Cover not available
Part of
Grammatical and Sociolinguistic Aspects of Ethiopian Languages
Edited by Derib Ado, Almaz Wasse Gelagay and Janne Bondi Johannessen †
[IMPACT: Studies in Language, Culture and Society 48] 2021
► pp. 389–412

Polysemy of Ethiopian sign language

 | Addis Ababa University
The purpose of this study was to examine cases of polysemous signs in Ethiopian Sign Language (hereafter ethsl). There are various processes of forming polysemy in sign language. To carry out this study, data was collected from users of sign language in Addis Ababa and Hossana by means of direct elicitation, video recording and analysis of ethsl dictionaries. The data showed some cases of polysemy through meaning extension as well as other occurrences of polysemy. A qualitative descriptive method was used to describe the polysemous signs in ethsl. The article describes different cases of initiating semantic extension processes, such as action vs. result of activity, noun vs. verb, systematic meaning relations, such as animal vs. meat, and generality. Also borrowings from oral language and other sign languages are found. One aim of this study is to contribute new knowledge about how polysemous signs in ethsl are extended/derived, as well as accounts for the process of meaning extension. This study will be useful for lexicographers of sign language dictionaries, as well as for second-language learners of sign language.
Keywords: lexical semantics, polysemy, polysemous signs
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The history of the Ethiopian Sign Language
  • 3.Conceptual framework
    • 3.1Conceptual theories that relate to polysemy in lexical meaning
    • 3.2Distinguishing polysemy from other lexical semantic relations
    • 3.3Notions of polysemy in sign language
  • 4.Research method
    • 4.1Direct elicitation
    • 4.2Observations
    • 4.3Video recording
    • 4.4 ethsl dictionary analysis
  • 5.Research findings
    • 5.1Different cases of polysemy in EthSL
    • 5.2The process of developing derivative polysemous signs in EthSL
      • a.Metonymically motivated EthSL polysemous signs
      • b.Metaphorically motivated polysemous EthSL signs
      • c.Polysemous EthSL signs originated from semantic borrowing from foreign languages
      • d.Iconically motivated polysemous EthSL signs
    • 5.3Discussion of polysemy in EthSL dictionaries and in the studied material
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 23 April 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/impact.48.16gir
References (27)
References
Apresjan, J. D. (1974). Regular polysemy. Linguistics, 12(142). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cokely, Dennis. 2014. Interpreting Culturally Rich Realities: Research Implications for Successful Interpretations. Rochester NY: RIT Publishing.Google Scholar
Copestake, Anne & Briscoe, Ted. 1996. Semi-productive polysemy and sense extension. In Lexical Semantics. The Problem of Polysemy, James Pustejovsky & Branimir Boguraev (eds), 15–67. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Crasborn, Onno & Sloetjes, Han. 2008. Enhanced ELAN functionality for sign language corpora. In Proceedings of LREC, 2008, Marrakech.Google Scholar
Dikyuva, Hasan, Makaroğlu, Bahtiyar & Arık, Engin. 2017. Turkish Sign Language Grammar. Ankara: Ministry of Family and Social Policies Press.Google Scholar
Ethiopian National Association of the Deaf. 2008. Birtat. Addis Ababa: Artistic Printing Press.Google Scholar
Ethiopian National Association for the Deaf (ENAD). 2008. Ethiopian Sign Language Dictionary. Addis Ababa: Artistic Printing Enterprise.Google Scholar
Ethiopian National Association of the Deaf (ENAD). 1976. ሀ የአማርኛ ምልክት ቋንቋ መፅሃፍ. Birhan ena Selam Printing Press.Google Scholar
Eyasu Hailu Tamene. 2017. The Sociolinguistics of Ethiopian Sign Language: A Study of Language Use and Attitudes. Washington DC: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria. 1992. An Introduction to Language, 4th edn. Raleigh NC: North Carolina State University.Google Scholar
Johnston, Trevor & Schembri, Adam. 2007. Australian Sign Language: An Introduction to Sign Linguistics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kidane Admasu. (2013). Compound Signs in Ethiopian Sign Language. Unpublished MA thesis, Addis Ababa University.Google Scholar
Klepousniotou, Ekaterini. 2002. The processing of lexical ambiguity: Homonymy and polysemy in the mental lexicon. Brain and Language 81(1–3): 205–223. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lewis, M. Paul (ed.). 2009. Ethnologue: Languages of the World, 6th edn. Dallas TX: SIL International. <[URL]> (20 August 2011).
Lyons, John. 1977. Semantics, Vol.1. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Naughton, Karen. 2001. Linguistic Description and Analysis of Verb of Visual Perception in American Sign Language (ASL). PhD dissertation. University of New Mexico at Albuquerque.Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. (1979) Modality and the English modals. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James. 1996. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Riemer, Nick. 2010. Introducing Semantics. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Saeed, John I. 1997. Semantics. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schilling, Natalie. 2013. Sociolinguistic Fieldwork. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stokoe, William C., Casterline, Dorothy C. & Cronberg, Carl G. 1965. A Dictionary of American Sign Language on Linguistic Principles. Silver Spring MD: Linstok Press.Google Scholar
Stokoe, William C. 1960. Sign Language Structure: An Outline of the Visual Communication Systems of the American Deaf [Studies in Linguistics: Occasional Papers 8]. Buffalo NY: University of Buffalo.Google Scholar
Supalla, T., & Newport, E. 1978. “How many seats in a chair? The derivation of nouns and verbs in American Sign Language.” In P. Siple (ed.), Understanding Language through Sign Language Research. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Taub, S. 2001. Language from the Body: Iconicity and Metaphor in American Sign Language. Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Valli, C., Lucas, C., & Mulrooney, K. J. 2005. Linguistics of American Sign Language: A Resource Text for ASL Users (4th edn.). Washington, DC: GallaudetUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Wrigley, O., et al. 1990. The Sign Language Dictionary. Revised and Expanded Edition. Bangkok: National Association of the Deaf in Thailand.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Linde-Usiekniewicz, Jadwiga & Sylwia Łozińska
2023. In Quest of Influences of Polish Language Dictionaries on the Oldest Polish Sign Language Dictionary. International Journal of Lexicography 36:4 ► pp. 447 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.