Cover not available
Part of
Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Aspects of Ethiopian Languages
Edited by Derib Ado, Almaz Wasse Gelagay and Janne Bondi Johannessen †
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 48] 2021
► pp. 345–364

Durational variations in Oromo vowels

| Addis Ababa University
| Dembi Dolo University
An acoustic study of vowels of Cushitic languages has not been undertaken, though their vowels seem to exhibit durational variations. We wanted to identify factors that would affect vowel length in Oromo, a Cushitic language widely spoken in the Horn of Africa. Sixty-four speakers (F = 32, M = 32) from four dialect areas of the language in Ethiopia produced vowel data in different environments. An acoustic analysis of the data showed that duration of the vowels varies significantly across dialects, with the longest duration in the Eastern dialect and the shortest duration in the Western dialect. Gender has no significant effect on duration of the vowels, but the vowels have significantly longer duration when followed by voiced singletons than voiceless, and when followed by voiced singletons than by voiced geminates. Collectively, phonologically long vowels are two times longer than short ones, and this difference is significantly affected by dialect and environment, but not by gender. A significant variation was also observed among the vowels with regard to their intrinsic duration. It is concluded that, besides phonological length, the regional background of speakers and phonetic environment are key factors determining duration of Oromo vowels.
Keywords: Oromo, vowel, dialect, duration, environment, Cushitic
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Oromo language
  • 3.Methods
    • 3.1Speakers
    • 3.2Stimuli and procedures
    • 3.3Statistical analysis
  • 4.Results
    • 4.1Intrinsic duration
    • 4.2Phonological vowel length
    • 4.3Consonantal environments
    • 4.4Gender
    • 4.5Dialect
  • 5.Discussion
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 23 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.48.14neg
References (69)
References
Aldubai, Nadhim Abdulamalek. 2015. The impact of geminates on the duration of the preceding and following vowels in Ta’zi dialect. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) 6(1): 335–358. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Al-Tamimi, Jalal & Khattab, Ghada. 2015. Acoustic cue weighting in the singleton vs geminate contrast in Lebanese Arabic: The case of fricative consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 138(1): 344–360. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aoyama, Katsura & Reid, Lawrence A. 2006. Cross-linguistic tendencies and durational contrasts in geminate consonants: An examination of Guinaang Bontok geminates. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36(2): 146–156. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. 1982. Effects of accent on vowel duration in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 71: 23, 32.Google Scholar
Begus, Gasper. 2017. Effects of ejective stops on preceding vowel duration. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 142(4): 2168–2184. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Behne, D., Moxness, B. & Nyland, A. 1996. Acoustic-phonetic evidence acoustic-phonetic evidence in Norwegian. TMH-QPSR 37(2): 13–16.Google Scholar
Bender, M. Lionel, Mulugeta, Etefa & Stinson, D. Lloyd. 1976. Two Cushitic languages. In Language in Ethiopia, M. Lionel Bender, J. Donald Bowen, R. L. Cooper & Charles A. Ferguson, 130–154. London: OUP.Google Scholar
Bender, M. Lionel. 1971. Languages of Ethiopia. A new lexicostatistic classification and some problems of diffusion. Anthropological Linguistics 13(5): 165–288.Google Scholar
Blažek, Václav. 2010. Glottochronological classification of Oromo dialects. Lingua Posnaniensis 52(2): 27–42. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2013. Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer [Computer software]. <[URL]> (13 May 2013).
Bradlow, Ann R., Torretta, Gina M. & Pisoni, David B. 1996. Intelligibility of normal speech: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication 20(2): 255–272. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Braunschweiler, Norbert. 1997. Integrated cues of voicing and vowel length in German: A production study. Language and Speech 4(4): 353–376. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Catford, John C. 1977. Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Bloomington IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G., Pisoni, David B. & de Jong, Kenneth. 2005. Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118(3): 1661–1676. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Jong, Kenneth. 2004. Stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus in English: Patterns of variation in vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics 32: 493–516. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dissassa Melaku. 1980. Some Aspects of Oromo Phonology. Lawrence KS: Kansas State University.Google Scholar
Dommergues, Jean-Yves. 2007. Long and short vowels in Swiss French: Their production and perception. French Language Studies 17: 1–19. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durisala, Naresh, Nambi, Arivudai & Batra, Ridhima. 2011. Intelligibility and acoustic characteristics of clear and conversational speech in Telugu. Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery 63(2): 165–171. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ericsdotter, Christine & Ericsson, Anna M. 2001. Gender differences in vowel duration in read Swedish: Preliminary results. Lund University Working Papers 49: 34–37.Google Scholar
Escudero, Paola, Boersma, Paul, Schurt Rauber, Andréia & Bion, Ricardo. 2008. A cross-dialect acoustic description of vowels: Brazilian and European Portuguese. PACS number(s): 43.70.Fq, 43.70.Kv, 43.72.Ar 1–23. <[URL]> (19 August 2020).
Esposito, Anna and Maria Gabriella Di Benedetto. 1999. Acoustical and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106. 2051–2062. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Feda Negesse. 2015. Classification of Oromo dialects: A computational approach. International Journal of Computational Linguistics 6(1): 1–10.Google Scholar
Fox, Robert A. & Jacewicz, Ewa. 2009. Cross-dialectal variation in fomant dynamics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126(5): 2603–2618. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2016. Phonological Typology. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Lagefoged, Peter. 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29: 383–406. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gragg, Gen. 1976. Oromo of Wollega. In The Non-Semitic Language of Ethiopia, M. Lionel Bender (ed.), 166–195. Lansing MI: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Hajek, John & Stevens, Mary. 2008. Vowel duration, compression and lengthening in stressed syllables in Central and Southern varieties of standard Italian. In Interspeech, 22–26 September, 516–519. Brisbane, Australia. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hansen, Benjamin B. 2004. Production of Persian geminate stops: effects of varying speaking rate. In Augustine Agwuele, Willis Warren & Sang-Hoon Park (eds.) Proceedings of the 2003 Texas linguistics society conference. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla. 86–95.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1981. The Waata dialect of Oromo. Grammatical sketch and vocabulary. In Language and Dialect Atlas of Kenya, Vol. 1: Geographical and Historical Introduction: Language and Society, Selected Bibliography, Bernd Heine & Wilhelm J. G. Möhlig. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Hertrich, I. & Ackermann, H. 1997. Articulatory control of phonological vowel length contrasts: Kinematic analysis of labial gestures. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102: 523. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, James M., Michael J. Clark & Robert A. Houde. 2000. Some effects of duration on vowel recognition. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108(6): 3013–3022.. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, James, Getty, Laura A., Clark, Michael J. & Wheeler, Kimberlee. 1995. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97(5), Pt. 1, 97(5): 3099–3111. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hirata, Yukari. 2004. Relational acoustic invariance in Japanese vowel length distinction. From Sound to Sense, 11–13 June, 2004, MIT.Google Scholar
Hoequist Jr., Charles. 1983. Syllable duration in stress-syllable- and mora-timed languages. Phonetica 40: 203–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holt, Yolanda F., Jacewicz, Ewa & Fox, Robert Allen. 2015. Variation in vowel duration among southern African American English speakers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 24: 460–469. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Homma, Yayoi. 1981. Durational relationship between Japanese stops and vowels. Journal of Phonetics 9: 273–281. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Idemaru, Kaori & Guion, Susan G. 2008. Acoustic covariants of length contrast in Japanese stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 38(2): 167–186. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa, Fox, Robert Allen & Salmons, Joseph. 2007. Vowel duration in three American English dialects. American Speech 82(4): 367–385. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Keith & Martin, Jack. 2001. Acoustic vowel reduction in Creek: Effects of distinctive length and position in the word. Phonetica 58: 81–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kawahara, Shigeto & Braver, Aaron. 2014. Durational properties of emphatically lengthened consonants in Japanese. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 44(3): 138–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaye, Alan S. 2005. Gemination in English. English Today 21(2): 43–55. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kebede Hordofa. 2009. Towards the Genetic Classification of the Afaan Oromoo Dialects. PhD dissertation, University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Kong, Qing-Ming. 1987. Influence of tones upon vowel duration in Cantonese. Language and Speech 30(4): 387–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kukkonen, P. 1990. Patterns of Phonological Disturbances in Adult Aphasia. PhD dissertation, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Lennes, M. 2017. Spect–speech corpus toolkit for praat (Version 1.0.0). Retrieved from [URL]
Lippus, Partel, Asu, Eva. L., Teras, Pire & Tuisk, Tuuli. 2013. Quantity-related variation of duration, pitch and vowel quality in spontaneous Estonian. Journal of Phonetics 41: 17–28. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lloret, Maria-Rosa. 1988. Gemination and Vowel Length in Oromo Morphophonology. PhD dissertation, University of Indiana at Bloomington.Google Scholar
Luce, Paul A. & Charles-Luce, Jan. 1985. Contextual effects on vowel duration, closure duration, and the consonant/vowel ratio in speech production. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 78(6): 1949–1957. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mayr, Robert & Davies, Hannah. 2011. A cross-dialectal acoustic study of the monophthongs and diphthongs of Welsh. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41(1): 1–25. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McClure, J. Derrick. 1977. Vowel duration in a Scottish accent. Journal of International Phonetic Association 7(1): 10–16. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Most, Tova, Amir, Offer & Tobin, Yishai. 2000. The Hebrew vowel system: Raw and normalised acoustic data. Language and Speech 43(3): 295–308. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Oder, A. L., Clopper, C. G., and Ferguson, S. H. (2013). Effects of dialect on vowel acoustics and intelligibility,” J. Int. Phon. Assoc. 43, 23–35. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Owens, Jonathan. 1985. A Grammar of Harar Oromo [Cushitic Language Studies 4]. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Payne, Elinor M. 2005. Phonetic variation in Italian consonant gemination. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 35(2): 153–84. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Salmons, Joseph, Tepeli, Dilara & Mercer, Jennifer. 2005. Structured heterogeneity and change in laryngeal phonetics: Upper Midwestern final obstruents. Journal of English Linguistics 33(4): 307–338. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Raphael, L. 1972. “Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word-final consonants in American English,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 1296–1303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ridouane, Rachid. 2010. Geminate at the junction of phonetics and phonology. In Cécile Fougeron, Barbara Kühnert, Mariapaola D'Imperio and Nathalie Valleé (eds.), Laboratory phonology 10, 61–90. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rosner, B. S. & Pickering, John Brian. 1995. Vowel Perception and Production. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Schoormann, Heike E., Heeringa, Wilbert J. & Peters, Jorg. 2017. A cross-dialectal acoustic study of Saterland Frisian vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141(4): 2893–2908. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stroomer, Harry. 1995. A Grammar of Borana Oromo (Kenya). Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar
Tjaden, Kris, Richards, Emily, Kuo, Christina, Wilding, Greg & Sussman, Joan. 2014. Acoustic and perceptual consequences of clear and loud speech. Folia Phoniatr Logop 65: 214–220. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tserdanelis, Georgios and Amalia Arvaniti. 2001. The acoustic characteristics of geminate consonants in Cypriot Greek. In Aggouraki, Yoryia, Amalia Arvaniti, J. I. M. Davy, Dyonysis Goutsos, Marilena Karyolaimou, Anna Panagiotou, Andreas Papapavlou, Pavlos Pavlou and Anna Roussou (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Greek Linguistics, 29–36. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.Google Scholar
Tsukada, Kimiko. 2009. An acoustic comparison of vowel length contrasts in Arabic, Japanese and Thai: Durational and spectral data. International Journal on Asian Language Processing 19(4): 127–138.Google Scholar
Velayudhan, S. & Howie, John M. 1974. Acoustical measurements of distinctive vowel quantity in Malayalam. Language and Speech 17(1): 95–102. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wako Tola. 1981. The Phonology of Mecha Oromo. MA thesis, Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar
Wang, Youfa & Chen, Hsin Jen. 2012. Use of percentile and Z-scores in anthropometry. In Handbook of Anthropometry: Physical Measures of Human Form in Health and Disease, by Victor R. Preedy (ed.), 29–48. Heidelberg: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wayland, Ratree. 1997. Non-native production of Thai: Acoustic non-native production of Thai: Acoustic. Applied Linguistics 18(3): 345–373. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wedekind, Klaus. 1989. Status and dynamics of Ethiopian vowel systems. Journal of Ethiopian Studies 22: 105–172.Google Scholar
Williams, Daniel & Escudero, Paola. 2014. A cross-dialectal acoustic comparison of vowels in Northern and Southern British English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 13 (5): 2751–2761. DOI logoGoogle Scholar