Online public denunciation as recursive social practice
Incidents of online public shaming commonly start when a record of conduct that is perceived as transgressive by
either one of the parties to that interaction or a third party observer is posted, in the form of a narrative description,
photograph, audio/video-recording, screenshot, and so on to an online platform, followed by viral amplification of that online
public denunciation post through sharing by others within and across platforms. Building on an analysis of 26 incidents of online
public denunciations of public incivilities it is argued, in this paper, that public denunciations essentially involve inviting
networked audiences to denounce entextualized moments of conduct, which are recontextualized as not only morally transgressive,
but as also warranting public condemnation. It is proposed that the procedure by which online public denunciations are
accomplished is thus recursive, as it not only involves the ascription of action to prior conduct of the target in question that
construes that prior conduct as transgressive, but the embedding of the ascription of that complainable action within a public
denunciation that invites condemnation of that ascribed action. However, since social media platforms allow for the
re-entextualization and subsequent recontextualization of prior posts through which public condemnation has been invited, online
public denunciations are themselves inevitably open to recursive recontextualization. It is concluded that online public
denunciation is thus an inherently recursive form of social practice.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Entextualization and recontextualization on social media platforms
- 3.Data and method
- 4.Entextualization and recontextualization in online public denunciations
- 4.1Entextualizing public incivilities
- 4.2Recontextualizing public incivilities
- 5.Online public denunciation and recursion
- 6.Concluding remarks
- Acknowledgements
- Notes
-
References
References (58)
References
Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2014a. “Moments
of sharing: Entextualization and linguistic repertoires in social networking.” Journal of
Pragmatics 731: 4–18. 

Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2014b. “Languaging
when contexts collapse: Audience design in social networking.” Discourse, Context &
Media 4–51: 62–73. 

Bateman, John. 2017. “Triangulating
transmediality: A multimodal semiotic framework relating media, modes and genres.” Discourse,
Context & Media 201: 160–174. 

Bauman, Richard, and Charles L. Briggs. 1990. “Poetics
and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life.” Annual Review of
Anthropology 191: 59–88. 

Bernstein, Basil. 1990. The
Structuring of Pedagogic Discourse: Class Codes & Control, Vol.
IV. London: Routledge.
Bös, Birte, and Sonja Kleinke. 2017. “Publicness
and privateness.” In Pragmatics of Social
Media, ed. by Christian Hoffmann, and Wolfram Bublitz, 83–121. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Bublitz, Wolfram. 2015. “Introducing
quoting as a ubiquitous meta-communicative act.” In The Pragmatics of
Quoting Then and Now, ed. by Jenny Arendholz, Wolfram Bublitz, and Monika Kirner-Ludwig, 1–26. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic
Structures. The Hague: Mouton. 

Elleström, Lars. 2010. “The
modalities of media: A model for understanding intermedial
relations.” In Media Borders, Multimodality and
Intermediality, ed. by Lars Elleström, 11–50. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 

franzke, alina shakti, Anja Bechmann, Michael Zimmer, and Charles M. Ess. 2020. Internet
Research: Ethical Guidelines 3.0. Association of Internet Researchers (AoIR).
Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2021. “
Getting
into the mob: A netnographic, case study approach to online public
shaming.” In Analyzing Digital Discourse, ed.
by Marjut Johansson, Sanna-Kaisa Tanskanen, and Jan Chovanec, 247–274. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2022a. “Moral
emotions, good moral panics, social regulation, and online public shaming.” Language &
Communication 841: 61–75. 

Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar. 2022b. “
Karen:
Stigmatized social identity and face-threat in the on/offline nexus.” Journal of
Pragmatics 1881: 14–30. 

Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Patricia Bou-Franch. 2019. “Introduction
to analysing digital discourse: new insights and future
directions.” In Analysing Digital
Discourse, ed. by Pilar Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch, 3–22. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Garcés-Conejos Blitvich, Pilar, and Lucía Fernández-Amaya. 2023. “The
offline/online nexus and public spaces: Morality, civility, and aggression in the attribution and ratification of the
Karen social identity.” In The Discursive
Construction of Place in the Digital Age, ed. by Alejandro Parini, and Francisco Yus, 121–151. New York: Routledge. 

Georgakopoulou, Alexandra. 2017. “‘Whose
context collapse?’: Ethical clashes in the study of language and social media in
context.” Applied Linguistics
Review 8(2–3): 169–189. 

Giles, David, Wyke Stommel, and Trena Paulus. 2017. “The
microanalysis of online data: The next stage.” Journal of
Pragmatics 1151: 37–41. 

Giles, David, Wyke Stommel, Trena Paulus, Jessica Lester, and Darren Reed. 2015. “Microanalysis
of online data: The methodological development of ‘digital CA’.” Discourse, Context &
Media 71: 45–51. 

Goodwin, Charles, and Alessandro Duranti. 1992. “Rethinking
context: An introduction.” In Rethinking Context: Language as an
Interactive Phenomenon, ed. by Alessandro Duranti, and Charles Goodwin, 1–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gruber, Helmut. 2017. “Quoting
and retweeting as communicative practices in computer mediated discourse.” Discourse, Context
& Media 201: 1–9. 

Gruber, Helmut, Michael Haugh, and Chaoqun Xie. 2023. “Recontextualization:
Modes, media and practices.” Frontiers in
Communication 81, 1164897. 

Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse
Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Haugh, Michael. 2022. “(Online)
public denunciation, public incivilities and offence.” Language &
Communication 871: 44–59. 

Haugh, Michael, and Valeria Sinkeviciute. 2019. “Offence
and conflict talk.” In Handbook of Language in
Conflict, ed. by Matthew Evans, Lesley Jeffries, and Jim O’Driscoll, 196–214. Abingdon: Routledge. 

Herring, Susan. 2019. “The
coevolution of computer-mediated communication and computer-mediated discourse
analysis.” In Analysing Digital Discourse, ed.
by Pilar Gárces-Conejos Blitvich, and Patricia Bou-Franch, 25–67. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Hoffman, Christian. 2017. “Log
in: Introducing the pragmatics of social media.” In Pragmatics of
Social Media, ed. by Christian Hoffman, and Wolfram Bublitz, 1–28. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 

Iedema, Rick. 2001. “Resemiotization.” Semiotics 1371: 23–39. 

Iedema, Rick. 2003. “Multimodality,
resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice.” Visual
Communication 2(1): 29–57. 

John, Nicholas. 2013. “Sharing
and web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword.” New Media &
Society 15(2): 167–182. 

Joyce, Jack B. 2022. “Resistance in public disputes:
Third-turn blocking to suspend progressivity.” Discourse
Studies 24(2): 231–248. 

Joyce, Jack B., and J. Sterphone. 2022. “Challenging
racism in public spaces: Practices for interventions into disputes.” Journal of
Pragmatics 2011: 43–59. 

Jones, Rodney. 2009. “Dancing,
skating and sex: Action and text in the digital age.” Journal of Applied
Linguistics 6(3): 283–302.
Kádár, Dániel Z., and Rosina Márquez-Reiter. 2015. “(Im)politeness
and (im)morality: Insights from intervention.” Journal of Politeness
Research 11(2): 239–260.
Leppänen, Sirpa, Samu Kytölä, Henna Jousmäki, Saija Peuronen, and Elina Westinen. 2014. “Entextualization
and resemiotization as resources for identification in social
media.” In The Language of Social Media: Identity and Community on
the Internet, ed. by Phillip Seargent, and Caroline Tagg, 112–136. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Levinson, Stephen C. 2013. “Recursion in
pragmatics.” Language 89(1): 149–162. 

Marlow, Mikaela L. 2017. “Public discourse and intergroup
communication.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of
Communication, ed. by Jon Nussbaum. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Marwick, Alice, and danah boyd. 2010. “I
tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined
audience.” New Media &
Society 13(1): 114–133. 

Negra, Diane, and Julia Leyda. 2021. “Querying
‘Karen’: The rise of the angry white woman.” European Journal of Cultural
Studies 24(1): 350–357. 

Nelson, Lisa. 2018. Social
Media and Morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Park, Joseph Sung-Yul, and Mary Bucholtz. 2009. “Public
transcripts: Entextualisation and linguistic representation in institutional contexts.” Text
&
Talk 29(5): 485–502. 

Pfurtscheller, Daniel. 2022. “From
private phones to public screens: Cross-media recontextualization of chat discourse in the case of the Austrian ÖVP corruption
affair.” Frontiers in
Communication 71, 1059131. 

Puschmann, Cornelius. 2015. “The
form and function of quoting in digital media.” Discourse, Context &
Media 71: 28–36. 

Sinkeviciute, Valeria. 2020. “‘Hey
BCC this is Australia and we speak and read English’: Monolingualism and othering in relation to linguistic
diversity.” Intercultural
Pragmatics 17(5): 577–603. 

Smith, Phillip, Timothy Phillips, and Ryan D. King. 2010. Incivility:
The Rude Stranger in Everyday Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

Szabla, Malgorzata, and Jan Blommaert. 2020. “Does
context really collapse in social media interaction?” Applied Linguistics
Review 11(2): 251–279. 

Tagg, Caroline, Philip Seargeant, and Amy Aisha Brown. 2017. Taking
Offence on Social Media: Convivality and Communication on
Facebook. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. 

Webb, Helena, Marina Jirotka, Bernd Carsten Stahl, William Housley, Adam Edwards, Matthew Williams, Rob Procter, Omer Rana, and Pete Burnap. 2017. “The
ethical challenges of publishing Twitter data for research dissemination.” Proceedings of the
2017 ACM on Web Science Conference
(WebSci’17), 339–348. New York: Troy. 

Wesch, Michael. 2009. “YouTube
and you: Experiences of self-awareness in the context collapse of the recording
webcam.” Explorations in Media
Ecology 8(2): 19–34. 

Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Xie, Chaoqun & Weina Fan
2024.
Theorizing impoliteness: a Levinasian perspective.
Journal of Politeness Research 20:1
► pp. 157 ff.

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 4 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.