Allen, J.F., Byron, D.K., Dzikovska, M., Ferguson, G., Galescu, L., & Stent, A. (2001). Toward conversational human-computer interaction. AI Magazine, 22(4), 27–37.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Austin, J.L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ballim, A., Wilks, Y., & Barnden, J. (1991). Belief ascription, metaphor, and intentional identification. Cognitive Science, 151, 133–171. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barbella, D.M., & Forbus, K.D. (2011). Analogical dialogue acts: Supporting learning by reading analogies in instructional texts. In
Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
(pp. 1429–1435). San Francisco, CA: AAAI Press.
Bridewell, W., & Isaac, A. (2011). Recognizing deception: A model of dynamic belief attribution. In
Proceedings of the AAAI 2011 Fall Symposium on Advances in Cognitive Systems
. Arlington, VA: AAAI Press.
Bridewell, W., & Langley, P. (2011). A computational account of everyday abductive inference. In
Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
. Boston.
Bullwinkle, C.L. (1975). Picnics, kittens and wigs: Using scenarios for the sentence completion task. In
Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence
(pp. 383–386).
Cahn, J.E., & Brennan, S.E. (1999). A psychological model of grounding and repair in dialog. In
Proceedings of the AAAI Fall Symposium on Psychological Models of Communication in Collaborative Systems
(pp. 25–33). North Falmouth, MA: AAAI Press.
Carberry, S., & Lambert, L. (1999a). A process model for recognizing communicative acts and modeling negotiation subdialogues. Computational Linguistics, 251, 1–53. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Clark, H.H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cohen, P. (1997). Dialogue modeling. In R.A. Cole (Ed.), Survey of the state of the art in human language technology, Cambridge Studies In Natural Language Processing (pp. 204–210). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gabaldon, A., Langley, P., & Meadows, B. (2013). Integrating meta-level and domain-level knowledge for interpretation and generation of task-oriented dialogue. In
Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems
(pp. 171–186). Baltimore, MD: Cognitive Systems Foundation.
Davidson, D. (1967). The logical form of action sentences. In N. Rescher (Ed.), The logic of decision and action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grice, H.P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York, NY: Academic Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hobbs, J.R., Stickel, M.E., Appelt, D.E., & Martin, P.A. (1993). Interpretation as abduction. Artificial Intelligence, 631, 69–142. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kamp, H., & Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Litman, D. (1985). Plan recognition and discourse analysis: An integrated approach for understanding dialogues. Ph.D. Thesis, Technical Report 170,Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester.
McRoy, S., & Hirst, G. (1995). The repair of speech act misunderstandings by abductive inference. Computational linguistics, 211, 435–478.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Meadows, B., Langley, P., & Emery, M. (2013a). Seeing beyond shadows: Incremental abductive reasoning for plan understanding. In
Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Plan, Activity, and Intent Recognition
(pp. 24–31). Bellevue, WA: AAAI Press.
Meadows, B., Langley, P., & Emery, M. (2013b). Understanding social interactions using incremental abductive inference. In
Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on Advances in Cognitive Systems
(pp. 39–56). Baltimore, MD: Cognitive Systems Foundation.
Neches, R., Langley, P., & Klahr, D. (1987). Learning, development, and production systems. In D. Klahr, P. Langley, & R. Neches (Eds.), Production system models of learning and development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ng, H.T., & Mooney, R.J. (1990). On the role of coherence in abductive explanation. In
Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence
(pp. 337–342). Boston, MA: AAAI Press.
Perrault, C.F., & Allen, J.F. (1980). A plan-based analysis of indirect speech acts. American Journal of Computational Linguistics, 61, 167–182.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Polanyi, R., & Scha, R. (1984). A syntactic approach to discourse semantics. In
Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Computational Linguistics
(pp. 413–419). Stanford, CA: Association for Computational Linguistics. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Reichman, R. (1981). Plain-speaking: A theory and grammar of spontaneous discourse. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., & Jefferson, G. (1978). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. In J. Schenkein (Ed.), Studies in the organization of conversational interaction. New York, NY: Academic Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thagard, P.R. (1978). The best explanation: Criteria for theory choice. The Journal of Philosophy, 75(2), 76–92. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomai, E., & Forbus, K.D. (2009) EA NLU: Practical language understanding for cognitive modeling. In
Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference
(pp. 117–122). Sanibel Island, FL: AAAI Press.
Traum, D.R., & Allen, J.F. (1994) Discourse obligations in dialogue processing. In
Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting on Computational Linguistics
(pp. 1–8). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
Wielemaker, J., Schrijvers, T., Triska, M., & Lager, T. (2012). SWI-Prolog. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 121, 67–96. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)