharic, Afroasiatic, Arabic, Berber, case, convergence, Cushitic, Gəʿəz, Hebrew, Omotic, re-analysis, thematic roles
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The morphological side of the question
  • 3.The syntactic-functional side of the question
  • 4.Conclusion
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 23 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.48.10edz
References (58)
References
Al-Jallad, Ahmad & van Putten, Marijn. 2017. The case for Proto-Semitic and Proto-Arabic case: A reply to Jonathan Owens. Romano-Arabica 17: 87–117.Google Scholar
Appleyard, David. 2011. Semitic-Cushitic/Omotic relations. In Weninger et al. (eds), 38–53. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Cushitic. In Semitic and Afroasiatic: Challenges and Opportunities, Lutz Edzard (ed.), 199–206. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Azeb Amha. 2012. Omotic. In The Afroasiatic Languages, Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Erin Shay (eds), 423–504. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Blau, Joshua. 1969. Some problems of the formation of the Old Semitic languages in the light of Arabic dialects. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Semitic Studies, 38–44. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities.Google Scholar
Butts, Aaron Michael. 2019. Gəʿəz (Classical Ethiopic). In The Semitic Languages, John Huehnergard & Naʿama Pat-El (eds), 117–144. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cassuto, Philippe. 2018. De quelques traces de désinences casuelles et modales en hébreu biblique. In Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality, Lutz Edzard, Manuel Sartori & Philippe Cassuto (eds), 24–44. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Chaker, Salem. 2018. Les marques obligatoire du nom et l’état d’annexion en berbere: Diachronie et reconstruction en contexte de langue de tradition orale. In Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality, Lutz Edzard, Manuel Sartori & Philippe Cassuto (eds), 162–183. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Crass, Joachim. 2005. Das K’abeena. Deskriptive Grammatik einer hochlandkuschitischen Sprache. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Corriente, Federico. 1971. On the functional yield of some synthetic devices in Arabic and Semitic morphology. Jewish Quarterly Review 62: 20–50. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Diem, Werner. 1978. Divergenz und Konvergenz im Arabischen. Arabica 25: 128–147. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1981. Untersuchungen zur frühen Geschichte der arabischen Orthographie, III: Endungen und Endschreibungen. Orientalia 50: 332–383.Google Scholar
. 1991. Vom Altarabischen zum Neuarabischen. Ein neuer Ansatz. Semitic Studies in Honor of Wolf Leslau, Alan Kaye (ed.), 297–308. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. 2014. Marked Nominative Systems in Eastern Sudanic and Their Historical Origin. Cologne: University of Cologne.Google Scholar
Edzard, Lutz. 1998. Polygenesis, Convergence and Entropy: An Alternative Model of Linguistic Evolution as Applied to Semitic Linguistics. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 2016. Experiencer constructions and the resultative function of impersonal verbs in Ethio-Semitic. In Time in Languages of the Horn of Africa, Ronny Meyer & Lutz Edzard (eds), 138–156. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 2018a. The opposition ‘nominative’ vs. ‘absolutive’ case in a Semitic perspective. In Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality, Lutz Edzard, Manuel Sartori & Philippe Cassuto (eds), 184–203. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
. 2018b. The marked nominative in Arabic, Semitic, and Afroasiatic. In Re-engaging Comparative Semitic and Arabic Studies, Daniel Birnstiel & Naʿama Pat-El (eds), 105–126. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2019. Amharic. In The Semitic Languages, John Huehnergard & Naʿama Pat-El (eds), 202–226. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elmedlaoui, Mohamed. 2012. Berber. In Semitic and Afroasiatic: Challenges and Opportunities, Lutz Edzard (ed.), 13–198. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
al-Farrāʾ, Yaḥyā ibn Ziyād. 1983. Maʿānī al-Qurʾān, ed. by Muḥammad ʿAlī an-Najjār & ʾAḥmad Yūsuf Najātī. Beirut: ʿĀlam al-Kutub.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Charles. 1960. The Arabic koine. Language 35: 616–630. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fück, Johann. 1950. Arabiya. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Gelb, Ignace. 1965. The origin of the West-Semitic qatala morpheme. In Symbolae Linguisticae in Honorem Georgii Kuryłowicz, Witold Taszycki (ed.), 72–80. Krakow: Polska Akademia.Google Scholar
Handschuh, Corinna. 2014. A Typology of Marked-S Languages. Berlin: Language Science Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 2009. Terminology of case. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 505–517. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hasselbach, Rebecca. 2013. Case in Semitic: Roles, Relations and Reconstruction. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hayward, Dick. 1984. The Arbore Language. A First Investigation. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Huehnergard, John. 2019. Proto-Semitic. In The Semitic Languages, John Huehnergard & Naʿama Pat-El (eds), 117–144. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Idasiak, Amandine. 2018. Évolution du système casuel et de la mimation dans la langue akkadienne. In Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality, Lutz Edzard, Manuel Sartori & Philippe Cassuto (eds), 11–23. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Kahr, Joan. 1976. The renewal of case morphology: Sources and constraints. Stanford Working Papers on Language Universals 20: 107–151.Google Scholar
König, Christa. 2009. Marked nominatives. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 535–548. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kulikov, Leonid. 2009. Evolution of case systems. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 439–457. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Lamberti, Marcello & Sottile, Roberto. 1997. The Wolaytta Language. Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1985. Grammaticalization: Synchronic variation and diachronic change. Lingua e Stile 20: 303–318.Google Scholar
Leslau, Wolf. 1995. Reference Grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Lucas, Christopher. 2007. Jespersen’s cycle in Arabic and Berber. Transactions of the Philological Society 105(3): 398–431. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mous, Maarten. 2012. Cushitic. In The Afroasiatic Languages, Zygmunt Frajzyngier & Erin Shay (eds), 342–422. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Nöldeke, Theodor. 1862. Hebräische Sprache. Book review of Lehrbuch der hebräischen Sprache by J. Olshausen (1861). Orient und Occident 1: 755–764.Google Scholar
Owens, Jonathan. 1985. A Grammar of Harar Oromo (Northeastern Ethiopia). Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
. 1998. Case and Proto-Arabic. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 61: 51–73; 217–227. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2018. Where multiple pathways lead: A reply to Ahmad Al-Jallad and Marijn van Putten. In Case and Mood Endings in Semitic Languages – Myth or Reality, Lutz Edzard, Manuel Sartori & Philippe Cassuto (eds), 96–161. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Pisani, Vittorio. 1952. Parenté linguistique. Lingua 3: 3–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rabin, Chaim. 1969. The structure of the Semitic system of case endings. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Semitic Studies Held in Jerusalem, 19–23 July 1965, 190–204. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Science and Humanities.Google Scholar
Retsö, Jan. 1997. State and plural marking in Semitic. In Built on Solid Rock: Studies in honour of Professor Ebbe Egede Knudsen on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday April 11th 1997, Elie Wardini (ed.), 268–282. Oslo: Novus Forlag.Google Scholar
. 2006. Thoughts about the diversity of Arabic. In Current Issues in the Analysis of Semitic Grammar and Lexicon II, Lutz Edzard & Jan Retsö (eds), 23–33. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1984. Case in Cushitic, Semitic, and Berber. In Current Progress in Afro-Asiatic Linguistics, Papers of the Third International Hamito-Semitic Congress, London, 1978 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 28], John Bynon (ed.), 111–126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logo
Streck, Michael P. 2000. Das amurritische Onomastikon der altbabylonischen Zeit, Band 1. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
2011. Amorite. In Weninger et al. (eds), 452–459. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tosco, Mauro. 1994. On case marking in the Ethiopian language area. In Sem, Cam, Iafet: Atti della 7a Giornata di Studi Camito-Semitici e Indoeuropei, Vermondo Brugnatelli (ed.), 225–244. Milan: Centro studi camito-semitici.Google Scholar
Tropper, Josef. 2000. Der altäthiopische Status constructus auf -a aus sprachvergleichender Sicht. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 90: 201–218.Google Scholar
. 2002. Altäthiopisch. Grammatik des Ge‘ez mit Übungstexten und Glossar. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Versteegh, Cornelis H. M. 1981. A dissenting grammarian: Quṭrub on declension. Historiographia Linguistica 8: 403–429. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Waltisberg, Michael. 2002. Zur Ergativitätshypothese im Semitischen. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft 152: 11–62.Google Scholar
. 2011. The case functions in Amorite: A re-evaluation. Journal of Semitic Studies 56: 19–36. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weninger, Stefan. 2011. Old Ethiopic. In Weninger et al. (eds), 1124–1142. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Weninger, Stefan, Khan, Geoffrey, Streck, Michael P. & Watson, Janet (eds). 2011. The Semitic Languages: An International Handbook [Handbücher zur Sprach und Kommunikationswissenschaft 36]. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Zaborski, Andrzej. 1990. Preliminary remarks on case morphemes in Omotic. In Omotic Language Studies, Richard J. Hayward (ed.), 617–629. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar